The New Mongols

Back in September 2006, when Musharraf was riding high, promoting his book in the USA saying he took part in the WOT for the sake of Pakistan because the US had threatend to bomb it into the stone-age, and all the idiots (who are now against him) were clamoring for him, I wrote this piece, showing my consistent condemnation for the military, its dictator and now its excrement. Look at the near prophetic words at the end:

The date and the text of the article can be verified at this person's blog who is on my mailing list:

http://fahadkhan.wordpress.com/2006/09/30/musharrafs-response-to-the-bo mb-pakistan-back-to-stone-age-threat/

The New Mongols

Only the most barbaric and perverse people on earth, possibly in its entire history can threaten the lives and well being of a nation of 162 million in such an off hand manner, as the US elite did regarding Pakistan (according to Musharraf’s claims) and that also not as the ultimate end but as a by-the-way endeavor in order to get to destroy another 30 million in Afghanistan and send them “back to the stone age”.

These US elite are barbarians, in the most explicit meaning of the word, they do not recognize the vast majority of people on earth as “humans”- it is very easy for them to make pronouncements like “get ready to be bombed “. To them you are not human, regardless of the rhetoric of freedom and democracy. They will not refrain from killing you or your kids and grandkids if they interfere with their objectives. Then they call themselves “civilization”, yet are worse than the Mongols, the most perverse barbarians the world has seen. They have a whole history of carnage behind them and proposed barbarism in front of them, and yet they have the audacity to talk about “Islamic-terrorism” and hypocritically about Darfur.

This episode should also tell future generations in Pakistan the true nature of their “sovereignty” which is non existent and the nature of their “leader”, to whom selling books is of greater importance than national sovereignty. When the “president” of a nation answers more to Simon & Schuster and gets a pat on the back for a “good job” as he wags his tail in elation to Bush, a nation with such a “leader” is indeed in deep trouble.

Those of you who ask what else could Pakistan have done, America is too big and strong, let me answer that by asking a simple question, “Would you hand your mama over to be raped just because the rapist was packing a pistol?” If Musharraf couldn’t handle the heat, couldn’t come up with a plan to preserve national sovereignty, he shouldn’t have strutted around as “leader” of a sovereign nation. The Pakistan military by its acts proves to be the indigenous occupation force of the Americans in Pakistan, all this fear mongering is just showmanship, this military sold this nation to the Americans long time back.

Looking out for “best national interest” does not mean you make decisions that surrender national sovereignity (granted there wasnt any before, thanks to the Pakistan military). If you do that then there is no “national interest” since there is no “nation”. Very simple concept, and the person who does that is not a “national leader” but a member of a “foreign occupying force”. Such incidents multiplied might lead eventually to the political authority of this ‘occupation force of the Americans in Pakistan’ i.e. the Pak Army to erode, which would be a step in the right direction.