editor of this site

… i am writing here because this is pertinent and because you chose to ignore my previous post. of course, you can delete this post as you have done in the past many times with my posts.
…to begin with the interactor salim-chauhan and his multi avatars have no credibility as has been well established and his loyalty to either pakistan or india is as questionable as his credibility…
…now, you as an editor are fast losing any credibility and good will that you might have had. your bias and your highhanded disregard of chowk guidelines that you flaunt are on record for everyone to witness now. as a member of this site you would do well to remember chowk is just another address in the cyber world without chowkies…
…i demand an answer on this board from you… not in your ilog or elsewhere… pertinence and responsibility demands that of you… rest of my post #80 reproduced below, is self explanatory.

#80 by khamkhwa. on January 18, 2006 5:18pm PT
Chowk guidelines are very clear about certain interacts and their disposal. I quote those guidelines for other interactors and editor-in-chief.

"Posts are filtered if they do not meet Chowk Interact Guidelines and this includes posts that are not related to the article. Such posts may not be offensive but starting discussions totally unrelated to the article is discouraged in the article interact space."

...in view of above, i do not see any relevance to the article except hate-filled bukwaas against Punjabis by one interactor whose interacts detailed below should have been deleted as was done in the case of #31 and #39...andher nagri chaupat raja or is it rani...:(

#s...4, 17, 20, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 37, 41, 43, 44, 46 and 47....incidentally #30 is not only irrelevant it’s also offensive. what has musharraf’s sister’s peachy mud(whatever it means)has got to do with this article.?

Thank you for your patience.