Bhaskar Dasgupta February 7, 2006
#1 Posted by Urstruly on February 7, 2006 11:33:11 am
There is a proverb in urdu language that says that in order to test the rice in a cauldren you only need to taste a few grains from it. If Indian chowk crowd is a representative ``strorm trooper`` outcome of your education system then may God help your country. The only people I see here who are psychotically obssessed with religion, especially other people`s religion, are your countrymen. Your education system may have produced next generation of clerks who use PCs instead of typewriters, and who shout in their cell phones rather than at their chaprasis but it has failed to produce decent human beings. India has probably become the third most corrupt in the nation becuse of your new educated class; with McCauley`s education and with majority illiterate at least there was some degree of honesty but now the sense of right and wrong has been lost. You call this education? So either the crowd here is a product of your education system or they are the people whose unwed mothers leave them on garbage dumps and they somehow survive and grow up hating everyone. Dasgupta sahib take off your horse blinkers and see where your country is standing today. Sure you are making more money now but so does a street thug.
#2 Posted by samosa on February 7, 2006 12:42:55 pm
Is the author going to join the conversations?
Can anyone point out changes that BJP Government introduced in History books while they were in power? I looked online and googled BJP +History +books and all I find is accusations but never a list of changes.
Was history ever revised in text book before BJP government?
Can anyone point out changes that BJP Government introduced in History books while they were in power? I looked online and googled BJP +History +books and all I find is accusations but never a list of changes.
Was history ever revised in text book before BJP government?
#3 Posted by Behram1 on February 7, 2006 2:37:06 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#4 Posted by jang on February 7, 2006 4:18:00 pm
#1 {India has probably become the third most corrupt in the nation becuse of your new educated class; }
why 3rd most corrupt? which are #1 and #2?
why 3rd most corrupt? which are #1 and #2?
#5 Posted by harimau on February 7, 2006 4:50:39 pm
The article is proof that all Bengalis are hopelessly brainwashed.
Nehru had his coterie of left-wing historians write textbooks glorifying the Islamic thugs who ruled India. They were made standard textbooks in schools and colleges and National awards and money were showered on persons like Romila Thapar for their treachery.
If only Indians had been taught the truth about the actions of Islamic thugs in India, we would be rid of the most backward of the 140 million+ Muslims by now. They would all be living in Pakistan or Bangladesh. We would not be wasting money on the Hajj pilgrimage and similar crap. We would not have banned ``Satanic Verses``; instead, we would have a subsidized Eastern Economic Edition printed and sold in India. We would have had army tanks ring any frikking group of people protesting the absolutely fantastic cartoons that Jyllands-Posten had published and at the first sign of stone-throwing, there would be retaliation from the tanks` guns.
Pakistani Butt-Fakhrs (this includes Behram1) and any hand-wringing self-hating Hindu who is sorry he doesn`t have enough females in his family to be raped by Islamic thugs can enroll at Jawaharlal Nehru University and continue to get their daily dose of illusions. Perhaps Jawaharlal Nehru was right: it is easier to brainwash people than to provide them with their daily dose of tranquilizers.
Nehru had his coterie of left-wing historians write textbooks glorifying the Islamic thugs who ruled India. They were made standard textbooks in schools and colleges and National awards and money were showered on persons like Romila Thapar for their treachery.
If only Indians had been taught the truth about the actions of Islamic thugs in India, we would be rid of the most backward of the 140 million+ Muslims by now. They would all be living in Pakistan or Bangladesh. We would not be wasting money on the Hajj pilgrimage and similar crap. We would not have banned ``Satanic Verses``; instead, we would have a subsidized Eastern Economic Edition printed and sold in India. We would have had army tanks ring any frikking group of people protesting the absolutely fantastic cartoons that Jyllands-Posten had published and at the first sign of stone-throwing, there would be retaliation from the tanks` guns.
Pakistani Butt-Fakhrs (this includes Behram1) and any hand-wringing self-hating Hindu who is sorry he doesn`t have enough females in his family to be raped by Islamic thugs can enroll at Jawaharlal Nehru University and continue to get their daily dose of illusions. Perhaps Jawaharlal Nehru was right: it is easier to brainwash people than to provide them with their daily dose of tranquilizers.
#6 Posted by subroto on February 7, 2006 4:56:33 pm
Interesting write-up but have you written it completely free of any bias from your side ;-)
#3 Its rather sad that you are out to ruin this board with your scatalogical obsession and even more sadder when i realise that you are probably one of the older (age wise) interactors here.
