unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2009 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 2324 25 26 27 28
29 30

Recently by pakdoc

  • In India, 5,000 kids die every 24 hrs: UNICEF
  • The Extremists of Pakistan
  • The Doctrine of Divide and Rule
  • Democracy- An Elected Dictatorship
  • Muslims- the forefathers of modern day sciences and technology 2
  • Muslims- the forefathers of modern day sciences and technology 1
  • Heaven in Hell
  • A Pakistani owns and runs Edible Arrangements
  • An Autumn Tale
  • Be the change you want to see
  • Islam and nationalism
  • War for peace
  • Muslim Astronomers and Astrophysicists of 21st century
  • Outstanding Muslim Achievements in Science & Technology (1700 - 2008)
  • The ingenious muslim contributors
  • The Revolution Within

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • pakdoc
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

How media alters mass perception

Posted: Oct 5, 2009 Mon 11:08 pm     Views: 243    Interacts: 18

Mass media has a crucial role in political and religious upbringing of a nation. By virtue of its vast viewer ship it can play a pivotal role in shaping a tolerant society with sound religious and social values. But unfortunately the power of this source is misused in most parts of the world. When such an efficacious tool becomes a toy at hands of a handful of elite, the result is devastation and turmoil by effect of oppression of thoughts and opinion. Although, democracy croons about freedom of speech and freedom of press; in reality, most large democracies have a state run press where they monitor and crop real data, withholding truth from the public that elects them. Twisted reality is portrayed purposefully to shape mass opinion according to the government’s desire. A lay man does not recognize this crafty fraudulence of hypocritical democracies, who refuse to practice what they preach. So, when a thinker or revolutionary speaks up about the two-facedness of our rulers, he is silenced using fear tactics or worse….

This guile is not just practiced by democracies who police the media, but also by media itself. The press and tube realize the effect of their medium and abuse its power to serve their own agenda. They present their own doctrine using propaganda strategy, imprinting their perspective on viewer’s mind by repetition of contorted information and omission of alternate view representation. When misinformation seemingly goes unchallenged, it is accepted as truth by the viewers. Thus, the goal of false propaganda is slyly achieved.

Some of our Pakistani newspapers also run internet blogs. Some argumentative contributions are frequently published in these newspaper which reflect views of deviant sects, communists and atheists about Islamic basics in name of liberal interpretation of Quran, which is another tradition gaining root amongst the ‘enlightened moderates’ of today. The blogs are targeted at changing mass perception about Islam by contorting the words of the Book in accordance with their own will. Such blogs police all comments for quranic and hadith references. I would like to draw attention towards a recently published article in Dawn written by a controversial society critic, aimed at redefining Islamic injunctions about allowance of alcohol consumption, sale and punishment. To counter the farce penned by the ignorant author, I posted my replies quoting references from hadith and quran (the absolute source of Islamic knowledge), pointing towards the invalidity of his poorly researched article. All of my replies were removed from the blog, except one which was allowed to stay after editing the quoted quranic verse. To add to my fury, the posts, allowed to be published on the alleged blog were those that raved about the “well-researched” article and agreed with the author. My friends had similar complaints about their comments on this blog.

What I have come to realize after this incidence is of the technique, the media uses to alter mass perception. This ongoing campaign of de-islamization in Pakistan by a handful of media commentators, some opinionated academic and journalists works by muting the mass uproar against them by censoring publication of such protests on media channels and newspapers owned and run by these elite, thereby, giving the illusion of acceptance of their contorted ideation by public. My personal experience of such censorship, and the acknowledgement of similar incidences by a few outspoken friends has re-enforced my fears about subjugation of freedom of speech and right to be heard in popular media of Pakistan. These industries chant about providing a platform to represent independence of thought to obtain diverse views essential for progress of a society. Yet, have no tolerance for alternate views, that too in matters and subjects where their own expertise is questionable.

I have also noticed a few media commentators with ulterior motives parrot their perspective about a particular event (sometimes irrelevant to subject of discussion) swerving the topic away from real issues and beating the bush about subjects of no real significance. Many a times these tangential conversations of traitors within our ranks oppose national interest of our country and Ummah at large.

After the veil of deception was lifted from my eyes, my restlessness grew to initiate efforts for breeding and circulation of truth. I know many concerned citizens are already playing their part. Some have formed collaborations to organize their efforts and obtain their goal. These chivalrous men who bravely face oppositions imposed by the targets of their satire are inspirational and give me courage to voice my concern about our society. I hope more people participate pro-actively in this wake up project instead of taking seats of passive spectators.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by pakdoc on Saturday October 10, 2009 12:02 am
i meant.......Allah did intend Islam to be easy for common men...but how many have read the Book(quran)? reading books ABOUT quran doesnot count equal to reading the Book itself(quran).....
Posted by pakdoc on Saturday October 10, 2009 12:00 am
Allah did intend Islam to be easy for common men...but how many have read the Book? reading books about quran doesnot count towards reading the book itself..... also tell me how accurate can a translation be? translated literature does not depict the true flow and character of the original writing...... men of knowledge, who spend their lives to interpret the meaning of the Book donot read translations....they learn the language, excel in it and then undertake the task of interpreting Quran..... while people who are adamant of distorting quranic teachings donot even bother to read its translation in their mother tongue....

Islam is about submission of one's will to Allah.... not about distorting Allah's message according to our own will... problems of today's world do not arise due to "specialists" hijacking islam...but due to deviants, representing islam....... be it deviant suiciders who have zero knowledge about islamic teachings, donot read quran or know how to offer salaat or be it deviant liberals, with zero knowledge about islam, donot read quran or offer salaat, but want to interpret quran in light of their "lacking knowledge".... both have misrepresented islam and not followed its injunctions......

secular extremism is just as dangerous as religious extremism...... both extremes, left and right.... impose their views on each other and donot follow Allah's rules!
Posted by pakdoc on Friday October 9, 2009 11:47 pm
i concur witth taji about her point that men of knowledge can gather the true essence of quranic verses....quran is for all to FOLLOW, its not open to misinterpretation by men lacking religious knowledge...

my medical example was to illustrate the joke religiously naive liberals, have made of quranic teachings and islam..... it was by no means, meant to compare sciences and religion......

This is what i posted on NFPs blog in answer to his misinterpretation on quranic verses about alcohol consumption:

To be able to interpret the true meaning of quranic verses and Islamic teachings one has to know when ayats descended, why they descended, about what they descended, if they are general or particular, if they are nasih or mansuh. (Some ayats were changed by some other ayats that descended later. The former are called mansuh, which means 'changed.' The latter are called nasih, which means 'the one that has changed the other.' The ayat about wine is an example.)

Intoxicants were forbidden in the Qur'an through several separate verses revealed at different times over a period of years. At first, it was forbidden for Muslims to attend to prayers while intoxicated (4:43). Then a later verse was revealed which said that alcohol contains some good and some evil, but the evil is greater than the good (2:219). This was the next step in turning people away from consumption of it. Finally, "intoxicants and games of chance" were called "abominations of Satan's handiwork," intended to turn people away from God and forget about prayer, and Muslims were ordered to abstain (5:90-91). (Note - the Qur'an is not arranged chronologically, so later verses of the book were not necessarily revealed after earlier verses.)

Posted by AmbiBambi on Thursday October 8, 2009 11:04 am
banjara - - the administrators will be known to all - and this will keep them in check:)
Posted by Taji on Wednesday October 7, 2009 12:16 am
While I agree that Islam is not a field for specialists only and common person has full right to understand and interpret it, the operative word her is "understand". If a person makes serious efforts in reading up multiple books and different school of thoughts, and then put forward an well developed opinion, that is a good thing. However in the media both conservatives and liberal elements try to do half baked job, and sweeping generalizations are overflowing e.g. West is evil, and Moulvi is evil etc. That is a problem of superficiality of our media.
Posted by Skeptical on Tuesday October 6, 2009 11:48 pm
Once again with due respect, why do you think religon is a a field only for specialists. After all the Quran is supposed to be for all to intrepret. And please natural sciences are different from social issues pertaining to society such as role of religon, politics etc. In natural sciences like physics, owing to extremely techincal nature of the subject, the opinion of the expert has to be relied upon. However, religon is for masses and therefore can be intrepreted by masses though the intrepretation should be based on factual information. One of the biggest problems has been that Islam has been hijacked by so called specialists. We do not intrepret it ourselves rather depend on "specialists".And these specialists only belong to ultra conservative wing of Islam.
God did not intend religon to be a rocket science but for all to practice and understand.
Moreover, where are the liberal voices in the media? Point me ONE program which has liberal underpinnings.
Entertainment program with semi clad women are not liberal. Westernised yes but liberal No.
Posted by pakdoc on Tuesday October 6, 2009 11:19 pm
secular extremism is just as harmful as religious extremism.... religion teaches us morality not barbarity.... just because the media has potrayed muslims to be terrorist doesnot mean they are terrorists...parroting media propoganda without processing the info thru the brain's analytical centers is another idiocy i find hard to swallow!!
the muslims who kill muslims are not following islam...they are as oblivious to their religion as these so called "liberals"( well actually most of which are communists, socialists and atheist)... these deviants (be it to extreme right or left) do not represent islam!!! and when such deviants start interpreting islam in light of their own isms...then, Allah help our deen!!
Islam doesnot need to be re-interpreted....it needs to be properly followed...islam is all about willful submission of ones self for love of Allah..... its message is not open for contortion by whoever wills, to fit with worldly trends!!
Posted by pakdoc on Tuesday October 6, 2009 11:06 pm
@ambibambi-good idea
@skeptical-contrary to your opinion, i think media has representation from both sides...but the point I raised in my log was the hypocrisy certain media liberals practice,(liberalism is an ideology where liberty of thought and expression is an individuals right)by censoring an alternate opinion on newspaper blog...not because the opinion is offensive..but because it contradicts their own opinion.... thereby, giving the impression of unanimous approval of their thougths by the masses.....i donot give a damn if the topic of their articles is music, politics or society at large..... but, spreading farce about islam, with their trivial amount of religious knowledge is what infuriates me.... its like hearing a quack deliver a lecture about intricate neurosurgery procedure!!! this religious quackery, and pig-headedness of not listening to specialist opinion about a specialist field is what makes me wonder about how liberal these liberals really are!!
Posted by banjara286 on Tuesday October 6, 2009 09:05 am
ambibambi,
it would be great if u could start a blog such as u suggest. let me, however, state - at the risk of annoying u - that i have seen many self-proclaimed liberal blogs where opinions that are contrary to blog-administrators are routinely censored. this is, of course, true of chowk as well.

