unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

An Alternative Spelling of Eed

Hamzaad January 10, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 128-144   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

#16 Posted by Wolfe on January 10, 2006 10:28:34 am
Finally something worth reading amongst the boring banal stuff that usually occupies the space.

No offense taken.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by aashee on January 10, 2006 10:24:05 am
KAKA,
You are WEIRD!...and so is your write up.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by kalihawa on January 10, 2006 10:22:04 am

I have never understood how we can associate sacrifice with Gods. They way we assign attributes to Him, sacrifice and worship can only please Satan!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by hamzaad on January 10, 2006 10:20:50 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by KaalChakra on January 10, 2006 10:01:08 am
Unless some believers deploy mythology to perpetrate mischief and injustice against nonbelievers, it is best to avoid dragging mythical personae through the mud.

There is a similar, but breathtakingly beautiful ancient Indian story of Raja Harishchandra. These stories are not supposed to be true and logical. They are supposed to be beautiful, instructive, and timeless.

Eid mubarak.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by HP on January 10, 2006 9:42:48 am

It is not just offensive, it is outrageously offensive! A little humor might have put some life in the article.
I can see the veins standing out on some foreheads. Please just don’t have a blowout. ;<)

Sometimes real crap gets published in journals, and sometimes really great stuff has to struggle to get the approval of the editors. We just have to believe that there is something in the article that caught the editor’s eye and imagination.

Religion is a clumsy farrago of myths and wishful thinking and old traditions which is irrelevant to our understanding of reality, and in fact often impedes our understanding. We lose nothing if it goes away. As people recognize its lack of utility, something that often (but not necessarily) happens as we learn more about science, it fades away.

Myths should be challenged. What does not meet the reality must either be ridiculed or put in the right perspective. I support publishing of this article as sometimes it is necessary to look at the intellectual value in the writing too.

The story of Abraham has many holes. But how those holes should be handled? This article has a personal touch bordering on venom about a story which everyone knows would not stand the test of logic.

I just think that the editors should have removed venomous edges from the article to make it a good dissection of the story of Abraham.

“then she probably was raped from behind; her eyes forced shut by the rapist and therefore never could see the rapist (or maybe she did, but he probably was too close of a kin).”

Palpable! could have been said with a little humor to make it livelier.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by khamkhwa. on January 10, 2006 9:04:01 am
...as i have been saying all along chowk`s anti-muslim, anti-pakistan bias seems to be getting stronger since the arrival of chowk`s indian editor... if the purpose is to denigrate all things pakistani or all things muslim then chowk has achieved it`s target... btw this crap was condemned by all at chusni in 2003 which is when this drivel by kaka aka hamzaad was posted on a thread celeberating Eid... shame on chowk , it`s editor and it`s owners for insulting a large number of muslims, jews and christians alike...

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by _digit on January 10, 2006 8:46:30 am
To the author: Chill....relax.

To Chowk: LOL...f*ck you too...







reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by Zeena on January 10, 2006 8:20:44 am
=== Interact Removed ===
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by Zeena on January 10, 2006 8:17:35 am
Dear Farzana Versey
This article is just crap. So, this is the standard of chowk to publish any stupid crap. Absolute NONSENSE.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by hamzaad on January 10, 2006 8:09:30 am
`When there are possible explanations - perfectly coherent explanations - then there’s no need to bring in the immaculate nonsense.`

Before anyone accuses kaka of not knowing the difference between `virgin birth` and `immaculate conception`, below is the original with the unfixed spelling `mistakes` that chowk staff seems to have `corrected`.

http://www.chusni.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=7;t=000025;#000006
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by ullu_ka_pathha on January 10, 2006 8:07:38 am
Don`t you chowkies have any policy regarding articles.Is this your standard of freedom of expression?. Any idiotic bas*ard can scribble few lines on any topic under the booze induced halucinations and you people put this ``masterpiece`` on your front page to show your neutrality or secularism.
You guys are filthy beyond description.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by Ally on January 10, 2006 6:17:29 am
This article doesn`t make any sense other than to degrade Ibrahim in an offensive way. An article thats attempting to be funny, but ends up being offensive and in bad taste.

I know its all the rage nowadays to question religion and what have you, but a little respect does no harm!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by masanamuthu on January 10, 2006 5:30:53 am
ROFL.. very funny..

I don`t know the real story, it could have been more fun if i had known how the story was told..

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by kill-men on January 10, 2006 5:00:33 am
All id like to say is, before you completely change who Ibrahim is sposed to be, just remember that there are millions out there who happen to believe in what the Quran says, and do believe, that Ibrahim indeed was a great man. Before pointing fingers at him, just remember that for us, he is still a part of our religion, we respect him, and he is a part of our faith. You have compltely changed who Ibrahim is truly supposed to be in your article, and i just want you to know that by doing so, you are insulting our faith, you are insulting us. Kindly refrain from doing so.
Yes, nasah this post is offensive.

Has lashing out at Islam, and its respected pioneers become a fashion at chowk?!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by nasah on January 10, 2006 4:44:33 am
I think this post is offensive.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 128-144   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Interact Index

    #144 Zeena
    #143 teshah
    #142 Zeena
    #141 teshah
    #140 mannyd
    #139 mannyd
    #138 mannyd
    #137 Zeena
    #136 Zeena
    #135 mannyd
    #134 teshah
    #133 Zeena
    #132 teshah
    #131 teshah
    #130 mannyd
    #129 mannyd
    #128 Zeena
    #127 Zeena
    #126 Zeena
    #125 mannyd
    #124 mannyd
    #123 mannyd
    #122 mannyd
    #121 Zeena
    #120 teshah
    #119 Zeena
    #118 nasah
    #117 pmishra2
    #116 Zeena
    #115 Zeena
    #114 hamzaad
    #113 Pracha
    #112 einsteinwallah
    #111 Zeena
    #110 einsteinwallah
    #109 Raw_Dust
    #108 Zeena
    #107 Zeena
    #106 Zeena
    #105 hamzaad
    #104 alert
    #103 Zeena
    #102 soysauce
    #101 alert
    #100 rsridhar
    #99 Zeena
    #98 einsteinwallah
    #97 jang
    #96 shobig_sifar
    #95 masadi
    #94 alert
    #93 masadi
    #92 masadi
    #91 masadi
    #90 Zeena
    #89 hamzaad
    #88 Zeena
    #87 Raw_Dust
    #86 Zeena
    #85 Raw_Dust
    #84 Zeena
    #83 sattar2
    #82 jang
    #81 Urstruly
    #80 jang
    #79 zombilici
    #78 Urstruly
    #77 Zeena
    #76 Zeena
    #75 jang
    #74 khamkhwa.
    #73 shobig_sifar
    #72 Saminasha
    #71 nasah
    #70 hamzaad
    #69 IAliBirmingham
    #68 jang
    #67 soysauce
    #66 soysauce
    #65 Salim_Chauhan
    #64 nasah
    #63 soysauce
    #62 Saminasha
    #61 sattar2
    #60 HP
    #59 kalihawa
    #58 sattar2
    #57 hamzaad
    #56 Urstruly
    #55 Saminasha
    #54 Urstruly
    #53 Urstruly
    #52 Saminasha
    #51 burpinder
    #50 UmerMurtaza
    #49 mustafa_sahib
    #48 Morningdew
    #47 Rizwan
    #46 sadna
    #45 sadna
    #44 Zeena
    #43 masanamuthu
    #42 hamzaad
    #41 Zeena
    #40 Zeena
    #39 masanamuthu
    #38 scout
    #37 Zeena
    #36 Ranjit
    #35 chaltahai
    #34 Raw_Dust
    #33 sadna
    #32 Zeena
    #31 nasah
    #30 khamkhwa.
    #29 Zeena
    #28 nasah
    #27 Zeena
    #26 _digit
    #25 Zeena
    #24 Zeena
    #23 hab
    #22 masanamuthu
    #21 FarzanaVersey
    #20 khamkhwa.
    #19 khamkhwa.
    #18 nasah
    #17 pmishra2
    #16 Wolfe
    #15 aashee
    #14 kalihawa
    #13 hamzaad
    #12 KaalChakra
    #11 HP
    #10 khamkhwa.
    #9 _digit
    #8 Zeena
    #7 Zeena
    #6 hamzaad
    #5 ullu_ka_pathha
    #4 Ally
    #3 masanamuthu
    #2 kill-men
    #1 nasah

Latest Interacts

  • nkg: #4 This is not... Bihar & Louisiana: A
  • nkg: Arjun... Off the topic...After the... US Commando Strike in
  • nkg: Re: # 82 ahemd... Can you... US Commando Strike in
  • nkg: Re: # 134 Arjun... Marx was... US Commando Strike in
  • _arjun19: #139 Posted by masadi... US Commando Strike in
  • CreateAlpha: Hamid, jokes aside....the next... US Commando Strike in
  • harimau: Ref dost_mittar #25 [The Maruti... Save Me From Charismatic
  • crazyghan: "The verses which were... Honor Killings in Babakot

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • Free to Breed
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Thanksgiving II
  • Madeleine’s ’Deadly Delusions’
  • Tribute to Abdus Salam
  • The Dark Side of Cyber Relationships
  • Beyond ’Fictional Economic Man’

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited