unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Modi’s Men and their Mean Machines

Farzana Versey May 3, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#1 Posted by bharath on May 3, 2006 12:09:00 pm
Phew! what a venom! What a biased ranting and raving!

And then you wonder why there are Hindu extremists and Hindutvadis.

Despite your claims, feeble efforts to portray yourself as neutral
you come across as a frenzied partisan communalist.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on May 3, 2006 12:19:15 pm
FarzanaVersey {``A 32-year-old man was burnt alive by a crowd of 1,500, two days after the demolition.
.... Those who have faith believe. And those who want to prove that their beliefs are supreme make a spectacle of their own faith.
.... When you pray you are essentially talking to your soul. Why, then, let that private conversation become a tamasha?
...He should start with his own party’s Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi who started dancing the minute actor Feroz Khan made some negative comments about Pakistan, calling him a “true nationalist”. ``}


Farzana,

I love the way you fuse various seemingly unrelated events into your central theme for many of your articles. You tie together bits and pieces of news into a tidy bundle to expose the hypocrisy and mental disease afflicting society`s holy cows. Once again, you have authored a moving, informative, but very scathing sarcasm against bigotry, jingoism, and chauvinism. You didn`t state it openly, but to me it`s obvious that you are more incensed at the murder of the 32-year old man than at the demolition of the dargah. I agree with you - our priorities should always be with the sanctity and preservation of human life.

I am delighted at your consideration of prayer as a private conversation. I too feel the same way. Often, I don`t feel like joining other believers in a jamaat type prayer, preferring to say my own words to my own God, in my own way, in the privacy of my own soul.

Finally, please go easy on Feroz Khan. He is an extrovert and certainly not a diplomat. From what little I know about the incidence, his Pakistani host Fukhr-e-Alam was the instigator. Regardless, the Government of Pakistan had no right in expelling Feroz and not allowing him to proceed to Karachi. I see this as another Lahori attempt to dominate Karachi`s affairs. :) Thanks.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by delhiwala on May 3, 2006 12:22:38 pm
#1,
Chup hoja salley!

She is darned right.
Since when an old Sufi Dargah is an enroachment?
Dargah came before the Municipality office came.

Gujrat is becoming a hotbed of communal activities, and she is right BJP is using that as a trend setter for other parts of India.

When did Muslims in Gujrat fought against Hindus? I have never heard of that.
In U.P yes, I agree sometimes Muslims initiate the riots, but the poor Gujju Muslims does not deserve this, and all sensible Indians need to condemn this violence without any hesitation.

This gives a very bad face to India overseas and whole world looks at India as communal country.

They are taking unnecessary Panga.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by dost_mittar on May 3, 2006 12:23:45 pm
Dear Farzana:

``Surely, we cannot bring in history on every occasion and most certainly not to justify the acts of elected leaders in a democracy.``

Well said!

When I read about the news, I initially thought that it was the usual noise against municipal authorities doing their job, until I found out, as you have pointed out, that this ``encroachment`` has been there since more than a century. Modi may not have been directly involved in this affair - he probably has nothing to gain politically at this point and was doing alright with his newly-acquired image of an efficient administrator - but he has created a climate in Gujarat where any communal administrator can create a mischief with impunity; more than likely, the purpose was to provoke a riot and that purpose was achieved.

The municipal authorities may not have done anything illegal in demolishing this dargah, which according to the reports, was reverred by both Hindus and Muslims; if so, they were wongfully legal.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by delhiwala on May 3, 2006 12:27:00 pm
These Muslims who are in BJP.

I dont now how they manage their daily lives?

My dad used to know Sikandar Bakht, and personally he was a very likeable person. But his views on BJP and India, surprise me......

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on May 3, 2006 12:31:49 pm
bharath #1 {``Phew! what a venom! What a biased ranting and raving!
And then you wonder why there are Hindu extremists and Hindutvadis>``}

Bharath Bhai,
On this one, you are acting too much like a jingoistic chauvinist. Please try to read the same article that I read. Farzana is against religious bias whether in the tamasha of public prayer or in the demolition of harmless relics to gain votes. She is also pointing out the pusillanimous behavior of notorious crusaders for justice. There are Hindu extremists and Hindutvadis, just as there are Muslim extremists and Jihadists, because of unsupervised and insincere procreation. Relax and do try to keep an open mind. Thanks. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by swarrier on May 3, 2006 12:40:15 pm
#1

What`s wrong with the article? FV`s just asking why a 200 year old dargah was demolished? Was any reason given? And after 2002 shouldn`t this be handled a little more sensitively, even if the dargah had to go?

What`s being built there, that it was so imperative to knock it down?

Does anybody have any details on the demolition?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by jang on May 3, 2006 12:57:28 pm
i thought things in india cannot be demolished that easily, you need a court order. was there none in this case?

what next, sidhi-vinayak tample since its a traffic nightmare?
how about burying haji-ali under a flyover?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by Kulharee on May 3, 2006 1:07:13 pm
Doesn’t India have an Imminent Domain like we have in Pakistan, where State can demolish any place to build what it wants?

Warrier Ji, the State is widening the road, and the Darghah stood smack in the middle of it. Some compromise should have been worked out. Why are people so messed up?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on May 3, 2006 1:11:49 pm
#7, swarrier {``FV`s just asking why a 200 year old dargah was demolished? ``}
Warrier,
I think that she is more upset at the murder of the 32 year old man who was just driving his car. I have never been to Gujarat and from what I have been reading and hearing, I don`t think I will even try. What a shame that a country on the threshold of modernity has to put up with this gang of Nazis in one of its more ``advanced`` states?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by swarrier on May 3, 2006 1:13:55 pm
Re: # 8
Jang, remember Arthur Phillip Dent`s house. I think the court order may have been there, and either nobody paid attention to it, or it was being contested.
I think I will concur with DM`s analysis here, somebody wanted to provoke a riot.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by dullabhatti on May 3, 2006 1:25:12 pm
temples, dargahs and gurdwaras are on numerous roads and streets...many a times standing in the middle of it....but now that they are there, government should find out an alternate to traffic rather than demolish them...that is assuming that was the real reason to demolish this dargaah in question, which it does not seem to be.

I have seen some gurdwaras and dargaahs in East Punjab go up right on the roads in the alst 20 years...such encroachment should be stopped no doubt.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by nasah on May 3, 2006 1:26:44 pm
that crummy crazy jihadi-imitating Hindutva basatrd is hell bent on destroying the intercommunal harmony and tarnish the progressive image of India....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by jang on May 3, 2006 1:34:40 pm
warriorji, typically no civil servant will do this without a court order. its his neck on the line. if there is a stay, they patiently wait exchanging pan-tambaku. demolitions tend to be always politically touchy even if its a mere pan thela, and more the reason why they do it by the book.

there was an incident when comissioner of nagpur was going around with a buldozer, he would wait with a buldozer, get a phone call that the signing is done and immediately bulldoze to avoid any phone calls from politicians etc. his argument was all he needed was the magistrate signature, and he was all set. in one case i heard the shopkeeper was shouting i have advaniji on the mobile phone..chandrashekar ignored him.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by Urstruly on May 3, 2006 1:35:30 pm

I thought, in India, a dead Muslim was a good Muslims; but now it seems like them Hindus are after dead Muslims too.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by swarrier on May 3, 2006 1:42:38 pm
Re: # 9
Kul
I`m not saying it shouldn`t have gone. But if its 200 years old it can`t be an encroachment. I know a road in Ville-Parle that was widened. It has a tree right in the middle of it. They did not cut down the tree. It`s still there and people drive around it on the new wide road.
That`s why it would be good to know the details leading up to this demolition.

Salim
8 people were killed. Not just the poor person in his car. This is definitely for political mileage.


Modi like quite a few other politicians is an unscrupulous man. Yon Cassius has a lean and hungry look.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #202 nkg
    #201 samosa
    #200 nasah
    #199 dost_mittar
    #198 harimau
    #197 arjun_m
    #196 nasah
    #195 dost_mittar
    #194 arjun_m
    #193 swarrier
    #192 nasah
    #191 harimau
    #190 nasah
    #189 harish_hyd
    #188 Salim_Chauhan
    #187 FarzanaVersey
    #186 Zeena
    #185 HP
    #184 Zeena
    #183 harimau
    #182 Salim_Chauhan
    #181 dost_mittar
    #180 FarzanaVersey
    #179 harish_hyd
    #178 Zeena
    #177 Salim_Chauhan
    #176 samosa
    #175 FarzanaVersey
    #174 FarzanaVersey
    #173 Salim_Chauhan
    #172 Zeena
    #171 harimau
    #170 jang
    #169 Salim_Chauhan
    #168 Indian007
    #167 reva315
    #166 arjun_m
    #165 chaltahai
    #164 Indian007
    #163 FarzanaVersey
    #162 Indian007
    #161 Indian007
    #160 harimau
    #159 reva315
    #158 zeemax
    #157 wiseguyin
    #156 pmishra2
    #155 masanamuthu
    #154 FarzanaVersey
    #153 kaptain
    #152 aslam644
    #151 Zeena
    #150 wiseguyin
    #149 Zeena
    #148 wiseguyin
    #147 Zeena
    #146 wiseguyin
    #145 Zeena
    #144 harimau
    #143 wiseguyin
    #142 chaltahai
    #141 mohar11
    #140 wiseguyin
    #139 einsteinwallah
    #138 Zeena
    #137 swarrier
    #136 soysauce
    #135 HP
    #134 swarrier
    #133 jang
    #132 tvarad
    #131 FarzanaVersey
    #130 wiseguyin
    #129 Urstruly
    #128 swarrier
    #127 pmishra2
    #126 jang
    #125 jang
    #124 Aisha_Sarwari
    #123 FarzanaVersey
    #122 harimau
    #121 harimau
    #120 antihypochrist
    #119 Zeena
    #118 Zeena
    #117 krishna_abcd
    #116 ballukhan
    #115 ajeya
    #114 Ramanujan
    #113 HP
    #112 pmishra2
    #111 tvarad
    #110 wiseguyin
    #109 swarrier
    #108 jang
    #107 harimau
    #106 wiseguyin
    #105 samosa
    #104 arjun_m
    #103 samosa
    #102 samosa
    #101 soysauce
    #100 samosa
    #99 samosa
    #98 soysauce
    #97 Salim_Chauhan
    #96 Salim_Chauhan
    #95 samosa
    #94 samosa
    #93 samosa
    #92 soysauce
    #91 swarrier
    #90 mohar11
    #89 drlokraj
    #88 mohar11
    #87 mohar11
    #86 dost_mittar
    #85 HP
    #84 jang
    #83 jang
    #82 khamkhwa.
    #81 Indian007
    #80 Indian007
    #79 wiseguyin
    #78 khamkhwa.
    #77 samosa
    #76 samosa
    #75 Salim_Chauhan
    #74 jang
    #73 wiseguyin
    #72 mohar11
    #71 bongdongs
    #70 swarrier
    #69 jang
    #68 jang
    #67 arjun_m
    #66 nasah
    #65 jang
    #64 FarzanaVersey
    #63 FarzanaVersey
    #62 arjun_m
    #61 harimau
    #60 FarzanaVersey
    #59 FarzanaVersey
    #58 GT
    #57 delhiwala
    #56 delhiwala
    #56 delhiwala
    #55 Humsab
    #54 kedarnathji
    #53 jang
    #52 kedarnathji
    #51 jang
    #50 avkrishna
    #49 GT
    #48 bharath
    #47 kedarnathji
    #46 kedarnathji
    #45 harimau
    #44 antihypochrist
    #43 bharath
    #42 jang
    #41 samosa
    #40 GT
    #39 khamkhwa.
    #38 khamkhwa.
    #37 HP
    #36 arjun_m
    #35 guru
    #34 samosa
    #33 arjun_m
    #32 Salim_Chauhan
    #31 GT
    #30 swarrier
    #29 arjun_m
    #28 mohar11
    #27 GT
    #26 swarrier
    #25 Salim_Chauhan
    #24 mohar11
    #23 mohar11
    #22 Salim_Chauhan
    #21 mohar11
    #20 Salim_Chauhan
    #19 bongdongs
    #18 jang
    #17 swarrier
    #17 Salim_Chauhan
    #16 swarrier
    #15 Urstruly
    #14 jang
    #13 nasah
    #12 dullabhatti
    #11 swarrier
    #10 Salim_Chauhan
    #9 Kulharee
    #8 jang
    #7 swarrier
    #6 Salim_Chauhan
    #5 delhiwala
    #4 dost_mittar
    #3 delhiwala
    #2 Salim_Chauhan
    #1 bharath

Latest Interacts

  • _arjun9: #110 Posted by aslam644... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • tahir: Re: # 120 "since he... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • nb: Tahir, please, are you... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • tahir: Re: # 117 "daughters of... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • hamidm2: how i came to... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • tahir: Re: # 117 "you are... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • tahir: Re: # 111 "These losers... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • akcheema: Re: # 32 recently there's... Diabetes: Wrestling with a

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Muslims in America
  • Anti-Americanism in Pakistan and the Taliban Menace
  • Muslim Ghettoisation
  • The Lame Duck Government
  • Music: Muslim Madonna
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Lonesome Warrior
  • The Comfort Zone
  • The Life Hereafter
  • Saint Or Sinner?
  • Teaching and Popularizing Science

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited