The Indo-Pak Summit, Kashmir and the Taj Mahal

Jul 8, 2001
One cannot expect a solution from just one summit on the complex Kashmir problem ...



During the 17th Century Shah Jahan, the Muslim Emperor of , ordered the building of a monument to parallel the beauty of the woman he loved (and lost). Thus came into existence the white marble structure at the city of Agra that millions today have come to admire as the Taj Mahal, a monument of great beauty. And when one speaks of beauty in , the other place that comes to mind is , the “Switzerland of the East” where has intervened in a number of wonderful ways. To tie the two together here, and are to hold a summit at the highest level around mid-July at Agra, in the backdrop of the Taj Mahal to discuss various issues including (one hopes) .

The blood soaked legacy of the partition of British- on the basis of into and a Muslim in the year , a princely state had the misfortune of having a Muslim majority and a Hindu ruler. The Princely states were given a choice. Join either or (and in a couple of cases, possibly vague assurances of independence by the British that are difficult to confirm).

naturally expected to fall on its side of the border due to its predominantly Muslim . When it saw that things were not going its way due to a variety of reasons, it encouraged the influx of its “tribals” to help in its acquisition of the area. countered by sending in its armed forces after it had received an “Instrument of Accession” signed by the Maharajah to join . After all was said and done got roughly 35% of the State (it agreed to turn some of it over to that had a “different map” of the boundary), got roughly 65% (but it lost a part to during a in 1962 (on the same issue of maps) and currently holds 45% of the former State of Jammu and . And that is roughly where things stand today (plus or minus a few percent).

In the -48 period, either to gain time to win over the Kashmiri Muslims or to test the newly formed , the first Prime Minister of Pandit (of Kashmiri Hindu descent) took the problem of to the UN which under certain conditions recommended a plebiscite (vote), to ask the Kashmiri who they wanted to join. Thus the gave the right of self-determination to the Kashmiri that none of the other states had in response to a request from . gave its assurance that it would bide by the wishes of the Kashmiri people. And if this was not complicated enough, the Kashmiris had their own mercurial leader of the time by the name of Shaikh Abdullah, who (possibly against the long term interests of his own people) ended up trying to play the two countries against one another. That in a nutshell brings us to the problem that we have today.

According to the logic of partition, being a Muslim majority area, should have gone to . And for the past 11 years a horrible LIC (Low Intensity Conflict) has been going on in the “Indian Occupied” side of . Some of it is being assisted from the “Pakistani Occupied” side of (just to be fair) and nobody seems to be winning. Add to that the fact that both and now possess , and that the power Capitals of the world, especially Washington have finally woken up to the fact that things could really get out of hand. The “Kargil ” of 1999 was stopped by the intervention of then President Bill Clinton. He put full pressure on the Pakistanis and their supporters to withdraw from the heights that they had captured on the Indian side of the Line of Control (LOC) in currently separating the Indians and the Pakistanis.

The Muslim majority in forms the bulk of the on the Indian side but does not inhabit a large land area. The Muslims are an absolute majority in the Valley, parts of Ladakh and a couple of districts in Jammu (the three main areas that make up the Indian Occupied side of the former princely state. The Hindus are the majority in Jammu and the Budhists in most parts of Ladakh. The Kashmiri-Hindu (Pandit) minority has been forced out of the Valley by the violence and is currently living as a community in Jammu and in the rest of . Their voice also needs to be heard.

That brings us back to the July summit in Agra between Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari and ’s President General and whether as a topic will be discussed between them? Many Kashmiris, both Hindu and Muslim sure so, as do the Pakistanis who are pinning their hopes once again on outside help to find a lasting solution. , the strongest power in this complex scenario is currently hopeful of an outcome that will maintain the territorial status quo (therein may lie the problem). But it is also interested in a natural gas pipeline from Iran that will feed its growing needs. That this pipeline can only run through or at the very least within its area of influence is a thought not lost to . has aspirations of being a world power. But can it get there with an unfriendly as its neighbor?

President General was quoted on June 15th as saying that he would try for a new beginning with at the summit and “change history”. The Indian PM has made no such positive statements. But both must be aware that though Washington is not mediating this meet, it is certainly looking over their shoulders.

So what can one expect or is a fair and just solution to the problem today?

In the 17th century the emperor Shah Jehan was overthrown by his son Aurangzeb and imprisoned (they say) in a tower from where he could see the Taj Mahal till he died. Almost similarly, today the Kashmiri Hindus are separated from and homeless in what they believe is their own country while the majority Muslims are without a country in their own homes.

One cannot expect a solution from just one summit on the complex problem. But let us all agree that is beautiful and should remain so. And just maybe all we need to do now to find a lasting solution is show a little humanity.

A Pakistani-American writer from Sacramento, California. Ras is also a reporter for Pakistan Link.