unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« October 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Recently by GT

  • Insurance.
  • The Next President.
  • The mauling of adivasis in Assam.
  • Nandigram: What is the problem?
  • Gujrat: Knowing is not enough, we need to remember.
  • Quo Vadis?
  • Transition to democracy -1.
  • Not so fast.
  • What now?
  • Geelani's views?
  • So finally ...
  • Kaal.
  • No Title
  • No Title
  • Further on in the debate:
  • Reply to Masadi continued:

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • GT
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Reply to Masadi continued:

Posted: Jun 20, 2007 Wed 11:43 am     Views: 131   


OK, so what you are saying is that preferences of the people should be changed in a way that they are completely aligned within the group. And yes I agree that such preference alignment has been advocated by God, prophets, Marx and Advertisers. If preferences are fully homogenous, as I mentioned in my earlier reply, you are fully correct. I believe that full homogeneity is impossible. What I showed in my note is that, even with a little bit of heterogeneity of preferences you will get into a mess.

I on my part am against preference changes. This is for three reasons: (1) I believe that complete preference alignment is impossible and even with small heterogeneity there would be problems; (2) I am not an expert on changing preferences; (3) I sense ’superiority’ amongst those who advocate that others preferences should be completely changed over all alternatives to get to homogeneity.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



GT

  • Interacts: 1221
  • iLogs: 11
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 5632
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Oct 22 2005
  • Last signin: Oct 10 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • 1783..When America was defeated by Muslims
  • Hatred Than Love

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • ‘Dustbin of history’ or ‘history of sorts’
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Rape Survivor Families Struggle Against Odds
  • Better Times
  • Love at Shara Zawia
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Is Islam Undemocratic?
  • Intolerance in Official Practice
  • A Day in the Year 2030
  • A Wedding with the Divine
  • Repercussions of Nuclearization

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited