Kibbutz Criminals

Comparing today’s Muslims with the modern Jews is fundamentally wrong as both groups belong to different social backgrounds. Jews in the US are former Europeans. They moved from one industrialized society to another super industrialized society.

The Arabs or Muslims whether they live in the ME or India, are still part of the tribal societies. Despite their persecution in Europe and to some extent in the US too, Jews were able to get good education and a largely stable family life because the system was open enough for them to take advantage of. Both modern societies taught Jews modern means of making money and excelling in business through creating first class networks.

The difference in background makes them take different approaches to the issues or generally in all political matters. The education and modern societies teach people to adapt to situations and take diplomatic way in resolving issues. Tribal, semi tribal or the feudal societies don’t place a whole lot of emphasis on diplomacy and often resort to violence to resolve issues.

So the Muslims are too backward to compete with Jews in terms of creating a message.
Muslims are not one political or geographical entity. So there can never be one message.


“There is a lesson in this for the Muslims to acquire the two ‘P’s: public relations and a good dose of persecution.”

PR is a primitive word itself. You lobby for your interests. FV has not defined who Muslims should lobby or point their PR/lobbying campaigns too. Should that effort be pointed at the US government or the effort should be made to change the public opinion about Muslims. And finally, who is going to do that. Every Muslim country has its own relationship with the US/West. Muslims are not in one country nor are they one entity to send one message out. Saudis would lobby for their interests and the Indonesians would lobby for their own benefit. Both countries have different issues and different economic relationship with the US or other western countries.

Think about the South American countries. They are pretty much all Christian but their relations with the West or the US are not similar so they will do their own lobbying.

You see the whole Idea of Muslim nation and one Muslim effort has no value. It is naïve to even suggest that Muslims can lobby to gain some ground over the Jews.
Jews are part of the Western culture. They communicate with the West as Westerns and have cultural affinity despite some severe issues in the 40s.

Guilt dominates the current relations between the Jews, Israelis and the West. If the Jews were persecuted in some African and Asian country, the west would have sympathized with them, would have had some empathy towards them but the relations would have been entirely different.

The West does not have any Guilt relationship with the countries they colonized and in some instance brutally colonized. So even though the persecution factor was there the associated guilt was not. It is more of cultural affinity thing than anything else.

Re: # 64

Its funny how India is never seen as a Hindu state with the bomb, is nt it, even after Gujarat 2002, Bombay 1992 Delhi 1984 and the pathetic state of minority rights in India, not to speak of its religiously biased policy whether in Kashmir or Pakistan.

There is no doubt the media does play a vital role.

I disagree with that last line of the article.

Seriously, Muslims need just one P - Power, acquisition of which will help them more than all the things they do now.

Other than that, another P will help immensely - Planned Parenthood:)

#66 by parthaab on March 22, 2006 2:44pm PT

so why is the paki bomb seen as the islamic bomb? perhaps it`s cos the pakis made it that way themselves..

#68 LOL

Re: # 24
Actually that has been changed recently. Sikh Gangs are getting very prevalent in Vancouver area and one Sikh boy(non practicing) was caught selling Bhang in Queens.

#67 ``P - Power``

we have enough of that power-hunger in the muslim world. how about an ``E`` for Elections instead??

From the article:

{{For example, can you ever imagine a Jewish Mob?}}

There was in fact an active Jewish Mob in the US in the early decades of the last century. Its best-known figures were Meyer Lansky and Benjamin (‘Bugsy’) Siegel. This is not esoteric information – it’s very well known. In this, Jews were simply emulating other ‘ethnic’ immigrant groups making a living in the large cities of the New World, like the roughly contemporaneous Italian immigration, and the Irish before them.

What distinguished the Jews as a community from other waves of ethnic immigration to the US was that they possessed in greater measure the cultural DNA needed to move rapidly out of the traditional urban immigrant niches, into the professions and into legitimate and safe but still lucrative business.

More contemporary examples of mafioso-type figures of Jewish background can be found among the oligarchs of Yeltsin-era Russia. The best known of these was Boris Berezovsky.

Jewish people can been found in all fields of human endeavour, whether legitimate or illegitimate, constructive or destructive. They are just like other human beings, only more so.

{{Can we see any identity for them beyond the rabbi, the kibbutz, the Holocaust?}}

This comment reveals more about the author than it does about Jews.

Re: # 71

Your prescription for ``E`` and the 3 ``R`` is what we need to accept..............and more importantly we need to fire the self proclaimed PR guys like OBL and his band of global Jehadis...........rest would automatically follow from the good work done by muslim professionals who are already working and competing with the Europeans, Japanese and Americans in the modern economies..........and we need to encourage out of box thinking instead of prescribing more collective noding of the heads as it only encourages dumbing of the Ummah..............

Re: # 71

By ``Power`` I didn`t imply hunger for power in terms of dictatorships etc. What I implied was having a ``powerful economy``, ``powerful democracy`` etc. So E for Elections certainly is part of that.

for the Tough Jews like Rich Cohen -- the toughest Jews were even tougher than the Nazis......against the `tough` Palestinians -- except for the ovens....

a lot of `tough` Nazis has rubbed on the `tough` zionists -- thank you God of Sharon`s Israel.

but then again -- not all jews are zionists....or Meyer Lansky either......

This is a must read article for those who still think that muslims need not get worried about the propaganda by the mullahs about their `false` identity within a western culture............

The Suicide Bomber and the Leap of Faith
Stephen Gallagher

---

The following article is from Volume 26, Issue 1 of Free Inquiry

---

Without risk there is no faith, and the greater the risk the greater the faith.

—Sören Kierkegaard



Who are these new possessed who think anything is

permitted, not because God doesn’t exist, but precisely because He exists and this existence drives them to

madness?

—Bernard-Henri Lévy



Suicide bombing is the targeted use of self-destructing human beings against noncombatants (“soft targets”), most often with the ostensible purpose of effecting geopolitical change. It is a psychological weapon, aimed not so much at a given bombing’s immediate victims but rather at the larger audience made to witness it. This deep understanding of the need to force others to witness makes the suicide bomber, by definition, a modern protagonist.

There are other levels of this modernity that bear close investigation. Why? Because to explain suicide bombings with reference to any single, overt “cause”—poverty, the Palestine question, or a reaction to Islamic eclipse—is to miss their essential nature. There are other things going on here.


Who Are They?



I feel it is naïve, perhaps even dangerous, to think in terms of a precise “profile” of the suicide bomber. Still, the phenomenon has been with us long enough for certain trends to emerge.



The experience of the suicide bomber has a coherent and rational connection to the rest of his (and, increasingly, her) life, concerns, and values, and general sense of how the world works. One key motivator is a profound dissatisfaction with, and alienation from, contemporary secular society. What little research there is (it’s tough to find subjects, since most of them blow themselves to bits) suggests that these suicide bombers have no appreciable psychopathology and are at least as well-off and well-educated as the surrounding populations. The suicide bomber tends to be older, better-educated, more widely traveled and well-read, and more sophisticated than those populations.



Suicide bombers apparently span the whole spread of their societies’ normal distribution in terms of education, age, socioeconomic status, and personality type. Their religiosity appears to be no more radical or strong than the surrounding population (which may be an alarming fact in itself, but that is another discussion). Bombers are generally men aged eighteen to forty (though there was a flurry of young, female bombers at one point). They express no socially dysfunctional attributes or suicidal symptoms.



With suicide bombers, then, the central challenge is to decipher why educated, nonpathological individuals respond in such a way, and in such numbers. Why this act? One would expect people like that to think twice about dying. Apparently not. Or maybe they did think twice—and did it anyway. Other than the one, final horror, the final exclamation point on an otherwise ordinary life, the suicide bomber as a type appears to be completely normal. Then why?

