unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Why is Bush so Keen on a Nuke Deal ?

nabendu debsharma March 3, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 96-112   1 2 3 4 5 6 7

#11 Posted by KaalChakra on March 3, 2006 11:35:26 am
The reference there was to iron_mask`s # 5.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by KaalChakra on March 3, 2006 11:33:35 am
Presumptuous though it may sound, that is of some concern for the US.

Overall, this is a great deal for the US, and a pretty good one for Indians. India should hope to grow into an economic competitor for the US. There is no reason for the US and India to be in opposing ideological or military `camps.`

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by Kulharee on March 3, 2006 11:33:37 am
The deal is great on many fronts. Firstly and foremostly, it will ease the dependence on oil for such a robust and fast growing economy. Secondly, it brings two super-powers closer. Bush will soon be in Islamabad; may be Bush and Mush can sign a deal for opening up hog farming in Pakistan and other issues of bilateral importance; including opening up some schools in Pakistan teaching tolerance and respect of other faiths. If I am not mistaken there are no such schools there. And I really and sincerely hope that Bush raises the question of minorities in Pakistan that have always gotten a raw deal by the Mullah run country. I see Bush as the leader of the free world, and I hope I am not disappointed by him. So far I am very proud of him. He is doing one hell of a job. Long live Bush and God bless the United States.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by soysauce on March 3, 2006 11:30:04 am
Ferinstance, what iron_mask (#5) has posted deepens the mystery still. It actually says india may not at all need this deal and that`s why they made the deal.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by soysauce on March 3, 2006 11:27:12 am
Bongdongs, the iraq war too is a mystery to me and reading everything I could get my hands on hasn`t helped.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by parthaab on March 3, 2006 11:24:12 am
I absolutely agree. However much the right wing media in India is jubiliant in allying with the fanatical Bush, for the Americans, after 911 and Guantenamo, its plain economics and need to show itself in the company of respectable nations.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by bongdongs on March 3, 2006 11:15:50 am
#4

If its a mystery to you, then read more and try to understand instead of regurgitating trite arguments(?).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by iron_mask on March 3, 2006 10:56:14 am
According to the Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/india/story/0,,1722312,00.html)

Spinning a web for India

Underneath fuzzy talk of shared values, President Bush`s real concern is to hobble a potential rival

world away from its self-declared international war on terror, Washington has spied greater and more potent threats on the horizon. India`s nuclear programme - built in isolation, from scratch, after American-imposed sanctions in the 70s - is such a threat.
Not only has a poverty-stricken country, without outside help, built a nuclear industry, but its scientific establishment has also mastered the technically difficult reprocessing cycle and achieved a series of unique breakthroughs in nuclear technology. India might one day be ``free`` to assemble as large an atomic arsenal as possible and, even more problematic for Washington, end up with a monopoly on an energy source of the future.


By comparison America has not built a nuclear reactor for three decades, since the Three Mile Island scare of the late 1970s. Conscious of being dependent on oil in a time of rising prices, George Bush decided to reactivate the country`s nuclear programme and capture the benefits of the labour of others. It is this that informs American thinking on how to deal with incipient risks to its global dominance, not some fuzzy talk of a special relationship with India built on a sense of shared values.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by soysauce on March 3, 2006 10:34:58 am
Actually this whole nucular deal is a mystery to me -why the US is eager to sell & why india is eager to buy. India`s record on hazardous waste is horrendous and nuclear waste will only add to the pollution. Sure, ways of power generation have to be found, but india should be on the leading edge of sustainable power development such as wind, tidal, solar and micro-hydel but instead we are trying to run before we can learn to walk.
On the part of the US, it`s little skin off Bush`s nose. Between now and when the deal is ratified (if it is ratified), the war industry will make a killing selling hi-tech weaponry to india and down the line, it will use india as the bogeyman to sell more of the same to pakistan.
So long as there is a huge technological gap and a desire to own the latest, india will be in the debt of the war industry of the west.
If instead the PM could have wrangled a half a million H1B visas in exchange for some IAEA inspection, it would have made a lot of fiscal and common sense.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by jang on March 3, 2006 10:33:14 am
the nuke deal was first proposed by india as a way to forward the strategic relationship ahead in concrete terms. there was a general agreement that the indo-us strategic relationship needs to go forward..NATO style alliance was out of the Q, and india was very allergic to anything which openly was posed as anti-china..blackwill comment: the fastest way to empty a drawing room in dilli is to say ``bulwark against china``. this deal was proposed and was accepted as a novel way to move forward strategic alliance without an overt relationship (i.e. like ``non-nato ally`` etc).

dhanda-pani, people-poeple etc is on its own track anyways..what was missing was a strategic relationship.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by arjun_m on March 3, 2006 10:18:19 am
#1 by masadi on March 3, 2006 10:06am PT


``Big business`` doesn`t have to pressure Bush on India, the Indians are falling all over themselves to the point of selling their mothers to get big business in.


Comrade masadi....Isn`t that just sour grapes now that India signed a nuclear deal which isn`t on the table for Pakiland..It`s not like Pakiland doesn`t want the deal either..

Pakistan not against deal, wants same

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan said on Thursday it was not against a civilian nuclear deal between the United States and India and demanded the same facility for Pakistan.


People who let foreign powers bomb and kill their citizens on their soil without so much as demanding an apology shouldn`t really be talking about selling their mothers...Isn`t selling your mother better than giving her away for free?


The US has always treated Pakistan as a whore,


A whore gets to pick her clients..and she sets her own rates..A condom, on the other hand..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by masadi on March 3, 2006 10:06:18 am
``Big business`` doesn`t have to pressure Bush on India, the Indians are falling all over themselves to the point of selling their mothers to get big business in. The ``big business`` in the US practically ``owns`` congress so there is no trouble there. Bush is courting India as a future bulwark against China. Pakistan due to its size cannot fulfill a similar role as India can against China ( even though the Chinese are going to kick the Indian`s a$$es at will regardless of any US deal), and thus Pakistan doesn`t enjoy equal status with the US regardless of how frequently Musharraf kisses GWB`s behind. The US has always treated Pakistan as a whore, for its own purpose, used and discarded upon need, always giving greater importance to India for its own selfish reasons, in my opinion.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 96-112   1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Interact Index

    #107 sanjay
    #106 harish_hyd
    #105 rsridhar
    #104 arjun_m
    #103 nasah
    #102 nasah
    #101 soysauce
    #100 soysauce
    #99 rsridhar
    #98 arjun_m
    #97 rsridhar
    #96 arjun_m
    #94 nasah
    #95 nabendu
    #93 rsridhar
    #92 rsridhar
    #91 mohar11
    #90 mohar11
    #89 arjun_m
    #88 bongdongs
    #87 nasah
    #86 bongdongs
    #85 nasah
    #84 arjun_m
    #83 bongdongs
    #82 nasah
    #81 arjun_m
    #80 harish_hyd
    #79 bbabu
    #78 rsridhar
    #77 rsridhar
    #76 sanjay
    #75 harimau
    #74 sanjay
    #73 sanjay
    #72 Ranjit
    #71 sanjay
    #70 bbabu
    #69 arjun_m
    #68 Dash_Dot
    #67 Dash_Dot
    #65 arjun_m
    #63 Ranjit
    #62 parthaab
    #64 mohar11
    #61 sanjay
    #60 harimau
    #59 harimau
    #58 harimau
    #56 sanjay
    #57 ballukhan
    #55 nasah
    #66 mohar11
    #54 sanjay
    #53 sanjay
    #52 bbabu
    #51 ahmedmadani
    #50 nasah
    #49 rsridhar
    #48 bongdongs
    #47 swarrier
    #45 soysauce
    #46 swarrier
    #42 bongdongs
    #44 swarrier
    #43 swarrier
    #41 Dash_Dot
    #40 soysauce
    #39 Netizen
    #38 dullabhatti
    #37 bongdongs
    #36 KaalChakra
    #31 parthaab
    #35 Netizen
    #32 chaltahai
    #34 Kulharee
    #30 KaalChakra
    #29 soysauce
    #28 chaltahai
    #27 soysauce
    #26 soysauce
    #25 bongdongs
    #24 KaalChakra
    #23 soysauce
    #22 iron_mask
    #21 bongdongs
    #20 Kulharee
    #19 soysauce
    #18 KaalChakra
    #17 bongdongs
    #16 soysauce
    #15 bongdongs
    #33 Netizen
    #13 mohar11
    #12 soysauce
    #14 Kulharee
    #11 KaalChakra
    #10 KaalChakra
    #10 Kulharee
    #9 soysauce
    #8 soysauce
    #7 parthaab
    #6 bongdongs
    #5 iron_mask
    #4 soysauce
    #3 jang
    #2 arjun_m
    #1 masadi

Latest Interacts

  • anil: Tahmed sahib: May be Hamidm... Why Zardari Should Be
  • tahmed32: in #59, para 5... Why Zardari Should Be
  • tahmed32: anil sahib: i hope... Why Zardari Should Be
  • tahmed32: hamidm #53 actually i... Why Zardari Should Be
  • anil: Hamidm sahib: I do not... Why Zardari Should Be
  • anil: Tahmed sahib: After Zardari’s election,... Why Zardari Should Be
  • bubba: Re: # 77 Posted... US Commando Strike in
  • hellbound: and YLH I still... Why Zardari Should Be

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • Free to Breed
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Bihari Refugees
  • The Basanti Dye
  • Building Homes and Building Software
  • Me and My Creator
  • A Conversation with Hanif Kureishi

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited