Musharraf Spilling the Beans—Why Now?

masadi,

.......... everyone knows why african americans have a high poverty rate - if you and al sharpton want to live in denial, it is your choice .......

............ let me give you a simple example based on my 30 years of first-hand experience in the business world (as opposed to drawing biased conclusions from raw census data)

........ until recently, for the last 20 plus years companies would hire anyone who could walk, chew gum and write code - they hired hundreds of thousands of macacas and other species that could spell j2ee, BUT i have seem maybe 3 or 4 african american programmers ..... why ?...... simple - even though programming pays fairly well, it is hard coolie work .......... similarly in the consulting business which demands that fresh associates work 100 plus hours a week to make the cut, i have not seen any, not one, african american (lots of macacas are killing themselves to make manager and most of them die because they cannot handle the liquor after a fourteen hour day - natural slection at work)........ trust me on this because over the last thirty years i have made the rounds of most major IT companies and consulting firms ....... and many many years ago i used to recruit for an IT company that would hire a syphillitic one-legged whore if she could spell cobol and was given specific instructions to make our eoe quota - but i could never find a black man who was willing to make the sacrifice ( once or twice i did find a black woman) .......... as any black woman would tell you she would love to have a bmw (black man working) but they are hard to find ...........................

.............african americans suffer from this sense of victimhood and entitlement that keeps them mired in misery and poverty - or maybe, like you, they love cheese ..............

Re: # 624
hamid
it`s not politically correct but there are some studies which suggest blacks have lower iq than average, maybe that explains their low achievement.

hat tip: antiwar.com....

warning...only click if you have a broadband connection....

...contd...

.........and how many were devoured by vultures ... lol ...

.........lying macaca ...

dumbass_macaca .... says:

...official figures...

Abey dumbass, according to your own Parful Bidwai_macaca writing for Khaleej Times:

``The Indian army ``recovered 249 bodies, of which only five were accepted by Pakistan, and the total Pakistani casualties of 725 killed included 45 officers and 68 Special Service Group personnel.``

Of-course you can discount the macaca version by a factor of 1/3 hence my figure of 500.

Now answer please:

...how many bodies of Pak soldiers did macacas retrieve and offered to return to Pak?

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

#619 by zeemacaca

Approx 500 Pak Army including Mujahideen were martyred.

Abay Bhand, give me official figures of the macacas killed. No Alibaba fables like the one recounted to you by the Paki `Major`...Got it? No Alibaba fables please..LOL!

#618 dumbass_macaca

Approx 500 Pak Army including Mujahideen were martyred. None were left behind except a few who were killed in the withdrawal and bodies could not be retrieved. None were left on the heights etc.

Now your answer ...

...how many bodies of Pak soldiers did macacas retrieve and offered to return to Pak?

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

#617 by zeemacaca

.... how many bodies of Pak soldiers did macacas retrieve and offered to return to Pak?

Abay Bhand, first tell us how many Paki macacas were killed. Then we can use Madarssah math and multiply that by 5 to arrive at the Indian casualties. Then I`ll tell you how many macacas were returned to Bhandland and how many were devoured by vultures...LOL!

#615 by dumbass_macaca,

....they didn`t need any in the first place, having abandoned their dead....

Hahahaha ... rotflmao .... hey dumbass ... now google for it .... how many bodies of Pak soldiers did macacas retrieve and offered to return to Pak?

Hahahaha .... now don`t jump up and down ... give a definitive answer ... LoL

#609 by behram1

Behram,

I thought the argument was about whether Taliban won or not and whether they are responsible for the current state Afghanistan is in, and not about whether or not the Taliban`s worldview is right or wrong. Your response does not address the argument but instead goes into the black/white `evil forces of darkness`; morality of governance; women`s rights and stuff ... pure faux TV stuff ..

Listen, you may have read a lot about Afghanistan, but I know a bit more than that about that country since Zahir Shah`s time so please grant me that!

You say: When are we going to take control of our own faith, and start moving forward in the community of nations?

Name me a single Islamic country which is moving forward without either completely prostituting itself (UAE) or which hasn`t confronted USA (Malaysia). Any other?

My friend, there`s no `community of nations` for the weak, but only of the strong (i.e. G7, G8, G10 etc ...). So Muslims have to get strong before they`re out of this inferior rest of the `also-rans` of the G77 lot ... To do that they`ll have to confront G7-10. No other choice.

Regards.

Re: # 616 by zeemax on October 6, 2006 3:34am PT

Dear Zeemax:

Is it possible for you to consider that maybe present day rulers of Islamic world are out of touch with the rest of the world, and what their citizens expect? Do you really think that the ruling class want their citizens to live in harmony and peace?

Have you ever thought why only the Islamic world brings in Arabs to fight their cause? Because it is the Ummah that they are fighting, right!?

Then we look at Darfur, Arab Muslims are killing Black Muslims. Why?

Why did we have a flood of Arabs to fight the Soviets? Are you acknowledging then, that Afghans (or even in collaboration with Pakistanis), by themselves could not have handled this invasion?

It is not the Ummah thing, Zeemax, it is the Arab thing, and hopefully someday you will get it.

Of course, I respect your opinion regarding

{Listen, you may have read a lot about Afghanistan, but I know a bit more than that about that country since Zahir Shah`s time so please grant me that! }

But, first, you must tell me why would you know more than anyone of us on this site? As for myself, is it because I am a non-muslim? uh! just testing your pulse.

{Name me a single Islamic country which is moving forward without either completely prostituting itself (UAE) or which hasn`t confronted USA (Malaysia). Any other? }

Granted, no muslim country can be named because they were mostly colonised in the last 300 years, or so. All the more reason that we recognize our inability to work in the modern world. Can you imagine if muslims suddenly became more liberal than the west? Then, what do you think the world would see? A very, very, very progressive muslim mindset. Is that possible?

{My friend, there`s no `community of nations` for the weak, but only of the strong (i.e. G7, G8, G10 etc ...). }

Do we then just go into oblivion? Why the stress on getting ourselves recognized?

What is all the fuss about?

Respectfully submitted,

#613 by bhand zeemacaca

Hay dumbass, Pak did not run out of coffins ... macacaland did; and macacaland is 5 times bigger than Pak; leading to the only possible conslusion that macaca casualties were at-least 5 times larger (as a rule of thumb) if not even more; than those of Pak`s.

Of course I can understand why Bhandland didn`t run out of coffins..they didn`t need any in the first place, having abandoned their dead macacas to rot on the hills, while the surviving macacas like the great Paki `Major` (who regaled you fools with Alibaba tales of how Indians were being shot by their officers) fled..LOL!

This is hilarious..India is 5 times bigger means so casualties were 5 times greater? ROTFL!!!! Which Madarssah did you go to abay zeemacaca? You`re touching new heights in stupidity every time you open your mouth...does your son know you`re so stupid? If he does, I can bet he`s ashamed of you. I sure would be if I were him.

#610 by dumbass_macaca

Paki macacas haven`t had the balls to come up with the figures for their own dead, which are about twice higher than Indian...

Hahaha ... dumbass macaca lets lose another `phuljhari` ...

Hay dumbass, Pak did not run out of coffins ... macacaland did; and macacaland is 5 times bigger than Pak; leading to the only possible conslusion that macaca casualties were at-least 5 times larger (as a rule of thumb) if not even more; than those of Pak`s. ROTFL......

Re: # 613

a gem from the Shrrek Jamaat-namard-e-fake-momin, Amir Jamaat-e-chowk-Ibn Alqaeda, Zeemini

#613 by zeemax on October 6, 2006 3:16am PT
#610 by dumbass_macaca

Paki macacas haven`t had the balls to come up with the figures for their own dead, which are about twice higher than Indian...

Hahaha ... dumbass macaca lets lose another `phuljhari` ...

Hay dumbass, Pak did not run out of coffins ... macacaland did; and macacaland is 5 times bigger than Pak; leading to the only possible conslusion that macaca casualties were at-least 5 times larger (as a rule of thumb) if not even more; than those of Pak`s. ROTFL......


the reason is that Pakistanis left their dead on the hill tops for the vultures to scavenge. Fortunately for them the indians buried them. Hence the running out of coffins.
Zeemini, need to learn logic form Masadii Complexii Psued. Scholarii

behram writes <<< Trust me, I know the intricacies of Pakistani/Afghanistani/Iranian (PAI) relationship from day one >>>

Only a fool would trust a bigot to whom ethnicity is more important in deciding affairs than anything else- a sure sign of illiteracy if there ever was one.

Re: # 612 by masadi on October 6, 2006 2:55am PT

Dear Masadi:

Thank you for the kind words that your faith has taught you.

{Only a fool would trust a bigot to whom ethnicity is more important in deciding affairs than anything else- a sure sign of illiteracy if there ever was one.}

Or was it just your upbringing.

Respectfully submitted,