| « September 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
Recently by googenschlaugen
- J&K
- Pakis forced to eat Injun shit
- Sadna appreciation
- Response to Manto
- Applause for Sadna
- More about Temporal’s hypocrisyZeena,
- Temporal is such a hypocrite
- Hello and thanks to my dear friends.
- Portfolios
- Moose Limb fears
- No Title
- Message to Chowk Staff
- Mulla Logic
- Miss Bronx
- 1st Chowk Annual Beauty Contest - Vote for Miss Chowk 2005
- QUAID
Farooq Bhai,
You are a brave man to raise the Kashmir issue again. I have thought about this, debated with both Indians and Pakis about this, and have finally come to the following conclusion:
Pakistan’s position of "give us Kashmir, hold a plebiscite in Kashmir, it’s a Muslim majority area and therefore belongs to Pakiland" has rapidly deteriorated into utter nonsense.
Let’s see why?
India is not going to give Kashmir to Pakiland, just because Pakistan insists that it happen. Pakistan wanted Junagadh and Manavadar at one time and considered Hyderabad a disputed area also. I think we all agree that both Junagadh and Manavadar issues have long been settled, thanks to Pakiland finally forgetting about the impossible claims. Hyderabad never attained the level of a claim, and everyone agrees that Hyderabad is firmly in Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra, both integral parts of India.
Holding a plebiscite in Kashmir, although the UN resolution demanded it, is not going to happen. UN resolutions, like old fish, tend to get smelly and disposable. There never was a plebiscite for the 1947 partition. The Muslim League winning majorities in Muslim majority provinces was not a blank check for partition. Also, one could argue that Indian Kashmir has had several elections, there have been elected Muslim Chief Ministers, and elected Muslim representatives more often than in Pakiland over the last 58 years.
Yes, Kashmir is a Muslim majority area and so are Sinkiang, Nazareth, Muradabad, maybe Bhopal, and even Hyderabad, and possibly parts of Southall, Jackson Heights, Mississuaga, and Chicago. A Muslim majority does not necessarily mean that all the people living there need to become citizens of a Pakiland or equivalent. By the way, Bangladesh is also an overwhelmingly Muslim area. India has the second largest Muslim population in the world and Indian Muslims appear to get along with each other much better than their coreligionists in Pakiland. That ought to be good for some points, at least.
Enough time and energy has been wasted in trying to make every excuse in the world to get Kashmir to become a part of Pakistan. If Pakis were more honest, they would say simply that Kashmir is necessary because almost all of Pakiland’s water resources pass through it. Perhaps, if Pakiland agreed to the LoC as the border, then India could provide guarantees for Pakis’ liquid concerns.
Salim Ahmed Chauhan
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
googenschlaugen
- Interacts: 28
- iLogs: 19
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 1866
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Jun 4 2005
- Last signin: Jul 17 2005
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


