Rakesh Mani August 7, 2006
#1 Posted by Inquirer on August 7, 2006 9:33:36 am
The author has described useful sounding organizations: DIA, DESI and IndiCorps. What is his purpose?
He should have catalogued the individual activities by them and then indictated what he wants done by others, Chowkies included.
He should have catalogued the individual activities by them and then indictated what he wants done by others, Chowkies included.
#2 Posted by rakeshmani on August 7, 2006 4:31:03 pm
Re: # 1
Inquirer sahab,
The author has not just described these organisations but has also taken the pains of succintly explaining what DIA and IndiCorps do. Perhaps asking for some more ``inquiry`` on your part would not be uncalled for.
As for the others, the gist of it is that others ought to appreciate such examples and be inspired.. and then either participate in such initiatives to change/improve our societies from the youth level or, for the more enterprising amongst us, to try and set up such organisations ourselves where we feel they might be helpful and successful.
Inquirer sahab,
The author has not just described these organisations but has also taken the pains of succintly explaining what DIA and IndiCorps do. Perhaps asking for some more ``inquiry`` on your part would not be uncalled for.
As for the others, the gist of it is that others ought to appreciate such examples and be inspired.. and then either participate in such initiatives to change/improve our societies from the youth level or, for the more enterprising amongst us, to try and set up such organisations ourselves where we feel they might be helpful and successful.
#3 Posted by Inquirer on August 8, 2006 5:25:14 am
Re: # 2, rakeshmani:
The Chowk is a discussion forum. If I were to follow your philosopy my succinct response would be that the article is: succinct, insubstantive and ineffective.
Now that does not open many avenues of interactions, does it?
The Chowk is a discussion forum. If I were to follow your philosopy my succinct response would be that the article is: succinct, insubstantive and ineffective.
Now that does not open many avenues of interactions, does it?
#4 Posted by rakeshmani on August 8, 2006 4:14:36 pm
Re: # 3
To each his own sir. Depends on how you look at it.
To each his own sir. Depends on how you look at it.
Interact Index
Also by Rakesh Mani
Similar Articles
- Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses Dost Mittar
- Feminist Mumbo-Jumbo! Pranay Rupani
- Translation of a (Love) Letter by Allama Iqbal to Miss Atiya Faizi Asif Naqshbandi
- Fields Of Joy Umer Murtaza
- Time for Musharraf to Quit saeed qureshi
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- pakistan3: Re: # 362 tahmed32, It takes... Dhokha and Being a
- tahmed32: and i once had... Dhokha and Being a
- tahmed32: pakistan: ok, you got... Dhokha and Being a
- pakistan3: Re: # 359 unlike you,... Dhokha and Being a
- Naqshbandi: and this link explores... Translation of a (Love)
- tahmed32: further to #257: although... Dhokha and Being a
- masanamuthu: Mystic: #325: One advice. CAPS... Dhokha and Being a
- tahmed32: #355 pakistan: point well... Dhokha and Being a








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content