Irena Akbar July 4, 2006
#160 Posted by echoboom on July 7, 2006 9:42:49 am
``Naa ghabraa tuundiyay baad-i mukhalif sey aiy Uquaab
Yeh to chaltee hai tujhay Ooncha UurRanay kay liyay``...Allama Iqbal.
tr:
Worry not about the opposing ferocious gale O eagle
It is help you to soar higher..and higher..higher.
Watershed events which brought Islam to the west so that they convert in huge numbers:
Iranian revolution, Rushdie ( Laantee), Afghanistan, Iraq, Gulf 1, Gulf 2, 9/11, 7/7 & many other gales & eddies.
It is a disgrace when one is patted on the back , get one`s poonch straightened every
day, given a tidbit & rewarded with ``good doggie, nice doggie``.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_yorkshire/5153614.stm
One Muslim`s reflections on 7/7
Yeh to chaltee hai tujhay Ooncha UurRanay kay liyay``...Allama Iqbal.
tr:
Worry not about the opposing ferocious gale O eagle
It is help you to soar higher..and higher..higher.
Watershed events which brought Islam to the west so that they convert in huge numbers:
Iranian revolution, Rushdie ( Laantee), Afghanistan, Iraq, Gulf 1, Gulf 2, 9/11, 7/7 & many other gales & eddies.
It is a disgrace when one is patted on the back , get one`s poonch straightened every
day, given a tidbit & rewarded with ``good doggie, nice doggie``.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_yorkshire/5153614.stm
One Muslim`s reflections on 7/7
Jamil Ahmed says some good came out of the tragedy of 7/7
The London bombings proved to be a watershed in the life of Jamil Ahmed, a 35-year-old Muslim from Leeds.
The father-of-five from Harehills said the shock of 7/7
and the bombers` links to his home city forced him to reassess the
whole direction of his life.
He was inspired to quit his job to set up his own company promoting ethnic diversity in the workplace.
And he also believes that, far from alienating Muslims, the bombings have led to a wider understanding of Islam.
The events of 7/7 even forced him to reassess his faith, which he said has been strengthened as a result.


This is an opportunity, through very unfortunate circumstances, to create more understanding

Jamil Ahmed
``A year ago I was worried that the tragedy in London
would create polarisation of communities, but the reaction of the wider
British community has not been the way many people expected,`` he said.
``We as a society reacted very well to it and did not
fall apart, especially here in Leeds, where you might have expected a
strong backlash.
``It was actually something that brought people together to say we have all been affected by this.
``This is an opportunity, through very unfortunate circumstances, to create more understanding.
``People have come to terms with the fact that this was criminality which could come from any section of society.
``I think the whole issue forced people to come out of
their comfort zones and start to address the issues behind this
terrible act.``

Jamil Ahmed`s faith has been strengthened since 7/7
Mr Ahmed said the bombings made him ask tough questions about his relationship with Islam.
``I was quite weak in my religion and it was something I did not give much thought to.
``The events in London got me to think about what is Islam and I started to really look at the faith.
``I realised it was completely the opposite of what people portray it as.
``It has been a watershed in my life. My faith has been
strengthened and as a result I attend my local mosque at least four
times a day.
``Islam is not unique in having a code of respect and
honour for your neighbour or fellow human beings and valuing life. That
is in all faiths.
``We live to give to others not just to think about
ourselves. That is British and that is Islam - there is no conflict
whatsoever.
#159 Posted by Netizen on July 7, 2006 9:37:00 am
Irena:
``Agreed 16 per cent is a large chunk of people and 36 per cent is even larger but isn`t 64 per cent the largest of all and that it deserves to be the headline? ``
NO. because its very disturbing fact that there are still 16% around who justify the cowardly act. what is you were mercilessly raped and the 20% of the rapist family said that you deserved it. wouldn`t that be a unbelievable headline!
``The report added that 13 percent of the Muslims polled thought the bombers were martyrs while seven percent felt suicide attacks on British civilians were justified in some circumstances``
it just says a lot about the enemy-within the society that they will have to deal with. yes it is sensational and unbelievable.
a more accurate headline would been
``(16 + 13 + 7) 36% of british muslims stand and applaud british killers and we are silent!!``
``Agreed 16 per cent is a large chunk of people and 36 per cent is even larger but isn`t 64 per cent the largest of all and that it deserves to be the headline? ``
NO. because its very disturbing fact that there are still 16% around who justify the cowardly act. what is you were mercilessly raped and the 20% of the rapist family said that you deserved it. wouldn`t that be a unbelievable headline!
``The report added that 13 percent of the Muslims polled thought the bombers were martyrs while seven percent felt suicide attacks on British civilians were justified in some circumstances``
it just says a lot about the enemy-within the society that they will have to deal with. yes it is sensational and unbelievable.
a more accurate headline would been
``(16 + 13 + 7) 36% of british muslims stand and applaud british killers and we are silent!!``
#158 Posted by zeemax on July 7, 2006 9:16:03 am
Wah ... Wah ... what gems ... deserves to be written in golden words and repeated over and over again!
You belong to the category of bigoted Hindus... Otherwise how would you say, how would you blabber, how would you sleep at night without barking, how would you empty your bowels without saying, You seem to be the kind of person who just shouts in the cyber arena (for publicity sake since you don`t get any attention in reality)
Atta girl ... sock it to him ..... what a great addition to chowk.com
But really ... I do feel sorry to see the great Arjun Ram with his tail between his legs ... shivering like a wet puppy ...
Irena for Chief Editor ... no ... Prime Minister ...
You belong to the category of bigoted Hindus... Otherwise how would you say, how would you blabber, how would you sleep at night without barking, how would you empty your bowels without saying, You seem to be the kind of person who just shouts in the cyber arena (for publicity sake since you don`t get any attention in reality)
Atta girl ... sock it to him ..... what a great addition to chowk.com
But really ... I do feel sorry to see the great Arjun Ram with his tail between his legs ... shivering like a wet puppy ...
Irena for Chief Editor ... no ... Prime Minister ...
#157 Posted by swarrier on July 7, 2006 8:47:35 am
Re: # 119
Tahmed,
I still think Arjun is anti Pakistani and not completely anti Muslim.
Now I got along quite well with the average Pakistanis I used to play cricket with in Boston/Dorchester/Cambridge etc. We had mixed club primarily Indians with a sprinkling of Pakistanis, one Sri Lankan, one Englishman one American and two Jamaicans. Nobody hated each other.
But there are people in Pakistan who don`t mind coming to India to kill civilians for the sake of whatever they believe in. That isn`t quite the done thing.
I don`t make a claim that all Hindus are nice and innocent either.
I`m sure qutite a few of us will agree that a little bit of religion, customs etc is good, too much can be quite stultifying and ultimately dangerous. There is a kernel of evil in all of us. It does not take much to nuture it.
To quote your favourite on another board
`` The evil that men do lives after them,
The good is oft interred with their bones.``
Tahmed,
I still think Arjun is anti Pakistani and not completely anti Muslim.
Now I got along quite well with the average Pakistanis I used to play cricket with in Boston/Dorchester/Cambridge etc. We had mixed club primarily Indians with a sprinkling of Pakistanis, one Sri Lankan, one Englishman one American and two Jamaicans. Nobody hated each other.
But there are people in Pakistan who don`t mind coming to India to kill civilians for the sake of whatever they believe in. That isn`t quite the done thing.
I don`t make a claim that all Hindus are nice and innocent either.
I`m sure qutite a few of us will agree that a little bit of religion, customs etc is good, too much can be quite stultifying and ultimately dangerous. There is a kernel of evil in all of us. It does not take much to nuture it.
To quote your favourite on another board
`` The evil that men do lives after them,
The good is oft interred with their bones.``
#156 Posted by arjun_m on July 7, 2006 8:31:37 am
#152 by vivek on July 7, 2006 7:59am PT
The fact of the matter is 16% supporting the bombers in the very country which was bombed is a very high number
Media is biased against muslims
Non-muslims are biased against muslims
bottom line: Reality is biased against muslims..
The fact of the matter is 16% supporting the bombers in the very country which was bombed is a very high number
Media is biased against muslims
Non-muslims are biased against muslims
bottom line: Reality is biased against muslims..
#155 Posted by krishna_abcd on July 7, 2006 8:27:51 am
I`ve said this many times on Chowk before, and I`ll say this again. Muslims and Islam present a danger to humanity compared to which Communism, Nazism and Fascism are insignificant. People like Hamidm, SR, VRV etc. may be liberal and progressive human beings, but their family members may not be. They may be raising the next generation of Osamas without realizing it.
Regardless of the level of this realization in Europe and America today, the day will surely come when this realization will hit home. It`s just that it might be too late by then. People like the author of the current article illustrate how this cancer is slowly but surely spreading in the West.
When I was young, my father gave me the autobiography of Winston Churchill to read. He told me to note two things - how very good English can be written using simple sentences, and also how intelligent and highly perceptive men can also be so biased in their world view because of their upbringing. So although Chuchill was an arrogant British Imperialist to the core, and never really could get rid of the biases of the particular class he was born into, he was also a very thoughtful and inquisitive person. For example - his thought experiments about the ``reality`` of our existence.
So I would like to re-quote his views on Islam and Muslims, which I think are highly accurate:
[How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.
Winston Churchill
The River War]
#154 Posted by arjun_m on July 7, 2006 8:24:28 am
#143 by lucknawi on July 7, 2006 7:19am PT
Use a simple Internet tool called Google
Why don`t you google for reports in the media about hindus killing muslims and the victims clearly being identified as muslims..
IN fact, i`ll post the link for you..CLick here
You can change the source to other newspapers if you want..
Use a simple Internet tool called Google
Why don`t you google for reports in the media about hindus killing muslims and the victims clearly being identified as muslims..
IN fact, i`ll post the link for you..CLick here
You can change the source to other newspapers if you want..
#153 Posted by SN on July 7, 2006 8:08:44 am
Irena Akbar,
Are u for real??? What a shocking news that 1 out of 6 side with the bombers....Where is ur outrage on that? Instead all I see is you lamenting about some obsure heading in a newspaper. Get a hold...
And whats with calling everybody Fascist, Hindutva, Modi supporter etc when they dont agree with you?
SN
Are u for real??? What a shocking news that 1 out of 6 side with the bombers....Where is ur outrage on that? Instead all I see is you lamenting about some obsure heading in a newspaper. Get a hold...
And whats with calling everybody Fascist, Hindutva, Modi supporter etc when they dont agree with you?
SN
#152 Posted by vivek on July 7, 2006 7:59:03 am
The fact of the matter is 16% supporting the bombers in the very country which was bombed is a very high number, and the author is busy whining about a newspaper reporting about it. Newspaper articles like this are based on perception with in the muslim community, the author would serve a better purpose if she helped in altering the perception instead of whining about it.
#151 Posted by pmishra2 on July 7, 2006 7:46:21 am
# arjun_m
I think there is no need to look for conspiracy theories. It is well know that there is an ugly, left-wing, hypocitical world-view in which the workings of open societies are held to extremely high standards while at the same time completely ignoring the violence and hatred emerging from mono-cultural countries like China/Saudi Arabia/Pakistan.
The problems of US/UK/Israel are used to justify violence against civilians and other misbehavior while maintaining complete silence over the cultural and physical genocide of tibetans in china, the extinction of hindus in pakistan, the 100s of billions of saudi money used for islamofascist indoctrination.
This is the world view Irena-ji belongs to. They are thousands of these comrades, living comfortably in the open and democratic society of india while at the same time spewing contempt for the state that nurtures them.
I believe in democracy and these people have the right to behave as they wish. But at the same time, they need to understand that they will be judged as apologists and supporters of violence and closed, authoritarian societies.
Just shouting ``RSS``, ``hindu fascist`` does not count as an argument anywhere outside of the JNU campus.
I think there is no need to look for conspiracy theories. It is well know that there is an ugly, left-wing, hypocitical world-view in which the workings of open societies are held to extremely high standards while at the same time completely ignoring the violence and hatred emerging from mono-cultural countries like China/Saudi Arabia/Pakistan.
The problems of US/UK/Israel are used to justify violence against civilians and other misbehavior while maintaining complete silence over the cultural and physical genocide of tibetans in china, the extinction of hindus in pakistan, the 100s of billions of saudi money used for islamofascist indoctrination.
This is the world view Irena-ji belongs to. They are thousands of these comrades, living comfortably in the open and democratic society of india while at the same time spewing contempt for the state that nurtures them.
I believe in democracy and these people have the right to behave as they wish. But at the same time, they need to understand that they will be judged as apologists and supporters of violence and closed, authoritarian societies.
Just shouting ``RSS``, ``hindu fascist`` does not count as an argument anywhere outside of the JNU campus.
#150 Posted by lucknawi on July 7, 2006 7:39:56 am
Oye Mishra,
You just proved MY point by saying, “I have also seen many reports in which ``a certain community`` burnt down press offices, shops, goverment offices and killed people because of salman rushdie, danish cartoons etc”.
That’s exactly what I have been trying to say all along. That when Muslims do wrong, their religion is identified but when they suffer, their religion is NOT identified.
Clap, Clap, Clap! Mishra-ji just put across my point!
Irena Akbar
You just proved MY point by saying, “I have also seen many reports in which ``a certain community`` burnt down press offices, shops, goverment offices and killed people because of salman rushdie, danish cartoons etc”.
That’s exactly what I have been trying to say all along. That when Muslims do wrong, their religion is identified but when they suffer, their religion is NOT identified.
Clap, Clap, Clap! Mishra-ji just put across my point!
Irena Akbar
#149 Posted by lucknawi on July 7, 2006 7:34:05 am
Re: # 140
Mian Pandit Mishra-ji,
My only Leftist ``illogical`` reply to you is that you have either not read my article carefully or have failed to understand its rather simple point. It only talks of media bias against Muslims. It does not justify 16 per cent of UK Muslims supporting the bombers. It`s your wishful, whimsical, wierd, Hindutva-Moditva, ``Rightist logical`` thinking that makes you want to belive that I am trying to clean-chit the 16 per cent UK Muslims.
Irena Akbar (Farzana Versey in arjun_m`s little chowk world)
Mian Pandit Mishra-ji,
My only Leftist ``illogical`` reply to you is that you have either not read my article carefully or have failed to understand its rather simple point. It only talks of media bias against Muslims. It does not justify 16 per cent of UK Muslims supporting the bombers. It`s your wishful, whimsical, wierd, Hindutva-Moditva, ``Rightist logical`` thinking that makes you want to belive that I am trying to clean-chit the 16 per cent UK Muslims.
Irena Akbar (Farzana Versey in arjun_m`s little chowk world)
#148 Posted by VRV on July 7, 2006 7:27:48 am
Ms. Akber,
As u claim to be a journalist, u must aware of this attractive headings, the pressmen crave to highlight. That`s normal.
The 16% is quite alarming. I guess it`s more than that.
You said: ......the media is disturbingly biased against the coverage of Muslims...
That`s not true.
If 1% of your body cells contain cencer (cells), would u ignore & say that 99% is OK, why bother? You need to worry about the problem even if it`s small......
As u claim to be a journalist, u must aware of this attractive headings, the pressmen crave to highlight. That`s normal.
The 16% is quite alarming. I guess it`s more than that.
You said: ......the media is disturbingly biased against the coverage of Muslims...
That`s not true.
If 1% of your body cells contain cencer (cells), would u ignore & say that 99% is OK, why bother? You need to worry about the problem even if it`s small......
#147 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 7:22:27 am
zeemax: with friends like you, though, muslims dont need any enemies. why dont you become a hindu and spare us all the embarassment of your hiding from the obvious truth?
#146 Posted by swarrier on July 7, 2006 7:20:51 am
Re: # 101
Sri
`` do you feel there is any rational reason for a not-so-religious backward caste hindu like me to hate muslims ?``
You tell me. What does religion and caste have to do with this? You can be an atheist and have as many rational reasons to hate some of them as like some of them.
My point is saying, ``I hate Muslims`` is like saying ``I like Americans``. So would you like all Americans including their share of crooks, murderers, killers, theives ......
It is not necessary to hate people on the basis of religion, ethnicity etc.
Sri
`` do you feel there is any rational reason for a not-so-religious backward caste hindu like me to hate muslims ?``
You tell me. What does religion and caste have to do with this? You can be an atheist and have as many rational reasons to hate some of them as like some of them.
My point is saying, ``I hate Muslims`` is like saying ``I like Americans``. So would you like all Americans including their share of crooks, murderers, killers, theives ......
It is not necessary to hate people on the basis of religion, ethnicity etc.
#145 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 7:19:46 am
lucknawi #138 Yes of course it is a terrible thing for an Indian muslim to call a Pakistani a friend. :-) Good Indian muslims must constantly demonstrate their loyalty to India by following these burnt up hindu men in their demonization of Pakistanis and by apologizing for being commie muslims themselves.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- nkg: Re: # 66 Ahmed... The basic... US Commando Strike in
- ibaunited: a very famous marlboro... Spare Us The Smoke,
- MatloobZaman: Re: # 5 I am... Honor Killings in Babakot
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 64 I... US Commando Strike in
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 64 I... US Commando Strike in
- nkg: Re: # 62 Ahmed... You should... US Commando Strike in
- nkg: Re: # 59 ahmed... Yes sir,... US Commando Strike in
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 61 Major... US Commando Strike in








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content