| « November 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
Recently by nazarhayatkhan
- Good Writeup by Irfan Hussain (Dawn - 8 Jan 2005)
- Karachi Chowkies Get-togather
- Ahmed Zai
- nooralain
- Veerish
- Veeresh - Come & Stay
- My Gurus on Chowk
- Chowk’s Fire & Fury!
- Is Chowk addictive?
- Assessment of a writer’s success?
- Posting a Post
- Anyone close to Virginia!
- Is being nameless better?
- My walk at Chowk
- Who are these Chowk Wallas?
- Who are they?
Posted: Jul 23, 2003 Wed 11:17 am Views: 53
How should a writer be assessed on Chowk?
On number of hits?
On number of Posts?
On topic chosen - maximum marrks for reformist, humantarian?
On controversial subject versus informational subject?
On basic research?
On quality of language?
On style & simlicity?
On conciseness and clarity?
On orginality?
On effectiveness?
I do not know? May be the Chowk needs to provide these guidelines for a more fair and an accurate assessment?
Or may be it is not required at all - let it be informal and easy as at present. And not create this needless tension. And discourage writing itself!
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
nazarhayatkhan
- Interacts: 1266
- iLogs: 16
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 7991
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Dec 25 2002
- Last signin: Sep 5 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


