Adil Mulki January 24, 2006
#2 Posted by Ed on January 27, 2006 2:48:51 am
Well, I addressed the cliches when they were not so worn out but due to my schedule there was some delay in making the submission and then there was some further delay by chowk editors. .... the result.... I appear to be ``addressing worn out cliches`` :).
Thanks for the encouragement.
Thanks for the encouragement.
#1 Posted by Love2love on January 26, 2006 8:25:25 pm
Not very effective Adil as a satire. You are addressing worn out cliches. But must say you do have the power to write. Now plot your stories and scenes equally well.
#3 Posted by Ed on January 27, 2006 4:49:28 am
Re: # 1
Well, I addressed the cliches when they were not so worn out but due to my schedule there was some delay in making the submission and then there was some further delay by chowk editors. .... the result.... I appear to be ``addressing worn out cliches`` :).
Thanks for the encouragement.
Well, I addressed the cliches when they were not so worn out but due to my schedule there was some delay in making the submission and then there was some further delay by chowk editors. .... the result.... I appear to be ``addressing worn out cliches`` :).
Thanks for the encouragement.
Interact Index
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- rabiawsti: #42 well, land reforms predated... There is no ‘honour’
- hamidm2: Re: # 74 masadi mian, "Ahmad... Why Zardari Should Be
- masadi: hamid writes to tahmed"...... Why Zardari Should Be
- masadi: Venga writes "HP, this... There is no ‘honour’
- masadi: Here is an article... There is no ‘honour’
- masadi: HP writes "were large... There is no ‘honour’
- tahmed32: #72 hamidm: i grew... Why Zardari Should Be
- hamidm2: Re: # 70 tahmed, .... so... Why Zardari Should Be








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content