unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2009 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 2425 26 27 28
29 30

Recently by pinku

  • repaeting again what i said in some other blog earlier
  • bubble of a believer
  • Pakistan: all round ideal diplomacy and politics
  • hinduism and krishna
  • pakistani mathematicians
  • hindu mathematics
  • often repeated, the nice islamic invaders of past
  • cross roads and religions
  • who cursed intellect?
  • the passion versus serinity stuff may be interesting
  • Imran Khan vs Charles Darwin : By Irfan Husain
  • We are not ‘crazy in Pakistan’ By Kamran Shafi
  • Chowk staff:: is it a bug or what???
  • for chowk staff
  • hum tum?
  • "elite" ka dard

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • pinku
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

bubble of a believer

Posted: Sep 1, 2009 Tue 02:06 am     Views: 182    Interacts: 3



Gad bless Gad,

You need a good definition before you can compare things with that definition, the simple, yet powerful but a bit useless definition is let's call this thing with characteristics x,y, z and whatever else you can find as "XXX" or God.

For some amazing reason, beyond human mind's explaination, the idea of whatever exists is God or "XXX" is the only thing that can be defined without definition, everything else needs assumptions/axioms (basically this infinity to give complete context):-)

So there is one thing that exists, you chose its name and check whatever attributes/characteristics you can find (you belong to it, so you can start by defining your own self first), but whatever exists is just one.

Once people understand this all in one simple concept, they will be more willing to understand things as they really are.

So as long as a believer understands that bubble is too big for him to believe in anything useful, he/she can happily consider athiest to be his/her alter ego while keeping his belief intact (as well as infinite).


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by pinku on Tuesday September 1, 2009 06:48 pm


160 Posted by TehsinA
Tehsin said this:


#150 Posted by pinku


By defining God as infinity you achieve both unity and infinite diversity and this is fantastic. Of course we can still say that the best way for humans is the golden mean i.e. central point between both these extremes. But is there time, a direction, a movement? If there is, then is God moving, is their a purpose for him moving? But he is perfect wouldn’t that affect his perfect state (moving from a perfect state would definitely be a fall i.e less then perfect).

Heck I am back in the bubble! Get me outta here.

Posted by pinku on Tuesday September 1, 2009 06:46 pm
160 Posted by TehsinA on
The moment you say "infinite" it is perfect. You are missing one simple point here, "time", "change", "evolution" everything is happening with-in that infinity. Infinity itself is just infinity, no change ever. This infinity in itself, as a whole, doesn't move, doesn't change, doesn't talk, nothing. But still it embodies all those "changes", "movements" and everything else. If things were simpler than this, why will you need philosophy? :-)

You have to understand that only "infinity" is perfect, otherwise even the definition of perfect itself is not perfect. Let me know if you do not understand it.


[[
Of course we can still say that the best way for humans is the golden mean i.e. central point between both these extremes.
]]

what is central??? who needs that central, what do you know about "best"? what do you know about "perfect"? Seems you are confusing your definitions and arbitrarily assuming that something is "best".

The simplest and most powerful way to define either world or God or all you see is "infinity". A rational mind doesn't have another option except chosing name. So you can call it world, God, whatever. But the essence is "whole" and not "part" and this "whole" can probably be not known by part.

So just salute the "wholeness" of whole and think how this wholeness shows emptiness of our existence.
Posted by pinku on Tuesday September 1, 2009 02:12 am
monotheism is basically a monologue/foolish God, polytheism is childish/playful God,
atheism is a God who is mostly absent
agnosticism is basically a careless God

While God in itself is the one who is trying to understand who he/she/it is....

pinku

  • Interacts: 806
  • iLogs: 42
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 15727
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: May 28 2008
  • Last signin: Dec 31 1969
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • It's your fault Grandpa..
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • MURAWWAT O MOHABBAT KE MABAIN (afsana)
  • WHEN AMERICA WAS DEFEATED BY MUSLIMS

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Uneven Democracy : The Cry from Chhattisgarh
  • NRO Is Just a Name
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • His Decision
  • Why The War On Ghosts Was Lost
  • An Interview with Deepa Mehta
  • The 5 H’s of Work in the 90’s
  • Compilation of Opinions on the Military Takeover in Pakistan

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited