Karamatullah K Ghori September 26, 2006
#455 Posted by aquaris on October 3, 2006 1:47:16 am
Re: # 432
..........and I must say resememblance in uncanny.....
swap the toppis...and trim the beard.....and you will get a duplicate...
and also ..... seems similiar debates have been going on and On...without much success...
so FAR...
..........and I must say resememblance in uncanny.....
swap the toppis...and trim the beard.....and you will get a duplicate...
and also ..... seems similiar debates have been going on and On...without much success...
so FAR...
#454 Posted by okhla99 on October 3, 2006 12:17:30 am
Re: # 452
Most widely read, admired and respected ``Professor`` Masadi Sahib,
Now you have proclaimed dear Hamidm to be a ``dimwit`` too. Well, Hamidm, welcome to the club whose membership shall soon include the rest of mankind.
Masadi, why is it that anybody who does not agree with you immediately incurs your complete and total wrath. Why is it that many of us refuse to believe that our society (especially the economically weaker rungs) is an epitome of cleanliness and hygiene (having invented them in the first place)? Why is it that most of us refuse to believe that the decadent western civilisation also lives in physical dirt (sewage) and is mired with filth?
Do you know who discovered Phenyle, or antiseptics or antibiotics or the importance of sterile implements?? But then, you know everything. So it is pointless to ask.
By the way, regards to everyone else in Lululand.
Most widely read, admired and respected ``Professor`` Masadi Sahib,
Now you have proclaimed dear Hamidm to be a ``dimwit`` too. Well, Hamidm, welcome to the club whose membership shall soon include the rest of mankind.
Masadi, why is it that anybody who does not agree with you immediately incurs your complete and total wrath. Why is it that many of us refuse to believe that our society (especially the economically weaker rungs) is an epitome of cleanliness and hygiene (having invented them in the first place)? Why is it that most of us refuse to believe that the decadent western civilisation also lives in physical dirt (sewage) and is mired with filth?
Do you know who discovered Phenyle, or antiseptics or antibiotics or the importance of sterile implements?? But then, you know everything. So it is pointless to ask.
By the way, regards to everyone else in Lululand.
#453 Posted by zeemax on October 3, 2006 12:10:45 am
#439 by fiendish-macaca
Dear Mr. fiendish-macaca, before asking me so many questions, can you kindly tell us why macacas held 60,000 civilians in the first place for two years as POWs if it wasn`t just for blackmail? Were these Prisoners of War? Why were they not immediately repatriated?
Besides the person hanging upside down on a pole in the now famous photo ... is it a civilian?
Hmmm ..... Your tactics of circular reasoning, false dilemmas and tu-quoques are typical Bhaand-macacus behaviour.
Dear Mr. fiendish-macaca, before asking me so many questions, can you kindly tell us why macacas held 60,000 civilians in the first place for two years as POWs if it wasn`t just for blackmail? Were these Prisoners of War? Why were they not immediately repatriated?
Besides the person hanging upside down on a pole in the now famous photo ... is it a civilian?
Hmmm ..... Your tactics of circular reasoning, false dilemmas and tu-quoques are typical Bhaand-macacus behaviour.
#452 Posted by masadi on October 2, 2006 9:04:15 pm
Hamidm writes <<< ..... have you ever noticed how ``white`` the japanese are ?....... i went to a sushi place for lunch today and as usual was awed by how well-dressed, well-groomed, polite and `white` the japanese people look... >>>
A clear sign of an enslaved self-hating mind is that they will see everything ``good`` in the objects of their worship and attribute everything bad to those they hate. So when this dimwit sees the Japanese looking good and acting polite he sees that as a sign of ``whiteness`` and when he sees rudeness and dirt he attributes those no everything non-white. Apparently he has never lived among the `white` in a dorm or in the same house otherwise he would know that they come in all brands and fashions, not to mention the dirtier than dirt infamous `white trash` who will outdo any paindo in their paindoness with all kinds of tattoos and piercings up the wazoo. The fact is that the Muslims invented the soap, they perfected personal hygiene based on the Quran`s emphasis on cleaning up before prayer at a time when these white people he worships were suffering from countless diseases as a result of sewage problems.
A clear sign of an enslaved self-hating mind is that they will see everything ``good`` in the objects of their worship and attribute everything bad to those they hate. So when this dimwit sees the Japanese looking good and acting polite he sees that as a sign of ``whiteness`` and when he sees rudeness and dirt he attributes those no everything non-white. Apparently he has never lived among the `white` in a dorm or in the same house otherwise he would know that they come in all brands and fashions, not to mention the dirtier than dirt infamous `white trash` who will outdo any paindo in their paindoness with all kinds of tattoos and piercings up the wazoo. The fact is that the Muslims invented the soap, they perfected personal hygiene based on the Quran`s emphasis on cleaning up before prayer at a time when these white people he worships were suffering from countless diseases as a result of sewage problems.
#451 Posted by friend on October 2, 2006 5:07:00 pm
Check http://www.chowk.com/show_article.cgi?aid=00001137. It is interesting look back 6 years ago.
#450 Posted by CoolAL on October 2, 2006 3:08:11 pm
Re #449
Hmm. The link takes you to interact #42 in the article. Look at #44.
Hmm. The link takes you to interact #42 in the article. Look at #44.
#449 Posted by CoolAL on October 2, 2006 3:04:01 pm
Re # 437
Well, I was curios myself, so I searched.....
Romair Uvacha ;)
http://www.chowk.com/show_article.cgi?aid=00001144&channel=civic%20center&threshold=1&layout=0&order=0&start=520&end=529&page=1#42
Well, I was curios myself, so I searched.....
Romair Uvacha ;)
http://www.chowk.com/show_article.cgi?aid=00001144&channel=civic%20center&threshold=1&layout=0&order=0&start=520&end=529&page=1#42
#448 Posted by arjun2 on October 2, 2006 2:38:56 pm
AQK`s daughter`s got the goods on Pakiland..
It looks like El-Presidente, weasel that he is, pinned the blame on AQK to save his own tushy..AQK knows he`s likely to get whacked..but he`s got an insurance policy..
AQ`s daughter denies Musharraf`s claims
OUR MONITORING DESK
Dina Khan, the daughter of nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan has criticised claims made by President Pervez Musharraf in his autobiography. In her first statement since her father’s arrest in 2004, Dina Khan said suggestions that her father asked her to go public on Pakistan’s nuclear secrets were “ludicrous”, BBC reported Monday.
In his book, President Musharraf said that Dr Khan sent a letter to his daughter, Dina, asking her to “go public on Pakistan’s nuclear secrets” through British journalists.
Instead, Dina Khan, the daughter of AQ Khan, claims that the letter was for her mother, Dr Khan’s wife. Giving the details Miss Khan said, “The letter gave his version of what actually transpired and requested my mother release those details in the event of my father being killed or made to disappear.”
She said the letter mentioned “people and places” but contained no nuclear blueprints or information.
Dina Khan maintained that she was questioned by the British security service MI5 about the document but they were satisfied, she had not committed any crimes and was not in possession of any important information.
“The mistake my father made was in being far too vocal in his opinion about those in power, and as a result he is now paying the price,” she said.
She added that her sister was forbidden from seeing her parents for a period of months, and that she was not allowed to travel to Pakistan for a year.
“Our mail is opened, our mobiles are tapped and the house is bugged,” she said.
Dr AQ Khan remains under house arrest in Islamabad. He was recently allowed out briefly for surgery for prostate cancer.
Dina Khan ends her statement with a warning. “The investigation into the nuclear scandal was officially closed months ago, yet my father’s situation remains unchanged. Perhaps the hope is to have him rot quietly at home, forgotten by all.
“That will never happen. The truth will come out eventually, it always does.”
Dr A Q Khan ,the nuclear scientist in his letter to his wife had only expressed fears and doubts concerning his security and the letter contained no nuclear secret or sketches. What Gen Musharraf has written in his book referring to the said letter is incorrect. This has been disclosed by Dr Shafiqur Rehman an old companion of Dr A Q Khan in his talk with the BBC. BBC had asked his opinion about Dr Qadeer’s daughter Dina Qadeer’s conversation with the radio.
It was also alleged that heavy nuclear equipment was transported on cargo planes to North Korea and Iran. Dr Shafiq, commenting on the charge said that these cargo planes were C-130 aircrafts which were used by the PAF only under permission from the GHQ. Dr Shafiqur Rehman, who was also taken along with Dr Qadeer but later released after interrogation, said that the President’s claim that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was non-operational in 1999 when he had come to power, was wrong. When Pakistan had completed nuclear tests in 1998, all the world had become aware that Pakistan was then a member of the Atomic Club and possessed nuclear weapons, he said. Nuclear programme, not being operational then seems to be something ridiculous, he added.Answering a question he opined that Dr AQ Khan’s statement on the TV in which he had admitted the charges before the nation was something that was made to say on the gun point. Such statements are often obtained by police but these are worthless, Dr Shafiq said.
Meanwhile, Federal Information Minister of Pakistan, when asked by BBC to comment upon Dina Qadeer’s statement on the BBC said that he would talk about it later but he could not be contacted afterwards.
It looks like El-Presidente, weasel that he is, pinned the blame on AQK to save his own tushy..AQK knows he`s likely to get whacked..but he`s got an insurance policy..
AQ`s daughter denies Musharraf`s claims
OUR MONITORING DESK
Dina Khan, the daughter of nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan has criticised claims made by President Pervez Musharraf in his autobiography. In her first statement since her father’s arrest in 2004, Dina Khan said suggestions that her father asked her to go public on Pakistan’s nuclear secrets were “ludicrous”, BBC reported Monday.
In his book, President Musharraf said that Dr Khan sent a letter to his daughter, Dina, asking her to “go public on Pakistan’s nuclear secrets” through British journalists.
Instead, Dina Khan, the daughter of AQ Khan, claims that the letter was for her mother, Dr Khan’s wife. Giving the details Miss Khan said, “The letter gave his version of what actually transpired and requested my mother release those details in the event of my father being killed or made to disappear.”
She said the letter mentioned “people and places” but contained no nuclear blueprints or information.
Dina Khan maintained that she was questioned by the British security service MI5 about the document but they were satisfied, she had not committed any crimes and was not in possession of any important information.
“The mistake my father made was in being far too vocal in his opinion about those in power, and as a result he is now paying the price,” she said.
She added that her sister was forbidden from seeing her parents for a period of months, and that she was not allowed to travel to Pakistan for a year.
“Our mail is opened, our mobiles are tapped and the house is bugged,” she said.
Dr AQ Khan remains under house arrest in Islamabad. He was recently allowed out briefly for surgery for prostate cancer.
Dina Khan ends her statement with a warning. “The investigation into the nuclear scandal was officially closed months ago, yet my father’s situation remains unchanged. Perhaps the hope is to have him rot quietly at home, forgotten by all.
“That will never happen. The truth will come out eventually, it always does.”
Dr A Q Khan ,the nuclear scientist in his letter to his wife had only expressed fears and doubts concerning his security and the letter contained no nuclear secret or sketches. What Gen Musharraf has written in his book referring to the said letter is incorrect. This has been disclosed by Dr Shafiqur Rehman an old companion of Dr A Q Khan in his talk with the BBC. BBC had asked his opinion about Dr Qadeer’s daughter Dina Qadeer’s conversation with the radio.
It was also alleged that heavy nuclear equipment was transported on cargo planes to North Korea and Iran. Dr Shafiq, commenting on the charge said that these cargo planes were C-130 aircrafts which were used by the PAF only under permission from the GHQ. Dr Shafiqur Rehman, who was also taken along with Dr Qadeer but later released after interrogation, said that the President’s claim that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was non-operational in 1999 when he had come to power, was wrong. When Pakistan had completed nuclear tests in 1998, all the world had become aware that Pakistan was then a member of the Atomic Club and possessed nuclear weapons, he said. Nuclear programme, not being operational then seems to be something ridiculous, he added.Answering a question he opined that Dr AQ Khan’s statement on the TV in which he had admitted the charges before the nation was something that was made to say on the gun point. Such statements are often obtained by police but these are worthless, Dr Shafiq said.
Meanwhile, Federal Information Minister of Pakistan, when asked by BBC to comment upon Dina Qadeer’s statement on the BBC said that he would talk about it later but he could not be contacted afterwards.
#447 Posted by friend on October 2, 2006 2:06:42 pm
Truly#446
You are right on target!!!! That is what people don`t understand..
One more measure of civilization is ability of people to squat near railway line and relieve themselves.
You are right on target!!!! That is what people don`t understand..
One more measure of civilization is ability of people to squat near railway line and relieve themselves.
#446 Posted by Urstruly on October 2, 2006 1:13:32 pm
Any nation that doesn`t use lotta, is not civilized.
#445 Posted by bulleya on October 2, 2006 12:56:53 pm
hamidm mian........``that`s why i am in awe of white people......``
nothing wrong with being in awe of someone.......for example, i have always been in awe of homer simpson - he has been rated by sociologists to be the ideal TV father and husband......very caring, simple and down to earth.........
however the important question is, ``are white people in awe of you, also?``..........or is it just a one-sided love affair.......if it is then i am afraid, you are setting yourself up for a huge disappointment in the future..........
nothing wrong with being in awe of someone.......for example, i have always been in awe of homer simpson - he has been rated by sociologists to be the ideal TV father and husband......very caring, simple and down to earth.........
however the important question is, ``are white people in awe of you, also?``..........or is it just a one-sided love affair.......if it is then i am afraid, you are setting yourself up for a huge disappointment in the future..........
#444 Posted by hamidm2 on October 2, 2006 10:36:06 am
Re: # 443
tahmed,
..... have you ever noticed how ``white`` the japanese are ?....... i went to a sushi place for lunch today and as usual was awed by how well-dressed, well-groomed, polite and `white` the japanese people look .......... it is amazing how neatly they can eat anything from noodles to sushi with chop sticks, unlike the slurping madrasis and afghanis at the trough ....... that`s why i am in awe of white people
tahmed,
..... have you ever noticed how ``white`` the japanese are ?....... i went to a sushi place for lunch today and as usual was awed by how well-dressed, well-groomed, polite and `white` the japanese people look .......... it is amazing how neatly they can eat anything from noodles to sushi with chop sticks, unlike the slurping madrasis and afghanis at the trough ....... that`s why i am in awe of white people
#443 Posted by tahmed32 on October 2, 2006 9:04:56 am
hamidm: Please dont try to disgrace muslims by referring to this mullah-hate as a muslim. As for his references to GBS, this is nothing new for this lowlife. He is as much in thrall of goras as you are. Only difference is - while you joke about it, he is sincere at his awe, posting pictures of gora persian and arab mullahs, getting the stamp of approval for his mullah-gods by placing them next to goras (as he does in this post), referring with great delight at some gora convert to islam, while all the time ranting about gora-worshipping by others.
#442 Posted by friend on October 2, 2006 8:09:55 am
Pee beta
Here is link on how Macaca made tiger pee in their trousers
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878969-1,00.html
Here is link on how Macaca made tiger pee in their trousers
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878969-1,00.html
#441 Posted by friend on October 2, 2006 7:43:50 am
Pee max
Just read how Pakis pee`d in their trousers when Injuns tried to give POWs to bingos
``In May 1973, Pakistan instituted proceedings against India concerning 195 Pakistani prisoners of war whom, according to Pakistan, India proposed to hand over to Bangladesh, which was said to intend trying them for acts of genocide and crimes against humanity. India stated that there was no legal basis for the Court`s jurisdiction in the matter and that Pakistan`s application was without legal effect. Pakistan having also filed a request for the indication of provisional measures, the Court held public sittings to hear observations on this subject; India was not represented at the hearings. In July 1973, Pakistan asked the Court to postpone further consideration of its request in order to facilitate the negotiations which were due to begin. Before any written pleadings had been filed, Pakistan informed the Court that negotiations had taken place, and requested the Court to record discontinuance of the proceedings. Accordingly, the case was removed from the List by an Order of 15 December 1973.``
Just read how Pakis pee`d in their trousers when Injuns tried to give POWs to bingos
``In May 1973, Pakistan instituted proceedings against India concerning 195 Pakistani prisoners of war whom, according to Pakistan, India proposed to hand over to Bangladesh, which was said to intend trying them for acts of genocide and crimes against humanity. India stated that there was no legal basis for the Court`s jurisdiction in the matter and that Pakistan`s application was without legal effect. Pakistan having also filed a request for the indication of provisional measures, the Court held public sittings to hear observations on this subject; India was not represented at the hearings. In July 1973, Pakistan asked the Court to postpone further consideration of its request in order to facilitate the negotiations which were due to begin. Before any written pleadings had been filed, Pakistan informed the Court that negotiations had taken place, and requested the Court to record discontinuance of the proceedings. Accordingly, the case was removed from the List by an Order of 15 December 1973.``
#440 Posted by hamidm2 on October 2, 2006 7:43:25 am
Re: # 432
echoboom,
..... i find it strange that you, a good muslim, worship a man who was a homosexual and who wanted to ban private property .......... there is hope for you yet !
echoboom,
..... i find it strange that you, a good muslim, worship a man who was a homosexual and who wanted to ban private property .......... there is hope for you yet !
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- anil: Tahmed sahib: I like your... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: anil sahib #62: This... Why Zardari Should Be
- anil: Tahmed sahib: May be Hamidm... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: in #59, para 5... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: anil sahib: i hope... Why Zardari Should Be
- tahmed32: hamidm #53 actually i... Why Zardari Should Be
- anil: Hamidm sahib: I do not... Why Zardari Should Be
- anil: Tahmed sahib: After Zardari’s election,... Why Zardari Should Be








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content