#3 Its rather sad that you are out to ruin this board with your scatalogical obsession and even more sadder when i realise that you are probably one of the older (age wise) interactors here.
#7 Posted by bjkumar on February 7, 2006 5:04:06 pm
Beads, the concerns expressed here may have been legitimate at some point but are now obsolete (or about to become so) due to the internet - because in future, such information will never be gathered from just one source - so better accuracy will automatically ensue. If individual countries revisit their textbooks to more closely align contents with actual facts, that will result into a more uniform account of history - assuming that history really matters in this day and age - I am beginning to doubt that because the world has changed so much in the recent past and continues to change at such rapid pace that there are few historical precedents to guide us.
In the meanwhile, there is little to be gained by ``rubbing it in`` to our Pakistani friends - they know in their hearts what they have missed out. On an individual basis, there is little difference between the capabilities of the Indians and the Pakistanis - each one can shine (or stink) as much as the other - but as our friend HP so confidently pronounced on another board - size matters, and that holds for populations as well.
Indians` size is greater and that is simply a fact of life!
#8 Posted by subroto on February 7, 2006 9:06:49 pm
Wll then maybe Nehru was right - for a nation to go forward it was time to stop dwelling on past injustices (real or perceived). Blaming and maligning any community is not going to help.
#9 Posted by harimau on February 7, 2006 10:34:39 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#10 Posted by Ramanujan on February 7, 2006 11:14:13 pm
harimau,
My bengali friends tell me that in any fair election the commie ba$tards would lose hands down.
The comrades have come up with ways to rig an election that would put Lalu to shame.
Apparently comrade Subroto is an exception, not the rule.
My bengali friends tell me that in any fair election the commie ba$tards would lose hands down.
The comrades have come up with ways to rig an election that would put Lalu to shame.
Apparently comrade Subroto is an exception, not the rule.
#11 Posted by burpinder on February 8, 2006 2:41:15 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#12 Posted by harish_hyd on February 8, 2006 2:59:00 am
#4 by jang
[why 3rd most corrupt? which are #1 and #2?]
Bangladesh and Chad are the most corrupt (#1) countries ranked at 158, Pakistan is at 144 (marginally better than Bangladesh), while India is at 88. That explains Urstruly`s heartburn.
[why 3rd most corrupt? which are #1 and #2?]
Bangladesh and Chad are the most corrupt (#1) countries ranked at 158, Pakistan is at 144 (marginally better than Bangladesh), while India is at 88. That explains Urstruly`s heartburn.
#13 Posted by haideri on February 8, 2006 6:35:39 am
#12
Just googled ``Most corrupt countries in the world`` and this is the first record I got.
href=``http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/08/29/corrupt.index
``HONG KONG, China (CNN) -- Bangladesh and Indonesia are ranked among the world`s most corrupt countries, according to an annual survey by German-based Transparency International.
In the Asia Pacific region, New Zealand and Singapore were amongst the least corrupt countries while Australia, Hong Kong and Japan also had low levels of perceived corruption.
At the other end of the scale, Bangladesh and Indonesia were joined by Vietnam, Pakistan, the Philippines and India as being considered highly corrupt.
Covering 102 nations, the Corruption Perceptions Index claims to ``reflect perceived levels of corruption among politicians and public officials.``
It is based on 15 surveys from nine institutions and includes the perceptions of country analysts and the business community both resident and expatriate. ``
haideri
Just googled ``Most corrupt countries in the world`` and this is the first record I got.
href=``http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/08/29/corrupt.index
``HONG KONG, China (CNN) -- Bangladesh and Indonesia are ranked among the world`s most corrupt countries, according to an annual survey by German-based Transparency International.
In the Asia Pacific region, New Zealand and Singapore were amongst the least corrupt countries while Australia, Hong Kong and Japan also had low levels of perceived corruption.
At the other end of the scale, Bangladesh and Indonesia were joined by Vietnam, Pakistan, the Philippines and India as being considered highly corrupt.
Covering 102 nations, the Corruption Perceptions Index claims to ``reflect perceived levels of corruption among politicians and public officials.``
It is based on 15 surveys from nine institutions and includes the perceptions of country analysts and the business community both resident and expatriate. ``
haideri
#14 Posted by jang on February 8, 2006 7:35:32 am
actually what i dont understand is why is urstruly is using a ``western neo-imperialist`` standard (i.e. corruption). should not the quality of education be evaluated on more relevant measures such as how ``just and godfearing`` the society has become, or maybe per-capita jihadi quotient?
i find one refreshing change (dont know if its due to education system)..more people seem to indulge in classical arts of india, such as the music and dance than ever before. less refreshing is rise of (at least not fall of) mysticism among the educated; e.g., ``vastu`` knowledge is a must for any practicing architect more than understanding of bulding code.
overall, the education system is far from a success, not so much from quality but quantity perspective of getting 10 years of universal education..say equivalent to sri lanka or kerala.
i find one refreshing change (dont know if its due to education system)..more people seem to indulge in classical arts of india, such as the music and dance than ever before. less refreshing is rise of (at least not fall of) mysticism among the educated; e.g., ``vastu`` knowledge is a must for any practicing architect more than understanding of bulding code.
overall, the education system is far from a success, not so much from quality but quantity perspective of getting 10 years of universal education..say equivalent to sri lanka or kerala.
#15 Posted by Urstruly on February 8, 2006 9:14:46 am
Re: # 14
There is two kind of education. One may be called the Vocational Education, for lack of better words. If we set this as a standard of education then there is virtually no one illiterate in the world. For example, a farmer, who has never seen the inside of a school, may know his vocation very well; sometimes so well that he may be able to teach a thing or two to the so called agriculture engineers. Similarly, a sweeper who sweeps the streets and cleans gutters knows his vocation very well though he never learnt it in the schools. If we extend this logic further, all the engineers, doctors, MBAs, computer programers, and lawyers even when their education was far more structured than that of farmer, cobbler or sweeper have only the vocational education. That is the point author was trying to make when he pointed out to McCaulay`s education system that was pointed towards training slave minded drones for the British imperialism. While he correctly pointed out to the ideological bend that education has taken in Pakistan, he failed to differentiate between education in India and how it has changed from McCauly`s making of vocational drones and the education of today that created another set of vocational drones.
To me there is more to education. The core principle of education should be to enhance our awareness of self. That is an attribute that separates us from animals, that we can visualize and analyze ourselves as a third person. This is the attribute that allows us to judge between right and wrong. This is what makes us better human beings from just being men. The education of religion is only one part of it. While religion gives us the moral frame work only the self-awareness gives us the tools to build our character around that framework.
The education system in Pakistan in this respect even with the ideological bend failed because of the immorality, cowardice and dishonesty of those on the helm, so it did not give us self-awareness whereas in India it failed to start in the first place. So the end result is that the two countries are producing vocational drones. You create more than us, that`s all.
#16 Posted by jang on February 8, 2006 9:44:01 am
``To me there is more to education. The core principle of education should be to enhance our awareness of self.``
look, its simpler..the nai, mochi and the mali, simply lack tools to read, acquire knowledge and enhance their own knowledge, however romantic you find it. a basic 10 year education simply gives you the tools..you can then get awareness or simple hygine...the educated needs the basic tools oa acquiring more info that HE chooses. trying to make a better person thru education brings in ideology, and theirin is a big problem..what is the right ideology.
mbas and coomupter literate simply are armed with tools, its upto them what they do with them.
look, its simpler..the nai, mochi and the mali, simply lack tools to read, acquire knowledge and enhance their own knowledge, however romantic you find it. a basic 10 year education simply gives you the tools..you can then get awareness or simple hygine...the educated needs the basic tools oa acquiring more info that HE chooses. trying to make a better person thru education brings in ideology, and theirin is a big problem..what is the right ideology.
mbas and coomupter literate simply are armed with tools, its upto them what they do with them.
listing 1-16
1 2
Interact Index
Also by Bhaskar Dasgupta
Similar Articles
- Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses Dost Mittar
- Feminist Mumbo-Jumbo! Pranay Rupani
- Translation of a (Love) Letter by Allama Iqbal to Miss Atiya Faizi Asif Naqshbandi
- Fields Of Joy Umer Murtaza
- Time for Musharraf to Quit saeed qureshi
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- mullah_toofani: Masadi baitay, You seem like... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: g'night... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: In #22 "facing" not... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: Give a free reign... Translation of a (Love)
- mullah_toofani: In my humble mind,... Translation of a (Love)
- aaendra: Mullah Sahab Zindabad, Allah... Feminist Mumbo-Jumbo!
- tahir: Re: # 418 Stutter-2 Will... Of Medical Students, Passports
- tahir: Well, THIS was the... Translation of a (Love)








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content