With the arrival of US Central Command Chief, Gen. Zinni, in Islamabad, Pakistan's leadership is hoping that things will start looking up on its side. It thinks that it can convert the unwanted notoriety it has gained recently into some kind of face-saving effort and a breather to regroup for a later offensive.
Pakistan's problem though, is that it has confused savvy Public Relations for diplomacy and statesmanship -- neither of which it has shown much talent for. It maintains a formidable lobby in Washington and probably spends more money on it -- a group of suited, tied and alligator-shoed professionals who would sing praises of the Satan for a boatload of greenbacks -- than on food for its own people. What are a few dead or malnourished bodies for the cause of jihad, eh? But, as always, actions speak louder than words and this case too is no different.
The Foundation of Power - Falsehood
Since its creation, Pakistan's leadership has defined its existence by saying, "Pakistan is the savior of Muslims in all of the Indian sub-continent," "Muslims should not be ruled by Hindus as they will be oppressed," etc. The true reason, though, is not the fear of oppression. It is fueled by a greed for power and control by three groups of people -- feudal lords, clergy, and most importantly, the army.
The feudal lords, who to-date control Pakistan's polity, feel bitter that the Afghan/Persian/Mughal feudal empire that flourished for about 800 years is gone and in a democracy like India's they have no chance of coming to power. They cannot reconcile to the democratic concept of majority rule, which would turn their world topsy-turvy. A true democracy where the electorate is educated (not just literate) is a pure meritocracy. Their feudal aspirations would come to a screeching halt in India.
The second group is Pakistan's clergy who hate every other religion -- both philosophically and strategically. If their constituents were to become truly educated (not just brought up on a religious preaching) -- as would happen in a democratic country -- and exposed to the broader world around them, no one would be interested in their narrow-minded theocratic tirades. Their educated constituents would clearly say that anything short of full respect and tolerance for their fellow human beings is against, God forbid, God's word. Their flock would desert them the moment it sensed the wolf in sheep's garb.
So, they hatched this wonderful blueprint for Pakistan about half a century ago. A country based on a seemingly valid concern -- subjugation of Muslims by Hindus. Mohammed Ali Jinnah became the ideal fall guy. Who would not trust the word of that irreligious man? Never mind that Hindus and populations of the other native religions had been the ones subjugated for over a thousand years by the forefathers of the elite who were making innocent and injured noises now. Once Pakistan was formed, Jinnah was promptly thrown into a cell, albeit well furnished, and declared ill. Now the country was the feudal lords' and the clergy's to rule. To enforce their ironclad laws, they brought in the army. However, the army and its sister agencies, instead of listening to these people, became the center of power for Pakistan. There are no guarantees in Pakistan -- the constitution is after all written on paper and in a country where over 70% of the people are illiterate there is not much chance of many knowing the constitution. We all know how long paper lasts. A gun on the other hand, lasts a lot longer and is very effective in disposing off certain elements that are inconvenient. It takes a whole lot of paper to do any serious damage.
Pakistan has thus turned into an oligarchy well versed in the art of making things disappear. The feudal lords, the clergy and the army top brass, all have found wonderful ways of pocketing the hard cash their country comes by through the generosity of the foolish West. Most of this money goes to ensure a comfortable and notably un-Islamic retirement for many of these kleptocrats (sic.) in places far away from the dirt and squalor of their own country. In addition, the arms that the United States furnished the Afghan mujahideen have been found to have developed a certain liking for Pakistan, and hence acquired permanent residency there, having expressed the desire to fly east of the border to burst forth on the infidels.
It is amply evident that the elite that has founded and administered Pakistan has no interest in the liberation of the people whose cause they so wholeheartedly espouse at every given opportunity. Their agenda is clear -- power at any cost and disregard for other religions. If that means a few million human lives, so be it. In addition, for the Pakistan clergy, the only way they can ever control their people is through teaching them hatred.
Neighborly Relations - A Record of Belligerence
Pakistan army, leading a bunch of Afghan tribals, forcibly entered the Kingdom of Kashmir in 1947. The United Nations recognized the fact that Maharajah Hari Singh had signed the Instrument of Accession to India and asked Pakistan army to get out of Kashmir, before a solution could be found for Kashmir. Pakistan's establishment has not complied with that resolution to this day while broadcasting repeatedly to the whole world that India has defied the UN resolution. Other UN resolutions have also asked both India and Pakistan not to alter the demographic composition of Kashmir by any means. While India's government (through Article 370 of India's Constitution) has scrupulously followed that, Pakistan's on the other hand has injected all kinds of outside populations into Kashmir. Pakistan leadership’s pious reference to UN resolutions is like the Devil quoting the scriptures. In 1965, Pakistan's military embarked on a mission to capture Kashmir. When it turned out that it was actually Lahore's turn to be captured by the Indian armed forces, it ran to its friend, the US, to help. India's government was pressured by the US, as well as the erstwhile Soviet Union to accept a cease-fire. In spite of winning on the battleground, India's leadership lost diplomatically.
By 1971, despite its claim to be the protector of Muslims on the sub-continent, Pakistan's establishment had demonstrated that it had no such vision. Pakistan army's dismal acts of subjugation and state sponsored terrorism in today's Bangladesh prompted the population there to rise in a revolt and with the help of the Indian armed forces overthrow the military regime. Even as the US and the erstwhile USSR forced a cease-fire on India, Indian armed forces had made headway in the Ladakh region and Pakistan was forced to part with some territory as part of the cease-fire agreement. Indian and Pakistani generals exchanged over 20 maps delineating the cease-fire line in Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh provinces, a line known today as the Line of Control (LoC). Pakistan's military has been smarting ever since and wants to take revenge on India.
Having failed to overtly cause problems, the establishment turned to covert operations. In the 1980s, its Inter Services Intelligence, the notorious ISI, rounded up some feudal landlords who had lost their power in a democratic India and egged them on to start trouble in Punjab. This insurgency dragged on for almost a decade and ISI was always there with a helping hand -- militarily, logistically and diplomatically. As always, Pakistan's spin doctors claimed its leadership was extending only (im)moral support for the insurgents. The insurgency finally died when the people of Punjab got tired of it and voted to power a decent state government. There have been recent attempts by ISI to reopen the same Pandora's box.
Kashmir came in handy by late 1980s. As it often happens in democratic countries, power in New Delhi changed hands quite a few times in a short period of time. Pakistan's elite deemed this to be a weakness, and dispatched infiltrators through inhospitable mountains into the Kashmir valley to stir up trouble that lasted almost a decade. Once again, after a long struggle, the insurgency was defeated by the power of the ballot, as would happen in any decent democracy.
In May 1998, India tested nuclear weapons and Pakistan, after a delay, followed suit. The Indian government and its establishment followed their tests with declarations of "No First Use," "No Nuclear Weapons Against a Non-nuclear State" and the statement that the nuclear weapons were under the control of the civilian government, not the military. No such commitments were forthcoming from Pakistan's leadership. However, because of its (Pak leadership's) clever manipulation of the powers that be in world capitals, governments around the world held India responsible for triggering a nuclear arms race in South Asia. They conveniently forgot that it takes considerably more time than three weeks and more ingredients than just salt, pepper and curry powder to cook an atomic bomb. The testing of the weapons though, was a brilliant strategy on part of India's leaders. Everyone had known that India had had a nuclear weapon since 1974. But, Pakistan’s nuclear program had always been a matter of speculation. Pakistan’s leadership was drawn into the open with its nuclear sword unsheathed, thus making it acknowledge Pakistan was a nuclear power and placing on its leadership’s shoulders the burden to behave as a mature one.
To date, Pakistan leadership has shown no talent for either responsibility or maturity -- even by accident. In a country whose internal ethos has been the hatred of another and whose leadership can survive only by fomenting bigotry, responsibility is a rare commodity. Responsibility requires serious thinking, selfless action and a nurturing of goodwill -- none of which Pakistan's leadership has demonstrated capabilities for. It is easier to grow weeds than vegetables. Pakistan’s political and military leaders have routinely issued statements about using the nuclear option against the enemy -- a euphemism for India.
