| « December 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Recently by MantoLives
- Ambedkar's narrative of Jinnah's evolution
- EVIL INTERNATIONAL COALITION OF INDIAN COMMUNISTS, BRITISH IMPERIALISTS AND PAKISTANI ELITE at war against Mahatma Gupta
- ZAB and the Ahmaddiya amendment
- Public service for those who place any faith in Sadna's posts
- Jinnah's lobbying for the release of NWFP political prisoners particularly Bacha Khan
- History of Barelvis and Deobandis in South Asia...
- People's Jinnah Hall
- William Dalrymple's article
- Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and the Pakistan People's Party
- The answers Masadi does not have... or "blowing a million holes in Masadi's claims"
- Minorities' Demands
- Pakistan's Father
- The contradictions of Bhutto's Islamization drive
- From the Time Magazine
- Some Facts
- The Bhuttos
It is no use saying that this claim of the Musalmans being a nation is an after-thought of their leaders. As an accusation, it is true. The Muslims were hitherto quite content to call themselves a community. It is only recently that they have begun to style themselves a nation. But an accusation, attacking the motives of a person, does not amount to a refutation of his thesis. To say that because the Muslims once called themselves a community, they are, therefore, now debarred from calling themselves a nation is to misunderstand the mysterious working of the psychology of national feeling. Such an argument presupposes that wherever there exist a people, who possess the elements that go to the making up of a nation, there must be manifested that sentiment of nationality which is their natural consequence and that if they fail to manifest it for sometime, then that failure is to be used as evidence showing the unreality of the claim of being a nation, if made afterwards. There is no historical support for such a contention. As Prof. Toynbee points out :—
"It is impossible to argue a priory from the presence of one or even several of these factors to the existence of a nationality; they may have been there for ages and kindled no response and if is impossible to argue from one case to another; precisely the same group of factors may produce nationality here, and there have no effect."
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
MantoLives
- Interacts: 8901
- iLogs: 1034
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 106915
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Jul 25 2003
- Last signin: Dec 5 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


