Love Ya, Dubya

Re: # 59
I was begining to think that you might be getting serious about hating us folks.)))

I`ll take it with a grin and tonic, since you`re not a single malt type. Now if Behram the sugarcane magnate were to provide some real ``ganne ka ras`` instead of Texas rotgut, that would be fine too.

And now you`ve got me thinking about what I don`t have .To paraphrase Mark Knopfler
`` I want my two way radiooooooooooo`` and of course
Money for nothing ..... you know the rest, I suppose.

Our George of the Jungle has blood on his hand and pieces of human flesh on his shoes...

he has come to Pakistan and India in the hope that the two will clean his stinking shoes and hand him desi towels to wipe his bloody hands...

and of course the passive aggressive sub continentals will clean his shit, bathe him and sanitize him to make him a little presentable to his own people in the US (34% and falling) -- and to the world at large -- where he is one of the most despised leaders that ever came out of the wonderland of Jefferson and Washington.....

whether the Dr Strangeloves of Indian nuke and Missile establishments get their hands in the US nukear cookie jar or not -- or whether Petulant Pervez`s permanently perpetual dreaming of Kashmir gets him a Virtual Valley on a virtual US platter -- or not.....

the hand & feet washing ceremonies will be performed for Dubya the Disgraced Devo in India and Dubya the Demented Deliverer in Pakistan...

…....after all Bush`s British Butlers ruled India for 150 years -- not for nothin....

How deluded can you get? You really think you`re going to get an inch of Indian Kashmir?

Bush should be talking Kashmir

ISLAMABAD (APP) - President General Pervez Musharraf has said he expects US President George W Bush to use his influence to help settle the Kashmir dispute because “now is the ideal time and ideal environment to resolve it”.
“My expectations are that he should be talking of Kashmir, and resolution of Kashmir and putting his weight behind resolution of the issue,” he said in an interview to BBC ahead of a visit by the US president to Pakistan.
Asked if he expected any breakthrough on Kashmir the president said: “Breakthrough will not come through President Bush’s visit. Breakthrough will come when Pakistan and India agree to resolve the dispute and move ahead.
“All that I expect is his (Bush’s) weight, his voice, pressurising all three groups: me, the Indians, and Kashmiris, to resolve the dispute, now, because now is the ideal time and ideal environment to resolve it.
“He (Bush) should put his weight behind it. And when I say weight really it means he must use all influence that we sit at the table and resolve the dispute.”

#63

It is a generation of ideological fools like yourself that got us into this. We got a whole lot of chest swelling pride when Indira embraced a terrorist Arafat on the NAM stage for the whole world to see, but what the heck did we get out of the senile fool Gujral embracing Saddam other than putting a smile on the face of some JNU-walla as he read the ``The Hindu`` in the loo?

``Pani mein rehke magarmach se bair nahin karte``, If Dubya lets us import a few thousand tonnes of Niger-ian yellowcake and a few thousand megawatts of Westinghouse and Toshiba reactors (of course with EXIM bank funding), I`ll cook prime-rib barbeque on the steps of Kashi ghat for him myself.

``If that is indeed the case, I would like to ask my government just how much are these blokes investing in their home country? How are they doing India proud? How many Indians take part in protest movements within the United Sates or even support them? ``

is every NRI obligated to invest in india ???

also what has indias military budget to do with dubya`s visit???

this article comes out as a pent up anger towards bush and nri`s and indian establishment.

Re: # 59

``I know most Indians don’t have slavish mentality and are nice folks.``

How did you come to this conclusion? Do you know 600 million Indians? (``Most`` ... is more than half, right?).

``..... but what goes around comes around too. Just take it with a boulder of salt and grin:) ``. Am grinning!

``My point was about polling and how many Indians actually know Bush or can talk about America to say that 70% like the US and 54% love Dubya!. ``

Where did you learn statistics? Statistics is a science ... and it is little bit more than ``I know``. Pew probably modelled the survey to correct for the urban/rural, income level, education levels etc. Please, don`t try .... ``statistics is what you want to beleive``, etc.

Re: # 63

Yea I have time, I`ve just blown 5000 bucks worth of hardware...

Nasah sir
Why hide your bruised broken bedraggled body and your aggrievedly abnormal alliterative angst in prose? Let`s have a poem in the vein of Godfrey Gordon Gustavus gore ,,,,was a boy who`d never shut the door.
You could start with ...

Bush who`s budding British Butler Blair
Was prone to lie with characteristic flair..

It may not scan but it rhymes.....

Re: # 59
``Giani, ``et tu a closet communalist ?``
That beast is found only in India.... ``

That`s probably true. What is your preference? Closet communalists or the ``out in the open, running around with guns,stone to death or beheading`` kinda communalists?I am sure you also know where the later kind are found. Hint: Go west, young man!

#63 by nasah on March 1, 2006 2:10pm PT


Our George of the Jungle has blood on his hand and pieces of human flesh on his shoes...


So does the saudi king...I`m still trying to find a post from you denoucing his visit...

Fellow chowkis, may I recommend this excellent reading from BBC (Farzana, please do so too)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4760124.stm

#70

You are too green.....Idiot! Looks like your hiney takes a little time to burn....

Re: # 56

``The present Indian visit has Indians fantasising about better financial deals, but for Bush is just to reassure himself and his people that they have the largest democracy on their side. ``

on their side??? on what issue. also how does that matter??? india is not an security council member (has no veto power), imports more than it exports to u.s., is significantly dependent on u.s. economics to sustain its 7-8% growth.

every one knows that business will come only when we are able to deliver not because bush came to india. the point is indians would rather take a practical approach towards world issues rather than be eat empty slogans for dinner.


``If Bush does not care about Blairs opinion on world affairs, why ever should he care about Manmohan Singhs or Sonias?``

who in his right frame of mind thinks bush would???
hence what the point of antagonising (by hugging ``angry`` ahmed/saddam) when he (bush) is anyway not going to heed?
manmohan should only care about indias future.

``As for financial deals, Indian IT sector will continue to thrive irrespective of Bush, simply because of econmics and not so called friendship. ``

not if the beggar commies and mullahs start throwing anti-us fit in internatinal foras like ahmed.

InYourFace
# 69

HP does not need to go west. He needs to look out his window

Re: # 73

Indian may not be a security council member, but just meeting Manmohan Singh, Bush will be able to show himself as acceptable to the `non christian` world, if not to the muslims or the Buddhists, atheists or indeed, moderate Hindus.

Re: # 75

``but just meeting Manmohan Singh, Bush will be able to show himself as acceptable to the `non christian` world``

acceptable as what ????? as a president of usa or as a person or as a christian????

may be he should have gone to meet the shankaryacharya too.....

anyway, irrespective of whether he wants to show himself acceptable to a hindoo, a jain or a parsis, india should treat him as a representative of usa. he has come to india as a leader of american people not as an representative of any particular religion.

he is the most powerful man in the world. it doesn`t mean that you have to grovel in front of him but you can`t be stupid enough to rub him the wrong way when, infact he is extending co-operation and partnership.

jsut ask dawood, how his fortunes have turned since bush put him on the international terrorist list.

abey HP, you are losing your touch ;-) ..check out some websites from dalit for ammo

What i find unfair is the way western media treats protests. Protests in India are shown as symbols of a mature democracy, and commentors nod their heads in unison saying many americans also dont exactly agree with bush .. in short they see commonality.

A simple KFC burning in Lahore OTOH is shown as manifestation of intolerance, jihadi support for 9/11 and 3/11 and osama at worst and manipulations by mushy at best.

This just sucks :(