Mohammad Gill August 24, 2006
#66 Posted by tahmed32 on August 26, 2006 8:47:27 am
zeemax/echoboom: and one more thing - this labelling of any individual who puts the mirror to your face as an ahmedi is another old mullah trick. You can play your dirty tricks in front of fellow mullahs in Pakistan - but you cant play dirty tricks with anyone else. and you cant play your dirty tricks with Allah.
#68 Posted by tahmed32 on August 26, 2006 8:49:12 am
#65 dont try to be too clever. your understanding of islam is as idiotic as your understanding of economics. also see #66 below.
i have to go now, but will be back later. you can in the meantime pollute this board with your mullah crap.
i have to go now, but will be back later. you can in the meantime pollute this board with your mullah crap.
#69 Posted by tahmed32 on August 26, 2006 8:50:14 am
#67 i am a muslim - so i invoke allah. not a kafir like you who invokes mullahs and terrorists.
#70 Posted by zeemax on August 26, 2006 8:51:12 am
But tahmed, now that your sole remaining friend arjun_M(acaca) has been kicked out on his butt, You deserve pity, if not sympathy.
So you should leave too. Keep some remaining honour intact.
So you should leave too. Keep some remaining honour intact.
#71 Posted by zeemax on August 26, 2006 8:53:12 am
Okay .. repeat after me ... :
La` Ilalah` Illallah` Muhammad-ur-Rasul Illah``.
La` Ilalah` Illallah` Muhammad-ur-Rasul Illah``.
#72 Posted by echoboom on August 26, 2006 9:26:35 am
Zeemax:
Quadiani32 is getting outed ever so gingerly. Just like Mirza Ghulam-i-Farangi , he is an impostor muslim as well.
The CLEAREST giveaway of a Quadiani is the he will never ever say ANYTHING critical of United Satans ( aka ``Coalition``).
He has been advised to always support any government ..as long as it is NON-MUSLIM.
tQuadiani32 will NEVER be against ISRAEL, US, or UK.
The proof is in his phhudding--just watch him phuddak phuddak now.
Quadiani32 is getting outed ever so gingerly. Just like Mirza Ghulam-i-Farangi , he is an impostor muslim as well.
The CLEAREST giveaway of a Quadiani is the he will never ever say ANYTHING critical of United Satans ( aka ``Coalition``).
He has been advised to always support any government ..as long as it is NON-MUSLIM.
tQuadiani32 will NEVER be against ISRAEL, US, or UK.
The proof is in his phhudding--just watch him phuddak phuddak now.
#73 Posted by aquaris on August 26, 2006 9:41:06 am
The question in the article...
– What Next?
How about this....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ralph_Peters_solution_to_Mideast.jpg
Mr Ralph Peter preposes a re-drawing of the map of the muslim world....
especially getting the city of Mecca and Madina.....out of the hand of Al-Saud.
giving these holy cities in the hand of a rotationary concil...
also.... Pakistan will be among the biggest losers....with Balochistan going to an independet FREE Balochistan.. and NWFP going to Afghanistan..!!
#74 Posted by krishna_abcd on August 26, 2006 10:12:11 am
#73 by aquaris
[....especially getting the city of Mecca and Madina.....out of the hand of Al-Saud.
giving these holy cities in the hand of a rotationary concil...
also.... Pakistan will be among the biggest losers....with Balochistan going to an independet FREE Balochistan.. and NWFP going to Afghanistan..!! ]
Also, consistent with the ``right of return`` as it pertains to the Israeli issue, how about the ``right of return`` for Jews and Christians to Mecca and Medina?
Any takers? How about all you uncompromising islamic ``intellects``?
How about it? Eh? :)
[....especially getting the city of Mecca and Madina.....out of the hand of Al-Saud.
giving these holy cities in the hand of a rotationary concil...
also.... Pakistan will be among the biggest losers....with Balochistan going to an independet FREE Balochistan.. and NWFP going to Afghanistan..!! ]
Also, consistent with the ``right of return`` as it pertains to the Israeli issue, how about the ``right of return`` for Jews and Christians to Mecca and Medina?
Any takers? How about all you uncompromising islamic ``intellects``?
How about it? Eh? :)
#75 Posted by zeemax on August 26, 2006 10:17:15 am
#74
Shut up on your inanities ... let qadiani32 come back ....
Shut up on your inanities ... let qadiani32 come back ....
#76 Posted by queen_cut_paste on August 26, 2006 10:23:48 am
#74 abey they do not have g-mein-d to do much. All they can do in the words of zeemax is to ``bugger off`` which they have practiced since they were little brownie boys in their madrassa funded by the ayrabs......a source of camel jocks and PALs...
#77 Posted by krishna_abcd on August 26, 2006 11:08:22 am
#75 by zeemax
Go play with your viagra pills.
Go play with your viagra pills.
