Ras Siddiqui May 9, 2006
#56 Posted by subhashjoshi on May 11, 2006 6:41:30 am
Re: # 54 & 55 and various
Can we allow Gandhi and Jinnah to finally rest in peace?
I think nobody is going to blame G & J anymore if we scr*w up things for ourselves. It`s too late for that. So let the bygones be bygones.
G&J were mortals like us, it is but natural that they were at times weak, indecisive or plain stupid, may be. Just like everybody is. We have to move on from where they left, good or bad.
Sorry if my post sounded like a homily, but this G&J thing is too boring. Let`s have a more interesting fight.
Can we allow Gandhi and Jinnah to finally rest in peace?
I think nobody is going to blame G & J anymore if we scr*w up things for ourselves. It`s too late for that. So let the bygones be bygones.
G&J were mortals like us, it is but natural that they were at times weak, indecisive or plain stupid, may be. Just like everybody is. We have to move on from where they left, good or bad.
Sorry if my post sounded like a homily, but this G&J thing is too boring. Let`s have a more interesting fight.
#55 Posted by MantoLives on May 11, 2006 1:29:42 am
``Scruff of your neck``
Big words from a big bluffer.
#54 Posted by harish_hyd on May 10, 2006 11:30:14 pm
#53 by Mantolives
I knew this post would elicit this Pavlovian response from you. Please see #52 and come back to the other board where I have you by the scruff of your neck. Thanks.
I knew this post would elicit this Pavlovian response from you. Please see #52 and come back to the other board where I have you by the scruff of your neck. Thanks.
#53 Posted by MantoLives on May 10, 2006 10:50:18 pm
Harish mian,
Who is being clever by half on this board by posting this. You didn`t quote any ``Hard Copy`` reference there either. You posted a ``Review``.
Like I pointed out google sources - especially biased websites- are not the equivalent of hard copy sources which I have painstakingly produced. Furthermore, some of us have a tradition of collecting books... I can see how to the point, exact references that I produce have a disturbing effect on you.
You still haven`t responded to my question - which is unconcerned with Seervai as an authority on partition which a lot of your countrymen do consider him to be- that how your ``friends`` in the ``legal`` profession plead cases without consulting AIR Volumes?
My guess is that you made this up as you make up most of your stuff ...
Who is being clever by half on this board by posting this. You didn`t quote any ``Hard Copy`` reference there either. You posted a ``Review``.
Like I pointed out google sources - especially biased websites- are not the equivalent of hard copy sources which I have painstakingly produced. Furthermore, some of us have a tradition of collecting books... I can see how to the point, exact references that I produce have a disturbing effect on you.
You still haven`t responded to my question - which is unconcerned with Seervai as an authority on partition which a lot of your countrymen do consider him to be- that how your ``friends`` in the ``legal`` profession plead cases without consulting AIR Volumes?
My guess is that you made this up as you make up most of your stuff ...
#52 Posted by harish_hyd on May 10, 2006 10:31:17 pm
Oops. This one does not belong here. Apologies.
#51 Posted by harish_hyd on May 10, 2006 10:29:53 pm
#178 by Mantolives
Don`t try and jump off the topic now that you`ve been caught once again trying to be clever by half.
Call it trivia, but it is ``too clever by half``.
... (the bhagat singh issue was raised again by Drlokraj very effectively after I had acknowledged your point ... I think he clarified the real problem very well and you had no real answer to that.
I did dear Yasser. Lokraj said Gandhi was half-hearted. In that case, I can claim Jinnah was half-hearted too. So what does that prove? Your contention was that Gandhi did nothing. A simple Google search was enough to prove that you were peddling a blatant lie.
There is a book by A G Noorani called ``Trial of Bhagat Singh`` which also takes the same issue with Gandhi.
Prove it Yasser, instead of making wild assertions. Or is yet another claim in the already huge pile of unsubstantiated claims at which you`re so famous?
I am more interested in finding out how these ``Lawyers, Judges, Solicitors, advocates`` ( solicitors are not separate from advocates in Pakistan btw) plead cases or decide cases without ever consulting All India Reports which are replete with references to H M Seervai?
I don`t know nor did I find the need to ask them, given the fact that I`m not familiar with the intricacies of their profession. In any case, even if Seervai was all you claim, just how does it make him an authority on Jinnah`s intentions?
Also thank you very much for acknowledging that just like your imaginary friends in the legal professions, you don`t have any hard copy sources to prove your imaginary assertions.
Yaar Yasser, only a dumb idiot like you will rush to the nearerst library everytime there is a need to prove something. With so much available on the Internet to expose your spin, I simply don`t find any need to go to a library, nor do I have the inclination. At least disprove any of the assertions that I made, which will force me to look for a hard copy reference, but no, instead you will give silly excuses such as the one you made in response to Humayun Mirza`s claim that Jinnah sent his father to the NWFP to start a Jihad against the British. You said, ``Jinnah was angry``. I never had such a hearty laugh before.
Don`t try and jump off the topic now that you`ve been caught once again trying to be clever by half.
Call it trivia, but it is ``too clever by half``.
... (the bhagat singh issue was raised again by Drlokraj very effectively after I had acknowledged your point ... I think he clarified the real problem very well and you had no real answer to that.
I did dear Yasser. Lokraj said Gandhi was half-hearted. In that case, I can claim Jinnah was half-hearted too. So what does that prove? Your contention was that Gandhi did nothing. A simple Google search was enough to prove that you were peddling a blatant lie.
There is a book by A G Noorani called ``Trial of Bhagat Singh`` which also takes the same issue with Gandhi.
Prove it Yasser, instead of making wild assertions. Or is yet another claim in the already huge pile of unsubstantiated claims at which you`re so famous?
I am more interested in finding out how these ``Lawyers, Judges, Solicitors, advocates`` ( solicitors are not separate from advocates in Pakistan btw) plead cases or decide cases without ever consulting All India Reports which are replete with references to H M Seervai?
I don`t know nor did I find the need to ask them, given the fact that I`m not familiar with the intricacies of their profession. In any case, even if Seervai was all you claim, just how does it make him an authority on Jinnah`s intentions?
Also thank you very much for acknowledging that just like your imaginary friends in the legal professions, you don`t have any hard copy sources to prove your imaginary assertions.
Yaar Yasser, only a dumb idiot like you will rush to the nearerst library everytime there is a need to prove something. With so much available on the Internet to expose your spin, I simply don`t find any need to go to a library, nor do I have the inclination. At least disprove any of the assertions that I made, which will force me to look for a hard copy reference, but no, instead you will give silly excuses such as the one you made in response to Humayun Mirza`s claim that Jinnah sent his father to the NWFP to start a Jihad against the British. You said, ``Jinnah was angry``. I never had such a hearty laugh before.
#50 Posted by arstoo on May 10, 2006 7:51:05 pm
Ref#32
[First of all, India and Indians have been victims of Islamic terrorism since the early 90s.]
Dear Salim,
Just want to add to what you have said. You are slightly off the mark with your dates. India and Indians have been victims of Islamic terrorism since tha attack of M. Bin Qasim.
[First of all, India and Indians have been victims of Islamic terrorism since the early 90s.]
Dear Salim,
Just want to add to what you have said. You are slightly off the mark with your dates. India and Indians have been victims of Islamic terrorism since tha attack of M. Bin Qasim.
#49 Posted by Zeena on May 10, 2006 7:39:39 pm
Chowk Staff
Please, fix the article`s space. There is some technical glitch with this page.
Thanks
Please, fix the article`s space. There is some technical glitch with this page.
Thanks
#48 Posted by nasah on May 10, 2006 5:15:50 pm
OH my Wounded-Heads ones -- take off that sick bandage from your pretty heads and disappear in the Roman crowd.....with a clear head.
#47 Posted by Zeena on May 10, 2006 5:15:35 pm
And, why should I feel any responsibility> Responsibility for what? What did I do to feel guilty?
I am law abiding, heavy Tax paying , hardwroking , honest and loyal American citizen, then why should I need to remind any responsibility for 9/11 or for any gap or bridges by these idiotic Muslim organization?
I do not feel any gap. And, These idiots don`t know what they are talking about? God knows what they are trying to make out of America?
I am an American citizen, I condemn Muslim fanatic organization TO POLLUTE AMERICA with their stupid and hateful religion. America is not based on religion. It is based on basic human freedom. If they are that much keen of being religious , just pack their bags and leave America, lunatics.
I am law abiding, heavy Tax paying , hardwroking , honest and loyal American citizen, then why should I need to remind any responsibility for 9/11 or for any gap or bridges by these idiotic Muslim organization?
I do not feel any gap. And, These idiots don`t know what they are talking about? God knows what they are trying to make out of America?
I am an American citizen, I condemn Muslim fanatic organization TO POLLUTE AMERICA with their stupid and hateful religion. America is not based on religion. It is based on basic human freedom. If they are that much keen of being religious , just pack their bags and leave America, lunatics.
#46 Posted by Zeena on May 10, 2006 5:08:03 pm
#38
aktaie jii
Sorry, your post is irrelevant to my responses. You are discussing west and I am discussing South.
I can not comprehend your post, like you are unbale to comprehend my post. And irony is my posts are always very simple and straightforward.
I request you to please read my responses. I don`t deny that I am not Muslim.
Yes, I am denying the existence of these stupid fanatic organizations.
Again, my religion is my personal thing which has got nothing to do with my being American or not. Simple.............
aktaie jii
Sorry, your post is irrelevant to my responses. You are discussing west and I am discussing South.
I can not comprehend your post, like you are unbale to comprehend my post. And irony is my posts are always very simple and straightforward.
I request you to please read my responses. I don`t deny that I am not Muslim.
Yes, I am denying the existence of these stupid fanatic organizations.
Again, my religion is my personal thing which has got nothing to do with my being American or not. Simple.............
#44 Posted by nasah on May 10, 2006 5:01:06 pm
very simple -- remember tha famous saying -- don`t do in Mecca what the Romans do in Rome -- and don`t do in Rome what the Meccans do in Mecca -- and nobody will bother nobody .....
#43 Posted by bharath on May 10, 2006 3:16:11 pm
re#40
>>>>My question is again, if they are that much concerned about preserving their Muslim ethnicity and they are that much loyal with eachother based on their Muslim unity. Then why don`t they go back to their homeland countries and start bridging big gaps between poverty and hunger, between rich and poors............... <<<<<
Zeena MemSaab,
Very refreshing!
regards,
>>>>My question is again, if they are that much concerned about preserving their Muslim ethnicity and they are that much loyal with eachother based on their Muslim unity. Then why don`t they go back to their homeland countries and start bridging big gaps between poverty and hunger, between rich and poors............... <<<<<
Zeena MemSaab,
Very refreshing!
regards,
#42 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on May 10, 2006 2:18:28 pm
Siddiqui Sahib,
I mean seriously, sir, these imposters of ISNA, ICNA, CAIR, and other 4-letter words go around misrepresenting themselves as the sole spokesmen for 6 million to 7 million (the number keeps growing by a million every month!) ``Muslim`` Americans. This probably includes the almost 2 million expatriate Iranians most of whom have no desire to be associated with any religious outfit - especially a Wahabbi Sunni one.
Why can`t these few thousand people, with extra time on their hands, go around doing useful things - like picking up hot dog wrappers at ball parks? With their unbiased views and keen eyesight, perhaps they could judge wet T-shirt contests, or start halal barber shops, or better yet, consolidate their annoying organizations with Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Jerry Springer, or Jimmy Swaggart. In fact, much of the agenda of the extremist Muslims in America coincides with the Moral Majority and the 700 Club. No, the latter is not a strip joint in Norfolk with a staff of 700.
The sensible thing to do is to leave American Muslims alone. Let us be free to assimilate at our own rate and comfort level, instead of being hastily shoved into the mainstream out of rabid fear of being associated with the extremist Muslims. Can`t you see that these ``Muslim`` organizations are doing much more harm than the little good that is done by their phony appearances at Bar Mitzvahs and cross burnings?
Thanks to you guys, even our only claim to fun, yes the long-cherished institution of polygamy, has been hijacked by the Mormons of LDS - yeah, just watch an episode of ``Big Love.`` That could have been about us, if only we were perceived as good people. :)
I mean seriously, sir, these imposters of ISNA, ICNA, CAIR, and other 4-letter words go around misrepresenting themselves as the sole spokesmen for 6 million to 7 million (the number keeps growing by a million every month!) ``Muslim`` Americans. This probably includes the almost 2 million expatriate Iranians most of whom have no desire to be associated with any religious outfit - especially a Wahabbi Sunni one.
Why can`t these few thousand people, with extra time on their hands, go around doing useful things - like picking up hot dog wrappers at ball parks? With their unbiased views and keen eyesight, perhaps they could judge wet T-shirt contests, or start halal barber shops, or better yet, consolidate their annoying organizations with Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Jerry Springer, or Jimmy Swaggart. In fact, much of the agenda of the extremist Muslims in America coincides with the Moral Majority and the 700 Club. No, the latter is not a strip joint in Norfolk with a staff of 700.
The sensible thing to do is to leave American Muslims alone. Let us be free to assimilate at our own rate and comfort level, instead of being hastily shoved into the mainstream out of rabid fear of being associated with the extremist Muslims. Can`t you see that these ``Muslim`` organizations are doing much more harm than the little good that is done by their phony appearances at Bar Mitzvahs and cross burnings?
Thanks to you guys, even our only claim to fun, yes the long-cherished institution of polygamy, has been hijacked by the Mormons of LDS - yeah, just watch an episode of ``Big Love.`` That could have been about us, if only we were perceived as good people. :)
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- tahmed32: pinku: i really dont... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: ajeya: thanks for your... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- ajeya: #296 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- Dinaric: Re: # 295 I agree... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: #296 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: pinku/dinaric: going by chowk... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: Re #292 Posted by... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- Dinaric: Re: # 286 "Rather ISCON... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content