unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« October 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1213 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Recently by NaghmaSanj

  • The position of Muslims in Britain
  • "Bhutto's dark Clinton-era Legacy" by Jack Cashill
  • US Presidential Candidates on Policy toward Pakistan
  • “It’s very suspect. suddenly a will has come into existence that nobody has seen before.” -- Mumtaz Bhutto
  • Brief List of Criminal & Civil Cases against Mr. Asif Ali Zardari
  • Dalrymple's Obituary: Pakistan's flawed and feudal princess
  • Where is Benazir's Will?
  • Shaukat Aziz and Citibank's Laundering of Asif Zardari's Money
  • How Citibank Laundered Asif Zardari's Money
  • Advice to Musharraf: Dismiss the People, Appoint Another
  • It is Martial Law, not Emergency; the PCO is Unconstitutional
  • Text of Musharraf’s Nov 3-4, 2007 "Emergency" Speech
  • Timeline (Notes on Events Leading up to "Black Saturday")
  • Lawyers Reject New Judges
  • Text of the Supreme Court Order Annulling the Proclamation of "Emergency"
  • Musharraf Quotes Lincoln, Again (as he had done in 1999)

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • NaghmaSanj
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

"Bhutto's dark Clinton-era Legacy" by Jack Cashill

Posted: Jan 7, 2008 Mon 11:40 am     Views: 258    Interacts: 0

Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue.

Posted: January 1, 2008
1:00 a.m. Eastern

In researching the April 1996 Croatian plane crash that killed former Clinton Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, I slowly but steadily moved to the conclusion that it was not an accident.

The evidence strongly supports sabotage by Croatian intelligence. The evidence just as strongly argues that Croatian President Franjo Tudjman and his son Miroslav, the nation's intelligence chief, had no reason to initiate such a plot.

After Brown had a literal "come to Jesus" experience in early 1996, however, several parties did have reason to fear Brown in his increasingly apparent confessional mode.

Chief among them were the Clinton White House and the People's Republic of China in that Brown served as principal bagman in their campaign cash-for-technology exchanges.

There was, however, a third possible suspect. I chose not to explore this angle in any detail in my book "Ron Brown's Body" because my knowledge of this suspect's involvement with Brown comes from only one source, the late Stephen Dresch.

A forensic economist of the highest order, Dresch had been commissioned by one of the insurance companies held potentially liable in the Brown crash to find out all he could about Brown. No one knew more.

Had Dresch not proved so scrupulously reliable in his other investigative efforts, I would have been disinclined to believe the story he told. It is that excessive.

Nevertheless, the story squares with the reckless logic of Brown's life as well as with all credibly reported facts. All the details that follow that do not involve Brown can be easily verified.

The story begins in 1987, when Benazir Bhutto, the eldest daughter of a former Pakistani prime minister, married a polo-playing idler by the name of Asif Ali Zardari.

Educated at Harvard and Oxford, the pretend populist Bhutto denounced the greed she saw around her, especially the "avaricious politicians" who were destroying her country.

Among the greediest was the nation's strongman ruler, Gen. Mohammed Zia ul-Haq, who was not about to share what he had so brutally acquired.

Eight months after Bhutto's marriage to Zardari, however, Zia died in what the New York Times called "a mysterious plane crash." This unexpected tragedy, added the Times, "opened the way for Bhutto to win a narrow election victory."

Although there were no subsequent arrests, few in Pakistan believe this crash to have been an accident.

Bhutto's new husband, Zardari, quickly proved to be more avaricious a politician than Zia. His conspicuous gift for extortion as Bhutto's minister for investment earned him the honorific "Mr. Ten Percent."

In 1990, Zardari allegedly attached a bomb to a Pakistani businessman and forced him to withdraw money from his bank account. He was arrested for blackmail and convicted.

Largely because of Zardari, the president of Pakistan dismissed Bhutto in August 1990 for corruption and inability to maintain law and order. In 1993, however, Bhutto was elected Prime Minister once again, and Zardari's conviction was overturned.

Brown likely met Bhutto and Zardari for the first time in South Africa in May 1994, where all three had gone to witness the inauguration of Nelson Mandela as the country's first black president.

At about this same time, back in Washington, according to Dresch, Brown made the acquaintance of a Bhutto protegee, Pakistani's new ambassador, the glamorous Maleeha Lodhi.

With a Ph.D. in politics from the London School of Economics and her movie star looks, Lodhi, a single mom, took Brown and Washington by storm.

In November 1994, although Pakistan already had an official lobbyist, Lodhi chose to give some of her business to Patton Boggs, Brown's former employer.

Signing the contract for Patton Boggs was none other than Lanny Davis, a partner who would soon earn his 15 minutes of fame by flacking on nightly cable shows for Clinton during the Monica fiasco.

Lodhi and her lobbyists had one overriding mission: to kill or suppress the so-called Pressler amendment and close the books on a deal for American F-16 fighter bombers that had been initiated years before.

In brief, the amendment declared that no American military or technology aid could go to Pakistan unless it would "reduce significantly the risk that Pakistan will possess a nuclear explosive device."

Pakistan was understandably miffed that President Bush 41 applied the amendment in 1990 after Pakistan had already paid General Dynamics $658 million for 28 F-16s.

Amer Lodhi, Maleeha's brother, saw an opportunity in the F-16 imbroglio. A former executive with the infamously corrupt Bank of Commerce and Credit International, Amer got to know Brown through his sister. When in D.C., Zardari joined the party.

Inevitably, Amer Lodhi and Zardari came up with a scheme. Not surprisingly, it involved the always pliable Brown. Brown was to use his influence not to secure the F-16s, but to get Pakistan its money back.

Incredibly, Zardari and Amer Lohdi planned to pocket at least $400 million of the returned money minus an 8 percent, or $32 million, cut for Brown. For Brown, this was to be the mother of all insider deals.

Although Brown's pull was scarcely worth $32 million, the Pakistani investment in Brown had an insidious intelligence about it. By involving Brown, the Pakistanis were by extension implicating the White House in their scheme.

With the 1996 election at stake, exposure could damage the Clinton administration almost as much it would Bhutto's. The best way to avoid exposure would be to keep Bhutto in power. If push came to shove, everyone would have an interest in doing just that.

Zardari and Lohdi, however, overreached. Not content with the $400 million on the F-16 deal, they pitted Russia against France in a competitive bidding situation to see who would replace the planes that the Americas had refused to send.

The French won the competition, not on lowest bid, but on the highest bribe. In 1995, as reported by the New York Times in a special feature called "House of Graft," a leading French military contractor, Dassault Aviation, "agreed to pay Zardari and a Pakistani partner a $200 million commission for a $4 billion jet fighter deal."

The contract even included elaborate mechanisms to hide the proposed payoff and to prevent it from triggering French corruption laws.

As 1995 rolled into 1996, Zardari and Lohdi hammered out their deal with the French, and the Pakistani media began to hammer Bhutto and Zardari.

Stories of the incredible corruption in which the first couple of Pakistan was mired began to surface. Facing an election in February 1997, Bhutto blasted the media and insisted that the stories were all fabrications. Sound familiar?

That Bhutto and Hillary Clinton would come to share the same political strategist, Mark Penn, should come as no surprise.

With an increasingly tenuous grip on power, Bhutto and Zardari, however, had real reason to fear some sudden revelation of Zardari's dealings by a prominent American source like Brown.

Bhutto and Zardari had some familiarity with mysterious death. Just as they benefited politically from Zia's plane crash, they benefited from another mysterious tragedy in September 1996.

A police hit squad in Karachi, under murky circumstances, managed to kill the leader of the opposition to Bhutto, her own brother, Murtaza Bhutto.

The relief, however, was short lived. The mother of Benazir and Murtaza credibly accused Bhutto and Zardari of masterminding the assassination of her son, and Zardari was charged with the murder.

In November 1996, the president of Pakistan dismissed Bhutto once again. Mohammad Nawaz Sharif won the ensuing election in a landslide, and Bhutto and Zardari were in serious trouble.

The court sentenced the pair to five years in prison for corruption, fined them $8.6 million and disqualified them from holding public office. Bhutto went into exile and Zardari was left to rot away in a Pakistani jail.

Meanwhile, at least according to Pakistani sources, Lanny Davis and Patton Boggs advanced the cause of the refund on the F-16s by threatening to sue America to get the money back.

President Clinton obliged them. He chose to telephone Prime Minister Sharif and confirm the nearly $500 million final settlement of the F-16 dispute on Dec. 18, 1998. If this date sounds familiar, it should. It was the penultimate day of the House impeachment hearings.

On Dec. 19, the day Clinton was impeached, "The delighted prime minister announced that the long pending F-16 issue was resolved, and it was a concrete outcome of his recent Washington visit."

One has to wonder what else – or rather who else – they talked about during that visit.

Source: Reproduced from ...
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59471


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



NaghmaSanj

  • Interacts: 5
  • iLogs: 64
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 18417
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Sep 22 2006
  • Last signin: Aug 5 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • MURAWWAT O MOHABBAT KE MABAIN (afsana)
  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Circus
  • The Mountain

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • ‘Dustbin of history’ or ‘history of sorts’
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Rape Survivor Families Struggle Against Odds
  • Love at Shara Zawia
  • Better Times
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Listen South Asia
  • Wake up Deluded Humans
  • And now, the army!
  • The Control-Loving Economist is Coming Out of the Closet Again
  • Choona Aur Chooriyan

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited