Taking the Lid off Sexual Fantasies

Re: # 110

wow...my range of interests seem to be growing....

re: 109

arent posts 100-3 enough for you?

Re: # 172: I will reply to my own question by the following quote from a Lahori:

``Dr. Muhammad Iqbal`s Statement re the Qadianis:
by Maulana Muhammad Ali

[Dr. Sir Muhammad Iqbal, who was once a great admirer of the Ahmadiyyah Movement, issued in 1936 a long statement re the Qadianis. It was motivated mainly by political reasons and the views of the extremist Qadiani section were made the basis of this statement. Maulana Muhammad `Ali replied to it and explained the Lahore Ahmadiyyah standpoint and threw light on the correct beliefs and mission of the Founder of the Ahmadiyyah Movement in Islam The reply first appeared in the weekly Light, Lahore, and later in the form of a booklet entitled Dr Sir Muhammad Iqbal`s Statement re the Qadianis. Another detailed commentary was made in Urdu by Syed Akhtar Husain Gilani entitled `Allama Iqbal aur Tahrik-i Ahmadiiyat. -- Editor]

My conclusion from this is that in order to serve the dominant group of Muslim League headed for the division of India, Iqbal abandoned the Ahmadiyyas to whom his father once belonged.

This is the end of my interest in Iqbal`s politics.

Re: # 98
why r my questions being erased?
i did not say anything bad to anyone?????

Re: # 98
why r my questions being erased?
i did not say anything bad to anyone?????

why are my thread gyaib?
I did not say any bad words here?
Just some jestful jokes.......o)

Urstruly,

You may cut out the philosophical ramblings ... and get to Bukhari/Muslim ahadith you are itching to quote ... while citing the Ijmah (or is it Qiyas?) among unwashed, goat-screwing ullema of our times.

As expected, yours is an ideological angle. And your solution will turn out to be forceful implementation of shariah to deal with the issue at hand. Of course all this will be based on works of Hadrat Abu Ala Maudoodi, rahmat-ullah aliyah, or some other third-rate imam ... who has written volumes of books telling believing women how to take care of their yoni for the pleasure of their husbands, so as to be guaranteed a place in jannah among the faithful …

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

sorry for typo in #104

correction,{{we need sexual fantasies to identify our sexuality}}}

Dr.Sohail

This is the whole extract of my discussion about your article, which you wrote in hurry.

Your whole point is, {{{we need sexual fantasies to identity our sexuality}}}

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG...............

I say,{{We do not need sexual fantasies for sexual identity}}

You can have sexual fantasies ,but having sex with some one based on fantasies is absolutely not a criterion for sexual identity.Sexuality is a solid identity which doesn`t need fantasy roofing...................

#92
echoboom jii

Thanks,but No thanks.....hahahaha


{{{So, you don`t need fantasies to identify your sexual identity. }}}

Drsohail,
Now I can rest knowing that you are a real doctor.
You must understand that this is Chowk and out of the blues shows up on FP as SEX-Doctor.
That should alarm any Chowkie. That is why I was very sceptical.

Now, let us talk real business, if I may.

It is widely believed that Sigmund Freud borrowed his thesis or some ideas from Aristotle and ancient Greeks, speaking of which Alexander and his Love affair with his Young mother comes to mind.

In your professional opinion, does male Sexuality takes its early formulation from their love to the first woman they come close to.

I understand that it is a very taboo subject but Western Scientist, including Freud and his daughter do believe that there is some merrit on this thought.

Re: # 64
Drsohail,
Now I can rest knowing that you are a real doctor.
You must understand that this is Chowk and out of the blues shows up on FP as SEX-Doctor.
That should alarm any Chowkie. That is why I was very sceptical.

Now, let us talk real business, if I may.

It is widely believed that Sigmund Freud borrowed his thesis or some ideas from Aristotle and ancient Greeks, speaking of which Alexander and his Love affair with his Young mother comes to mind.

In your professional opinion, does male Sexuality takes its early formulation from their love to the first woman they come close to.

I understand that it is a very taboo subject but Western Scientist, including Freud and his daughter do believe that there is some merrit on this thought.

Re: # 64
Drsohail,
Now I can rest knowing that you are a real doctor.
You must understand that this is Chowk and out of the blues shows up on FP as SEX-Doctor.
That should alarm any Chowkie. That is why I was very sceptical.

Now, let us talk real business, if I may.

It is widely believed that Sigmund Freud borrowed his thesis or some ideas from Aristotle and ancient Greeks, speaking of which Alexander and his Love affair with his Young mother comes to mind.

In your professional opinion, does male Sexuality takes its early formulation from their love to the first woman they come close to.

I understand that it is a very taboo subject but Western Scientist, including Freud and his daughter do believe that there is some merrit on this thought.

#97
Dr. Sohail
With all due respect I did not mean to up set you. You have been very kind to respond in a timely manner with decency of your personality. I am absolutely not offended.

I am just pointing out the flaws in your article in a highly POSITIVE CRITICISM. It looks like you do not like MY POSITIVE CRITICISM. OK, you are the boss, I will just sit back and relax.

Happy.
Hullo, hullo I apologize if you got up set for my ACADEMIC discussions totally based on your profession and this article.

Dr.Sahib

When you have the courage to write this article and publish on chowk, you must have the courage to take the heat of a positive criticism with open heart and mind. If, you get offened so, easily just by mere criticism, wonder how you take the heat by psych patients? Psych patients are a real challenge for your patience. But, I am seeing opposite here.

Thank you for your response.
Sincerely
Zeena

#86 arey Ulloo..... Urstruly and Gill sahib are two different people....with two diametrically opposite views on somethings....and you have nto figured that out yet after being on chowk for 2 years..sharma naal dubb mar.

Khamkhwa and Dr sahiba re both from GTA but not the same person. so stop speculating when you obviously look disoriented in your specualtions.:)

on a serious note, why are some people so offended by the article? it almost feels like doctor has said few things in general which might apply to certain posters in particular and they are taking it so personally.:) bhaiyeO kisi di gall nai ho rahi...tuhade paRday dhakke hoye ne...don`t worry.

Re: # 94

Dear Saminasha...as I mentioned before I am new on chowk and not familiar with

the dynamics. Sometimes if I feel I do not know the whole situation or do not have

anything meaningful to say, I stay quiet. Please do not take it personally.

sincerely sohail

Re: # 90

Dear Zeena....My first response was to not respond. But then I decided to respond to your

letter as a token of respect as you have put so much time and energy to write a long letter.

It appears to me as if my article and my letter has offended you which was not my

intention. I tried to share that our similarities are more than our differences but you chose

to focus on the differences. I have no intention to convince you or convert you to my

philosophy. If you are happy with your point of view and it works for you that is great. My

philosophy works for me. I am just sharing my views. You have every right to disgree.

Since I do not know you I do not want to upset and offend you anymore so I will not be

responding to your future letters. Other readers are free to read or not read what I write.

They are also free to agree or disagree. My intention is sharing not convincing or

converting. Wish you all the best. sincerely sohail