Happy 56th Anniversary, Pakistan and India

Aug 12, 2002
Chowk, Pakistan and India



A veteran chowkie (now MIA) hailing from had introduced me to in October 99, and I am eternally grateful. While I might not describe my time as ‘happy’ on given my own personal intolerance for the intolerant, but underneath all the sneers, name-calling and bigotry, one finds the essence of , which is freedom. The kind of unfettered freedom without any checks and restrictions which if used (and believe me) negatively can be dangerous in real life, but perhaps we all realized at some level that the Cyberworld is not the real world. For the easily provoked (including me), however this too can be hazardous. Nevertheless this freedom necessitated a sense of responsibility which many cultivated over time, and many tried and failed. The achievement of was its perseverance despite those who didn’t.

Though it was left to take its own unique personality, served better than anything else in the Cyber-realm as a forum for people to people contact amongst the two nuclear rivals and . Yet its biggest success was its biggest failure. Many impressionable young net-surfers who joined this website at tender young ages have gone away with a bitter taste in the mouth. One can easily discern this bitterness in my own writings. There are many like me on both sides of the border in , who came to for a deeper understanding and appreciation of and , but who left with a deep feeling of disgust and hatred for each other’s countries. We are all guilty of creating such . What can we possibly achieve by insulting each other? What possible benefit will we get by insulting or ? How would our petty and pathetic attempts at insulting our respective founding fathers change or alter their achievements and failures? Will dissecting the two nation theory change the fact exists? The debates about and , and the two nation theory are academic exercises which should be carried out with facts, sources and figures and not on baseless speculations about what did with his grand nieces, or ’s motives behind making . Ultimately the democratic framework requires tolerance of all opinions and views except intolerance. This means that as long as they don’t advocate the murder of innocent civilians for their harmless personal opinions, all inclusive, Pakistani Nationalists, Indian Nationalists, Hinduvtists, Islamists, South Asianists, globalists, isolationists, Kashmiri Separatists etc should be tolerated. and are lands of diverse yet narrow outlooks with respect to , race, and . ’s first Prime Minister had late in his life concluded ‘each person’s idea of is his own brand. When we bring and open the door of opportunity to everyone, this outlook brings about group conflict. You may well have described Hindu communalism as Hindu , and Muslim communalism as Muslim .’ So let us accept this and seek Unity in , both in our respective countries, and here on . The tolerance of not just in national and sub-national groups but ideologies will ultimately clear the way for , and the dividend is too high to miss out on. I, as a patriot of , can only favor , for only is the sole guarantor of ’s welfare.

Perhaps for those Pakistanis who use the Gujurat carnage (and other in Modern ) to establish some esoteric point about the Two Nation theory it would be worthwhile thinking about the sectarian violence, the church bombings, and the massacre of East-Pakistanis/Bangladeshis by our brave and bold ‘Muslim’ Army. Is the murder of a Muslim at the hands of a Muslim at any level better than the murder of a Muslim at the hands of a Hindu? And for those Indians who point to ’s short comings it won’t be a futile exercise to consider the Gujurat Carnage, and slow rise of right wing Hinduvtist forces. and are blasted 24/7 on each other’s and in each other's ? When will we learn. When will jingoistic garbage like Ghaddar and Musalman stop being 'Blockbusters' and 'Superhits'. I, for one, was thoroughly disgusted when three eloquent officials from the foreign ministry lambasted the Indian for not living up to its claim of . I have no lost for , but hello! is a self proclaimed Islamic Republic which over the last 20 years has moved closer to theocracy. The wisdom of the sages suggests: ‘Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones at others’. No should be used as stick to beat the other with. It is high time intellectuals on both sides stopped castigating the other side. The Sumit Gangulys and Nasim Zehras of and would be much more productive if they sought to undo the ills of their own nations. Otherwise they should be boycotted Indians and Pakistanis respectively. It is about time the Ardeshir Cowasjees, Najam Sethis, Farzana Verseys and Arundhati Roys took over as the genuine voices of and .

I don’t wish to give the impression that I am absolving myself of all the blame. I am not an angel and I am equally responsible, but by the same token I feel that my pride in being a Pakistani and the I feel for my country is often the reason some mischief mongers would want to provoke me into this unstoppable cycle. What I feel for my country will never go away so if that bothers you, it just ain’t going away. I am still unable to understand why must a harmless wish like ‘ Zindabad’ bite any non-Pakistani. In less than 2 weeks and will celebrate their 56th Birthday. Perhaps a little soul searching for every chowkie is in order. ‘ thy neighbor’ is a battered commandment when it comes to our two countries. Instead let us enact ‘be indifferent to thy neighbor’ in . Let all Pakistanis be more concerned about their Non-Muslim Pakistani brethren, than their Gujurati co-religionists. If I were an Indian my advice to my countrymen would have been ‘Forget about the Jamaat-e-Islami, think RSS’.

With these words of ‘The past must be buried and let us start afresh. I wish Hindustan prosperity and ’, I am turning a new leaf, to live and let live, with the sincere that a new era of Peaceful and Non-Violent indifference may begin between our two countries.


Yasser Latif Hamdani is an ex-expat, a human being and a Pakistani