Pakistan Today - On the Brink of Collapse
By public statistics and widely available newspaper reports from inside that country, Pakistan is in a whole lot of trouble. It faces a terrible balance of payments situation -- it recently got a loan to make payments on other loans. Everyday ethnic riots are taking their toll on the society. In addition, the freedom of press is being eroded at a rather alarming rate. The judiciary has been silenced. The national political leadership has embarked on a path to further Islamize the country by the imposition of the Sharia -- a fact that is not liked by a majority of the population. In addition, hard-line Islamic groups have been holding the political leadership hostage. The army is trying to climb back into power by hook or crook, having sensed its chance for the first time in more than a decade. Pakistan's Islamic constituency has now begun to sponsor more than just the "jihad" in Kashmir. It has been found to have close links with worldwide terrorist organizations that are united in their hatred of free societies. The likes of Osama Bin Laden have found plenty of sympathizers inside Pakistan's madrassas (religious schools) and military. The military turns a convenient blind eye on the recruitment and training of cannon fodder for the Islamic Jihad. While its civilian leadership pretends to cooperate with authorities worldwide, the military and the clergy of Pakistan are busy sharpening their swords, behind the scenes, for the final assault on the United States, Western Europe and India -- all demonstrably free societies.
With the above mentioned internal troubles mounting, having lost the battles of misinformation and terrorism, and being pushed hard by its hard-line clergy and military, Pakistan's leadership has indulged in its latest adventure by sending its troops in disguise across the Line of Control into India. Its reasoning is that the world leadership would rush in -- by the mere fact that both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers -- and take charge of the situation to deliver a verdict in favor of Pakistan. It is evident from the its past and current treatment of Banglas, Mohajirs and Ahmediyas that Pakistan's leadership has no love for Kashmiris. This latest saber rattling is an attempt to shore up a flagging economy and hold together a politically disintegrating society in addition to getting a preeminent position to lead the Islamic Jihad. Its statements about using the nuclear option -- against an adversary whose leadership has committed to a "No First Strike" policy -- tantamount to nuclear blackmail. Pakistan’s establishment finds itself increasingly isolated both and home and abroad and has embarked on the latest fishing expedition in the hope that it can reel in some funds and respect out of the West. As part of its strategy of naked aggression cloaked in diplomatic-speak, Pakistan’s leadership has questioned the Line of Control, the Simla Agreement of 1972 and India’s right to defend its borders. In addition, it has turned a deaf ear to the appeals of the world powers to withdraw the infiltrators it has so shamelessly sponsored.
Pronouncements - Pillars of Deceit
Pakistan leadership's overt or covert calls for a "Safe Passage" or "Cease-fire" are all steeped in mendacity, aimed to lull the Indian leadership into thinking that it is finally time for peace. Time and again has India accepted a cease-fire only to be engulfed in the flames of yet another conflict -- a result of international vandalism unleashed over and over by Pakistan's leadership. Pakistan's establishment has no intention of giving up on its war (proxy or otherwise) on India - whether it is in the heights of the Himalaya, the minds of the world community or the ether of the Internet. Any arm extended in friendship hides another that holds a very sharp dagger to be plunged into the back of the unwary Indian leadership. To disguise the fact that its narrow, partisan and religion-based two-nation theory is about to join august company from the Jurassic period, Pakistan's leadership has whipped up unwanted religious passions. And continuing the saga of nuclear irresponsibility that has become a hallmark of the establishment, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif recently told his troops, "Nuclear and missile technology have given us great courage." Now, Nawaz Sharif wants to arrange a meeting with US President Bill Clinton to convince the United States of the piety of Pakistan’s purpose in unleashing a war on the sub-continent! By indulging in international arson, Pakistan's establishment has surely put its own country at tremendous risk. If your neighbor’s house is burning, can yours last forever?

