Saima Shah December 14, 2005
#598 Posted by mohar11 on December 21, 2005 9:08:49 am
Re: # 597
[...pakistanis based in pak stay away from this website....]
Of course - I am sure their activities at madrassas are keeping them busy ....
[...pakistanis based in pak stay away from this website....]
Of course - I am sure their activities at madrassas are keeping them busy ....
#597 Posted by faisaluno on December 21, 2005 9:00:30 am
the fact the few indian nut jobs are allowed to flood this joint in such large numbers says a lot about the priorities and the mindset of the people who run this place. no wonder pakistanis based in pak stay away from this website.
#596 Posted by Vlad on December 21, 2005 8:54:40 am
``It must be pointed out that Sadna and Ranger were subsequently banned and haven`t been able to post since yesterday... ``
Poor Ranger. Sniff.
Poor Ranger. Sniff.
#595 Posted by bongdongs on December 21, 2005 8:53:27 am
#594
Sorry I was looking for better and more honest sources than your good self.
Sorry I was looking for better and more honest sources than your good self.
#594 Posted by MantoLives on December 21, 2005 8:50:26 am
It must be pointed out that Sadna and Ranger were subsequently banned and haven`t been able to post since yesterday...
....
Bong dong...
Please do revisit the terrorist Manjit Singh`s case for more information. He is just one of the many infiltrators you fellows sent over.
Even before IT ... India was king at Outsourcing...
....
Bong dong...
Please do revisit the terrorist Manjit Singh`s case for more information. He is just one of the many infiltrators you fellows sent over.
Even before IT ... India was king at Outsourcing...
#593 Posted by faisaluno on December 21, 2005 8:44:25 am
do you get the feeling that everyday on chowk is groundhog day?
i pasted in excel, the list of interactors on this article to look at the frequency of contributors. i think chowk-staff needs to pay a serious attention to this list because its no fun interacting on a website where every single interesting discussion gets hijacked by retards with a single point agenda. and its no use expecting people to reform themselves because most of these losers have been around for about 5 years. maybe chowk-staff should limit the number of posts by interactor per day like they did on unplugged. i think quality of interaction will really improve if people have to think before they hit the submit buttom.
rsridhar Count 67
arjun_m Count 55
masadi Count 46
Mantolives Count 33
mohar11 Count 31
Ranger Count 24
sadna Count 22
faisaluno Count 21
SaimaShah Count 21
behram1 Count 19
HP Count 15
ahmedmadani Count 14
bolta_aaina Count 14
GT Count 14
Salim_Chauhan Count 14
mannyd Count 13
amansandhu Count 11
bbabu Count 11
ahmadzai Count 10
godot Count 10
parthaab Count 10
#592 Posted by MantoLives on December 21, 2005 8:42:26 am
Not just in Karachi... In Lahore as well... I lived through that terror. RAW was doing KGB`s dirty work... since Soviet Union outsourced this important issue to you chaps...
It wasn`t payback as such.
#591 Posted by bongdongs on December 21, 2005 8:23:05 am
I have heard it frequently alleged here that Indian intelligence sponsored violence in Karachi in the `80`s, but I have never heard the full details. Who is it that Indian intelligence supported? what were their activities? Can someone point me to some good resources or summarize it here.
Please note that I am not denying the issue, it was quite possibly a payback for 1980`s Punjab. Its just that I would like to hear the full story, before it is accepted as Gospel.
Please note that I am not denying the issue, it was quite possibly a payback for 1980`s Punjab. Its just that I would like to hear the full story, before it is accepted as Gospel.
#590 Posted by MantoLives on December 21, 2005 8:14:49 am
Amansandhu,
Sorry I missed your comment. You are right.
Pakistani plays were great before the pre-commercial era... competition with Indian soaps and slapstick comedy has driven Haseena Moen out of business. But I bet you... most Pakistanis would want to go back to those.
Aaj TV, Hum TV and some other new Pakistani channels are making an effort though... to improve the standard of the commercialised mixture... I was watching a new Pakistani drama the other day... and it was quite alright...
Sorry I missed your comment. You are right.
Pakistani plays were great before the pre-commercial era... competition with Indian soaps and slapstick comedy has driven Haseena Moen out of business. But I bet you... most Pakistanis would want to go back to those.
Aaj TV, Hum TV and some other new Pakistani channels are making an effort though... to improve the standard of the commercialised mixture... I was watching a new Pakistani drama the other day... and it was quite alright...
#589 Posted by Vlad on December 21, 2005 8:13:43 am
#587 ,
Haha...I was about to say the same thing about #586. Imagine that :))
Haha...I was about to say the same thing about #586. Imagine that :))
#588 Posted by amrita on December 21, 2005 8:11:20 am
Re: # 570
Saima, I`m glad :). Selective perception is probably the biggest epidemic going around chowk and so far there just seems to be no cure. The anti-Muslim slant is prolly something he wasnt even aware of when he was writing it and something the critics here would have skipped - I find a lot of people in the wake of 9/11 react negatively even when they`re not aware of it. A sort of subconscious racism. I`ve had people ask me if I was muslim and it shocked me someone would actually do that in ny of all places.
Saima, I`m glad :). Selective perception is probably the biggest epidemic going around chowk and so far there just seems to be no cure. The anti-Muslim slant is prolly something he wasnt even aware of when he was writing it and something the critics here would have skipped - I find a lot of people in the wake of 9/11 react negatively even when they`re not aware of it. A sort of subconscious racism. I`ve had people ask me if I was muslim and it shocked me someone would actually do that in ny of all places.
#586 Posted by amrita on December 21, 2005 8:01:55 am
Re: # 568
Manto - I dont know what your obsession is with Sadna but I`m afraid I dont subscribe to it. So yes, I dont follow her from board to board or post threads in her name in up where I constantly berate her. However, I have made it clear, on several occasions and most of them in connection to you, that I do not subscribe to her views. In fact at one point, and I`m covering old ground here as usual given your famously convenient memory, I even offered to take your view of Sadna for gospel. This was of course before I knew that you wouldnt know the truth if it drove up on the loneliest road in the world and ran you over with a bicycle.
But if I havent been obsessed with Sadna, neither have I been obsessed with any Pakistani on this site who posts anti-India comments. In fact, apart from a brief skirmish wherein I laughed at pokershark [who is generally held to be an indian masquerading as a pakistani btw] and a tiff with tahmed which was almost immediately sorted out, my disagreements have always been with fellow Indians like harimau and gujju.
And in none of these have I cried mommy and looked to others for help like you used to on up before farzana decided to experiment with free speech or come up with tons of excuses to explain exactly why I was the way I was [``the indians did it``, ``i`m finally listening to my fellow pakistanis on chowk`` or my favorite yet, ``i`m only copying sadna``].
My issues with you have nothing to do with your country - it has to do with you as a person. your nasty little habit of opportunistic and habitual lying, your absurd redefinition of common terms [remember when you called me an ``indian secular commie hindutva fanatic`` (??) in addition to being a fascist and some other things I cant remember right now? LOL] to more conveniently fit your arguments, your constant and ill-informed generalizations which you like to pass off as logical reasonings, and last but not the least, your sheer inability to take a stand on any issue without using half a dozen other people and issues for a crutch are merely things that irritate me about you.
Now if you`re quite done boring the rest of this board, not to mention myself, I`ll bid you good day.
Manto - I dont know what your obsession is with Sadna but I`m afraid I dont subscribe to it. So yes, I dont follow her from board to board or post threads in her name in up where I constantly berate her. However, I have made it clear, on several occasions and most of them in connection to you, that I do not subscribe to her views. In fact at one point, and I`m covering old ground here as usual given your famously convenient memory, I even offered to take your view of Sadna for gospel. This was of course before I knew that you wouldnt know the truth if it drove up on the loneliest road in the world and ran you over with a bicycle.
But if I havent been obsessed with Sadna, neither have I been obsessed with any Pakistani on this site who posts anti-India comments. In fact, apart from a brief skirmish wherein I laughed at pokershark [who is generally held to be an indian masquerading as a pakistani btw] and a tiff with tahmed which was almost immediately sorted out, my disagreements have always been with fellow Indians like harimau and gujju.
And in none of these have I cried mommy and looked to others for help like you used to on up before farzana decided to experiment with free speech or come up with tons of excuses to explain exactly why I was the way I was [``the indians did it``, ``i`m finally listening to my fellow pakistanis on chowk`` or my favorite yet, ``i`m only copying sadna``].
My issues with you have nothing to do with your country - it has to do with you as a person. your nasty little habit of opportunistic and habitual lying, your absurd redefinition of common terms [remember when you called me an ``indian secular commie hindutva fanatic`` (??) in addition to being a fascist and some other things I cant remember right now? LOL] to more conveniently fit your arguments, your constant and ill-informed generalizations which you like to pass off as logical reasonings, and last but not the least, your sheer inability to take a stand on any issue without using half a dozen other people and issues for a crutch are merely things that irritate me about you.
Now if you`re quite done boring the rest of this board, not to mention myself, I`ll bid you good day.
#585 Posted by MantoLives on December 21, 2005 7:35:35 am
Bolta-aina,
Please review Mohar11`s post very closely... I am sure you will concur with the view that the observations I made about the possible causes behind Sadna`s hateful bad behavior are probably as true of him as well.
Please review Mohar11`s post very closely... I am sure you will concur with the view that the observations I made about the possible causes behind Sadna`s hateful bad behavior are probably as true of him as well.
#584 Posted by arjun_m on December 21, 2005 7:17:40 am
#579 by Mantolives on December 21, 2005 5:38am PT
completely forgiven because you watched our plays in that period.
Manto...you`ll make a very bad lawyer...stick with your new job at the paki rag..
You`d have a point if I was the one who said Indians are full of love for pakis because they watched Paki plays..Did I ever say that?...I`ve maintained that Pakistan is the enemy because of sponsors Islamic terrorism in India and elsewhere..and that a majority of pakis, including those on chowk, may claim to be full of love for Indians but they support Islamic terrorism ...9/11 just send their love for the jihadis into the closet..they`ve all become what I call ``visa moderates`` moderates only because their visas depend on it..
about paki plays..a miniscule % of Indians actually watched paki plays..I`m willing to bet the % of pakis who watch Indian shows now is much larger than the % of Indians who`ve watched Pakistani plays at any time...
completely forgiven because you watched our plays in that period.
Manto...you`ll make a very bad lawyer...stick with your new job at the paki rag..
You`d have a point if I was the one who said Indians are full of love for pakis because they watched Paki plays..Did I ever say that?...I`ve maintained that Pakistan is the enemy because of sponsors Islamic terrorism in India and elsewhere..and that a majority of pakis, including those on chowk, may claim to be full of love for Indians but they support Islamic terrorism ...9/11 just send their love for the jihadis into the closet..they`ve all become what I call ``visa moderates`` moderates only because their visas depend on it..
about paki plays..a miniscule % of Indians actually watched paki plays..I`m willing to bet the % of pakis who watch Indian shows now is much larger than the % of Indians who`ve watched Pakistani plays at any time...
#583 Posted by mohar11 on December 21, 2005 6:17:54 am
Re: # 580 vlad
Our man bolta-aaina is new here and is still stuck in ``why-can`t-we-all-get-along`` mode :) ...... but yes - blaming anti-hindoo feeling of pakis on America was just completely cuckoo...... I mean I have heard all sort of lunatic rants here - but never heard that one - not even pakis would say that :)
Our man bolta-aaina is new here and is still stuck in ``why-can`t-we-all-get-along`` mode :) ...... but yes - blaming anti-hindoo feeling of pakis on America was just completely cuckoo...... I mean I have heard all sort of lunatic rants here - but never heard that one - not even pakis would say that :)
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- _arjun30: #83 Posted by... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- hamidm2: Re: # 85 cobra, .... i... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- MeiraJ08: Thanks Morni, for you... Fathers and Daughters
- Cobra: Why flag my post?... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- gowhargeelani: Dear Friends, please read... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- Cobra: But there is no... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- Cobra: Hamid, there are Kashmiri... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- gowhargeelani: Re: # 83 Well said,... ‘Dustbin of history’ or








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content