Pak Armed Forces vs. Pakistan

DEATH IN THE DESERT

40 by masadi on April 9, 2006 4:31pm PT


the Russians gassed ``their own people`` in the moscow theatre in 2002?


Riiiiight...the Russians just woke up one day and decided to gas a theater full of Russians...

and just the other day a few american planes just decided to fly themselves into buildings..

and what about the 180 or so aussies who just decided to drop dead in bali for no reason at all....

#235 by rsridhar on April 9, 2006 6:30am PT
<<< re:#230 by masadi
Masadi dude,......He gassed his own people...... >>>

Look damn fool, did the US attack Rwanda when a million people were being butchered? Did they attack Russia when the Russians gassed ``their own people`` in the moscow theatre in 2002? Do they attack themselves because their nuclear and chemical dumping has killed tens of thousands of Americans through cancer and other diseases? Did they attack Saddam at the time he was gassing ``his own people`` rather than strengthen him at the time? Did Saddam`s gassing kill as many of ``his own people`` as did the US sanctions regime or the current war of aggression?

If you don`t know anything other than hate I suggest you keep your damn mouth shut.

tahmed writes <<< masadi: So you were unable to meet my challenge to back up what you wrote in #230 and #229 by cutting anything I wrote in my article in order to prove you were not a liar. Your response fails to meet that test, and so you stand a proven liar >>>

In your usual perverted logic you turn things upside down. The quote that I reproduced from your miserable article proved what you dared me to to prove. You are blind and I have no cure for that. Once again, after having being humiliated, you are trying to weasel out of the position your lies have placed you in. It does not work, people here recognize you for who you are, a lying criminal who worships the American elite, and even went so far as justifying colonialism as conquest by ``truth`` and not ``force of arms``. You are a disgrace to the human race tahmed.

#233 by zeemax on April 9, 2006 2:45am PT

”Gul Rukh Khan is a fake khusra. Not even a genuine one. All his/her knowledge comes from sensationalism of the trashy eveningers.”

What about some horrible writers from now defunct the South Asia tribune…New nom de plume, new profile …same old, same old...

BTW, no respectable ``Gulrukh`` would spell her/his name with two LLs and Gulrukh is one word and not two.

Zeemax # 133: Kash u were able of something better than this.
By the way, how come not only Pakistani generals, even their supporters are as mean, ghaleez and khabees as u r.
Instead of Ms G R Khan points this was the only thing u could come up with.
Not to be surprised then that Pakistan as a nation is there where it is.

re:#233 by zeemax
Thanks for the info.
Sridhar

re:#230 by masadi
Masadi dude,
I know u have never replied to my posts but here is something for u to chew over.
US govt was severely criticised by its citizens over Vietnam. The atrocities were highlighted by the press: one reason why US forces had to finally retreat without a clear verdict in its favor.
I know of no other nation whose press would so openly and ruthlessly expose the atrocities as did the American press. It is all a part of history.
As far as the fight with American Indians (the politically correct term now is: Native Americans) is concerned, that too is a part of history. It was a fight to survive and the better of the two survived. If one were to believe the Aryan Invasion Theory, Aryans sweeping down the plains of India drove the early settlers south and ruthlessly suppressed or eliminated those who resisted their way of life. That is how it has always been in the past. Slavery too existed but muslim rulers made that into a profitable business and exported slaves from the areas that came to control. If u do not believe me, find out the reason why a certain part of mountain range along Silk Route is called ``Hindu Kush``. But America did realize Slavery was evil. A Civil war was fought and slavery was outlawed.
What matters is: how things are today.
Most muslim nations do not give the kind of freedom to their citizens that muslims living in US enjoy. Iraq war is proving to be costly for US but nobody would argue that Saddam Hussein was evil. He gassed his own people (the Kurdish). Who would do that? (except of course the rulers in the muslim world: Mushy is killing his own people in Balochistan, Waziristan). Can u ever imagine US govt killing its own citizens?
So, Masadi dude, get a life.
As i already said, u should have eaten the crap that i sent u. That was a good mixture of Castro, Bandhopadhyaya and Chow Min`s excreta. I hear it is highly sought after in the communist world. Try it out. It might improve your I.Q.
Sridhar

masadi: So you were unable to meet my challenge to back up what you wrote in #230 and #229 by cutting anything I wrote in my article in order to prove you were not a liar. Your response fails to meet that test, and so you stand a proven liar.

As for the rest of your lunatic rantings - no one can humiliate anyone with words other than himself . But that is a lesson for Advanced Kindergarten 431.

You never cleared Beginner Kindergarten 101 where they teach you to wash your face, speak the truth, and not call people names. Kindergarten 431 is way beyond your league.

This is my last post on this board to you. And since lunatics are always the ones who have the last word after wise men have had their say and left, you will now proceed to prove yourself a lunatic by writing a response to this post. Go ahead, make my day. :-)

#228 by rsridhar

Hence, Gul Rukh Khan has to be a female!

Gul Rukh Khan is a fake khusra. Not even a genuine one. All his/her knowledge comes from sensationalism of the trashy eveningers.

#231 tahmed32 writes

<<< #230 I see another great habit you never learnt was that of telling the truth. If you wish to prove that you are not a lier, I dare you to cut and paste anything from that article I wrote to back your claims. >>>>

How many times do you have to be publicly humiliated with these dares before you finally give up? Time after time you have come up with you bs claims daring me with this thing or the other, knowing full well your claims were flimsy. Let me tell you one more time, you keep supporting tyranny and barbarism, like you are doing and you will continue to be humiliated by the truth.

Here is your dare answered. Your pearls of wisdom from the article titled Open Letter to Those Opposing the Iraq War; Tauheed Ahmed March 29, 2003

<<< (Quote) So, to all those who distrust Bush when he says the US intends to introduce democracy in Iraq, I have this to say: Have the courage to see the truth. Because the truth will be still be there even if you close your eyes tightly shut to it.
And the truth is that the US and the Anglo-Saxon tradition on which it rests has conquered the world not through force of arms, but through the force of truth `` (end quote) >>>

Now who is the liar? LIAR! Idolator, criminal!

#230 I see another great habit you never learnt was that of telling the truth. If you wish to prove that you are not a lier, I dare you to cut and paste anything from that article I wrote to back your claims.

In addition to #229, here is a demonstration. Forget about current affairs that you can throw a smoke screen over to deceive the masses, you wont even condemn US atrocities in Vietnam, you wont condemn the genocide of the American Indians by the US, you wont condemn the racial genocide by these maniacs in the Atlantic Slave trade. You wont do any of that because you have sold your soul to them and submitted with complete submission as if they were your ``god``. You are a damn criminal tahmed. Your support of the Iraq war using the excuse of ``democracy`` reveald that very clearly. You talk about me washing my face because I called you ``damn fool``. You need to wash your soul a hundred times over and then some; You share in the crimes of the US elite.

tahmed writes : <<< Having resolved those issues, you can then talk about bigger things like ``what can i do to make the world a better place``. And to do that.

Because unless you do the above, your rantings about the ``evil US elite`` have no more substance than the rantings of a lunatic hurling abuse at passers by on the street and raving how martians are invading earth with the help of men in black suits descending from helicopters. >>>

I don`t have to resolve any issues. You are the one with bigger issues. On the one hand you tout the Quran and claim to be a decent human being, on the other hand you support the tyrannous elite and their barbaric war in Iraq that has killed over 100,000 innocents on the Iraqi side alone and maimed tens of thousands more and cut the life lines of life for millions. Now tell me, how good a job did your parents do when they taught you to support tyrants blindly? Is that support better as morality than calling some idiot who supports tyrants with zero knowledge a ``damn fool`` ? Once you have resolved that dilemma we can discuss whatever the hell you want to discuss, since so far you`ve been stumped time and again by your bs.

re:#220 by jang
As i understand (with my limited knowledge of Urdu!), the word Rukh means ``face``. So, Shah Rukh Khan is a Khan with the face of a ``shah`` (or king). Gul means a flower. Hence, Gul Rukh Khan has to be a female!
So much for my Urdu!
The author says in her post #219:
(Has military ever spared any chance to malign fellow Pakistanis at any international venue? Would my kaptaan brother remind me one single speech, press conference of Musharraf where he has not talked bad about Pakistani politicians?)
Madam,
Mushy has done worse. He has gone on record (in a press conference) accusing Pakistani women of ``getting raped`` intentionally in order to seek asylum and migrate to western countries to become ``millionaires`` (as he put it).
This is a shame for any nation to have such an idiot running the affairs of a nation.
Sridhar

gull rukh khan: as a chowk author, you have no business sitting on the sidelines, refusing to address any of the issues raised about your article, only to come down at the end to grandly make some more vacuous statements like a government spokesman, refusing to take questions.