unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« September 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 89 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30

Recently by TOLKININ

  • EQUAL but not SIMILAR ..any women
  • anti-Muslim comments
  • Country is geographical -Nation is Boundriless
  • Service to humaniy is the RENT we pay for existence in the world
  • Square logic vs Circular logic of SadnaAccuse And charged DESERVE a laywer if he can afford
  • Urdu
  • Attitude
  • implicit acceptance in the Quran of women
  • Limited Binary Logic
  • Coversion Booty & Koran
  • Stand up for ALL women
  • booty of Brahmin/ Chatri?
  • Irfan Hussain and now.....
  • Murder and label suicide very convenientConvenient
  • Does this met Kant
  • One Way Traffic

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • TOLKININ
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Attitude

Posted: Nov 3, 2007 Sat 07:09 am     Views: 367   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly there is objective evidence that Islamophobia is a thing that is
widely feared at the emotional level and therefore exists in that sense. I
was just addressing the logical validity of the concept, based on a
collectivity known as 'Islam' or 'Muslims.' For the Islamophobia concept to
be logically valid, there is no question that one would have to posit a
collectivity called 'Islam' or 'Muslilms.'

Not having read myself, it is still possible to have a little fun with
the question of whether or not it makes sense to ask for Muslims' opinion
when his writing is at best peripherally about Islam or Muslims.
Should we, for example, say that it is absurd to ask whether there is a
Christian view of J.K. Rowling, since her books are completely silent on
Christianity (other than having Christmas as an event in the books)?

I mean, isn't it simpler (in the sense of more intellectually manageable) to
just say that any identifiable group may have an attitude about anything
(without complicating it with the content of that thing), though that
attitude may not always be determinable or quantifiable?


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



TOLKININ

  • Interacts: 271
  • iLogs: 66
  • Gallery: 1
  • Page views: 12752
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Aug 4 2006
  • Last signin: Aug 3 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • The Circus
  • Some thoughts on Sufis and Sufism
  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • A New Kind of Charity this Ramadan
  • Honor Killings in Babakot
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Book: The Sparrow
  • So, We Are Nuclear Too!!
  • Modern Armies and Their Invincible Plans
  • A Consummate Professional
  • Japanese Premier Resigns

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited