| « July 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Recently by khakiflash
- Is hay-fever suffered the whole world over?
- Getting the last 2 inches off
- More humorous poetry, please.
- Racial attitudes in 1956 when filming 'Bhowani Junction'.
- Film 'The Darjeeling Limited'
- Still here
- Total anonymity on 'Chowk'.
- Food glorious food!
- Was fuer eine schoene Ueberasschung!
- Where are the runners?
- Ahmedinejad's comment re gays
- waiting for a muse
- enigma - or maybe not
- Lacking appreciation of visual art
- Limerick
- End-of-season reflections
Total anonymity on 'Chowk'.
Why are so many Chowkies so coy in giving even meagre details of themselves on their profiles? I don't think I've seen another profile which gives anything like as much as I've written on my own. Is it that a blanket of anonymity is absolutely essential before voicing one's opinions? Even without the mention of my nickname and back-view photo I can (and have been) readily recognised, and I don't mind - but I suppose I'm lucky in having an environment where recognition is no big deal. If one doesn't wish for reasons of safety and security to have one's family and friends able to identify and have access to one's thoughts then I suppose that a blank identity is understandable - but it's the fact that are there so many that I find puzzling - or is it just me?
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
While you have jumped out of the closet, it seems chowk environment encourages people to jump into the closet :)
Tazeen, you are a brave one. But then you do have to face the zeemax type bastards :(
khakiflash
- Interacts: 7
- iLogs: 45
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 9135
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Dec 26 2006
- Last signin: Jul 16 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list
