In 60 years what has Pakistan done for Pakhtuns?

Aug 8, 2007

Exactly after the division of in and the subsequent emergence of on the map of the world a fraudulent referendum was conducted to make Pakhtun regions a part of the then West . The referendum was boycotted by the Khudai Khidmatgars because it lacked the third option for Pakhtuns to join . After achieving the required result through unfair means the establishment in higher echelons of power started exploiting the Pakhtun resources to safeguard their vested interests in the name of national interests of the nascent land. The newly born state was based on ’s ideology which was better known to the ex-master than the founding father.

The strategy which was used to justify and continue the of Pakhtun resources was the misuse of as Pakhtuns have been known for their inclination towards . They were indoctrinated by the state sponsored clergymen about the stories of ideal past to win their hearts. They were hypnotized with the nostalgic romanticism of the Arab imperialism and retrogressive cum pro-establishment version of to keep them away from the helm of affairs. Their energies were used in the name of at the altar of the state to safeguard the vested interests of the ruling junta.

Pakhtuns have been raising voice against the exploitative and unjust rule of Pakistani ruling class. Seeing it as potential danger, the ruling elite of is now threatening the very survival of Pakhtuns as they consider Pakhtuns as the real hindrance in the realization of their nefarious designs. After investing in the indoctrination of Pakhtuns for decades, the establishment is now blaming Pakhtuns as religious fanatics. Even their for their land and – their is being made synonymous with talibanisation so they can easily be targeted. They are being presented as extremists. They are being killed and massacred in and for and their killers are taking the credit of their massacre to please their offshore masters.

Should the Pakhtuns re-think their decision of remaining a part of in the presence of the indecisive Durand line issue. The of has to answer the following questions to convince Pakhtuns to remain a part of . For the last 60 years what has the state of done for Pakhtuns?

1. Has it changed the British pre partition name of NWFP?
2. Has it made the pre-partition Pakhtun regions of NWFP, FATA, PATA, Attock, Mianwali and 45% Pakhtuns belt of Balochistan into a single Pakhtun Province within ?
3. Has it given the share of water along with its net profit according to A.G. Qazi formula to NWFP?
4. Has it banned the inhuman FCR in the fraudulently administered tribal areas – FATA?
5. Has it built any infrastructure or done any development work in Tribal areas despite of their volunteer service of defending the western border?
6. Has it given the due proportion in the revenue of tobacco production to the provincial of NWFP?
7. Has it established any new industrial estate or stabilized the old ones like Gadun Amazai or Jamrud industrial estates in NWFP against the vested of Punjabi Feudals?
8. Has it put more effort even after 60 years than what a single man Bacha Khan had put 60 years ago to establish schools or colleges in NWFP?
9. Has it given the due importance to investment in Mineral industry and Tourism industry in the heaven like NWFP?
10. Has it established the infrastructure necessary for the development of NWFP?
11. Has it changed its of strategic depth to destabilize as the instability of the geo-strategically important gets reflected in the Pakhtuns regions of and even affects the whole ?
12. Has it spent even 10 percent of the US aid to invest in modernizing the security in NWFP?
13. Why most of the bomb blasts, killings and attacks are in NWFP while the centers of command and control are in Rawalpindi, and ?
14. If forces of have been using Pakhtun regions to fight US for the containment of Saur during Zia regime and using it again to fight US on in Musharraf regime to destabilize and control then is it not the responsibility of to reconstruct and rehabilitate the Pakhtun regions and compensate for the which Pakistani has incurred in playing its role as an obedient servant to United States?
15. Has its Election commission conducted fair and free to give due representation to Pakhtuns and other oppressed nations so that they can put an end to the atrocities of the corrupt civil beaureocrats, establishment , feudal lords, capitalists, industrialists, waderas and sardars?

There is a limit to and injustice. According to Ali – a wise Arab ruler,
“A state can survive with disbelief but cannot survive with injustice”. The very basis of state, according to the master mind behind French - J.J. Rousseau, is a social contract between the people and the state in order for the latter to provide civil to its . If it fails to do so it has no justification.

If the state of cannot even assure the basic human right to the Pakhtuns and other – what can one expect about the other ?

The sooner the Musharraf regime backed by the fabricated PML-Q and fascist MQM hands over the reigns of power to the real representatives of people the better it is for the national interest of .

The national interest of is to make a strong democratic federation, devolve the power and autonomy to the provinces and keep minimum portfolios with the center.