#78 Posted by nasah on August 26, 2006 11:54:38 am
Fallouts of Lebanon war -- Ehud Olmert -- translated in Arabic -- Yahud Ulmaut -- will be out of business by the end of the year -- Hizbollah will remain armed and part of the new Lebanese government -- Bashar will go back to his profession of cataract surgery -- Shia Iraq governed by the Shia -- Sunni Syria governed by the Sunnis -- the new rule in the sectarianized Middle East(thanks to that Gee Whiz Texas dimwit).....
the new slogan -- the Shia ME must have Shia Nuclear bombs -- after Israeli stupid moronic unnecessarily destructive invasion of an innocuous innocent Lebanon -- Iran will go after the bomb -- no matter what -- the only safe bet for not being invaded.....and NOT being Qanad -- or NOT being Fallujad.....
.....the nuclear opposition in Iran has melted -- now nuclearization is a question of `life &/Or death` for Iran -- the same way Manhattan projects was for USA -- or the Russian A bomb was for USSR after Hiroshima....
Middle East will get ready for much awaited -- much cherished -- the Great Armageddon....the Mother of ALL Holocausts -- in 2010.....if McMc -- Mccacca McCain replaces the BBBB -- the Bumbling Born-again Buffoon Bush.....`Inshallah`
after the eternally 2 too tiring years....
the new slogan -- the Shia ME must have Shia Nuclear bombs -- after Israeli stupid moronic unnecessarily destructive invasion of an innocuous innocent Lebanon -- Iran will go after the bomb -- no matter what -- the only safe bet for not being invaded.....and NOT being Qanad -- or NOT being Fallujad.....
.....the nuclear opposition in Iran has melted -- now nuclearization is a question of `life &/Or death` for Iran -- the same way Manhattan projects was for USA -- or the Russian A bomb was for USSR after Hiroshima....
Middle East will get ready for much awaited -- much cherished -- the Great Armageddon....the Mother of ALL Holocausts -- in 2010.....if McMc -- Mccacca McCain replaces the BBBB -- the Bumbling Born-again Buffoon Bush.....`Inshallah`
after the eternally 2 too tiring years....
#79 Posted by hamidm2 on August 26, 2006 3:56:08 pm
Re: # 70
zeemax,
``But tahmed, now that your sole remaining friend arjun_M(acaca)``
.......... i was gone for a week or so and you think i have deserted my pir and murshid, tahmed - NEVER !........... i am back and ready to do battle with his enemies - the munafiq and the horse`s keister (that woud be echoboom)
............ i really have no idea what this innane argument is all about, but whatever it is i am sure that tahmed is right ...........
zeemax,
``But tahmed, now that your sole remaining friend arjun_M(acaca)``
.......... i was gone for a week or so and you think i have deserted my pir and murshid, tahmed - NEVER !........... i am back and ready to do battle with his enemies - the munafiq and the horse`s keister (that woud be echoboom)
............ i really have no idea what this innane argument is all about, but whatever it is i am sure that tahmed is right ...........
#80 Posted by HP on August 26, 2006 8:45:20 pm
It is one thing to say that ends justify means. But if the ends turn out to be unachievable and were predicted to be so in advance then persisting in justifying the means is equivalent to criminal complicity.
It seems clear from recent statements on both sides of the Lebanon war that what happened was somewhat unexpected. (Though, we do have reports that Israel had plans in place for sometime.) Hezbollah didn`t expect Israel to respond as hard as they did. Israel didn`t expect Hezbollah to use so many rockets or to be able to launch them in the face of an air and ground attack.
Underestimating your enemy is one of the standard mistakes of warfare. WWI was supposed to take six months. What is clear is that the UN force being put into Lebanon will do nothing to stop a recurrence of a new war in the coming years. No policies have been changed, Hezbollah will be allowed to rearm and the local population will be helped/intimidated the same as before.
The real powers in the region like this state of affairs, it keeps people distracted and thus takes the focus away from the true dictatorships in Saudi Arabia, Syria, and the rest of the Arab states. Even the US and the West are happy with the present arrangement. It is easier to negotiate long term oil contracts with dictators than with democratically elected leaders.
In the case of Hezbollah, they do not present much of a threat to Israel except that they pose a threat of somewhat massive retaliation, say, would the US bomb Teheran.
However, Israel could inflict on Lebanon damage that is many times larger than Hezbollah could do, and Lebanon will shrug it off if she will get adequate foreign aid. Hezbollah has zero potential to present a credible danger as an invader.
According to Benjamin B. Ferencz, the lead American prosecutor of the Military Tribunal II-A (later renamed Tribunal II) to try the Einsatzgruppen Case the `concept` for the war wasn`t mistaken, the war itself may have been a crime against humanity. Benjamin B. Ferencz, who prosecuted and convicted 20 Nazi`s of crimes against humanity in 1947 at Nuremberg, was quoted:
``Nuremberg declared that aggressive war is the supreme international crime,`` the 87-year-old Ferencz said. He said the United Nations charter, which was written after the carnage of World War II, contains a provision that no nation can use armed force without the permission of the UN Security Council.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- anil: Tahmed sahib: I like your... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: anil sahib #62: This... Why Zardari Should Be
- anil: Tahmed sahib: May be Hamidm... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: in #59, para 5... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: anil sahib: i hope... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: hamidm #53 actually i... Why Zardari Should Be
- anil: Hamidm sahib: I do not... Why Zardari Should Be
- anil: Tahmed sahib: After Zardari’s election,... Why Zardari Should Be








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content