Hang Guru, if that helps

#154 kanjar_macaca

Paks don`t have to do anything ... the Kashmiris are doing it ...

......sorry ....... laughing my ass off rolling on the floor ... LOL ....LOL!!!

Kashmir Benga Pakistan .... Inshallah ... Eventually!

So piss in your dhotis ... macacas.

Not too sure obout what will be the bordering region though instead of the present macacaland .......

#151 by zeemax on October 6, 2006 5:01am PT

inbred retard: the majority of Indians believe Indian Kashmir is a part of India...and being that Pakiland has been unable to do anything about it, that`s how it remains...your kashmir banega condomistan wet dreams notwithstanding....

the majority of pakis think siachen belongs to pakiland...but given your ability to do to the indian army what it did to the paki army in kargil - force it out of land it considers it`s own - there`s not much you can really do about it, is there?

....contd.....

......sorry couldn`t continue .... was laughing my ass off rolling on the floor ... LOL ....LOL!!!

#150 by zeemax on October 6, 2006 4:55am PT

yes..that`s an excellent thought...give to the pakis on a platter what they failed to get through repeated wars and insurgencies....

Kashmir banega Pakistan....allah-o-akbarrrrrr

.....of all the kanjar_macacas ....

And Indian democracy serves the Indian people, a msjority of whom believe Kashmir -

Just as the majority of Russians believed .... lol .... all the `istans` .... LoL ... were ... LoL ...

#148 by aslam644

Aslam, this is excellent line of thought, and a principled one. If Britain (you gave the example of Jersey) can negotiate with even the most lethal of them all i.e. IRA because of their widespread support in Northern Ireland, and give them what they wanted, what`s wrong with India? And, BTW, IRA has still not disarmed ... just in case ... you know .. ``Trust but verify`` as that old SOB the 3rd rate actor now pushing up daisies said.

But of-course, if macacaland gives up the Kashmir valley, it will disintegrate. So be it. It`ll be good riddance. It is inevitable.

#148 by aslam644 on October 6, 2006 4:41am PT

What about the land of the pure annexing balochistan? You know that balochistan was annexed, right?


A democracy exists to serve its people, not to subjugate them.


And Indian democracy serves the Indian people, a msjority of whom believe Kashmir - the Indian portion at least - is part of India just as much as bombay or delhi...

#134 by krishna_abcd on October 6, 2006 0:11am PT

I am not suggesting that if five guys in a mosque in Bombay decide they don`t want to be Indian then India should be divided. What I am suggesting is that if a distinct region wishes to secede then it should be allowed to. If Kashmir, or Nagaland do not wish to be a part of India, why do you wish to force them to be? This is the impulse of a fascist state, not a democratic one. A democracy exists to serve its people, not to subjugate them. It seems to me that you do not believe in principles, but in some kind of nationalist myth. That is the seed from which war and suffering grow.

#139 by zeemax on October 6, 2006 1:52am PT


But regardless of whether you agree or not, this is what the ultimate solution is going to be! (I.e. independent Kashmir valley plus POK minus Jammu and everything else).


and who`s going to make that happen? You? You and what army? The army that abandoned the bodies of it`s soldiers in Kargil?

mmmkay...

Now chew on what the US government is planning for condomistan..

Re: # 106
GT
I` don`t know if our being right or wrong is any consolation. What we state here are only our opinions, the ground reality may shift very quickly.
I don`t disagree about talking to various groups in this imbroglio. To me, talking to anybody has never meant legitimising them or their aims. All negotiations are welcome if it brings an acceptable solution.
However I would eventually prefer to neutralise(read destroy) all non-Indian groups that feel that they have a hand in the Kashmiri pie, even if we do include them in any talks. When I say non-Indian I do not just mean Pakistan. To some extent they have their hands tied too. There seem to be other forces in the picture.

As for Guru I have no opinion. Life without parole seems to be a better option than death. Another pawn, who knows who is manipulating the strings.

#143 by zeemacaca

Hey, are you a good code-coolie? Guess so because one doesn`t need much brains for that ....

Sure..Pakis are pioneers of the IT revolution....International Terrorism that is..LOL!

#143 by Zeemacaca the Bhand

And all the macacas will lose just as they`re losing everywhere else.

Sure..we`ve been losing for the last 60 years and you`ve been winning? Happy? But wait..wasn`t Bangladesh a part of Pakistan and Kargil a part of Pakistan before 1971? Then what happened? Did macacas lose? Guess so..LOL!

Hey, are you a good code-coolie? Guess so because one doesn`t need much brains for that ....

Funny how a nation of lowly code coolies kicked Paki butts every time. Perhaps Paki macacas thought bravado alone is enough and they had no use for brains. Fair enough..LOL!

#142 by dumbass_macaca

Because I`m FOR the Kashmiri armed struggle just as I am FOR Muslim armed struggles everywhere else in the world. And all the macacas will lose just as they`re losing everywhere else.

Get it? LoL ... you`re really funny ... gotta grant you that. Hey, are you a good code-coolie? Guess so because one doesn`t need much brains for that ....

#141 by zeemacaca

Who wants your land? Not me ... it is your own `Indian` Kashmiri people. They want it for themselves see? Get it? Eh? No?

Then why don`t you shut up your bhand macaca mouth? We`re dealing with the Kashmiri Muslim macacas our own way. Why is your chaddi on fire?

#135 by moronic_macaca

...at the mention of Israel, but then they turn around and support exactly same ideology in Kashmir.

Hey macaca ... just tell me a single common factor between the Palestinian/Israel situation and the Kashmir/India situation ... just a single teeny weeny one and I`ll give you a heeng paan as reward!

Of-course if the indigenous Kashmir valley people had been madrasi macacas and the Muslims had been imported and transplanted from Uzbekistan and the madrasis kicked out, I would agree with you .....!

As for ``Kashmir belongs to India and we will never, ever give you an inch of its land.``

Abey stop jumping up and down like a macaca. Who wants your land? Not me ... it is your own `Indian` Kashmiri people. They want it for themselves see? Get it? Eh? No?

Of-course you don`t because you aren`t moronic_macaca for nothing ...