I would argue that a large part of what we are seeing is a deep philosophical hunger: a hunger for a simple, Manichean worldview; a hunger for an unconditional encounter with the real and a craving for an irrevocable decision. In some of the most unstable parts of the world, it is, not surprisingly, the most educated and worldly who will often feel this lack of decision, this lack of certainty—an ache in the soul, born of a deep intolerance of ambiguity coupled with an unquenchable hunger.



As if on cue, the unquiet ghost of Sayyid Qutb appears on the scene to feed that hunger.



Qutb



Contrary to the simplistic view that suicide terrorism is the tainted fruit of “Wahhabism,” I would argue that the new, virulent strain of Islamist fundamentalism that fuels suicide terrorism is made up not of people who are Wahhabis but people whom I suggest we should consider calling “Qutbists.” Intriguingly, Qutbism is not an indigenous growth. It is an exotic hybrid, bred from the encounter of a brilliant Islamic intellectual with some familiar, radical Western ideas. Middle East scholar Malise Ruthven has shown that Sayyid Qutb, the most influential philosopher of radical Islam, incorporated many elements derived from European ideology into his thinking. For example, the idea of a revolutionary vanguard of militant believers really has no grounding in traditional Islamic thought. It is a “concept imported from Europe, through a lineage that stretches back to the Jacobins, through the Bolsheviks and latter-day Marxist guerrillas such as the Baader-Meinhof gang.”



Unpacking Ruthven’s analysis, we are able to see the very close affinities between Qutb’s flavor of Islamist fundamentalism and many of our old friends in the modern existentialist pantheon. Qutb draws his ideas and inspiration not from the Qur’an but from the main themes of thinkers such as Nietzsche, Heidegger, and, perhaps most significantly, Kierkegaard. Qutb’s philosophy, which is nothing less than the template for all of current Islamist radicalism, is informed much more by the twentieth century’s experience of the death of God than by anything to be found in the Qur’an.



In his earlier writings, Qutb was heavily influenced by Western individualism and existentialism. In common with many Arab intellectuals of his era, Qutb traveled and even lived in America, earning a master’s degree in Colorado in the late 1940s. His personal encounter with America was somewhat less positive than his educational encounter. It has always been an American conceit to pretend to be shocked—shocked, mind you—that the September 11 hijackers could have lived among us and yet still hated us, instead of fulfilling the archetypal myth of falling in love with America and its values. This should not be surprising when one considers that Qutb, their philosophical master, lived in America and found himself horrified and disgusted. America’s secularism and freedoms, especially sexual freedom, sent him back to Egypt in a dark mood of hatred and disgust.



Once back in the Middle East, he slowly assembled an enormous, internally consistent philosophical interrogation of the entire modern world. In Qutb’s view, humanity had reached a crisis stage. Humanity had lost touch with its own nature—which is to say, its own religious nature. Sexual relations had deteriorated to a level lower than animalistic. Life was an endless round of skeptical contingency, filled with anxiety, misery, and insecurity. He was onto something here that many can recognize: the sense that true human nature and the modern world have gotten out of joint, indeed are at war with each other. Qutb brilliantly articulated the disconnect felt by so many of his suicidal followers, the pain of being thrown into a world of secular and liberal values while dreaming of a completely different world. Qutb simply experienced and analyzed this insight in distinctly Muslim terms. Or did he?



I recently stumbled across a passage from Sayyid Qutb that encapsulates his assessment of American religion during his years in Colorado: “Nobody goes to church as often as Americans do, yet no one is as distant as they are from the spiritual aspect of religion.” Sound like anyone we know? Think of Kierkegaard, critiquing the easy religiosity of his Northern European contemporaries. I detect a strong “family resemblance” here.



The Gloomy Dane



Like Qutb, Kierkegaard felt that the people he dealt with every day went to church a lot but had not a clue in the world about the essence of true religiosity. While it is true that Kierkegaard is referring to the sort of typical anemic Northern European Lutheranism common in his day, I think we will able to see how his views can be deployed to interpret religiosity in general terms.



In contrast to the easy, comfortable, “bake-sale Christianity,” Kierkegaard unmasks a God whom you encounter, a God who confronts you. And, when you encounter this God, he tells you things. You see, there are some things this God wants you to do.



To Kierkegaard, religiosity is not going to church, paying alms, making the appropriate noises and gestures. It is not even enough to believe. One must believe and then act on that belief. And one’s acts must be such acts that one experiences “fear and trembling” at the enormity of what one is about to do. “There is no room for vacillation or ambiguity of the sort one commonly experiences elsewhere.”



This fear and trembling in the face of the requirement to act is the hallmark of freely choosing the absurd act. “He whose eye chances to look down into the yawning abyss becomes dizzy . . . dread is the dizziness of freedom. In this dizziness freedom succumbs. Further than this, psychology cannot go and will not. That very instant, everything is changed, and when freedom rises again, it sees that it is guilty. Between these two instants lies the leap, which no science has explained or can explain.”



As Kierkegaard tells us, religion, real religion, quite simply does not make sense. It wants us to believe that 2+2=5. Is it plausible that God actually wants me to take my son out into the desert and bend him over a crude altar and slit his throat? Is it plausible that God actually wants me to slam a bomb-laden truck into a hotel, or a fuel-laden jetliner into a skyscraper? Of course it isn’t plausible—which is why it is an object of unshakable belief. It only looks absurd because we are outside; we are not a part of it.



Decide. Commit. Act. Only then can the believer be said to exist. This leap is not necessarily a single act. It may be a series of acts, sliding into deeper commitment, and at no point in the step-by-step process does the person know the end result—until the moment the final decision is made.

In place of today’s limp, easy religiosity, Kierkegaard leaps clear over the whole of Western ethics and says, Do what God commands! “The misfortune of our age—in the political as well as the religious sphere, and in all things—is disobedience, unwillingness to obey . . . it is not doubt of religious truth but insubordination against religious authority which is the fault in our misfortune and the cause of it.”



Being a religious fanatic is, at bottom, a choice. A choice to fix everything in one fell swoop, in one absurd act that is embraced, not in spite of being absurd, but precisely because it is absurd. At this point, at the moment when the unequivocal and absurd act takes place, the feeling must be almost one of relief. Survivors of suicide bombings have reported seeing the bomber smile just before pushing the button. This makes perfect sense. All ambiguities are resolved, all problems solved, and all questions answered. No anxiety anymore. No despair anymore. No fear anymore. Nothing left to decide.



Must Action Necessarily Follow?



Kierkegaard always talked a good game. Brave words, a brave philosophy, from a man whose most “gutsy” action in his entire life was breaking off his engagement. To him, the whole thing was inward. What would this seemingly ordinary Northern European Victorian chap have made of those who take the same leap and act in ways that actually have consequences? Would he have been horrified? Would he have babbled, “But, but, that’s not what I meant!” Or would he have nodded reflectively and said, “Yes. There it is. Right there. Now you see what I was getting at.” We must never allow ourselves to forget that Kierkegaard considered “the faith of Abraham” to be exemplary.



Kierkegaard felt that he was trapped in an age of reflection and repose, lacking in frenzy. From our perspective, looking back over the long, dreary gulf between Kierkegaard and ourselves, we have seen quite enough examples of where frenzy can lead.



It is true that absurd beliefs, being easily vulnerable to rational attack, tend to generate a great deal of passion. But is passionate faith of this sort to be sought and admired? And why stop at Christianity? Can any person in good conscience construct an argument protecting Kierkegaard’s absurd faith of Abraham while simultaneously condemning the absurd faith of the suicide bomber? After all, twentieth-century Christian martyr Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote: “When Jesus calls a man, he calls him to come and die.”



If one is willing to treat Kierkegaard’s leap of faith as an admirable thing, then one must be prepared to come to terms with the consequences of that leap. All the consequences.



Given Kierkegaard’s seminal influence in the genealogy of Qutbism, the suicide bombers and all the rest were inevitable. When we look at the suicide bomber, we are seeing our own existential sensibility, stripped of ornamentation and boiled down to its pure, uncut essence: freedom and the act. This forces us to confront once again an ugly truth that the West has worked so assiduously to ignore for too many years: religious ideas have consequences.



Further Reading



Sören Kierkegaard, “The Point of View,” “That Individual,” “The Concept of Death,” “On Authority and Revelation,” and “Concluding Unscientific Postscript” in Walter Kaufman, ed., Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre (New York: American Library, 1975).



Malise Ruthven, A Fury for God: The Islamist Attack on America (London/New York: Granta Books, 2002).

---

Stephen Gallagher is a philosopher and writer who lives in North Carolina. He has lectured at the Southern Humanities Council, the Global Studies Association, and l’Université de Provence. He will speak at the Russian Academy of Sciences on “the death of tolerance” in June 2006.

E-mail this article to a friend
Join the Council today!

New Center For Inquiry Research Building Completed - A Message from Paul Kurtz

See Latest Press Releases and Statements from the Council

Stay informed about conferences, news, and advocacy efforts! Join the Council for Secular Humanism`s E-Mail List

Upcoming Conferences

A New Enlightenment Is Underway
Center for Inquiry - Florida
March 24 - 26, 2006

Center for Inquiry Alaskan Cruise
May 28 - June 4, 2006

---

The Latest Issue of Free Inquiry

---

re: Jew versus muslim
Why is it that when one thinks of a jew, one thinks of a doctor, scientist, a Nobel laureate perhaps.
Now-a- days, when one thinks of a muslim one thinks of protests, mayheim, terror, murder, Guantanama Bay, deportation etc etc
That pretty much sums up the difference.
Saw a movie called Maqbool ? recently. Brilliant acting by Pankaj Kapoor as a muslim mobster. Why is it that all the mobsters in Bollywood now-a-days are shown as muslims?
Why is it that almost every terrorist activity the world over has some connection with a muslim and to Pakistan?
Sridhar

Dear chief editor
This article could be an eye opener for Muslims, but, we Muslims already have opened our eyes and are watching our backs NOT to be stabbed by our cousins Jews again and again.
We realized Jews are financially successful, controlling not only America, but, also some other countries. Yes, it is amazing how a bunch of them are empowering us all! Yes, they are hard working, organized, resourceful, financially strong and most important thing is they do not forget holocaust, rather learn this lesson not to be weak again to suffer all that misery at the hands of the Germans. Their best tool is UNITY. No matter what they support eachother by going overboard. Yes, they are one great nation. All of us should learn from them if we, poor Muslims wish to survive in this Jewish world. All of us Muslims should follow their footsteps blindly. We, the poor, miserable and cruel Muslims should close our eyes and just accept Jewish slavery, just lick their feet and do what they want us to do, b/c they are gods of the world. (While the real GOD is watching all of us to judge us.) They are great, got slaughtered by Germans and now in return they have every right to slaughter barbaric Muslims. They got victimized by Germans and now they have to victimize poor, pathetic Muslims. They got kicked out of Germany, now this is their right to kick Palestinians out of their homeland. They are unable to see Germany eye to eye, but, they have every right to poke all Muslims eyes. They got bled by Germans and now they have to bleed Palestinians, after all they are successful and more powerful than those low lying Palestinians. This is the rule of this world of beasts to prey upon weaker beings and get more powerful, after all survival of the fittest must be employed with all it`s implications where ever it could be implied. Jews have every right to bomb the last Muslim on this earth,b/c this is also their right to be predators of the weaker ones. And, weaker ones, the Muslims do not have any right to survive b/c they need to be powerful, if, they wish to survive in this world of animals where might is always right, where survival of the fittest is the rule, where rich and powerful have all the rights to enslave the poors and weakers and even slaughter them to maintain their power. Yes, Muslims are the worst nation on this earth, they are weaker, senseless, backward and poor, they should be extinguished by Jews. And, yes our cousin Jews are exterminating them rapidly till the last Muslim will be on this earth. Jews are expediting their massacre to prove in front of America and European countries that they are the gods and they are the super supremos. You know just to prove their dominance and progress. On the other hand, Palestinian kids are fighting with bricks and stones with Jewish tanks and machine guns and then those kids meet their destiny which is chosen by Jewish gods that is death. Still Jewish cry out loud they are being bombed, they are being terrorized by Palestinian kids. They have to protect themselves from weeds, cottons, moles and pebbles and sand, which these Palestinian terrorist kids are throwing on these Jewish weapons of mass destruction`s. Yes, Jews are miserable, world has all the sympathies with them, even some Muslim countries have all their respect and sympathies with them after all they are being terrorized by these terrorist Muslim kids with pebbles and sand. Yes, they should defend themselves just by bombing these cruel terrorist kids, who have forgotten that they are just insects infront of these innocent giants, they have to be smashed under brave Jewish respectable and rich feet. Jews have every right to protect their homeland from those foreign invaders, called Palestinians and America has every right to support them for their miseries.
When average American views Jews as very, very selfish, not caring for anyone, but, themselves, that make them more superior in world`s eyes,b/c that is the key to success. Be selfish, self-centered, destroy all crawling insects and defeat all of them, bravo, wow. Yes, Jews are great nation with power, physical, financial and political, you name it and they have it all. Best thing with them is that they want to forget their miserable past, that is why they do not target Germany, they just got over it and now they are moving on with new plans and schemes to target, Muslims. And, I applaud them for that bravery and integrity and self defense to kill weaker nations. Wonderful. Just great. Although, Their great holy book Torah states not to oppress strangers and weakers,but, they change this statement to oppress and suppress them more b/c they have out grown Torah, after all Torah is some old backward book with no sense at all. Jews are the most modern nation on this Earth, why will they follow Old Torah. They are not morons to follow such idiotic things. Average American views them as without any sense of proportion or any judgment on world affairs, and they proved it by not indulging themselves with the rest of the world, they only mind their one and only superb business of dealing fairly with Muslims. America is lil smarter to stash them in the Middle East and there they are with their own homeland, which they say God has promised them,b/c they are the SPECIAL people of GOD. Yes, they are SPECIAL. Not only special, they are precious as well for America, exclusively.
When a common American say Jews are cruel and selfish, it hurts me, they are not. Even if they are it is their right to be whatever they wish to be, after all they are SPECIAL and PRECIOUS. Some Americans are upset over Jews concentration in New York, that upsets me more it is their prerogative to be selfish, cruel and slaughter Muslims to rule the world.
All the world should not think ill of Jews, even if they are ill willed for the rest of the world. They have all the right to think ill and do ill to Muslims, but, Muslims should never ever think ill of them at any cost,b/c again they are precious and special and gifted nation from God. They believe to control an evil tongue with weapons b/c they believe evil tongue is like an arrow and can kill at long distance, so, they are scared of the evil tongues of Palestinian kids which can kill them at a long distance. And of course they have every right to defend themselves by killing those naughty kids and they have every right to shed their blood for their evil tongue. Some international magazines run by Jews have every right to poison the minds of their common readers who accept their articles as facts. And, specially in current terror infested world, Jews are being terrified by Muslim kids and they should protect themselves from such hazardous environment.............All the journalists should obey them and never print anything negatively critical about them which could endanger their precious lives, and in that case if they will do that will echoe back and will pierce them.An average American is always prejudice towards Jews and stereotype them and label them as PENNY people and thinks they are dishonest in business and care only about themselves, as not loyal to America, as having too, much power. But, American govt.and Jews don`t care what these stupid Americans say in their homes or in their bedrooms, they just want more and more power, that is the only way to control this world and survive, Very smart.Clapping.Bravo. Such anti Semites should be punishable, it is unacceptable, who ever will have it, will be gunned down. So, forget anti Semites, just accept one sided criticism from Jews only. Yes, they are right, Muslims are wrong, Muslims are terrible, Muslims are dumb.......................Jews are free thinkers to label Muslims terrorists and they are filled with Muslim hatred, but, Muslims in return have no right to have anti Semites even if, they are being slaughtered by brave Jews. I just love Jews, I salute Jewish chivalry and integrity and prosperity. They are gods, and we are their disciples and slaves. I am highly impressed by Jews. They are sacred and pious, we should bow infront of their strength. After all Muslims are not their equals, they are far behind them in everything............

Jews are my heroes, we have to police every word that we say about Palestinian kids being butchered b/c if we will have empathy with those terrorist kids, we will be labeled as anti Semitic and of course siding with those silly naughty terrorist Palestinian kids. We don`t wish to be anti-Semitic, not even in our wildest dreams. It might be equivalent in spitting truth to this great Jewish power. We don`t have nerves to be kicked out or be declared as anit-semitic.After all Jews are our masters and we are their faithful slaves.
Now, whats going on in Palestine? Is it simply Jews and Muslims hate for eachother or is it more to it? Why Palestinian kids are throwing pebbles and stones to their tanks? Why are the majority of Palestinians are refugees? How dare 5 ,6,7 year old Palestinian kids throw stones at Israeli soldiers with AK 47`s? What kind of situation would drive young Palestinian kids to voluntarily blow themselves up? We heard of such phenomenon as chained Africans throwing themselves in to the oceans during the days of slavery, pregnant African slave mothers slit their own throats and Africans burning themselves to burn fields they worked on and committing suicides in colonial times.
As every one of us know, the movement of Israeli creation is called Zionism and it didn`t start with the holocaust but began at the end of 19th century to control browns through out the world. Nigeria and Argentina were also considered for new Jewish states, but, to control oils was more suitable for great Jews and America so Palestine was the right target to allocate Israel right at the heart of middle east, Wow. What a smart move!The population of Palestine in 1900 was 5% Jewish, 10% Christian and 85% Muslims. Jews went in to Palestinian villages and butchered defenseless civilians and using their so called smart and cruel murderous tactics drove them out of their homeland and created a permanent refugee Palestinian population. What a great idea! Simply, brilliant.Palestinians are stopped from drinking water, from work, from visiting relatives, etc.And they are forced to live under permanent curfew, being persistently fired upon by Jewish well trained soldiers. What a great strategy! Jewish soldiers ordering Palestinian men to turn and fire them with bullets is daily routine. After all Jews have to protect themselves from these terrorists. We have to watch this powerlessness of Palestinians without feeling any kind of sympathy for those nasty silly people who don`t surrender, idiots. Jews have every right to be as much ruthless as possible to stop these terrorist Muslim kids with stones and pebbles. Just shameless terrorists.

We wholeheartedly support Palestinian genocide, ethnic cleansing and extermination by our Jewish masters. Jews are courageous nation to fight for their right of having their own homeland at any cost.

Deaths of few Jews by suicide bombers is outraged by American media and politicians makes us more inclined towards Jews supermacy.Yes, they have to kill all Palestinians for few deaths. Yes, they got to finish them all, after all, Palestinians are like cockroaches, they have to exterminate them all. Cockroaches can make their stomachs sick. After all Jews have to prove themselves more superior than British colonial era, their rule was not that much horrible and superb as Jewish rule is. Jews stepped in Palestinian toes themselves, then they move their toes, in return got killed along with their families. Very smart strategy first provoke violence and then use excessive force to shut them. Excellent.

Jews have proven by their intelligence that they are superior, they have complete freedom, Palestinians have limited freedom, Jews have invaded Palestinian bed rooms, bathrooms and kitchens by great power, and they are forced to live outside of their own houses surrounded by soldiers with latest machine guns. Just speechless!

Idiot, moron, weak, silly Palestinians still don`t surrender, they are so, stubborn, just pathetic. And, the most disgusting slogan that they raise is,`` give us liberty or death.`` So, they are choosing death over their slavery. How much idiot they could be?

These Palestinian sick cockroaches, rats why don`t they lick Jewish supremacy and be done with it. Why don`t they let go their freedom, get over their integrity and move on with slavery?

On side note:-
Tipu Sultan was also stupid to say,`` give me one day of life with freedom and take away my 100 years of life with slavery.``

Re: # 78

Excellent Zeena..............you have been more forthright than the article of this article.....................