unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« September 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30

Recently by Salim_Chauhan

  • If I had a choice between cliftonbridge and scout, I would select ..
  • Helpful and timely advice to Bristol and Cliftonbridge
  • Response to DM Sahib regarding diverse ancestry
  • Response to Kaal Bhayya
  • TS PI, are you the dentist brother?
  • Political prediction
  • Kaal Bhayya, are you trying to become my VP? ...and feedback on your valid concerns ..,
  • To the brilliant women of Chowk!
  • Can you believe the hysterical paranoia of Madame Flatulence?
  • Who's on first?
  • A few words of advice to my ex-friend Coomar
  • In worship of THE GODDESS of prose
  • Bye Bye Mushy!
  • Georgia on my mind!
  • Chowk is acting like Random House
  • Message to Dear friend Cobray

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Salim_Chauhan
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Zee, let's talk about abuse.

Posted: May 19, 2008 Mon 09:17 am     Views: 105    Interacts: 0

Post by zeemax on May 19, 2008 7:32:25 am
{"Eklavya,

... contd ... take nb for example. She has been vilely abused incessantly and sexually all over Chowk by Salim including, on iLogs. Has any 'Hindu' come out in her defense? Why? Is she less of a Lady?"}

Zee,
I was one of the few genuine critics of your abuse posted the other day. While others may have had an axe to grind with you, I was on good terms with you and still found it necessary to let you know that I condemned such outbursts.

Now, your use of my name as an example of abuse needs to be balanced by some facts:

What is more abusive, playing on some words such as Bengalun, or trivializing the expressed desire of a pedophile to rape the female toddler of a Chowkie? Dismissing such vulgarity by stating that the "infant does not exist and therefore there is no abuse," is in the stupid and vicious category.

What is more abusive - playing on the word Bengalan, or using "SHOOT" and "SHUNT" to refer to the female genitalia as punctuation in every other post?

What is more abusive - referring to a person's self-admitted problem of flatulence or constantly referring to male chowkies as NAMARD?


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



Salim_Chauhan

  • Interacts: 5007
  • iLogs: 2242
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 132351
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Aug 14 2005
  • Last signin: Sep 5 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • The Circus
  • Some thoughts on Sufis and Sufism
  • An Occult Religion behind an Islamist fascade

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • Free to Breed
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Wake up Deluded Muslims
  • Extra-judicial Executions
  • Bebee Phool Nahin Lo
  • The Quranic Concept of Love
  • The Impossible Fundamentalism of Doubt

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited