Doctors Role in Organizing Health Services

Mar 25, 2005

profession in is passing though very critical time. Doctors, collectively and individually, need to acknowledge that being a doctor means taking responsibility not only for their own practice but for the wider system of which they are part.

Quality, from the patient’s view, is not only the work of one person but the system as a whole. Doctors are under heavy stress to keep alive their traditional image of medical professionalism. There is no at the level where doctors should be engaged in more open dialogue with the public and play a more active role in managing and designing services.

It is fact that individual doctors are highly trusted by the patients and their attendants but generally confidence in the profession as a whole has badly been affected. Doctors are facing serious professional challenge in ensuring that the quality of out of hours services are sufficiently high to warrant handing over clinical responsibility of their patients.

Our system has been designed, developed and maintained by politicians rather than physicians which is one of the most distressing aspects of care infrastructure. Doctors should be allowed to look at the infrastructure they work within.

To do better for care system in , planners should opt for doing best for the tertiary care system rather than starting from the top down. Doctors changing their profession from practicing medicine to planning infrastructure should plan working system that delivers effective, affordable, acceptable care for our . Their mostly likely jurisdictions are epidemiology, care analysis, business acumen, political effectiveness, accounting and management skills and information system expertise.

Brain-drain in emboldened by lack of incentives, barring from taking part in care infrastructure and no attractive structure. Greater discussion would certainly help to reduce public concern about ending GP’s duty to provide out of hours duty. Those involved in public programmes are aware of the fact that about a third patient were unhappy with the arrangements.

formed National Commission in August 2004 and promised to submit their report within three months. Many steps were taken like increasing stipends for postgraduate doctors, house officers, medico-legal legislations and change in nursing service structure. It’s almost five months passed but there is no report from that commission. One of the tasks for this commission was to review the Structure of Personnel service structure of doctors, dentists, pharmacists, nurses and paramedical staff but there is no such ‘review’ so for. Consistency in policies is imperative for building confidence in departments. We are optimistic that this commission will emerge one day with amicable solution but question arises how much time require?

Its need of the hour that stalwarts at the making level should consider revamping care infrastructure and introduce such a model where all can get better care facilities in .