unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

The Algebra of Arundhati’s Injudiciousness

Farzana Versey January 23, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 128-144   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#129 Posted by queen_cut_paste on January 25, 2006 1:01:16 pm
#124 and others on this topic. A very interesting issue has been raised.
The problem is more derooted than that Farzana. I could be wrong here (let me give an ametuer`s try)
from a pattern you get a hypothesis. from the hypothesis you get a proposition and or theorem.

Infinite justice cannot be a theorem. It has to be a set (purely based on what you suggest about justice). It is on this set that you define the Algebra. Again, the set ``infinite justice`` can be both infinite dimensional or finite dimensional (a point raised by dotty). The issue gets more complicated if it is infinite dimensional since the algebra on it is diffiult to establish and also difficult to define well defined properties. Alephnull could do the honours here!
The relationship you given has to be established using the Algebra defined on the set of ``infinite justice``. When that is done you have a theorem.


Poor Arundhati Roy could have simply suggested the ``Financial Mathematics of Infinite Justice`` as the title and it would have been understood by many. But going for something which sounds abstruce, she has merely dug herself into a hole of sorts. FInacial Mathematics is what she was suggesting (here first column/article with this title dealt with this aspect of the US policy).

Anyway as HP suggested, will leave to the real expert -like Alephnull (a cantor set if I recall from earlier days), andthe other Alephs, and ofcourse HP him/her_self.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#130 Posted by queen_cut_paste on January 25, 2006 1:06:09 pm
#128 oh dear the old suitably employed do-gooder-troublemaker - cannot even say Sahitya Academi.

I am sure the academi had taken her consent before annoucing the award. AS has been suggested here, she could have said no. But then that is not like her. She is a publicity seeking tramp. So after giving her consent she refused. On the OTHER HAND SHE HAS TAEN THE Chevalier award from the french Govt. An award in Sydney and many other for her writings other than for that book God of small things.

But this is just a small inconvience for the jobless-subsidy-seeking-trouble-makers.

Maybbe Bush should increase their stipend so that they can go on some more jamborees and keep out of mischief.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#131 Posted by HP on January 25, 2006 1:13:27 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#132 Posted by arjun_m on January 25, 2006 1:14:25 pm
#125 by HP on January 25, 2006 11:53am PT

your only exposure to math is when you calculate the 15% tip on fares..do they have a ``math for cab driver dummies`` book or something?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#133 Posted by Saminasha on January 25, 2006 1:14:42 pm
and only a talentless jackass would come up with the clunker ``Financial Mathematics of Infinite Justice`` so that right wing jingoistas who could not understand the poetics of literary language if it were mainlined to them in a Willam Carlos Williams poem would just barely get it...

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#134 Posted by queen_cut_paste on January 25, 2006 1:22:41 pm
come HP you can do better than that (#131). Please do not equate the three of us, I can gaurantee that I am not one of those two. Do not misplace your temper, or high-horsedness. Save for the likes of Alephnull to turn.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#135 Posted by queen_cut_paste on January 25, 2006 1:25:03 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#136 Posted by Saminasha on January 25, 2006 1:28:36 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#137 Posted by dullabhatti on January 25, 2006 1:34:54 pm
samina, if it is upto Roy to accept or refuse the award why you feel compelled to advocate her reasons for refusal here? Laura Bush`s invitation is not same as say invitation from an Art organization that gets federal dollars for promotion of arts in USA under some federal program that may be in place when Bush was still in diapers. It does not make sense for AR to go to a recital invitation offered by RSS chief or Sonia Gandhi...or even Manmohan Singh`s wife.

You fail to acknowledge the difference between:
Government and Country
and further berween country and its institutions.
In democracies public interest institutions come into existence with government money. over time they build credibility and earn respect of their people.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#138 Posted by Saminasha on January 25, 2006 1:55:38 pm
dullah,

you continue to evade my points, so I really don`t see the point in continuing this conversation with you.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#139 Posted by iron_mask on January 25, 2006 2:00:26 pm
har har har. All it needed was a small peeble and the interacts roll on.

Have saminasha, farzana kissed and made up. They seem to be having a good old one-two going on here. and #138 is the classic opt out by DOLE. declare herself a winner when cornered and disappear from the scene for a while.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#140 Posted by sadna on January 25, 2006 2:10:27 pm
Saminasha #128
``I am struck by the rancour that has greeted Roy`s decision.``

Again, as posters keep repeating, the rancour is not about her refusal, it is about her mischaracterisation of the Akademi and its award which is a national award given by fellow literary figures, not a government award.

Those who respect the Sahitya Akademi are going to get angry when simply because it is Roy speaking, a national institution gets painted black in a rather mindless manner. Being female and dissident doesn`t confer infallibility on a person, you know.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#141 Posted by sadna on January 25, 2006 2:26:05 pm
While you wait for math wizards, peoples, kindly understand what are metaphors. When you write `anatomy of a riot` you don`t actually talk of heart, intestines and kidneys of a riot.

Similarly if you write algebra of xyz, you don`t necessarily intend it to be pure math published with equations, you want to say xyz is an aggregation of factors a,b,c. In this case `infinite justice` is obviously a satirical reference to the US`s name for their Afghanistan war and what actually were the factors resulting in this war
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#142 Posted by Saminasha on January 25, 2006 2:30:45 pm
Sadna,

Are you saying that there is just one truth, or only one interpretation of the Sahitya organization or what their award means?

You aren`t, and I understand your position. This understanding, however, does not prevent me from understanding Roy`s position.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#143 Posted by sadna on January 25, 2006 2:41:36 pm
Saminasha #142
Yes, in this case there is only one truth, which is that Arundhati Roy has unnecessarily painted the Sahitya Akademi with the black which she paints government and its policies. She has also painted black her fellow literary figures who are associated with the Akademi and all the work it does on behalf of the nation.

She need not have accepted the reward, but she should not have tried to paint the Akademi with the same brush she paints the government. Her self-righteousness wrt the government doesn`t hurt her credibility as much as her self-righteousness wrt the Akademi which just doesn`t work.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#144 Posted by sadna on January 25, 2006 2:42:33 pm
Correction:She need not have accepted the award, but she should not have tried to paint the Akademi with the same brush she paints the government.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 128-144   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #166 burpinder
    #165 burpinder
    #164 ajeya
    #163 pmishra2
    #162 iron_mask
    #161 masadi
    #160 giani_240
    #159 Saminasha
    #158 sadna
    #157 sadna
    #156 Dash_Dot
    #155 masadi
    #154 nb
    #153 arjun_m
    #152 Saminasha
    #151 arjun_m
    #150 Saminasha
    #149 Saminasha
    #148 sadna
    #147 Saminasha
    #146 iron_mask
    #145 dullabhatti
    #144 sadna
    #143 sadna
    #142 Saminasha
    #141 sadna
    #140 sadna
    #139 iron_mask
    #138 Saminasha
    #137 dullabhatti
    #136 Saminasha
    #135 queen_cut_paste
    #134 queen_cut_paste
    #133 Saminasha
    #132 arjun_m
    #131 HP
    #130 queen_cut_paste
    #129 queen_cut_paste
    #128 Saminasha
    #127 Salim_Chauhan
    #126 Salim_Chauhan
    #125 HP
    #124 FarzanaVersey
    #123 iron_mask
    #122 jang
    #121 Dash_Dot
    #120 sadna
    #119 Saminasha
    #118 Salim_Chauhan
    #117 jang
    #116 Dash_Dot
    #115 arjun_m
    #114 Dash_Dot
    #113 Dash_Dot
    #112 arjun_m
    #111 nandan
    #110 nasah
    #109 sadna
    #108 Zeena
    #107 Zeena
    #106 pokershark
    #105 mujnoon
    #104 antihypochrist
    #103 Saminasha
    #102 Saminasha
    #101 dullabhatti
    #100 Saminasha
    #99 Saminasha
    #98 dullabhatti
    #97 sadna
    #96 Saminasha
    #95 sadna
    #94 sadna
    #93 stuka
    #92 Saminasha
    #91 Saminasha
    #90 sadna
    #89 Saminasha
    #88 Dash_Dot
    #87 Saminasha
    #86 friend
    #85 dullabhatti
    #84 FarzanaVersey
    #83 sadna
    #82 mannyd
    #81 sadna
    #80 Saminasha
    #79 iron_mask
    #78 mannyd
    #77 MantoLives
    #76 mannyd
    #75 MantoLives
    #74 mannyd
    #73 MantoLives
    #72 mannyd
    #71 MantoLives
    #70 pmishra2
    #69 mannyd
    #68 MantoLives
    #67 sadna
    #66 sadna
    #65 iron_mask
    #64 Saminasha
    #63 MantoLives
    #62 iron_mask
    #61 iron_mask
    #60 iron_mask
    #59 Saminasha
    #58 iron_mask
    #57 Saminasha
    #56 Saminasha
    #55 iron_mask
    #54 iron_mask
    #53 iron_mask
    #52 iron_mask
    #51 Saminasha
    #50 Saminasha
    #49 Saminasha
    #48 Saminasha
    #47 mannyd
    #46 mannyd
    #45 MantoLives
    #44 Aisha_Sarwari
    #43 sadna
    #42 mannyd
    #41 Zeena
    #40 Zeena
    #39 nasah
    #38 Zeena
    #37 Zeena
    #36 HP
    #35 Zeena
    #34 Love2love
    #33 Saminasha
    #32 dullabhatti
    #31 dullabhatti
    #30 dullabhatti
    #29 Saminasha
    #28 Zeena
    #27 dullabhatti
    #26 Salim_Chauhan
    #25 Saminasha
    #24 Saminasha
    #23 pokershark
    #22 bongdongs
    #21 arjun_m
    #20 iron_mask
    #19 bbabu
    #18 samosa
    #17 Zeena
    #16 mohar11
    #15 Zeena
    #14 Dash_Dot
    #13 Dash_Dot
    #12 mohar11
    #11 viskash
    #10 hamzaad
    #9 nasah
    #8 nasah
    #7 kalihawa
    #6 mohar11
    #5 parthaab
    #4 arjun_m
    #3 JagdeeshGodbole
    #2 Saminasha
    #1 mohar11

Latest Interacts

  • tahmed32: BJ2: writes "A great... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: #59 maybe india can... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • dost_mittar: hamidm:#58: Going by his lota... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • pinku: #58 Posted by BJ2... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • jang: #59 cheema, you liked... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • akcheema: Re: # 58 Good post... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • hamidm2: Re: # 57 bj mian, ....... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • BJ2: Re: # 13 Harish, I... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • ‘Dustbin of history’ or ‘history of sorts’
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Rape Survivor Families Struggle Against Odds
  • Better Times
  • Love at Shara Zawia
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Changing of the Guard
  • Nuclear Strike Warning or Green Card Application?
  • The Life Hereafter
  • Discrimination Rudolph Giuliani Style
  • Five Solutions Searching For a Problem.

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited