Chowk Staff April 13, 2006
#77 Posted by bjkumar on April 14, 2006 1:35:28 pm
#76 (Disclaimer)
There is no serious intent here to give the late Mirza a run for his money, or his bottle!
#76 Posted by bjkumar on April 14, 2006 1:30:12 pm
#73 Netizen
I am not familiar with the Ghalib version. But here is how the present-day version SHOULD have read:
“Etch Pee ke dil pe choat lugee
Aurat ne dhuk-ke maar diye
Chal baar jara – kuchh pee-te hain
Ye ghum shayad kuchh thunda ho
Bouncer boalaa – hut bhaag abhie
Pichhle saa-re bill baakee hain
Jub laat lagee peechhe kuss ke
Etch Pee boala – dhutt tere kee
Aa bail mujhe too maar jara
Yeh jeena bhee koi jeena hai
Mak-khee munh pur aa baith gayee
Phir tutt-ee baaro-baar karee
Boatal puk-ree phir haathon mein
Jai-se buss wo hee aurat ho
Pee Pee ke tukre hazar hue
Koi yahan gira koi wahan gira!”
#75 Posted by HP on April 14, 2006 1:20:42 pm
Neti,
Iss dil kay tukray hazar hoi
Koi yehan gira, koi wahan gira!
Koi yehan gira, koi wahan gira!
I don`t know it was by Ghalib...I think it was an Indian movie song...appropriate! what do you say?
#72 Posted by HP on April 14, 2006 1:03:12 pm
I don’t know why people are upset. It is an Indian problem; a little more action here and there and then we are talking…summer is around the corner…let the fun begin!
Koi yehan gira, koi wahan gira!
#73 Posted by Netizen on April 14, 2006 1:09:12 pm
Re: # 72
HP
``Koi yehan gira, koi wahan gira!``
are you going to conclude the shera..........
i think it is by galib in inebriated state.... isn`t?
HP
``Koi yehan gira, koi wahan gira!``
are you going to conclude the shera..........
i think it is by galib in inebriated state.... isn`t?
#71 Posted by zeemax on April 14, 2006 12:54:17 pm
#57 by swarrier
How`re you coming along with `Camus` my friend? I hope you know by now what I mean.
Rgds
How`re you coming along with `Camus` my friend? I hope you know by now what I mean.
Rgds
#70 Posted by arjun_m on April 14, 2006 12:12:49 pm
#68 by Netizen on April 14, 2006 11:23am PT
Yup...Prophet tahmed, in all his self-righteous glory, chose to ignore that convenient fact..
doesn`t matter to me anyway...the way i see it, the only paki who doesn`t support terrorism is a dead paki...
Yup...Prophet tahmed, in all his self-righteous glory, chose to ignore that convenient fact..
doesn`t matter to me anyway...the way i see it, the only paki who doesn`t support terrorism is a dead paki...
#66 Posted by arjun_m on April 14, 2006 11:08:12 am
#46 by tahmed32 on April 14, 2006 7:50am PT
of course, Pakistanis dont gloat over such things,
Prophet tahmed(peace be unto your self-righteous rear): your paki brothers were gloating after the varanasi bombing..they were saying it`s part of the paki strategy to carry jihadi into India..
of course, Pakistanis dont gloat over such things,
Prophet tahmed(peace be unto your self-righteous rear): your paki brothers were gloating after the varanasi bombing..they were saying it`s part of the paki strategy to carry jihadi into India..
#68 Posted by Netizen on April 14, 2006 11:23:59 am
Re: # 66
arjun
``your paki brothers were gloating after the varanasi bombing..they were saying it`s part of the paki strategy to carry jihadi into India.. ``
that was HP`s strategy to fan communal strife in india. and according to him, it is paks ``right`` to do so.
arjun
``your paki brothers were gloating after the varanasi bombing..they were saying it`s part of the paki strategy to carry jihadi into India.. ``
that was HP`s strategy to fan communal strife in india. and according to him, it is paks ``right`` to do so.
#62 Posted by tahmed32 on April 14, 2006 10:19:22 am
#60 You can call me a ``closet mullah`` - but you are a shameless, open-air liar.
If you wish to prove otherwise, I challenge you to cut and paste anything I have ever written on chowk to back your name-calling.
If you wish to prove otherwise, I challenge you to cut and paste anything I have ever written on chowk to back your name-calling.
#67 Posted by mohar11 on April 14, 2006 11:21:48 am
Re: # 62 cm32
``open-air liar``?... that`s the best you can come up with? :))).... Anyway - I don`t know why you are so against the name ``Closet Mullah``..... it`s a good name and it fits your personality.... No?
``open-air liar``?... that`s the best you can come up with? :))).... Anyway - I don`t know why you are so against the name ``Closet Mullah``..... it`s a good name and it fits your personality.... No?
#64 Posted by Netizen on April 14, 2006 10:46:29 am
Re: # 62
tahmed:
you should step down from the high horse of ``morality`` that you are riding on.
there will always be people who are antagonist to each other, on both sides of the border.
you are conspicously absent when during the mudfest, indians are at the receiving end and start teaching ``humanity`` when the reverse happens.
eg. when indians were ridiculed as ``code-collies`` by eminient pakis such as behram you weren`t seen around but when some indians replied in kind by calling pakis ``cab-drivers`` you came out, guns blazing, calling hinuds castiest.
tahmed:
you should step down from the high horse of ``morality`` that you are riding on.
there will always be people who are antagonist to each other, on both sides of the border.
you are conspicously absent when during the mudfest, indians are at the receiving end and start teaching ``humanity`` when the reverse happens.
eg. when indians were ridiculed as ``code-collies`` by eminient pakis such as behram you weren`t seen around but when some indians replied in kind by calling pakis ``cab-drivers`` you came out, guns blazing, calling hinuds castiest.
