unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« October 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1213 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Recently by Zakkk

  • The 1974 amendment debate
  • Mantolives!
  • Like father, like son
  • found this interesting article
  • A night in Dera Bugti
  • Manto: What Ghaffar Khan said about Dr.Khan Shaibs death
  • Mantolives
  • Manto: The diff between politics of ideology & practical politics.
  • Mantolives & Ahmadzai
  • Preserving the legacy
  • link for last article
  • The story of a man of conviction
  • A new bok
  • No Title
  • Mantolives & Ahmadzai
  • Does this offend you?

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Zakkk
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

A new bok

Posted: Mar 27, 2006 Mon 01:33 am     Views: 63   

http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp...6-3-2006_pg1_4

A controversial new book by Lord Mountbatten’s ADC claims that the British nurtured the idea of Pakistan as a sort of pro-West “forward defensive glacis” against the USSR and a potentially pro-Communist Congress dominated India.

The “Untold Story of India’s Partition: The Shadow of the Great Game”, by Narendra Singh Sarila, is a gripping narrative on the basis of the new material he was able to study. Lord Wavell, being a military commander with a global perspective, thought that the Soviet Union would threaten the British empire and the All India Congress would be more prone than the All India Muslim League to side with the Communists.

Wavell was thinking of the Middle East and its oil wealth. Linked to this feeling was the strategic “possibility” that a region within India could be separated to act as the forward defensive glacis against Communism. By 1946, more and more British military leaders were thinking of the threat of “Russia” and anticipating that the next imperial war would be fought in the region.

When the British entered the war against Germany in September 1939, the Congress was ruling in eight out of 11 provinces. It then inexplicably decided to resign from these governments, awarding a walkover to the Muslim League and forcing Wavell to further refine his policy of supporting the Muslim League as a political makeweight. Sarila argues that this Congress resignation not only brought the Muslim League to power through the backdoor, it made partition possible by loosening from the Congress hold the Muslim-majority province of the NWFP.

In the event, says Sarila, Congress could not set foot in Punjab where men were enlisting for war 200,000-a-month, and Congress supporters from big business were producing overtime for the war effort and making profits hand over fist. Jinnah was more pragmatic. Raj politics was not black and white, it did not lend itself to principles, and that is the way it had to be played. Jinnah became sole spokesman under the Conservative Party, and when the Labour Party came to power its efforts to right the political balance in favour of Congress came up against the “precedents” set by the earlier administration.

In 1942, with the Japanese threatening to invade India, it was Gandhi’s turn to do something inscrutable: he tabled a resolution asking the British to “quit forthwith” and told the Japanese India had no quarrel with them. Almost all the Congress high command disagreed but passed it, only to change it overnight when Nehru threatened to quit Congress instead if it went public.

If Wavell thought of withdrawing the British army from what was to become India and locating it in what was to become Pakistan in order to defend the Middle East from Communism, he was disabused by the lack of support his favourite Jinnah enjoyed in Sindh, the NWFP and Punjab. Sarila captures the weak moments of the leaders that let India be divided. When Partition came, Nehru was “tired, worried and unhappy”.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



Zakkk

  • Interacts: 391
  • iLogs: 151
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 19592
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: May 27 1999
  • Last signin: Sep 14 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • MURAWWAT O MOHABBAT KE MABAIN (afsana)
  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Circus
  • The Mountain

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • ‘Dustbin of history’ or ‘history of sorts’
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Rape Survivor Families Struggle Against Odds
  • Love at Shara Zawia
  • Better Times
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Saint Or Sinner?
  • The Short-Circuiting of Democracy
  • Nuclear South Asia: An Explanation to America
  • Towards a Nuclear Weapons Free World
  • The Bulletin Board of a Believer

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited