unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« July 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 2526
27 28 29 30 31

Recently by Cigar

  • Five Finalists (Fly-In Movies Competition)
  • Widow and children of Murtaza Bhutto also mourn
  • Jaman.com
  • Inside Labyrinth (1986)
  • A Forgotten Incident (?)
  • This is Not a Reply
  • My Driving License
  • My First ever Review about a Salon
  • Gulgee and his wife found murdered
  • Mom, 3 Daughters Killed In Pond Crash
  • World Is Listening
  • Message from Amra Tareen (www.allvoices.com)
  • Saudi gang-rape victim is jailed
  • Long Live Pak-Turk Friendship
  • Eid Ka Halwa
  • (Dr? Oh yeah!) Aamer Liaquat Hussain is a Fraud

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Cigar
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

This is Not a Reply

Posted: Dec 20, 2007 Thu 08:53 pm     Views: 314    Interacts: 7

If your letter was the first thing directed towards me then I would have loved to reply, but this letter is not the first thing you sent my way.

First you wrote “curiosity” ilog, implying that my “mean” comment on your ilog is because of my marital status (and maybe my age, which you tried to guess), and you also didn’t forget to highlight my marital status while addressing me in your letter. You blame me to be judgmental and to have penchant of female gossip but you fail to realize that how judgmental and gossip-provoking you your self are while talking about something I didn’t share on public forum. All my comments had been related to what you wrote in your ilog (complete or incomplete, full or half truth, whatever it is) but I didn’t talk/guess about things, you didn’t share. Even after that, I am the one who is gossiper/judgmental and you are not. Great!

I dropped a comment on your curiosity ilog which was not abusive or derogatory (rather, that was in my own defense, I tried to tell that what I said was not because of my marital status but the because I believe in respecting yourself first) but you not only deleted that, but you also loosened the chain of your cyber-pet to attack me with the worst possible abusive language (and then you complain about derogatory and biased comments). I won’t even comment on that because I will have to lower myself to a level of a lowlife.

It was still OK until you repeated more or less same crap but in relatively civilized manner (thanks for that) . That implies you not only endorse what had been written but it was written with your consent. Now when you endorse that rubbish why would I even reply to you. You proved that are the same thing just in a better wrapper?

Your letter is also filled with judgments about me, about the things I have never talked about in my ilogs. You think you have right to say anything about me following, “I have noticed” and “ I know”, but at the same time my comments that are only relevant to issues you, yourself brought into public are not only judgmental but also “poking into your ‘personal’ matters”. But it is ok when you and your team not only try to guess things I never brought in public, but also claim to know very well about my relationships with my in-laws and my possible phobias. But at the end of the day I am judgmental, I am the one who love female gossip.

Even though its you who write ilogs on romantic tragedy but still I am the one who is enthusiastic about so-called romance and not you, just because I commented on them. Let alone discussing, I never talked about you in my personal interaction with any chowky but you not only discuss me but also conclude things about me but still you are not the one who love gossip. That is me !!!

Please don't feel free to respond, because I can’t lower myself to the level you have fallen to. Say whatever you want to say, I won’t respond or interact with you.

Cigar


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by sarah1983 on Friday December 21, 2007 04:01 pm
And yes one last thing....
"Please don't feel free to respond, because I can’t lower myself to the level you have fallen to. Say whatever you want to say, I won’t respond or interact with you."
ohh i am being a free rider!!!
opps...
Posted by Cigar on Friday December 21, 2007 04:00 pm
"It is my last interact,ilog on this"

I appreciate! Please Stay Away !!! I have seen enough of your (and your pet's) "conflict management abilities"
Posted by sarah1983 on Friday December 21, 2007 03:51 pm
Dear Mrs cigar!
As far as i know and readers on chowk know I just wrote 1 letter to you in the last few days.
I guess my memory is really good and i do not have any hallucination problem.
Are you sure you read 2 letters? From ME?
Or you might be assuming some thing on my behalf?
Can any one help me in this regard?
I know there are some really regular readers?
Faiqah? hurricane?any one??
And you complained that I deleted your interact it is there so that other people can also get some enlightenment from your intellectual ideas. And can get “embarrassed” as well.
Yes I found some very amusing ilogs and interacts from you after a bit of memory effort.

Posted by Cigar on Wednesday October 10, 2007 11:27 pm
You made me go and double check spellings of the word you have in Subject field.

Its Pain
Posted: Jul 1, 2007 Sun 08:19 pm Views: 43
someone needs to work on her spellings. Please use spell checker and don’t enter carriage-returns unnecessarily .



Just one very last comment, I usually ignore all this stuff because it does not matter to me. I would have even in this case.But then it become really personal..I hope you understand what are individualistic boundaries.
I am some one with a very cool temperament. I have dealt with kindergarten kids.
Spelling mistakes or no mistakes. There are so many other problems in real life to deal than to get bothered by opinions of a sheer stranger.
Even though I do not own any of the pieces here on chowk.(on ilogger).They are mediocre But if I dislike some one so much that her /his work is a pain to me and is irk some then why read?
Or even thinking to read?
This question is really bothering me!!

PS...
It is my last interact,ilog on this.
"words are sacred entities, do not waste them".
And i do not want to waste my words.
sarah
Posted by Cigar on Friday December 21, 2007 11:39 am
!!! reproducing some and deleting others, what a preposterous way !!!
Dirtier version of the letter has been deleted !!!



Posted by sarah1983 on Friday December 21, 2007 06:54 am
Dear Mrs Cigar!
We all write to vent some kind of anger and frustration. That’s what ilogs are for; they are not ethical, moral or political discussions. They are monologues in major cases.
I have friends not pets.
And then you are assuming too much. I do not ask people to write. They write what they want to write.
And then I guess both of us are intelligent to some level and understand what remarks means
Here are your very civilized interacts…
And the letter is a very civilized response to what you have said to me directly!!

Posted by Cigar on Sunday December 9, 2007 02:19 pm
You should be embarrassed of yourself!
Posted by Cigar on Monday December 17, 2007 06:32 pm
You may find it harsh or "means" but I have to be honest:

I feel really sorry for you to miss the real point altogether. I think you have watched too many Indian movies to believe that married women hate single girls hitting on married man. I hope one day you’ll be able to respect yourself and maybe then you’ll know why you should be embarrassed to let a man enter/exit your life at his own convenience. Until than enjoy the bliss of ignorance.
Posted by Cigar on Tuesday December 18, 2007 09:32 am
oh, I just noticed that you deleted my comment on your other ilog. Anyway, I don't mind as long as you read it before deleting.

I leave the rest to the judgment of readers.
My anger was definitely not directly proportional to your transgressions but it was worth it.
And being a part of academia and learning I will prefer to be civil.
Happy reading
:)
Sarah

Posted by Tigram on Friday December 21, 2007 12:36 am
hamari jaan chhor bhai jan
Posted by Faiqah on Thursday December 20, 2007 09:29 pm
This is not an interact

Cigar

  • Interacts: 8
  • iLogs: 80
  • Gallery: 5
  • Page views: 30621
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Sep 8 2005
  • Last signin: Feb 4 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • An Occult Religion behind an Islamist fascade
  • The Circus
  • Perspective

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Dhokha and Being a Muslim in India
  • Why is Karachi Turning Into a Sell-Out?
  • Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses
  • Time for Musharraf to Quit
  • Fields Of Joy
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • SC to PM: Do You Plead Guilty?
  • A Column of Ants
  • The Essence of Islamic Banking
  • The Ehtesaab Gold Medal
  • The Intellectual Imperative

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited