Farzana Versey January 23, 2006
#70 Posted by pmishra2 on January 24, 2006 8:32:55 am
Arundhati and Farzana in one column !
Wow, this could be fun!
OK. I will keep my mouth shut. There are far too many middle-aged indian men shrieking at indian women for saying this or that. I am really, really sick of that.
Nothing that Arundhati or Farzana can write (?wrong?) can compare to that kind of society-approved bullying.
Best wishes to both.
Wow, this could be fun!
OK. I will keep my mouth shut. There are far too many middle-aged indian men shrieking at indian women for saying this or that. I am really, really sick of that.
Nothing that Arundhati or Farzana can write (?wrong?) can compare to that kind of society-approved bullying.
Best wishes to both.
#69 Posted by mannyd on January 24, 2006 8:23:42 am
Manto: Sorry to hear about Wali Khan. Was he related to David also?
`I see that one Mannyd trying to be funny again...
He reminds me of the ``Black Knight`` - you know from the Monty Python fame:`
Yes I reminded you of playing the black knight in your fights with Sadhna. Oh you are such a sophist, just like Jinnah. How is the temple construction in Pakistan going on?
`I see that one Mannyd trying to be funny again...
He reminds me of the ``Black Knight`` - you know from the Monty Python fame:`
Yes I reminded you of playing the black knight in your fights with Sadhna. Oh you are such a sophist, just like Jinnah. How is the temple construction in Pakistan going on?
#68 Posted by MantoLives on January 24, 2006 8:12:40 am
Ladies and gentlemen,
I have some bad news. A very complex and controversial figure- whose historical role and flip flops I have profound disagreements but who nonetheless deserves credit for his support of Fatima Jinnah in her courageous campaign against the Military in 1965 and his role in the making of the Pakistani Constitution of 1973- has gone into coma.
Let us take a moment to pray for Wali Khan.
I have some bad news. A very complex and controversial figure- whose historical role and flip flops I have profound disagreements but who nonetheless deserves credit for his support of Fatima Jinnah in her courageous campaign against the Military in 1965 and his role in the making of the Pakistani Constitution of 1973- has gone into coma.
Let us take a moment to pray for Wali Khan.
#67 Posted by sadna on January 24, 2006 8:05:10 am
As for Arundhati Roy, the Akademi will likely hold the award for her till the time she is willing to accept it. No big deal.
#66 Posted by sadna on January 24, 2006 7:43:40 am
India was primarily a agrarian society(80%) and literacy was in the 30%s. We had 22 languages (at the minimum) that we had to preserve and grow the literary tradition of. Can anyone suggest some other way apart from a government sponsored institution functioning autonomously?
btw, recently the Akademi exhibited literature in tribal languages. Someday when we are rich and fully literate and everyone reads and buys books enough to sustain 22+ languages` literary traditions, we will not need Sahitya Akademi. Until then, bully for them.
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200601110314.htm
``
New Delhi, Jan 11 Books in eight tribal languages were the cynosure of all eyes as the annual Sahitya Akademi exhibition began here today showcasing nearly 3,000 titles in 22 recognised Indian languages.
The bilingual books, which carry their English translation alongside, in Bodo, Bharthari, Garo, Hmar, Khasi, Kokborok, Mizo and Rabha were published as a part of Akademi`s `Tribal Literature and Oral Tradition` project.
The other attractions in the exhibition include the mammoth volumes of `Encyclopedia on Indian Literature` (six volumes), the three-volume `English Writings of Tagore` and `History of Indian Literature`.
The exhibition also showcases books in Kashmiri, Dogri, Maithili, Sindhi and Nepali apart from writings for children and Akademi magazines.
The exhibition, which also provides with video films on 60 Indian writers, was inaugurated by Union Culture Minister S Jaipal Reddy who said that government ``does not intend to interfere in the matters of institution like Sahitya Akademi``.
``Institutions like Akademi flourish under an atmosphere of freedom and personally, I don`t believe in disturbing that equilibrium.``
He said technology cannot substitute reading and ``no intellectual were made by technology but reading``.
Akademi Secretary and noted Malayalam poet K Sachidanandan said that the mandate of Akademi, which ``publishes a book in every 30 hours``, was to make available ``good books at a reasonable price``.
#65 Posted by iron_mask on January 24, 2006 6:59:38 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#64 Posted by Saminasha on January 24, 2006 6:29:13 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#63 Posted by MantoLives on January 24, 2006 6:21:48 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#62 Posted by iron_mask on January 24, 2006 6:06:31 am
saminasha there is a method in this madness of Roy.
(a) She rejects an from the Academi in the name of govt award
(b ) she expects to be pilloried for this
(c) she bleats that she is being hounded and oppressed (tell me whats else can the trendy lefties do but bleat)
(d) she gains more column inches in thewest which is lapped up
(e) she is the winner financially through this.
(f) she can then accept more awards fromt he west (fly yo sydney, paris et al).
Some this MO is also used on chowk with a few variations.
(a) She rejects an from the Academi in the name of govt award
(b ) she expects to be pilloried for this
(c) she bleats that she is being hounded and oppressed (tell me whats else can the trendy lefties do but bleat)
(d) she gains more column inches in thewest which is lapped up
(e) she is the winner financially through this.
(f) she can then accept more awards fromt he west (fly yo sydney, paris et al).
Some this MO is also used on chowk with a few variations.
#61 Posted by iron_mask on January 24, 2006 6:03:30 am
maybe if she gets awarded the Padma Vibhusan or Bharat ratna she will accept it.
#60 Posted by iron_mask on January 24, 2006 6:01:55 am
Yep. It was set up by them.
But it is not run by them.
I am sure you will realise the difference. But then you are so close to the necon position coming in from the left that you......
if you see the organisation chart tell me where do you see the govt coming in.....
ofcourse people like yourself will always want to see consipiracies et all everywhere. Thatis why queenie said what she said about you.
But it is not run by them.
I am sure you will realise the difference. But then you are so close to the necon position coming in from the left that you......
if you see the organisation chart tell me where do you see the govt coming in.....
ofcourse people like yourself will always want to see consipiracies et all everywhere. Thatis why queenie said what she said about you.
#59 Posted by Saminasha on January 24, 2006 6:01:31 am
Tin Pot,
What does this say?
``The Sahitya Akademi was set up by the Government of India to foster and coordinate literary activities in all the Indian languages and to promote through them the cultural unity of India.
The Akademi was formally launched by the Government of India on March 12, 1954. It was registered as a society on January 7, 1956 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.``
http://www.sahitya-akademi.org/sahitya-akademi/org1.htm
What does this say?
``The Sahitya Akademi was set up by the Government of India to foster and coordinate literary activities in all the Indian languages and to promote through them the cultural unity of India.
The Akademi was formally launched by the Government of India on March 12, 1954. It was registered as a society on January 7, 1956 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.``
http://www.sahitya-akademi.org/sahitya-akademi/org1.htm
#58 Posted by iron_mask on January 24, 2006 5:58:41 am
she can accept the award from the french govt but not from the Shaitya academy. Maybe the members of the academy need to get french sounding names and get bleached ala M. jackson
French award conferred on Arundhati Roy
By Anita Joshua
NEW DELHI, APRIL 26. It was the last thing the celebrated Booker Prize-winning author Ms. Arundhati Roy expected when she walked into the French Ambassador`s residence here this evening to be conferred a high French honour: Chevalier des Arts et des Letters - Knight of the Order of Arts and Letters. After all, globalisation is what she`s been fighting against ever since she threw in her lot with ``Narmada Bachao Andolan``.
Mr. Bernard de Montferrand, the French Ambassador, introduced her as ``the best example of what I would call good globalisation``. When he went on to elaborate that ``good globalisation is one that enables us to reach the universal through cultural diversity``, Ms. Roy could be heard saying ``no, no``.
In her acceptance speech, the author of God of Small Things gave the gathering a sample of her wry humour when she quipped: ``It is not often that a writer gets recognised by the French Government and the Supreme Court of India in the same week.`` Said in reference to the Supreme Court`s recent observations on her response to contempt proceedings against her and others in the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) case, she articulated the hope that neither would dictate ``what I write, how I write, and when I write``.
Though the presentation of Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres was a literary event, Ms. Roy`s identity as an NBA activist was something that could not be kept away from even the Ambassador`s speech. Acknowledging the fact that her commitment to public life was inseparable from her work, Mr. Montferrand commented that ``this altruism from the part of a committed writer testifies to your great generosity``.
Again this was a qualification which India`s first recipient of the coveted Booker refused to wear. Shrugging it off, she sought to impress upon the gathering - which included several members of Delhi`s literary circles, including her publisher and the much-in-the-news Tehelka man, Mr. Tarun Tejpal - that she had her own selfish reasons for supporting the poor displaced people of the Narmada Valley. ``I am not fighting for any altruistic reasons,`` she asserted.
With Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres pinned on to her sari, Ms. Roy today joined the small family of Indians who have been honoured by the French Government with this award that is given to ``persons who have distinguished themselves by their creativity in the field of art, culture and literature or for their contribution to the influence of the arts in France and throughout the world``.
According to the Ambassador, Ms. Roy qualifies for the award on both counts. For in the words of the legendary General de Gaulle, as quoted by the Ambassador, ``any writer who writes well serves his country``. Then there was the universal appeal of her story which brought her not just the award but the badge of being ``the best example of good globalisation``.
French award conferred on Arundhati Roy
By Anita Joshua
NEW DELHI, APRIL 26. It was the last thing the celebrated Booker Prize-winning author Ms. Arundhati Roy expected when she walked into the French Ambassador`s residence here this evening to be conferred a high French honour: Chevalier des Arts et des Letters - Knight of the Order of Arts and Letters. After all, globalisation is what she`s been fighting against ever since she threw in her lot with ``Narmada Bachao Andolan``.
Mr. Bernard de Montferrand, the French Ambassador, introduced her as ``the best example of what I would call good globalisation``. When he went on to elaborate that ``good globalisation is one that enables us to reach the universal through cultural diversity``, Ms. Roy could be heard saying ``no, no``.
In her acceptance speech, the author of God of Small Things gave the gathering a sample of her wry humour when she quipped: ``It is not often that a writer gets recognised by the French Government and the Supreme Court of India in the same week.`` Said in reference to the Supreme Court`s recent observations on her response to contempt proceedings against her and others in the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) case, she articulated the hope that neither would dictate ``what I write, how I write, and when I write``.
Though the presentation of Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres was a literary event, Ms. Roy`s identity as an NBA activist was something that could not be kept away from even the Ambassador`s speech. Acknowledging the fact that her commitment to public life was inseparable from her work, Mr. Montferrand commented that ``this altruism from the part of a committed writer testifies to your great generosity``.
Again this was a qualification which India`s first recipient of the coveted Booker refused to wear. Shrugging it off, she sought to impress upon the gathering - which included several members of Delhi`s literary circles, including her publisher and the much-in-the-news Tehelka man, Mr. Tarun Tejpal - that she had her own selfish reasons for supporting the poor displaced people of the Narmada Valley. ``I am not fighting for any altruistic reasons,`` she asserted.
With Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres pinned on to her sari, Ms. Roy today joined the small family of Indians who have been honoured by the French Government with this award that is given to ``persons who have distinguished themselves by their creativity in the field of art, culture and literature or for their contribution to the influence of the arts in France and throughout the world``.
According to the Ambassador, Ms. Roy qualifies for the award on both counts. For in the words of the legendary General de Gaulle, as quoted by the Ambassador, ``any writer who writes well serves his country``. Then there was the universal appeal of her story which brought her not just the award but the badge of being ``the best example of good globalisation``.
#57 Posted by Saminasha on January 24, 2006 5:57:45 am
``The Sahitya Akademi was set up by the Government of India to foster and coordinate literary activities in all the Indian languages and to promote through them the cultural unity of India.
The Akademi was formally launched by the Government of India on March 12, 1954. It was registered as a society on January 7, 1956 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.``
http://www.sahitya-akademi.org/sahitya-akademi/org1.htm
The Akademi was formally launched by the Government of India on March 12, 1954. It was registered as a society on January 7, 1956 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.``
http://www.sahitya-akademi.org/sahitya-akademi/org1.htm
#56 Posted by Saminasha on January 24, 2006 5:56:32 am
Tin Pot,
Read the first line of this webpage:
http://www.sahitya-akademi.org/sahitya-akademi/org1.htm
What does it say?
Read the first line of this webpage:
http://www.sahitya-akademi.org/sahitya-akademi/org1.htm
What does it say?
#55 Posted by iron_mask on January 24, 2006 5:36:27 am
from http://howardrichards.org/peace/content/view/31/31/
(he is a professor of peace and global studies)
Roy says in one of her interviews with David Barsamian that militarism has become an economic necessity for the American Empire. I take this statement to be equivalent to saying that economic causes explain American militarism i.e. that for economic reasons there has to be militarism. She suggests two economic causes of militarism. (In addition to these she mentions several aspects of the psychology of daily life that are conducive to paranoia and to nationalist frenzy, both with respect to Indian militarism and with respect to American militarism. I do not count these here as economic causes, although they are no doubt related to the same social structures that produce the phenomena I am counting as economic causes.). One economic cause Roy mentions is that certain important American industries depend on war sales to keep going. Huge and expensive plants that are built to produce, for example, missiles, have to sell missiles or else go out of business. Wars are needed to deplete the stocks so that new orders will be placed. The second economic cause is that America completely depends on imported petroleum. This second reason for considering American militarism to be a necessary consequence of its economy is by itself a weak reason because America could buy petroleum without militarily controlling its source, as do many countries which depend on imported petroleum even more completely than the United States does. It becomes a strong reason when it is taken as a premise in a chain of reasoning which also includes other premises that people called “Neocons” hold, such as the premise that America’s enemies might get control of oil supplies and either refuse to sell America oil or bring America to its knees by raising prices. Then the conclusion follows: America must be militarist.
Well both she and the neocons are on the same page.
(he is a professor of peace and global studies)
Roy says in one of her interviews with David Barsamian that militarism has become an economic necessity for the American Empire. I take this statement to be equivalent to saying that economic causes explain American militarism i.e. that for economic reasons there has to be militarism. She suggests two economic causes of militarism. (In addition to these she mentions several aspects of the psychology of daily life that are conducive to paranoia and to nationalist frenzy, both with respect to Indian militarism and with respect to American militarism. I do not count these here as economic causes, although they are no doubt related to the same social structures that produce the phenomena I am counting as economic causes.). One economic cause Roy mentions is that certain important American industries depend on war sales to keep going. Huge and expensive plants that are built to produce, for example, missiles, have to sell missiles or else go out of business. Wars are needed to deplete the stocks so that new orders will be placed. The second economic cause is that America completely depends on imported petroleum. This second reason for considering American militarism to be a necessary consequence of its economy is by itself a weak reason because America could buy petroleum without militarily controlling its source, as do many countries which depend on imported petroleum even more completely than the United States does. It becomes a strong reason when it is taken as a premise in a chain of reasoning which also includes other premises that people called “Neocons” hold, such as the premise that America’s enemies might get control of oil supplies and either refuse to sell America oil or bring America to its knees by raising prices. Then the conclusion follows: America must be militarist.
Well both she and the neocons are on the same page.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- ijaz_gul: "IN THE fullness of... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
- anil: Re: # 57 Massaddi Mian: Please... Why is Karachi Turning
- masadi: #348 laddu writes "Re:... Dhokha and Being a
- ijaz_gul: Re: # 3 majumdar and... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
- masadi: An ilog I posted... Why is Karachi Turning
- masadi: ....not to mention how... Why is Karachi Turning
- masadi: Matloob Zaman writes "In... Why is Karachi Turning
- laddu: Why are Pakis so... Of Medical Students, Passports








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content