#61 Posted by Pardesi on April 14, 2006 10:05:12 am
Same culprits as in Benaras?
Syed Ahmed Bukhari, the shahi imam of Jama Masjid .. ``This is the handiwork of those who carried out the bomb blasts in Benaras. The persons who have been arrested are innocent but those who perpetrated the crime are still roaming around freely,`` he charged but refused to elaborate.
This is the first time that Jama Masjid has been targetted by the militants. In recent times the imam has been using strong language against terrorist outfits.
http://ia.rediff.com/news/2006/apr/14masjid.htm?q=tp&file=.htm
#59 Posted by tahmed32 on April 14, 2006 9:48:21 am
swarrier #57 you write ``Do you think any condemnation of trashy posts of some Indian hate-freaks, by learned or unlearned Indians will make a difference?
Yes.
you write ``However I can assure you that all Indians don`t look at the Mosque bombings in the same light as your Hindu gentlemen on unplugged.
Thanks for the assurance. Wish there were more of your kind on chowk. So far you are the only Indian who has been forthcoming. As you can see below, the others are merely writing exactly as I predicted. Except for masanamuthu who uses the opportunity to flatter himself by calling himself a ``freethinker`` while writing stuff that only an ``enslaved nonthinker`` would write.
you write ``Since you`ve been adept at picking out Indian/Hindu idiots I am sure you would be quite happy to pick out Pakistani/Muslim ones.``
Ask Pakistani idiots like masadi what they think of me and you will realize that I am an equal opportunity idiotbuster (OK, maybe ``idiotbuster`` is too ambitious a word, since mere posts written on chowk by me or anyone else isnt going to change an idiot into a thinking person. ) Only difference is, Pakistani idiots aim for bigger game than india, and pick on the US or the west or on other Pakistanis who dont chose to join them in this mudslinging, while indian idiots stay focussed on pakistan (to the point of clinical insanity in case of some of them). But cut and paste what you are referring to, and I will be glad to comment on it just as you have commented on, as you rightly say, the ``hindu hate-freaks`` .
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to express your views to the threads started by a couple of your countrymen on unplugged that I posted below.
Yes.
you write ``However I can assure you that all Indians don`t look at the Mosque bombings in the same light as your Hindu gentlemen on unplugged.
Thanks for the assurance. Wish there were more of your kind on chowk. So far you are the only Indian who has been forthcoming. As you can see below, the others are merely writing exactly as I predicted. Except for masanamuthu who uses the opportunity to flatter himself by calling himself a ``freethinker`` while writing stuff that only an ``enslaved nonthinker`` would write.
you write ``Since you`ve been adept at picking out Indian/Hindu idiots I am sure you would be quite happy to pick out Pakistani/Muslim ones.``
Ask Pakistani idiots like masadi what they think of me and you will realize that I am an equal opportunity idiotbuster (OK, maybe ``idiotbuster`` is too ambitious a word, since mere posts written on chowk by me or anyone else isnt going to change an idiot into a thinking person. ) Only difference is, Pakistani idiots aim for bigger game than india, and pick on the US or the west or on other Pakistanis who dont chose to join them in this mudslinging, while indian idiots stay focussed on pakistan (to the point of clinical insanity in case of some of them). But cut and paste what you are referring to, and I will be glad to comment on it just as you have commented on, as you rightly say, the ``hindu hate-freaks`` .
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to express your views to the threads started by a couple of your countrymen on unplugged that I posted below.
#58 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 14, 2006 9:40:12 am
swarrier #57, {``Now since I went there at your behest I see distinguished a pakistani gentleman being quite happy at civilian killings in Kashmir.
Since you`ve been adept at picking out Indian/Hindu idiots I am sure you would be quite happy to pick out Pakistani/Muslim ones.``}
Swarrier,
Obviously you are a victim of ICUPE (Insufficient Chowk UP Exposure). :) There are two people one probably a Pakistani and the other an Indian. They have swapped nationalities and each pretends to outdo the other in being the most extreme representative of his assumed nationality. The situation is hilarious - it`s more fun than simple role playing.
Since you`ve been adept at picking out Indian/Hindu idiots I am sure you would be quite happy to pick out Pakistani/Muslim ones.``}
Swarrier,
Obviously you are a victim of ICUPE (Insufficient Chowk UP Exposure). :) There are two people one probably a Pakistani and the other an Indian. They have swapped nationalities and each pretends to outdo the other in being the most extreme representative of his assumed nationality. The situation is hilarious - it`s more fun than simple role playing.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- MantoLives: Errata: Fazlurrahman's role in... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Tahmed, The insurgency of Fakir... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Stukay, You should ask... Living Gandhi and King
- MeiraJ08: too bad you're giving... Fathers and Daughters
- BJ2: [I'm a nice person.] I... Fathers and Daughters
- BJ2: My dear Meira, If you... Fathers and Daughters
- MeiraJ08: "Since the days of...since... Fathers and Daughters
- BJ2: Re: # 93 Meira, good... Fathers and Daughters








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content