Irena Akbar July 4, 2006
#128 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 5:54:57 am
#126 and if you have something to write, say it now. i dont have all day waiting for you to craft a clever answer!!
#127 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 5:52:55 am
#126 i didnt say ``brimming``. you added that. if you wish to comment on something i wrote, have the honesty to cut and paste what i wrote and keep your response within the context of what i wrote.
do i need to teach you how to be honest given that no one ever taught you?
do i need to teach you how to be honest given that no one ever taught you?
#126 Posted by harish_hyd on July 7, 2006 5:49:59 am
#122 by tahmed32
dont try to twist what i wrote. write like an honest man if you want me to respond to your post.
You said Pakis are brimming with goodwill for Indians. I just proved the opposite of what you wrote. Too bad you couldn`t digest the fact, your loss.
dont try to twist what i wrote. write like an honest man if you want me to respond to your post.
You said Pakis are brimming with goodwill for Indians. I just proved the opposite of what you wrote. Too bad you couldn`t digest the fact, your loss.
#124 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 5:47:34 am
lacknavi: i gave up a long time ago trying to reason with the likes of arjun. you dont reason with fanatics or fools.
PS: this replaces #123 and makes it more accurate. :-)
PS: this replaces #123 and makes it more accurate. :-)
#123 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 5:46:33 am
lacknavi: i gave up a long time ago trying to reason with the likes of arjun. you dont reason with fanatics.
#122 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 5:45:41 am
#120 dont try to twist what i wrote. write like an honest man if you want me to respond to your post.
#121 Posted by lucknawi on July 7, 2006 5:36:45 am
Arjun_m,
Nowhere does my article has anything that hints of support for terrorism or extremism. Produce any such sentence in the article to prove your allegation against me. I am pretty sure you can`t digest the fact that as a Muslim, I call myself a ``proud Indian``. You belong to the category of bigoted Hindus who would like to believe that Indian Mulsims can never be proud of being Indian and that they support Pakistan. You belong to the category of Hindus who, as secularist (in your view, pseudo-secularist) writer Amulya Ganguli says would love to see Muslims as terrorists and anti-women as that is what constitues the fodder of their hate campaign.
Irena Akbar
Nowhere does my article has anything that hints of support for terrorism or extremism. Produce any such sentence in the article to prove your allegation against me. I am pretty sure you can`t digest the fact that as a Muslim, I call myself a ``proud Indian``. You belong to the category of bigoted Hindus who would like to believe that Indian Mulsims can never be proud of being Indian and that they support Pakistan. You belong to the category of Hindus who, as secularist (in your view, pseudo-secularist) writer Amulya Ganguli says would love to see Muslims as terrorists and anti-women as that is what constitues the fodder of their hate campaign.
Irena Akbar
#120 Posted by harish_hyd on July 7, 2006 5:36:20 am
#119 by tahmed32
and outside chowk there is a lot of goodwill for indians in pakistan - as indian visitors to pakistan have found for themselves.
Sure..the AK-47 wielding terrorists who cross over into India from Pakistan are brimming with goodwill for Indians.
and outside chowk there is a lot of goodwill for indians in pakistan - as indian visitors to pakistan have found for themselves.
Sure..the AK-47 wielding terrorists who cross over into India from Pakistan are brimming with goodwill for Indians.
#119 Posted by tahmed32 on July 7, 2006 5:24:54 am
swarrier #97 I basically agree with everything (but not all, as mentioned below) that you write, and only wish some other posters on chowk had a tenth of your honesty. we could then actually have some discussion, rather than argument - and learn something from one another in the process!!
wrt ben laden, i would be disappointed if any newspaper (indian or otherwise) had anything good to say about this individual - just as i would be disappointed if anyone had anything good to say about Timothy McVeigh. Some individuals place themselves outside the limits of human society by their actions: and ben laden and mcveigh belong to that group.
regarding arjun - i dont consider him an antagonist since i dont waste time ``debating`` things with him. i dont agree with you though that this hatred is not targetted to muslims in general. of course it is. when many illegal immigrants from pakistan were deported from the US after 9/11, arjun was besides himself with joy at this. those were not ``jihadis`` who were deported, but ordinary people who no doubt broke the law - but by no stretch can be considered equivalent to murderous criminals. and there are others - like ranjit and gujjubania - who were besides themselves with joy at the recent earthquake even as the victims were buried under rubble.
nor do i think is this spite reciprocated by pakistanis as you seem to indicate - on chowk, you will find pakstanis ranting against the west or against one another. but you wont find an arjun or a gujjubania.
and outside chowk there is a lot of goodwill for indians in pakistan - as indian visitors to pakistan have found for themselves. i hope that stays over time even after borders open and there is greater intermingling of people.
wrt ben laden, i would be disappointed if any newspaper (indian or otherwise) had anything good to say about this individual - just as i would be disappointed if anyone had anything good to say about Timothy McVeigh. Some individuals place themselves outside the limits of human society by their actions: and ben laden and mcveigh belong to that group.
regarding arjun - i dont consider him an antagonist since i dont waste time ``debating`` things with him. i dont agree with you though that this hatred is not targetted to muslims in general. of course it is. when many illegal immigrants from pakistan were deported from the US after 9/11, arjun was besides himself with joy at this. those were not ``jihadis`` who were deported, but ordinary people who no doubt broke the law - but by no stretch can be considered equivalent to murderous criminals. and there are others - like ranjit and gujjubania - who were besides themselves with joy at the recent earthquake even as the victims were buried under rubble.
nor do i think is this spite reciprocated by pakistanis as you seem to indicate - on chowk, you will find pakstanis ranting against the west or against one another. but you wont find an arjun or a gujjubania.
and outside chowk there is a lot of goodwill for indians in pakistan - as indian visitors to pakistan have found for themselves. i hope that stays over time even after borders open and there is greater intermingling of people.
#118 Posted by arjun_m on July 7, 2006 5:14:43 am
#117 by lucknawi on July 7, 2006 4:56am PT
Dear author
you are an apologist for Islamist terrorist and the muslim community that tolerates the extremism that breeds people like the London bombers..
Dear author
you are an apologist for Islamist terrorist and the muslim community that tolerates the extremism that breeds people like the London bombers..
#117 Posted by lucknawi on July 7, 2006 4:56:46 am
Dear Interactors,
Thanks for your comments, most of which, were bizarre. Only Swarrior, Mantolives, Folio and Tahmed made any sense. By the way, I am not a Pakistani Briton. Very much an Indian and proud one at that.
Irena Akbar
Thanks for your comments, most of which, were bizarre. Only Swarrior, Mantolives, Folio and Tahmed made any sense. By the way, I am not a Pakistani Briton. Very much an Indian and proud one at that.
Irena Akbar
#116 Posted by arjun_m on July 7, 2006 4:44:20 am
#102 by zeemax on July 6, 2006 11:48pm PT
Neither his wife nor his neighbors nor anyone else in Beeston, Leeds believe that was him
Right..and we should take the word of his wife and neighbours over that of everyone else because the wife and neighbours are muslims and as we all know, muslims never lie and have an amazing grasp of reality and are never in denial..
plus, we know no muslim would ever do something like bombing a subway..
OTOH, non-muslims are genetically predisposed to staging such things as the 9/11 attacks, london bombings, madrid bombings, bombings in israel and indian parliament attack and pinning the blame on muslims..the grand conspiracy against muslims is an amazingly multicultural tapestry of all races and religions(barring the religion of peace of course)..
What about the videos made by the bombers themselves, the latest of which was released yesterday...that`s all part of the same conspiracy..
Neither his wife nor his neighbors nor anyone else in Beeston, Leeds believe that was him
Right..and we should take the word of his wife and neighbours over that of everyone else because the wife and neighbours are muslims and as we all know, muslims never lie and have an amazing grasp of reality and are never in denial..
plus, we know no muslim would ever do something like bombing a subway..
OTOH, non-muslims are genetically predisposed to staging such things as the 9/11 attacks, london bombings, madrid bombings, bombings in israel and indian parliament attack and pinning the blame on muslims..the grand conspiracy against muslims is an amazingly multicultural tapestry of all races and religions(barring the religion of peace of course)..
What about the videos made by the bombers themselves, the latest of which was released yesterday...that`s all part of the same conspiracy..
#115 Posted by harish_hyd on July 7, 2006 4:42:24 am
#114 by zeemax
You want proof of their innocence from me? I thought in the great democratic socities where you live, the burden of proof lies upon the accuser and not the accused ...
Tomes have already been written about the case which proves beyond reasonable doubt that it was the 4 Brit-Pakis that did it. More obviously, it is clear as daylight from the CCTV footage and the videotapes. Now since YOU made the claim that they were framed, it is incumbent upon YOU to prove that.
You want proof of their innocence from me? I thought in the great democratic socities where you live, the burden of proof lies upon the accuser and not the accused ...
Tomes have already been written about the case which proves beyond reasonable doubt that it was the 4 Brit-Pakis that did it. More obviously, it is clear as daylight from the CCTV footage and the videotapes. Now since YOU made the claim that they were framed, it is incumbent upon YOU to prove that.
#114 Posted by zeemax on July 7, 2006 4:03:52 am
#112 by harish_hyd
??? You want proof of their innocence from me? I thought in the great democratic socities where you live, the burden of proof lies upon the accuser and not the accused ...
But never mind ...
??? You want proof of their innocence from me? I thought in the great democratic socities where you live, the burden of proof lies upon the accuser and not the accused ...
But never mind ...
#113 Posted by zeemax on July 7, 2006 3:59:32 am
Quoted from NY Times, 7/7/06.
The BBC quoted the father of another bomber, Hasib Mir Hussain, 18, as denying that his son was involved. ``No one has shown me any evidence that he did it,`` Mahmood Hussain said.
Noone has shown him any evidence because there isn`t any ...
The BBC quoted the father of another bomber, Hasib Mir Hussain, 18, as denying that his son was involved. ``No one has shown me any evidence that he did it,`` Mahmood Hussain said.
Noone has shown him any evidence because there isn`t any ...
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- KaalChakra: That is exactly right,... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- sadna: rahul_capri He might have felt... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- rahul_capri: sadna, humanitarian and political... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- sadna: kaalchakra Only Muslims get picked... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: And here is my... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- marshakala: It's great to see... Three Cups of Tea
- Cobra: sharmeenqazi1, I'm not your... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- sadna: rahul_capri Since we don't know... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content