Comprehending Time

freethinker: you write To say that our brain is limited hence we cannot go any further is very unscientific.

I am saying that our brain is limited, but am not saying we should go no further. Indeed, what I am saying is almost the opposite - namely, that scientific advances have reached a stage where our ``reach`` has exceeded our ``grasp``. To continue my example of the hummingbird from the previous post, we can ``reach`` the ultraviolet patterns of flowers by sensing them through special equipment which then translate them into a color that we can actually ``grasp``. But we cannot hope, with our ``current version`` of the human brain and 5 senses, ever hop to ``grasp`` these colors and patterns the way a hummingbird does.

you write I lose you and your argument when you say “..it would be necessary to extend the capacity of the human brain itself.” How do you know that our brain is not evolving every instant of the time? Is there any specific and direct method of extending the capacity of the brain (extending it mechanically, or what?).

Natual evolution is a slow process. It took perhaps 15-20 million years for the human brain to evolve to the level where - a mere (relatively speaking) .03 million (i.e. 30,000) years ago - it reached the level needed for the concept of ``human progress`` to emerge.

Your next question is I think very interesting: Is there any specific and direct method of extending the capacity of the brain (extending it mechanically, or what?). The short answer of course is ``yes``. The long answer gets more interesting, I think and I have attempted a short exploration of the answer below:

1. Extending our input (i.e. sensing) capacity - telescopes have for centuries enabled us to do this. Today, we can ``see`` planets, draw a map of the universe a few thousand years after the Big Bang, and so forth. Microscopes are another example. infrared cameras are another example.

2. Extending our processing capacity - computers are the obvious example.

3. Extending our ``memory capacity`` - writing was the first example, computers enhanced it, and the internet and google has extended it vastly.

4. Extending our output (i.e. motor) capacity - we can direct machines sitting on mars to lift a rock, examine it, and relay back the results.

The above are obvious examples. But even these merely scratch the surface of what I am talking about. What I am talking about is:

5. Extending beyond our five senses to directly grasp other dimensions - thus opening a world that our existing brain cannot even conceive. This is an area I can only indicate here, but in substance it would represent a quantum jump beyond the incremental progress made to date through 1-4.

6. Upgrading or capacity for rational thought to match the technological prowess we have now attained (Arnold Toynbee had a series of important lectures back in the 1950`s I think which rightly warned against the danger of mankind destroying itself due to the mismatch between our technological reach and our rational grasp.

5. is important since without it we will always be limited by our ``inside the box`` grasp of External Reality. 6. is important since without it there is a very real danger of mankind not even making it to the next century - either due to unwise handling of environmental issues, or of political conflicts that arise from our animal instincts but our resolved through weapons that can destroy earth.

masadi: I havent read your last few posts to me, nor intend to waste any time reading them. But thanks for writing. :-)

netizen:

Thanks for sharing your knowledge with the readers.

Mohammad Gill

tahmed writes <<< ...in other words, our brains simply lack the capacity to understand this property of the fourth dimension.

3. As has been long understood our brain is limited to understanding a ``model`` of reality....Thus, the point I am trying to make is this: At some point in human progress (assuming mankind does not destroy itself in the meantime), it would be necessary to extend the capacity of the human brain itself....>>>

These are the rants of someone who has absolutely no clue about time whatsoever as physicists define it. Nothing that relativity talks about or string theory tries to grasp goes beyond the realm of logic. Increasing brain capacity will do nothing to change the rules of logic dependent on which is all understanding~ and human understand less about the brain than they do about time, so if understanding time needs enhanced brain capacity then enhancing brain capacity will require even greater requirement for enhanced brain capacity, according to this person`s logic if applied. He is just throwing words together without having any capacity for rational thought. In fact he has no clue about evolution as well, most mutations are disastrous, if humans start tinkering with mutations in order to produce beneficial traits, working on people as guinea pigs they will destroy millions and still not be guaranteed any results. His masters the Anglo Saxons used African Americans as guinea pigs and introduced diseases among indigeneous populations that they wiped out wholesale while claiming they had superior brain capacity and the others were less evolved, maybe he wants to go in the same direction of that long disproven pseudo science.

tahmed:

We should not feel discouraged if some concepts are too complex for physical visualization. If we were restrained by such constraints we would have already closed the shop. Mathematics is the strongest and most effective tool that we have; it helps us to progress into the darkest domain.

Four dimensional spacetime was an unfamiliar concept at the beginning of the twentieth century; now we use it as a matter of routine. Likewise ten or eleven (nobody mentioned 9 dimensions) dimensions in which the string theory seems to work are no longer daunting (not excessively); the physicists are working with them (mathematically, of course) and forming new concepts. If we close the shop simply because we cannot easily visualize what we are doing, we’ll not march ahead. The physicists and mathematicians fumble around and try everything and whatever seems to work, they take it and develop it further.

To say that our brain is limited hence we cannot go any further is very unscientific. I lose you and your argument when you say “..it would be necessary to extend the capacity of the human brain itself.” How do you know that our brain is not evolving every instant of the time? Is there any specific and direct method of extending the capacity of the brain (extending it mechanically, or what?).

In the second decade of the twentieth century, Kaluza had sent his paper to Einstein in which he had unified the theory of relativity and theory of electromagnetism in five dimensions. The idea of the fifth dimension was so outlandish and unreal to Einstein that he sat over Kaluza’s paper and did not send it for publication. That was a mistake!

P.S:

You’ve solved your own problem when you say “..Why should I waste my time with an individual who writes insults over the internet that he would never have the courage to repeat to anyone`s face in real life?” Avoid interacting with masadi if he doesn’t stop insulting you. The same goes for masadi also. You guys can make your point without hurling insults over each other.

Mohammad Gill

and in addition to #58, I`d say the same things to you on your face tahmed, you are the most pathetic kind of human being, one whose mind is enslaved and by the way you defend the US elite in all their crimes, it is of the same value as a rat`s fart.

tahmed writes <<< As for masadi, please see what Dot has to say. Why should I waste my time with an individual who writes insults over the internet that he would never have the courage to repeat to anyone`s face in real life? >>>

The person who was talking about my ``barking`` and wanted me to fetch his stick is now talking about me writing insults, this is the same person who called the political articles of the author ``communal garbage``, yet when I conceptualize his dimwit reasoning ability as the `mirasi mentality` he gets all worked up and points to his other ``dot`` mirasi friend who instead of dealing with my arguments points to an half a year old claim by a certain Ali Sina who claims I lied about his failing to meet my challenge~ of course to the mirasis the discussion is about the subjective personality of the poster and not their argument. Every post these people make provides further empirical evidence for their ``mirasi mentality``.

freethinker #55 I agree that progress in science is incremental - as Newton said, ``We stand on the shoulders of giants who came before us``. However, I dont think I made my point clear since you missed it. So let me try to illustrate with some examples:

1. At microcosmic scales, String theory calls for a 9 dimensional universe. Of these, three (length, breadth and height) are part of our everyday life, and the fourth (time) we are struggling to comprehend even partially (per your article). The other 5 are beyond our realm of intuitive understanding - in other words, our brains simply lack the capacity to comprehend reality beyond our three dimensions.

2. At macrocosmic scales, the Theory of Relativity calls for the slowing down of time itself. This concept of time itself slowing down is beyond our realm of understanding - in other words, our brains simply lack the capacity to understand this property of the fourth dimension.

3. As has been long understood our brain is limited to understanding a ``model`` of reality, not what Kant called the Ultimate Reality itself. Furthermore this model is based on our understanding of reality as conveyed to us by our five senses only. Our brains simply lack the wiring to understand anything beyond that.

The above are just some obvious examples.

Thus, the point I am trying to make is this: At some point in human progress (assuming mankind does not destroy itself in the meantime), it would be necessary to extend the capacity of the human brain itself. This may seem a strange concept, but not so strange when we realized that man`s reach has already exceeded his grasp (per Robert Browning`s famous lines) in a number of ways - we can ``see`` colors that are invisible to the naked human eye, but quite visible to the eye of a hummingbird (as has been recently demonstrated).

PS: As for masadi, please see what Dot has to say. Why should I waste my time with an individual who writes insults over the internet that he would never have the courage to repeat to anyone`s face in real life? THere are enough decent posters on chowk to interact with.

#53 Mr. Dot - greetings. Agreed on masadi. I think the problem is with his diet. :-)

tahmed:

Progress in science is systematic. Theory of relativity could not be developed before Newton`s laws of gravitation and Maxwell`s theory of electromagnetism were discovered. Newton had to follow Galileo and Kepler. Likewise, theory of quantum mechanics came to us at its opportune time. Miracles just don`t happen in science. And remember there would, most likely, be always some unanswered questions otherwise the human life would become very insipid and unexciting. If there are no problems to work upon, there will not be any research.

masadi has correctly mentioned the progress of human knowledge by ``incremental`` steps although he said it in a rather deprecating manner. Why don`t you two show some respect for each other?

Mohammad Gill

#53, little wonder the no name mirasi is an Ali Sina troll who has stumbled across here. His followers were crying and wailing to Wikipaedia because his mythology was busted. The so-called ``mathematical error`` of inheritance he presented actually revealed his ignorance of the whole concept of `warith` in the Quran, he successively adds the shares where no such successive addition is recommended by the Quran, when you bust his fuzzy math his followers run to the Wiki editors asking them for a judgment on how his mythological shroud of contrived intelligence was busted.

A Hindu hater of Islam appealing to tahmed following the ``the enemy of my enemy`` mirasi logic. Note that this is added to this thread, to answer the irrelevant and incoherent post and link by the no name mirasi in #53. If you are so sure about the mathematical error in the Quran regarding inheritance write an article on it and I will deal with it there to your heart`s content. Sina is no different than the other Hindu haters of Islam, his intelligence is just as pathetically dimwitted as all bigots.

TAhmed32 (various interacts), sir, what you say is nothing new. The detractor has previous form.
Anyway I would humbly suggest you see the following Lies and Deception which gives you a small flavour of the events and certain wiki entires and the arguments. remove the gratutuious religious insults you will see that obsfuscation and confusuion are a trade mark - very much visible here.

In addition to #51, Michael Talbot`s, ``The Holographic Universe`` is an exposition of this perspective for the layperson though he takes it to absurd directions at times. Here is a short read on it

The author regarding Iqbal <<< The eye of God sees all the visibles and His ear hears all the audibles in one indivisible act of perception. The priority of God is not due to priority of time; on the other hand, the priority of time is due to God’s priority.” This is all metaphysical and I do not believe it is going to help us in understanding what our mundane time is. >>>>

You cannot dismiss all that as ``metaphysical``. Check out the physicist David Bohm`s concept of the holographic model of the universe, a model that explains the experimentally verified non-local events of Quantum physics. Where there is no location, as in a hologram, it is no metaphysics for one viewing it to ``see all visibles and hear all audibles``, neither is it metaphysical for him to say ``be`` and it is.

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

tahmed writes <<< As discussed in #44, our brains simply lack the capacity at this time to comprehend the nature of the universe even as well established by quantum physics at one end and the theory of relativity at the other >>>

Of course the mirasi will use logic to try to prove that logic is futile, as if Quantum physics and relativity came from alien brains. It is not the limit of the brain that fails to comprehend the true nature of time, just like it wasn`t the limit of the brain that failed to comprehend that the earth was not flat. The secrets of reality take time to be uncovered by man in small incremental steps, it is no magic nor an all or none game, but mirasis would not understand

tahmed in #47 <<< #45 masadi: you can keep barking insults at me, and i can keep ignoring them. when we get tired of this game, we`ll switch to another game where I will throw you a stick, and you will run and fetch. >>>

I am not interested in games with mirasis, if you quit barking I will quit busting your mythology, what I will not permit, to the best of my ability, is for poodles of the colonials, like you, to mislead people.