my question to u is how long will it be b4 u fall in the same trap?
Posted by Skeptical on Tuesday October 6, 2009 03:13 am
Taji in my opinion the media is largely conservative at least on the ideological front. On entertainment yes, it can be some what westernised but there too it is not exactly liberal.
In your spare time, do go through the following article of mine. Among other things, it talks about the way media is catering to the "likes" of an increasingly conservative urban middle class.

http://www.chowk.com/articles/15771

Posted by Taji on Tuesday October 6, 2009 02:55 am
Ambibambi
Sure you can be both, most muslims are quite liberal anyways. But I think media operates in rather hyperbole, so every thing needs to be somewhat exaggerated. If you have to depict a modern girl on TV, she must be dressed in jeans and short top, while the conventional girl will be shown wearing a large duppatta on her head and speaking demurely. In reality most Pakistani women do not fall in either of the two types. It is the same in expressing views on the media. The balanced speaker is actually boring for talkshows, because he/she does not generate sufficient conflict to attract viewership.
Posted by AmbiBambi on Tuesday October 6, 2009 02:44 am
Why cant I be both..I see myself as a liberal, open-minded Muslim. WHy does society make it so difficult for us to combine both? I do not want to choose to be either a Muslim or a liberal - which is what it seems people expect.
Posted by AmbiBambi on Tuesday October 6, 2009 02:42 am
Without going into the left or right debate, I think everyone has the right to express their views in a peaceful manner. That is what PakDoc was saying.
Posted by Taji on Tuesday October 6, 2009 02:41 am
Media is an instrument, a powerful one, but still something which needs to wielded by humans. In Pakistan both conservatives and liberals are using media to project their views. The news media and talkshows are dominated by conservatives, mainly because majority of our print journalists and columnists have been from that side. The entertainment channels are dominated by westernized liberals, and they project their values in dramas and music shows. So on a single channel you can watch an Aalim followed by a drama serial depicting sexual relationship all in one evening.
Posted by Skeptical on Tuesday October 6, 2009 02:15 am
Sir with due respect, the media is not dominated by liberal opinion. Here the media is completely dominated by conservative thought. Its Amer Liaqats, zaid hamids and brigade which dominates. Frankly i really do not know how can you equate your I logs with courage as courage is going against the mainstream and on a controversial topic. You mirror the mainstream existing opinion. People like Asma Jehangir have the courage as they go against a mainstream opinion and brave threats from the hardliners.
There is hardly a liberal voice and even NFP has to talk about reintrepreting Islam rather than on seperation of religon and state.
Any how I would not start a debate on what you have written in your 3 I logs because over the years, I have realized that right wing philosphy is hard wired and is based on instinct and a sense of identity. And the right wingers will always follow their instinctive beliefs and will feel agitated when a different opinion is raised.

I am in the process of writing a detailed article on this subject and I hope that chowk will publish it.


Posted by AmbiBambi on Tuesday October 6, 2009 01:40 am
Ok so lets start an Anti-Dawn.com website (kidding). But I think we should ave a place where EVERYONE's views are accepted - as long as they are peaceful. Something like www.salaam.com. I just checked, the URL is available. Interested in starting with me?
Posted by pakdoc on Tuesday October 6, 2009 12:33 am
yep, it was dawn...and i am not the only one who has been censored....when i started talking about this i learnt that this has happened to alot of ppl....specially on dawn, and specifically by a few authors who specialize in anti-islam thesis.....
Posted by AmbiBambi on Tuesday October 6, 2009 12:08 am
ok, so I am now absolutely sure I know who this is! Although I do not agree with you, I salute your courage in speaking up for your convictions. If your response entries to anybody's blog have been removed, this is really reprehensible. Was this on Dawn?

pakdoc

  • Interacts: 0
  • iLogs: 42
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 6165
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Sep 29 2009
  • Last signin: Dec 31 1969
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • MURAWWAT O MOHABBAT KE MABAIN (afsana)
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • It's your fault Grandpa..
  • Fake Muslim History and The Reality!

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • Why MQM Wants To Enter Punjab?
  • Uneven Democracy : The Cry from Chhattisgarh
  • The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Denis Halliday on Iraq
  • The Posthumous Dialectic
  • Diary Notes: Basant
  • Scandalising the Pakistani Courts
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited