Murad A Baig October 10, 2006
#296 Posted by sattar2 on October 26, 2006 10:57:01 am
Murad (#292),
I agree that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) would not have endorsed taliban/al-qaida –style terrorism. His life and teachings of Quran make this adequately clear.
Urstruly,
Your ullema support hatred and fanaticism, so their endorsements are really not needed for a person to reject hatred and violence.
Review #170 and #173 for details. If you still don’t understand “terrorism”, it’s probably because you support it. Add to this hatred and persecution of Ahmadi-Muslims, and it becomes clear where you and your ullema stand.
And that’s the point of this article. I hope you are not fasting … Ramadan was over a few days ago … you know …
#295 Posted by Urstruly on October 26, 2006 10:09:42 am
Re: # 294
I think in the name of fairness we need to define the term ``terrorism`` first, but again nothing is fair anymore. This is a war and logical outcome of this war is that one of the combatants will lose and other will win. Propaganda is only one tool in this war. This war is being faught between forces of Tauheed (Monotheism) on one side and on the other side the confederate forces of evil aka atheism, secularism, liberalism, polytheism, animism, colonilaism, and state terrorism. Everybody has to choose sides.
I think in the name of fairness we need to define the term ``terrorism`` first, but again nothing is fair anymore. This is a war and logical outcome of this war is that one of the combatants will lose and other will win. Propaganda is only one tool in this war. This war is being faught between forces of Tauheed (Monotheism) on one side and on the other side the confederate forces of evil aka atheism, secularism, liberalism, polytheism, animism, colonilaism, and state terrorism. Everybody has to choose sides.
#294 Posted by muradbaig on October 26, 2006 7:06:12 am
Urstruly
It needs no death to trouble our thoughts and consciences and the subject surely is open to discussion.
What do you think?
Murad
It needs no death to trouble our thoughts and consciences and the subject surely is open to discussion.
What do you think?
Murad
#293 Posted by Urstruly on October 26, 2006 6:04:56 am
Re: # 292
Mr Baig
Who died and made you the conscience of Islam or Prophet?
Mr Baig
Who died and made you the conscience of Islam or Prophet?
#292 Posted by muradbaig on October 25, 2006 9:26:22 pm
Thank you Sattar
I think your interact says it all except that I don`t believe The Prophet would have endorsed the terrorism of Al Quida or the Taliban.
Murad
I think your interact says it all except that I don`t believe The Prophet would have endorsed the terrorism of Al Quida or the Taliban.
Murad
#291 Posted by sattar2 on October 25, 2006 8:30:44 am
Murad Sahib (#290):
... few rambling thoughts on what you wrote …
Who Wahabis follow is not relevant. They may (claim to) follow Quran, or the Prophet (pbuh), or whatever – the matter is best left up to them.
Whether or not Quran “endorses terrorism”, is a matter of one’s interpretation – interpretation of Quran, as well as interpretation of terrorism. If I recall correctly, it does say something along the lines of striking terror in the heart of enemies, picking up arms against the enemies, and slaying mischief makers. It is the context in which such commandments are to be understood and implemented that makes all the difference.
At the same time Quran professes that we should strive for peace and justice in our lives and communities. It emphasizes patience, steadfastness, and humility.
All this may sound mutually contradictory … but a life well-lived involves maintaining a balance between apparently contradictory impulses and forces, under varying circumstances and conditions. There is hardly a one-size-fits-all recipe. A life well-lived requires one to constantly evaluate one’s own self, one’s motives, one`s responses. A saying associated with Socrates sums it up nicely: ”Know thyself, and nothing in excess”.
It is perhaps for this reason that Quran emphasizes deep reflection and introspection, piety, patience, and prayer, to help one navigate his way through the maze of life in a graceful, thoughtful, just manner. At times circumstances demand that one take a firm stand and struggle with force against force, with violence against violence. Circumstances under which such drastic measures are allowed are severely, carefully restricted so that oppression is not carried out in the name of Allah. But then again, these are my views, and what one chooses to read in Quran depends upon what one is looking for in the first place. This outcome of one’s own bias affects not only the outcome of how one understand Quran ... but it applies to pretty much any document or philosophy one comes across.
After all is said and done, the (almost) universally accepted principle is that one should not force his beliefs on others. As long as Madrasses do not teach oppression and violence, I don’t see any reason why they should be restricted.
Just my $2e-02
#290 Posted by muradbaig on October 24, 2006 8:55:16 pm
Im back again.
The debate seems to have wandered far afield.
What about discussing the Wahhabis. Do they really follow The Prophet`s teachings?
Does the Qu`ran endorse terrorism?
Are the Wahhabis heretics?
Should their hold on Madrassas be restricted??
The debate seems to have wandered far afield.
What about discussing the Wahhabis. Do they really follow The Prophet`s teachings?
Does the Qu`ran endorse terrorism?
Are the Wahhabis heretics?
Should their hold on Madrassas be restricted??
#289 Posted by Inquirer on October 24, 2006 6:22:37 pm
All Indians are thankful to Nehru and Patel for avoiding the pitfall of defining who a Hindu is. Pakistan and Muslims fell into the trap - by trying to define who a Muslim is - never to recover and be forever damned with the internecine denominational warfare.
Perhaps a fiiting punishment for the divisive nature that they adhered to, though they could escape it.
Indian Muslims still have a chance.
Perhaps a fiiting punishment for the divisive nature that they adhered to, though they could escape it.
Indian Muslims still have a chance.
#288 Posted by sattar2 on October 24, 2006 2:07:59 pm
Urstruly (#285),
Let me add as you continue to ignore #271, and now #283 …
My belief is based upon Quran and ahadith. In response, you cannot even explain your faith that you go around forcing upon others. I reject your hateful interpretation of Islam. So deal with it …
The issue is not how you want Ahmadis to conduct themselves. The issue is how you are willing to conduct yourself as Ahmadi-Muslims practice Islam. I accept you as a Muslim, while your response is hatemongering and persecution of Ahmadis. And that’s the difference between you and me.
BTW, blessed month of Ramadam is over … so eid mubarak! I wouldn’t mind giving you an eid-hug … but only if you promise to use deodorant beforehand …
#287 Posted by dost_mittar on October 24, 2006 8:26:16 am
bulleya#282:
I did not pair you with myself as I agree with you as often as I disagree. Hamidm would have been an appropriate choice but I had already used him in opposition to urstruly`s viewpoint. As for who arjun_m is, you may check some of his messages on his profile to get an idea of where he stands.
I did not pair you with myself as I agree with you as often as I disagree. Hamidm would have been an appropriate choice but I had already used him in opposition to urstruly`s viewpoint. As for who arjun_m is, you may check some of his messages on his profile to get an idea of where he stands.
#286 Posted by shishapa on October 24, 2006 8:21:24 am
Is not this whole debate like American English and British English?
I mean both are English, with some difference amongst them.
British do not insist that American stop calling what they speak English because it differs from British English.
Whole world calls what Americans speak English and what British speak
English and does not care if there are any differences because they
are very minute and insignificant.
#285 Posted by Urstruly on October 24, 2006 7:47:37 am
Sattar #271
That is the point I have been trying to make all along i.e. our respective belief system is so diametrically opposite to each other, as if they are two different religions. And let me reitterate this that I have absolutely no problem with your belief system as long as you don`t call it Islam. I think you should give other people`s beliefs the same respect as you demand for yours.
#284 Posted by teshah on October 23, 2006 8:09:03 pm
Re: # 283
So the matter rests on the meaning of the word `Khatam`. This recalls to me the story of a senior advocate of Attock city, named Ain Fatmi, who had used his wakeelana logic to find a way to bypass this barrier to prophet-hood and had proclaimed himself not a prophet (Nabi), but a messenger (Rasool). He argued that their was a ban imposed only on `nabuwat` but none on `Rasalat`. Since none could produce any quotation either from the Quran or Hadees for `Khatamulmursaleen` it was thought expedient to kill that man to silence him. In fact, technically there is no ban even on claiming oneself as God. Pharaoh had claimed, ``Ana rabbakumulahla` but Moses had no technical argument against him except his miracles. Any military adventurer who is successful in conquering the Pakland also uses the same words and proclaims, ``I am your Chief Executive`` and no legal or constitutional barrier can check him. `Allah ho Akbar`.
So the matter rests on the meaning of the word `Khatam`. This recalls to me the story of a senior advocate of Attock city, named Ain Fatmi, who had used his wakeelana logic to find a way to bypass this barrier to prophet-hood and had proclaimed himself not a prophet (Nabi), but a messenger (Rasool). He argued that their was a ban imposed only on `nabuwat` but none on `Rasalat`. Since none could produce any quotation either from the Quran or Hadees for `Khatamulmursaleen` it was thought expedient to kill that man to silence him. In fact, technically there is no ban even on claiming oneself as God. Pharaoh had claimed, ``Ana rabbakumulahla` but Moses had no technical argument against him except his miracles. Any military adventurer who is successful in conquering the Pakland also uses the same words and proclaims, ``I am your Chief Executive`` and no legal or constitutional barrier can check him. `Allah ho Akbar`.
#283 Posted by sattar2 on October 23, 2006 8:47:46 am
Urstruly,
”I am the last prophet and this mosque of mine is the last mosque.”
In #209 you mutilated this hadith as you tried to explain it. Your explanation was an obscene attempt at reasoning. I negated your interpretation in #271 and will now explain this hadith for the sake of completion.
Here “last” means “the best model” and “the perfect example for believers to follow”.
Prophet’s mosque is the model mosque for Muslims. It is a place where Muslims gather for worshipping Allah, for marking Islamic festivals and events etc. It faces kaaba, there are separate areas for women and men, etc, etc. It continues to serve as the model mosque for Muslims.
Similarly, prophethood of prophet Muhammad (pbuh) will serve as the model for future prophets. Future prophets will be able to achieve prophethood by patterning their lives after the life of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and by following the message he brought.
It really is that simple …
++++
This interpretation is consistent with message of Quran where Allah calls the dear Prophet, pbuh the best model for believers (33:21), where Allah commands us to accept His prophets as they appear (7:35), and more.
Furthermore, this is consistent with meaning of “khatam-un-nabiyeen” (Seal of Prophets), as the most exalted prophet, whose message will bear witness to the propethood of other prophets.
++++
Now I know you’d rather have your teeth pulled out than admit your errors. But think of all this as me fixing your wisdom teeth. It hurts a bit, but will serve you well over time. I’ll give you a lobotomy next if your delusions persist …
#282 Posted by bulleya on October 21, 2006 11:58:01 am
dost-mittar #281: ``As regards arjun-m, his greatest claim to fame was constantly reminding romair``
I am simply trying to figure out who is arjun-m?.........ever since i have joined chowk, i only read the comments of ten or so individuals........i skip over everything else.......so i don`t even know who anyone else is, much less what they say..........after reading the comments of those ten or so individuals, i interact with maybe five or so, or a regular basis (you being one of them)........so i have no clue who anyone else, much less how they would have become attached with me!
had you said, to every romair, there is a dost-mittar, or a hamidm2, or an SR, or a hisexcellency etc, i would have some concept of the relationship...........but who is arjun-m?
I am simply trying to figure out who is arjun-m?.........ever since i have joined chowk, i only read the comments of ten or so individuals........i skip over everything else.......so i don`t even know who anyone else is, much less what they say..........after reading the comments of those ten or so individuals, i interact with maybe five or so, or a regular basis (you being one of them)........so i have no clue who anyone else, much less how they would have become attached with me!
had you said, to every romair, there is a dost-mittar, or a hamidm2, or an SR, or a hisexcellency etc, i would have some concept of the relationship...........but who is arjun-m?
#281 Posted by dost_mittar on October 20, 2006 9:16:09 pm
anil#281:
I was not trying to ``mark`` chowkies, only suggesting that for every view point on chowk, there is a counterpoint. As regards arjun-m, his greatest claim to fame was constantly reminding romair of his advice to everyone to proudly wear a T-shirt with Pakistani flag in the US when that country was contemplating an attack on Afghanistan in the wake of the 9/11 attack.
I was not trying to ``mark`` chowkies, only suggesting that for every view point on chowk, there is a counterpoint. As regards arjun-m, his greatest claim to fame was constantly reminding romair of his advice to everyone to proudly wear a T-shirt with Pakistani flag in the US when that country was contemplating an attack on Afghanistan in the wake of the 9/11 attack.
#280 Posted by anil on October 20, 2006 7:39:24 pm
Re: # 274
Romair:
It is indeed said that Dost-Mitter sahib has visualized Chowk.Com as the North American footaball where every player is marked, like he has done. I wish he would take initiative to let the thoughts freely - without being marked and in reaction to one and another. I know all the participants contribute more, if not viewed and not viewed themselves as being the target, or targeting someone.
Anil
Romair:
It is indeed said that Dost-Mitter sahib has visualized Chowk.Com as the North American footaball where every player is marked, like he has done. I wish he would take initiative to let the thoughts freely - without being marked and in reaction to one and another. I know all the participants contribute more, if not viewed and not viewed themselves as being the target, or targeting someone.
Anil
#279 Posted by KaalChakra on October 20, 2006 6:14:30 pm
For my own understanding, and we need not press this further, can a person who really worships Muhammad and believes in the possibility of Quran being error prone (not parts of the book requiring different interpretations but being actually wrong) call himself a Muslim (except in a coincidental maan-na-maan-mai-tera-mehmaan sense)?
#278 Posted by sattar2 on October 20, 2006 4:52:05 pm
Baig Sahib (#275):
1. I am of the view that no one (let alone Wahabis) has the right to impose his views on others. Wahabis should be free to interpret Quran as they see fit, as long as their interpretation does not force others one way or another. A saying goes: ``Your freedom to swing your arm ends where my nose begins``.
2. How much importance a Muslim gives to ahadith over Quran, is his preference … as long he does not impose his views on others. I would think Quran should be given more importance, but I would not expect each Muslim to feel the same way.
3. Mainstream Muslims should be free to reject views of Ahmadi-Muslims, or Wahabis, etc. Respect is a vague concept in itself … but respectful disagreements is the way to go …
4. One problem here is with meaning of”good Muslim”. Who defines it, and who accepts it. The other problem here is … what does “purge” mean? Sincere debate and discussion should be welcome, but not propaganda and hatemongering.
5. I don’t think there can be an “official opinion” since each sect has their own ”office”. Which office should override which office, is a debatable issue and is best left alone.
++++++
Urstruly (#272),
My reading comprehension is alright, thanks for the concern though.
… don’t mean to rub salt on your wounds, but it’s just that … after the 3rd assumption, 4th hypothesis, and 7th part of your second-last argument, I start to feel a little lost. Pardon me if I fail to take you seriously.
You should try stand-up comedy or writing erotic stories for a porn magazine. You may make more sense then …
#277 Posted by KaalChakra on October 20, 2006 6:20:58 am
Baig Sahib
You are too harsh on Masadi sahib for his complete belief in the infallibility of the Quran. Quran as a fallible book? - I have not heard of any such Islam.
Thanks for clarifying that you yourself do not follow the religion.
You are too harsh on Masadi sahib for his complete belief in the infallibility of the Quran. Quran as a fallible book? - I have not heard of any such Islam.
Thanks for clarifying that you yourself do not follow the religion.
#276 Posted by Inquirer on October 20, 2006 5:16:45 am
Re: # 275:
Thank you for answering th question about yourself and Islam. I take your word about yourself and commend you for clarifying the situation.
As for the needed reformation in Islam and its practice, it is essential that education be spread among the most uneducated of the largest group of humans that the Muslims represent. This is not a condemnation.
The key to action lies in establishing that the benefit of the Muslims lies in separating from the obfuscatory tactics of the Masjids. We definitely need to deal with the assassin commands of the Masjids and the associated vested interests decisively.
Thank you for answering th question about yourself and Islam. I take your word about yourself and commend you for clarifying the situation.
As for the needed reformation in Islam and its practice, it is essential that education be spread among the most uneducated of the largest group of humans that the Muslims represent. This is not a condemnation.
The key to action lies in establishing that the benefit of the Muslims lies in separating from the obfuscatory tactics of the Masjids. We definitely need to deal with the assassin commands of the Masjids and the associated vested interests decisively.
#275 Posted by muradbaig on October 20, 2006 12:02:25 am
October 20
I’m very sorry but I had difficulty posting an interact earlier
The many interacts to this article seem to have produced a rich crop of information on the origins of Islamic scriptures.
But the main questions remain:
1. Do the Wahhabis have the right to impose their narrow interpretation, including the urge for Jihadi violence or suicide bombing, Hijab and other extreme views upon all Muslims?
2. Muslims all respect the Quran but must they have to give equal respect to the Hadith written by mortal men many years later?
3. Do good Muslims have to also respect the other interpreters including the Ahmediyas, Bahai’s and Wahhabis?
4. If the answer to Q 2 or 3 is negative isn’t it time that good Muslims went back to The Prophet’s fundamental teachings and purged it of all the dubious baggage of ideas and customs that Islamic scholars, Mullas and Maulvis have added to it?
5. As most of these clerics are firmly rooted in the past in a mainly Arab tribal setting they react with anger to the winds of change. When will Muslims get an `official opinion’ on how The Prophet’s teachings apply to the challenges of modern life?
Other points:
Re Massadi’s interact no 20, and several other defenders of the Sharia. I think many of you are being very unkind and unnecessarily rude. Abuse is the last resort of those who run out of cogent arguments.
Massadi’s conviction on the eternal infallibility of the Quran is very similar to the `absolute’ conviction of many Hindus, Baptists, Buddhists and other believers in the infallibility of their scriptures. Orthodox Hindu’s believe with equal certainty that the complex method of pronouncing the Shlokas of the Vedas ensured that they were perfectly preserved from generation to generation before they could be put to writing many centuries later. Massadi’s arguments would similarly fail scientific examination.
All scriptures were transmitted by enlightenment or revelation to mortal humans like Buddha, Jesus or Muhammad and may have been inspired by God but were ALL put into writing centuries later and were thus the works of men. Studies by religious historians show that ALL of them had been modified over time.
Even if such facts can question the historical accuracy of all scriptures there is no reason why the faithful should deviate from what they want to believe but they should not try to impose these on others.
If the Wahhabi’s today control Mecca and fund the main Muslim seminaries around the world isn’t it time that rational Muslims speak out against fundamentally unislamic extremism?
Muslims around the world would be much better served by rational introspection and self correction than by angry reactions that make it suspect and unwelcome in many other societies in which Muslims want to live.
And to answer one question. I was born a Muslim but now follow no religion. I willingly follow the faith of the prophets but despise the corruption of these faiths by the armies of parasitical professional priests, padris, pundits and mullahs who claim that they are the sole selling agents of their brands of God.
Murad Ali Baig
I’m very sorry but I had difficulty posting an interact earlier
The many interacts to this article seem to have produced a rich crop of information on the origins of Islamic scriptures.
But the main questions remain:
1. Do the Wahhabis have the right to impose their narrow interpretation, including the urge for Jihadi violence or suicide bombing, Hijab and other extreme views upon all Muslims?
2. Muslims all respect the Quran but must they have to give equal respect to the Hadith written by mortal men many years later?
3. Do good Muslims have to also respect the other interpreters including the Ahmediyas, Bahai’s and Wahhabis?
4. If the answer to Q 2 or 3 is negative isn’t it time that good Muslims went back to The Prophet’s fundamental teachings and purged it of all the dubious baggage of ideas and customs that Islamic scholars, Mullas and Maulvis have added to it?
5. As most of these clerics are firmly rooted in the past in a mainly Arab tribal setting they react with anger to the winds of change. When will Muslims get an `official opinion’ on how The Prophet’s teachings apply to the challenges of modern life?
Other points:
Re Massadi’s interact no 20, and several other defenders of the Sharia. I think many of you are being very unkind and unnecessarily rude. Abuse is the last resort of those who run out of cogent arguments.
Massadi’s conviction on the eternal infallibility of the Quran is very similar to the `absolute’ conviction of many Hindus, Baptists, Buddhists and other believers in the infallibility of their scriptures. Orthodox Hindu’s believe with equal certainty that the complex method of pronouncing the Shlokas of the Vedas ensured that they were perfectly preserved from generation to generation before they could be put to writing many centuries later. Massadi’s arguments would similarly fail scientific examination.
All scriptures were transmitted by enlightenment or revelation to mortal humans like Buddha, Jesus or Muhammad and may have been inspired by God but were ALL put into writing centuries later and were thus the works of men. Studies by religious historians show that ALL of them had been modified over time.
Even if such facts can question the historical accuracy of all scriptures there is no reason why the faithful should deviate from what they want to believe but they should not try to impose these on others.
If the Wahhabi’s today control Mecca and fund the main Muslim seminaries around the world isn’t it time that rational Muslims speak out against fundamentally unislamic extremism?
Muslims around the world would be much better served by rational introspection and self correction than by angry reactions that make it suspect and unwelcome in many other societies in which Muslims want to live.
And to answer one question. I was born a Muslim but now follow no religion. I willingly follow the faith of the prophets but despise the corruption of these faiths by the armies of parasitical professional priests, padris, pundits and mullahs who claim that they are the sole selling agents of their brands of God.
Murad Ali Baig
#274 Posted by bulleya on October 19, 2006 6:53:43 pm
dost-mittar #267: ``every romair, there is an arjun_m;``
Who is arjun_m?
Who is arjun_m?
#273 Posted by sattar2 on October 19, 2006 3:01:52 pm
Urstruly,
You refuse to ``go further`` when I point out your incorrect, selective quoting of hadith, or when I adequately negate your view. #271 here is an example.
And your own delusions should concern you more. Tens and thousands of your kind have been killed in recent years, but you still do not get it. You are your own worst enemy. Live and let live, Sahib ...
#272 Posted by Urstruly on October 19, 2006 8:36:15 am
sattar
Give it a rest. and frankly I do not think you have a problem with reading comprehension. It is at this point when our debate comes I refuse to go any further and you start whinning.
Give it a rest. and frankly I do not think you have a problem with reading comprehension. It is at this point when our debate comes I refuse to go any further and you start whinning.
#271 Posted by sattar2 on October 19, 2006 7:57:28 am
Urstruly … some closing comments:
After more than a year of silence on this haidth you yourself quoted, you now argue that “last prophet” means last prophet ever but “last mosque” means one of the most exalted mosque (#209). This inconsistency in a simple hadith (”I am the last prophet and this mosque of mine is the last mosque”) defies reason and raises valid doubts about your interpretation. Arabic word “akhir” used twice in this hadith is commonly used to denote the meaning of “ultimate”.
You have argued your point on basis of another hadith, while conveniently ignoring several other ahadith which negate your view. Such cherry picking of facts can easily distort the truth.
For example, the dear Prophet (pbuh) stated that “Abu Bakr is the best among my followers, except one who is a prophet”. Furthermore, at the death of his toddler son (Ibrahim was his name, if I am not mistaken) he reportedly said “If he had lived, he would have been a prophet”. [Note that according to recorded history, this incident took place approx. 5 years after the revelation of the “khatam-un-nabiyeen” verse of Quran]. Furthermore, in several of his recorded sayings he foretold the coming of a future prophet among Muslims, who he referred to as Issa-ibne-Marriam to highlight parallels between Jesus Christ and this future prophet of Allah Almighty.
+++++++++++++++
You claim 450+ hadith support your view, but are able to cite only 1-2 ahadith. These too don’t hold up upon scrutiny. What about the remaining 448+ hadith? How do you count hadith? You claims are very vague and lack support on basis of facts.
+++++++++++++++
Initially you argued on basis of “khattam-un-nabiyeen” but you now seem to realize your case does not hold up. I have argued on basis of Quranic verses, Arabic language, historical references, and views of extremely well-known Islamic scholars to negate your interpreation of ``khattam-un-nabiyeen``. Now you don’t even mention Quran ... and that’s somewhat telling.
Quran explains each issue over and over again, to make it clear from different viewpoints. However, there is no mention of end of prophethood in any way or form, not even once. Do you think Allah forgot to mention this critical detail?
++++++++++++++++
Now, we can argue on and on, and go in circles. I am content with my take on things, and so should you be. You can consider me a non-Muslim and that’s a view you are entitled to. In my view you are a Muslim … since you claim to be a Muslim and I have no right to think of you otherwise.
But you and your mullahs go to extremes by targeting Ahmadi-Muslims for propaganda and violent persecution. This behavior, where a person is willing to hurt and even kill others over religious differences, is deeply disturbing. Such conflicts have resulted in grave suffering throughout human history and sent millions to early graves. Such violence should be shunned, fanaticism discouraged, and hatred rejected by everyone if we hope to establish peace in our society and in our lives. I hope some day you’ll see the light …
#270 Posted by KaalChakra on October 19, 2006 4:11:27 am
Inquirer
Zeemax gets a bad rap because he is the only one here who speaks openly of very real issues in religion - domination, power, force, violence.
On what basis is someone like Mr. Baig going to ``assert`` himself within a Muslim population? Is Mr. Baig a Muslim, in the first place?
Do we wait for ``reason`` to assert itself over faith (even though no accusation can be levied against Mr. Baig for being a partisan of reason)?
Zeemax gets a bad rap because he is the only one here who speaks openly of very real issues in religion - domination, power, force, violence.
On what basis is someone like Mr. Baig going to ``assert`` himself within a Muslim population? Is Mr. Baig a Muslim, in the first place?
Do we wait for ``reason`` to assert itself over faith (even though no accusation can be levied against Mr. Baig for being a partisan of reason)?
#269 Posted by Inquirer on October 18, 2006 6:10:23 pm
I am very late coming in and do not know how the audience has reacted but I totally agree with Beg. It is the bounden duty of the moderate Muslims to assert themselves and act shrewedly to reduce the importance of the Masjids in Islamic populations.
Hopefully, a return to moderation in addressing the world and inter-cultural problems subsequent to the coming of the November US elections by US will provide the necessary phillip and support.
Hopefully, a return to moderation in addressing the world and inter-cultural problems subsequent to the coming of the November US elections by US will provide the necessary phillip and support.
#268 Posted by sattar2 on October 18, 2006 9:10:01 am
DM,
Fair enough and thanks for clarifying your comments. However, I think you’ve misunderstood my comments.
To clarify things, I’ll mention that I am open to all sorts of debates and discussions. This applies to religious fanaticism, Nazism, and more. I am not at all insisting that such discussion be put an end to.
I am objecting here to your portrayal of fanatics as peaceful, compassionate folks. It started with your portrayal of Urstruly and Naqsh etc. as good human beings. My point was that if such individuals are good people, then arguably so were Nazis. Granted, Urstruly/Naqsh probably have not killed anyone personally. However, I am sure lots of Nazis never pulled the trigger on anyone’s head either.
And I am not comparing Chowk to Nazi Germany. This is an erroneous analogy. A more accurate analogy would be … to compare positive portrayal of fanatics by you … to positive portrayal of Nazism by a well-meaning newspaper that seems to have gotten it all wrong.
When I highlighted deception and deceit from Urstruly, as an example, you called it “debating skills” and that he was merely “skating around issues”. You later went on to portray him as a peaceful individual, quoting his “live and let live” line to me. This seemed like further sugarcoating of his deceit and fanaticism. Having known his views on killing apostates and support for anti-Ahmadi legislation, how can one fall for this “live and let live” line … is beyond me. I summed up my views in #245.
++++++++++
Some debates did take place on Iraqi issue before the war. But these debates did not have much impact in terms of the truth coming out. That was mainly due to propaganda from the leaders, followed by their puppet news outlets spinning the issues.
It is such spin and validation of deception that I find objectionable, not to debate and discussion itself. I hope this is clear.
[As a side note: Violence and propaganda deployed by fanatics against Ahmadi-Muslims has come around to haunt them in an exactly identical manner. Hatred they cultivated continues to cause turmoil in their own ranks, causing grave suffering for millions of innocents. In recent years tens of thousands of fanatics have been wiped out due to their global conflicts. However I cannot take comfort in suffering of my enemies. Human suffering is human suffering … and is lamentable to me at a personal level regardless of who suffers.]
++++++++++
DM, you are a decent fellow, with a lot of admirable qualities. And I absolutely love the saying about nectar of life … very well stated. I am all for churning of the oceans … as it reminds us that human beings must constantly struggle to maintain distinction between good and evil. Circumstances change from day to day, from one place to another. What seems good and pure in one place and time, may become evil under different circumstances. God and Satan continue to battle over human mind, and one must always be on guard, lest our complacency starts to shift the outcome in favor of the forces of the darkness.
To go back to the original point: There is indeed a distinction between masadi … and Urstruly. Masadi is a man of convictions and perhaps a nuisance at times. Urstruly is a trickster, who advocates killing those who disagree with him. Let’s not put them in the same category.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Urstruly … I am still waiting to hear your response to #247 … more later …
#267 Posted by dost_mittar on October 17, 2006 2:04:40 pm
sattar saheb:
I was absent from chowk for a couple of days. Here is my brief and, hopefully, final post on this topic.
I absolutely abhor the use of violence in settling matters relating to faith and am in total agreement with your viewpoint on this. It is important for me to say so since in defending certain individuals, it might appear that I am defending what they stand for. And I certainly do not agree with any belief system which endorses concepts like punishments for blasphemy and apostacy.
What we are talking here is in the context of this particular forum, which as a once almost universally hated chowkie, Jay, once correctly described as a marketplace of ideas. Here no idea is too drastic nor any idea so sacrosanct that it cannot be challenged. To borrow a concept from the Hindu mythology, it is through such a manthan (churning) of the ocean between the suras (gods) and asuras (demons) that amrit (nectar of life) was produced.
One cannot compare this forum to Hitler`s Germany. Unlike Nazi Germany, at chowk, every idea is challenged: for every Urstruly or Naqshbandi, there is a hamidm or a sattar; for every zeemax, there is a harimou; for every gujju, there is a HP; for every romair, there is an arjun_m; for every sadna, there is a manto and so on and so forth. If you believe that you have successfully debunked Urstruly`s interpretation of the Quran, your debate with him may have successfully immunised some readers of your debate from the effects of such ideas when they are presented at a khutba in his or her mosque. You mentioned the effect of the false propaganda of Bush-Blair in Iraq; in my opinion, this is precisely because, unlike chowk where this issue was rigorously debated, the US media failed to give equal time to the ``bad`` guys who were trying to challenge the establishment`s building of the case against the ``weapons of mass destruction`` in Iraq.
A point comes in a debate where people start to merely repeat themselves; I think that I have reached that point now. So, I will try not to post any further on this topic while looking forward to anything additional that you may want to add. And thanks for a nice discussion.
teshah:
Shahji, I can read Urdu if it is in print or in ``khush-khat``.
I was absent from chowk for a couple of days. Here is my brief and, hopefully, final post on this topic.
I absolutely abhor the use of violence in settling matters relating to faith and am in total agreement with your viewpoint on this. It is important for me to say so since in defending certain individuals, it might appear that I am defending what they stand for. And I certainly do not agree with any belief system which endorses concepts like punishments for blasphemy and apostacy.
What we are talking here is in the context of this particular forum, which as a once almost universally hated chowkie, Jay, once correctly described as a marketplace of ideas. Here no idea is too drastic nor any idea so sacrosanct that it cannot be challenged. To borrow a concept from the Hindu mythology, it is through such a manthan (churning) of the ocean between the suras (gods) and asuras (demons) that amrit (nectar of life) was produced.
One cannot compare this forum to Hitler`s Germany. Unlike Nazi Germany, at chowk, every idea is challenged: for every Urstruly or Naqshbandi, there is a hamidm or a sattar; for every zeemax, there is a harimou; for every gujju, there is a HP; for every romair, there is an arjun_m; for every sadna, there is a manto and so on and so forth. If you believe that you have successfully debunked Urstruly`s interpretation of the Quran, your debate with him may have successfully immunised some readers of your debate from the effects of such ideas when they are presented at a khutba in his or her mosque. You mentioned the effect of the false propaganda of Bush-Blair in Iraq; in my opinion, this is precisely because, unlike chowk where this issue was rigorously debated, the US media failed to give equal time to the ``bad`` guys who were trying to challenge the establishment`s building of the case against the ``weapons of mass destruction`` in Iraq.
A point comes in a debate where people start to merely repeat themselves; I think that I have reached that point now. So, I will try not to post any further on this topic while looking forward to anything additional that you may want to add. And thanks for a nice discussion.
teshah:
Shahji, I can read Urdu if it is in print or in ``khush-khat``.
#266 Posted by KaalChakra on October 17, 2006 7:55:51 am
sattar2
Thanks for your patient response.
Faith, so long as it does not harm or dominate others, always makes good sense.
Thanks for your patient response.
Faith, so long as it does not harm or dominate others, always makes good sense.
#265 Posted by sattar2 on October 17, 2006 7:15:08 am
kaalchakra (#257),
Fair questions … not offensive in any way...
Ahmadi-Muslim faith
Ahmadis consider themselves Muslims since they believe in Allah Almighty, the message of Quran, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), earlier prophets, articles of Islamic faith, etc. They believe in Day of Judgment, where each person will face judgment of Allah Almighty and will be rewarded (or punished) accordingly.
In Quran Allah uses the term “Muslim” for the faithful. Ahmadi-Muslims therefore cannot abandon this label, since they believe in the message of Quran and aim to model their lives as faithful believers.
And there’s more …
According to Quran Allah raised prophets for guidance of mankind as they went astray. Today Islam had been disfigured by its ullema and turned into a hateful, political ideology, designed to perpetuate political agendas, backwardness, and social decay. These ullema advocate ideological violence and hatred, propaganda, forcing their belief on others, and senseless belief in fairy-tale idea of prophets residing above clouds, genies and ghosts, and much more. For example, they believe that a prophet from two thousand years ago will descend from above clouds and lead Islam to victory by killing infidels, Jews, and more. Similar is their concept of Jihad as well, a corrupt notion to further their political agendas through hatred and senseless violence. Read #248/#249 for an example.
Decline of Muslims as predicted by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
To the credit of Islam and its prophet, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) predicted that a day will come when his followers would have reached the lowest of the lowest point and its scholars would be the vilest of Allah’s creations.
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) further prophesied that at such a time Allah will raise a prophet for the reformation of Muslims, who will shun violence, renew peaceful teachings of Islam, give the message of harmony between people of different faiths, do away with magical beliefs which would have become part of Islam over time, and more.
Persecution of Ahmadi-Muslims
Due to their views Ahmadi-Muslims have been targeted for violent persecution by ullema and their followers. This is very much like when Islam appeared 1400 years ago, when its followers were severely persecuted. Renewal of Islam at the hands of Allah’s prophet, appearance of whom was foretold by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), will take place in similar fashion: violent persecution met with steadfastness, patience, and piety.
Despite this persecution, Ahmadi-Muslims have refrained from engaging in propaganda, violence, or any form of hatred towards its enemies. They have refused to negotiate with ullema who preach hate, and this in turn has resulted in more hatred and violence aimed at Ahmadis. They have placed their trust in Allah Almighty and stuck with message of peace of Quran and examples of patience and piety set by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) ... and life goes on ...
Moving on …
Granted, this answer may or may not make sense to one. It raises more questions than it answers … and leads to a much larger discussion about role of religion, existence of god, his judgment, role of prophets, hell and heaven, concept of good and evil, and much, much more. But that would be a much larger discussion … so I am posting a somewhat concise answer to your inquiry. I hope it helps …
#264 Posted by arjun2 on October 17, 2006 6:26:58 am
#261 by bilal843 on October 17, 2006 1:31am PT
why stop there...
If mo of arabia hadn`t started islam, there would be mo madrassahs...so mo of arabia is to blame for all this..
why stop there...
If mo of arabia hadn`t started islam, there would be mo madrassahs...so mo of arabia is to blame for all this..
#263 Posted by harish_hyd on October 17, 2006 4:08:08 am
#262 by kaalchakra
You do not consider the local people and government responsible for supporting and financing jihad since late 1980s?
Pakis shouldn`t really be complaining because it`s not that they did it out of love for the US or plain altruism; they were adequately compensated for their role by being paid copious sums of money (Zia once refused US aid saying that they were just peanuts forcing it to significantly up the amount) for their services.
But for Pakis, its everyone else except themselves to blame. The root cause syndrome.
You do not consider the local people and government responsible for supporting and financing jihad since late 1980s?
Pakis shouldn`t really be complaining because it`s not that they did it out of love for the US or plain altruism; they were adequately compensated for their role by being paid copious sums of money (Zia once refused US aid saying that they were just peanuts forcing it to significantly up the amount) for their services.
But for Pakis, its everyone else except themselves to blame. The root cause syndrome.
#262 Posted by KaalChakra on October 17, 2006 2:46:31 am
bilal843
You do not consider the local people and government responsible for supporting and financing jihad since late 1980s?
You do not consider the local people and government responsible for supporting and financing jihad since late 1980s?
#261 Posted by bilal843 on October 17, 2006 1:31:35 am
well, the most of the terrorist centres (Pakistani Madrassas, Afghanistan etc) have received cash & arms during 80s from US through intermediary intelligence agencies of the Muslim countries in order to defeat Soviet power. so this whole ``terror`` of today is an outcome of policies of the US & West during cold war.
and sadly the victims are also the ordinary people of Muslim countries
and sadly the victims are also the ordinary people of Muslim countries
#260 Posted by ballukhan on October 16, 2006 10:02:10 pm
Re: # 259
``The fact however is that Islam already stand hijacked by the Salafi Mullah to be made a source of their `rozi roti`. ``
The heart of this problem is the issue of unproductive and unemployed mullahs who are left at the bottom rung of the modern economy and find religion as the best vehicle to move up the economic ladder................................forget about the `rozi roti` thing........now it is a multinational enterprise with crores of remittances waiting for you provided you make the right threatening noises ............. it is a big mafia racket now............
``The fact however is that Islam already stand hijacked by the Salafi Mullah to be made a source of their `rozi roti`. ``
The heart of this problem is the issue of unproductive and unemployed mullahs who are left at the bottom rung of the modern economy and find religion as the best vehicle to move up the economic ladder................................forget about the `rozi roti` thing........now it is a multinational enterprise with crores of remittances waiting for you provided you make the right threatening noises ............. it is a big mafia racket now............
#259 Posted by teshah on October 16, 2006 8:16:07 pm
Re: # 257
kaalchakra
``Why do Ahmadis insist on being identified as Muslims? What do they see in Islam that they remain so committed to its side even though they are martyred by ``fellow Muslims?````
A very good question indeed. Perhaps they wanted to hijack Islam. Bahai`s also tried this but failed and ultimately declared Islam to have `expired`. They are now living in peace even in Islamabad wherein they have a palatial centre in the heart of the city in sect er H-8.
The fact however is that Islam already stand hijacked by the Salafi Mullah to be made a source of their `rozi roti`. They are trying even to get the Shias declared as non-Muslims like Ahmadis in Pakistan by subverting the constitution of the country to make it a `Fatwa` against them. Do you suggest that we may allow free hand to the Mullah to make Islam their monoply.
kaalchakra
``Why do Ahmadis insist on being identified as Muslims? What do they see in Islam that they remain so committed to its side even though they are martyred by ``fellow Muslims?````
A very good question indeed. Perhaps they wanted to hijack Islam. Bahai`s also tried this but failed and ultimately declared Islam to have `expired`. They are now living in peace even in Islamabad wherein they have a palatial centre in the heart of the city in sect er H-8.
The fact however is that Islam already stand hijacked by the Salafi Mullah to be made a source of their `rozi roti`. They are trying even to get the Shias declared as non-Muslims like Ahmadis in Pakistan by subverting the constitution of the country to make it a `Fatwa` against them. Do you suggest that we may allow free hand to the Mullah to make Islam their monoply.
#258 Posted by teshah on October 16, 2006 6:54:21 pm
Re: # 244
Olympics is a paganistic ritual involving `Lehvo lahb` which is condemned by Islam. Only Islamofascists can take it as a good chance for parading their seriousness about Olympics and its clash with the Ramazan. As a matter of fact, Ramazan cannot be the same for all people, all the time. In any case it could provide a good excuse for the rerrorists to bomb the show.
Olympics is a paganistic ritual involving `Lehvo lahb` which is condemned by Islam. Only Islamofascists can take it as a good chance for parading their seriousness about Olympics and its clash with the Ramazan. As a matter of fact, Ramazan cannot be the same for all people, all the time. In any case it could provide a good excuse for the rerrorists to bomb the show.
#257 Posted by KaalChakra on October 16, 2006 6:29:16 pm
sattar ji and kulhari bhai
This is a sensitive question that I want to put most respectfully. On my part, it`s part curiosity, part genuine attempt to understand the world around us.
Why do Ahmedis insist on being identified as Muslims? What do they see in Islam that they remain so committed to its side even though they are martyred by ``fellow Muslims?``
If this is an inappropriate question, please ignore it.
This is a sensitive question that I want to put most respectfully. On my part, it`s part curiosity, part genuine attempt to understand the world around us.
Why do Ahmedis insist on being identified as Muslims? What do they see in Islam that they remain so committed to its side even though they are martyred by ``fellow Muslims?``
If this is an inappropriate question, please ignore it.
#256 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 6:08:37 pm
I just received this e-mail ... relevent to the topic.
This is about an Ahmadi martyred in Sri Lanka, victim of ideological violence at the hands of fanatics. It may help put things in perspective ...
++++++++++
Dear All,
Assalamu Alaikum. W.W.
Today the 14th October, 2006, an Ahmadi martyred.
Janab. A. Niyas Ahmad (65) has been martyred. Inna Lillahi Wa Inna
Ilaihi Rajioon. Today, early morning at about 4.15 A.M., while he was on
his way to Mosque on his bicycle, he had been stabbed to death by
unknown persons. The late A. Niyas Ahmad was working as care-taker for
Negombo Mosque for the last 35 years. This innocent pious Ahmadi had
been martyred after the numerous instigations of the non-ahmadi Ulamas
during this Holy Month of Ramadhan. In the recent days, in their Friday
Sermons as well as after Tharaveeh prayers, this Mullahs delivered
speeches full of instigations against Ahmadis. This campaign in Negombo
particularly in rise in the recent times. Situation in Negombo is a sort
of fearful condition for the Ahmadis. Please pray for them.
XXXXXXXXX
Press Secretary,
Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaath,
Sri Lanka.
This is about an Ahmadi martyred in Sri Lanka, victim of ideological violence at the hands of fanatics. It may help put things in perspective ...
++++++++++
Dear All,
Assalamu Alaikum. W.W.
Today the 14th October, 2006, an Ahmadi martyred.
Janab. A. Niyas Ahmad (65) has been martyred. Inna Lillahi Wa Inna
Ilaihi Rajioon. Today, early morning at about 4.15 A.M., while he was on
his way to Mosque on his bicycle, he had been stabbed to death by
unknown persons. The late A. Niyas Ahmad was working as care-taker for
Negombo Mosque for the last 35 years. This innocent pious Ahmadi had
been martyred after the numerous instigations of the non-ahmadi Ulamas
during this Holy Month of Ramadhan. In the recent days, in their Friday
Sermons as well as after Tharaveeh prayers, this Mullahs delivered
speeches full of instigations against Ahmadis. This campaign in Negombo
particularly in rise in the recent times. Situation in Negombo is a sort
of fearful condition for the Ahmadis. Please pray for them.
XXXXXXXXX
Press Secretary,
Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaath,
Sri Lanka.
#255 Posted by harimau on October 16, 2006 3:42:34 pm
ref arjun2 #244
[The 2012 London Olympics have been plunged into controversy by the discovery that the Games will clash with Ramadan, the most holy month in the Islamic calendar.
The clash will put Muslim athletes at a disadvantage as they will be expected to fast from sunrise to sunset for the entire duration of the Games.
In 2012, Ramadan will take place from July 21 to August 20, while the Olympics run from July 27 to August 12.
An anticipated 3,000 Muslim competitors are expected to be affected.
About a quarter of the 11,099 athletes who took part in the 2004 Athens Olympics came from countries with predominantly Muslim populations.
Because the Muslim calendar is based on a lunar cycle, the ninth month of Ramadan - which runs from the appearance of one new crescent moon to the next - gets earlier by around 11 days each year.
The clash will be a huge embarrassment for Lord Coe, Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, and London Mayor Ken Livingstone, who have been keen to ensure the Games involve all Britain`s ethnic communities.
Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the London-based Islamic Human Rights Commission, said: ``They would not have organised this at Christmas. It is equally stupid to organise it at Ramadan.
``It shows a complete lack of awareness and sensitivity.
``This is going to disadvantage the athletes and alienate the Asian communities by saying they don`t matter.
``It`s not only going to affect the participants it`s going to affect all the people who want to watch the Games.
``They won`t want to travel during Ramadan and they won`t want to watch sport. It`s a spiritual time.``]
However, Muslims will still be chasing their daughters with knives and slashing them to death during Ramadan for the sin of dating a non-Muslim. This is perfectly acceptable and British Muslims will soon be petitioning the Olympic Committee to include this among the sporting events in the Summer as well as the Winter Olympics.
[The 2012 London Olympics have been plunged into controversy by the discovery that the Games will clash with Ramadan, the most holy month in the Islamic calendar.
The clash will put Muslim athletes at a disadvantage as they will be expected to fast from sunrise to sunset for the entire duration of the Games.
In 2012, Ramadan will take place from July 21 to August 20, while the Olympics run from July 27 to August 12.
An anticipated 3,000 Muslim competitors are expected to be affected.
About a quarter of the 11,099 athletes who took part in the 2004 Athens Olympics came from countries with predominantly Muslim populations.
Because the Muslim calendar is based on a lunar cycle, the ninth month of Ramadan - which runs from the appearance of one new crescent moon to the next - gets earlier by around 11 days each year.
The clash will be a huge embarrassment for Lord Coe, Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, and London Mayor Ken Livingstone, who have been keen to ensure the Games involve all Britain`s ethnic communities.
Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the London-based Islamic Human Rights Commission, said: ``They would not have organised this at Christmas. It is equally stupid to organise it at Ramadan.
``It shows a complete lack of awareness and sensitivity.
``This is going to disadvantage the athletes and alienate the Asian communities by saying they don`t matter.
``It`s not only going to affect the participants it`s going to affect all the people who want to watch the Games.
``They won`t want to travel during Ramadan and they won`t want to watch sport. It`s a spiritual time.``]
However, Muslims will still be chasing their daughters with knives and slashing them to death during Ramadan for the sin of dating a non-Muslim. This is perfectly acceptable and British Muslims will soon be petitioning the Olympic Committee to include this among the sporting events in the Summer as well as the Winter Olympics.
#254 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 12:28:08 pm
... DM, read #248/#249 for further clarification ...
Do you need more or is this enough?
Or would like to get a court conviction to make up your mind??
#253 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 8:50:57 am
DM (#206):
Every war, or genocide, or mass-murder begins with words, writings, discussions, propaganda, speeches. It is sheer stupidity to separate words (written or spoken) from the eventual results they bring about.
Propaganda and manipulated intelligence on Iraq has led us to a useless war and unthinkable human suffering. Should we simply shrug our shoulders and say “... it’s too bad that words led us to this …” ??
Look, I am not asking that you start chasing Urstruly, zeemax, Naqsh, Jerry Falwells with a stick. But it is dangerous to portray them as peaceful men who deserve to be understood. It is also dangerous to validate their deception and trickery as harmless debating skills.
+++++
And yes, when Hitler was giving a speech, rousing masses againt Jews, one could have asked ...``how do we know he is really a fanatic in real life ...?``. So yes, you have a point ... I admit ...
#252 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 8:23:09 am
Naqsh (#249),
This is a tacit admission of guilt.
You seem to have made it clear that you support mindless violence, but hide behind trickery to cover your fanaticsm.
[But DM would argue it`s ok ... since we are only discussing issues here, there`s no harm in trickery and deception ...]
+++++++++
DM Sahib, ... ``learned, peaceful folks, with compassion circumscribed by faith?``
Who are you kidding?
#251 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 8:11:38 am
Urstruly (#212),
You comments about Ahmadi-Muslim view on jihad are erroneous. Ahmadi-Musilms fully endorse Quranic views of jihad. Why wouldn’t they? They fully believe in Quran, despite your nonsensical ramblings. Read on …
I am assuming you are talking about fighting jihad here. The concept of fighting jihad is sanctioned by Quran under certain circumstances only. It is grave injustice when concept of jihad is abused to validate political agendas, suicide bombings, and mindless violence.
According to Quran, fighting jihad is to be carried out strictly as a defensive struggle, against the aggressor. If one is allowed to practice his faith, there is no need for fighting jihad. Killing woman and children to put pressure on the aggressor is not jihad. Quran even commands believers to migrate to other lands in order to avoid persecution and oppression.
Ahmadi-Muslims refused to engage in fighting jihad against the British since Quranic pre-requisites for this jihad did not exist. They did however engage in peaceful political movements to get the British to leave India as the circumstances demanded. This is fully in line with Quranic commandments of striving for peace and justice as circumstances demand.
Rest of your post is the usual ramblings and anti-Ahmadi propaganda. Despite best efforts for almost a century, your mullahs have not been able to validate their claims against Ahmadis. It is propaganda, based upon hatred and lies.
#250 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 7:49:08 am
Ranjit (#211),
Here’s an alternate viewpoint:
Quran attests that prophets have appeared in the past and they guided people according to divine laws. It further attests that not all prophets brought divine law: some brought divine law, and some were raised to warn and to remind people on basis of the divine law.
From an Islamic viewpoint, one must ask: If appearance of all these prophets since the beginning of human history was not a problem, why should it be a problem now?
Current condition of Muslims attests that they have strayed far from the Quranic message of peace and piety. Quran attests that when people became so severely corrupt, Allah raised prophets for their reformation. Nothing in Quran even remotely suggests a change in this practice of Allah Almighty. Divine Laws that have been at work since the beginning of human history remain operable today, in my view.
As attested to by Quran, followers of prophets have always faced violent persecution and propaganda from corrupt elements of the society. This explains very well views of mullahs … as they advocate senseless violence and remain bent upon persecuting Ahamdis.
(... my next response to Urstruly will explain a bit more ...)
#248 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 7:26:45 am
Naqsh (#217):
You say … ”i have never advocated mindless violence …”
But all along you have supported killing people for blasphemy and apostasy and adultrey. Do you see the contradiction? We have very different interpretations of “mindless”, I guess.
And I won’t get into your belief about a two-thousand year old prophet residing above clouds. You are entitled to your views. However it is your fanatic, senseless violence that I am objecting to …
#247 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 7:18:51 am
Urstruly (#209),
Look, you have gone through a lot of reasoning, hypothesis, attempts at logic ... to conclude that same word, used twice in the same sentence, has two very different meanings.
If we start accepting such trickery, anything can be twisted to mean anything. Nice try, but it does not cut it ...
++++++++++
Here are a few for you:
- Prophet (pbuh) reportedly stated that … Abu Bakr is the best among my followers, except one who is a prophet.
- When the dear Prophet (pbuh) mentioned appearance of Issa-ibne-Marriam (Jesus Christ) in the later days, he foretold appearance of a prophet in the later days. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) referred to this future prophet as Issa-ibne-Marriam to underscore parallels between him and Jesus Christ.
[Re #217: Naqshbandi and the rest of the ummah thinks it is the same Issa-ibne-Marriam from two thousand years ago, who resides above clouds, and will descend down to earth one day, in flesh and blood, on shoulders to two angels. Are we to believe this fairy tale?]
- Quran never mentions that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is the last prophet ever. Did Allah forget this detail? I don’t think so …
#246 Posted by KaalChakra on October 16, 2006 6:51:31 am
Humsab bhai
It`s possible that we just don`t understand what Islam means by `Sabr`, `maufi` and `khush akhlaaqi,` and other such.
There is need for non Muslims to come together and study Islam objectively, not to praise it, nor to deride it, but exclusively to understand how it affects non Muslims.
It`s possible that we just don`t understand what Islam means by `Sabr`, `maufi` and `khush akhlaaqi,` and other such.
There is need for non Muslims to come together and study Islam objectively, not to praise it, nor to deride it, but exclusively to understand how it affects non Muslims.
#245 Posted by sattar2 on October 16, 2006 6:50:09 am
DM,
People like Urstruly, zeemax, Naqsh feed the cycle of ideological hatred and violence. Let’s not make excuses for them by sugarcoating their fanaticism. I see flaws in your reasoning which are discussed below.
What a book says, or doesn’t say
First things first: What Quran or any other book says is irrelevant here. A person has no right to force his beliefs on others, period. Violating this principle is fanaticism without an excuse, let’s get this right. Again, your point about interpretation of Quran is irrelevant here.
If you disagree, you may as well argue that Nazis were merely following their book and deserve to be understood. Same can be said of Gujrat riots. I’ll post more on this later, but this should suffice for now.
Presecution of Ahmadis
Your claim that Urstruly does not advocate violence against Ahmadis, is incorrect. He blames Ahmadis for violence against them, and that they are getting what they deserve. Every now and then he posts incorrect, hateful information about them. Similarly, zeemax insists Ahmadis are British agents working against Pakistan and Muslims. Such antics perpetuate hatred and violence against Ahamdi-Muslims.
[Note: I bring up persecution of Ahmadis specifically for a good reason. Since I am an Ahamdi-Muslim myself, I happen to know more about this particular subject. What I have thus learnt about fanaticism applies to persecution of others groups, Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Bahais, Christians, and more.
“Live and Let Live” lie
This is a sorry one. You suggest that Urstruly’s “live and let live” comment shows his peaceful nature. How can you ignore his support for anti-Ahmadi legislation and killing people if they leave Islam? His “live and let live” line is a lie which you fail to see through.
I’d reckon your thought process is a part of the problem here. One can spot fanatics like Urstruly and know what to expect. But when folks like you start portraying them as peaceful individuals, you contribute to building mainstream support for them and for what they advocate.
How do you think Hitlers and Maudoodis rise to power? Fanatics like Urstruly line up behind them, as expected. But when folks like you fall for their slogans like “live and let live”, their support gathers momentum. The truth eventually comes out, but only after unthinkable destruction and losses have taken place.
Deceit and deception
This is another sorry one: You validate Urstruly’s deceptive and deceitful tactics (even as he advocates ideological violence) by calling them skilled debate tactics. When he dodges tough questions on serious matters, you portray it is harmless skating around the issue. Such characterization is beneath dignity for further comments at this moment.
Further obfuscation
These men have displayed little regard for truth or human suffering. However, you characterize them as learned men, with compassion circumscribed by their faith. This is dangerous obfuscation, pussyfooting around the issue.
What’s next? An incestuous father is really a loving parent? Sorry about the blunt analogy, but it accurately reflects my take on your hollow views.
”Hate the sin, not the sinner”
Your claim to “hate the sin, not the sinner” does not cut it. If a person professes senseless violence, his deceit and hatred “are” the sins. If you validate these sins, there’s not much left to hate and to discourage. You may as well start writing checks for jihad fund for the sake of “empathy”, probably the next item on your do-good-universal-karma list.
+++++++++
After all is said and done, you are entitled to your views. I am of the opinion that your arm-chair philosophizing is pitiful and borders on being dangerous. At times one needs to take a clear, firm stand, and say it like it is. Your comments thus far have been a disappointment in this regard.
#244 Posted by arjun2 on October 16, 2006 4:42:51 am
Islamofascists again...
Muslims` anger as London Olympics clash with Ramadan
By Claudia Joseph Last updated at 22:24pm on 14th October 2006
The 2012 London Olympics have been plunged into controversy by the discovery that the Games will clash with Ramadan, the most holy month in the Islamic calendar.
The clash will put Muslim athletes at a disadvantage as they will be expected to fast from sunrise to sunset for the entire duration of the Games.
In 2012, Ramadan will take place from July 21 to August 20, while the Olympics run from July 27 to August 12.
An anticipated 3,000 Muslim competitors are expected to be affected.
About a quarter of the 11,099 athletes who took part in the 2004 Athens Olympics came from countries with predominantly Muslim populations.
Because the Muslim calendar is based on a lunar cycle, the ninth month of Ramadan - which runs from the appearance of one new crescent moon to the next - gets earlier by around 11 days each year.
The clash will be a huge embarrassment for Lord Coe, Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, and London Mayor Ken Livingstone, who have been keen to ensure the Games involve all Britain`s ethnic communities.
Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the London-based Islamic Human Rights Commission, said: ``They would not have organised this at Christmas. It is equally stupid to organise it at Ramadan.
``It shows a complete lack of awareness and sensitivity.
``This is going to disadvantage the athletes and alienate the Asian communities by saying they don`t matter.
``It`s not only going to affect the participants it`s going to affect all the people who want to watch the Games.
``They won`t want to travel during Ramadan and they won`t want to watch sport. It`s a spiritual time.``
Shaykh Ibrahim Mogra, an imam on the Muslim Council of Great Britain, said: ``I`m sure the athletes will seek advice from their scholars.
``They are obviously going to be at a disadvantage because other competitors will be drinking and keeping up their energy levels.
``But they are athletes and I am sure they will train their bodies to cope with this.
``A Muslim might feel it would have been nice to avoid this month but life doesn`t stop for Muslims during Ramadan even though they are fasting.
``The best thing for a Muslim is to continue his or her life as normal. This is the real test.``
The British Olympic Association is now planning a meeting with the organisers of London 2012 to discuss how the timing will affect UK Muslim athletes.
And Muslim countries such as Turkey are calling for the date to be changed.
Togay Bayalti, president of the National Olympic Committee of Turkey, said: ``This will be difficult for Muslim athletes.
``They don`t have to observe Ramadan if they are doing sport and travelling but they will have to decide whether it is important to them.
``It would be nice for the friendship of the Games if they had chosen a different date.``
The International Olympics Committee insisted the Games take place some time between July 15 to August 31, giving more than a week either side of Ramadan.
IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies said: ``We give a window to the five bid cities. The host city selects the dates within that window.
``The Games bring together virtually every religion and creed. How to deal with religious clashes is up to the athletes.``
Joanna Manning Cooper, spokeswoman for London 2012, said: ``We did know about it when we submitted our bid and we have always believed we could find ways to accommodate it.
``We had lots of things to consider when we submitted our dates, including the fact that transport will be less crowded in the summer holiday.
``We also need 70,000 volunteers and this is the best time to find them.
``We are working with the Muslim Council of Great Britain to find ways to accommodate Ramadan during the London Games.``
Muslims` anger as London Olympics clash with Ramadan
By Claudia Joseph Last updated at 22:24pm on 14th October 2006
The 2012 London Olympics have been plunged into controversy by the discovery that the Games will clash with Ramadan, the most holy month in the Islamic calendar.
The clash will put Muslim athletes at a disadvantage as they will be expected to fast from sunrise to sunset for the entire duration of the Games.
In 2012, Ramadan will take place from July 21 to August 20, while the Olympics run from July 27 to August 12.
An anticipated 3,000 Muslim competitors are expected to be affected.
About a quarter of the 11,099 athletes who took part in the 2004 Athens Olympics came from countries with predominantly Muslim populations.
Because the Muslim calendar is based on a lunar cycle, the ninth month of Ramadan - which runs from the appearance of one new crescent moon to the next - gets earlier by around 11 days each year.
The clash will be a huge embarrassment for Lord Coe, Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, and London Mayor Ken Livingstone, who have been keen to ensure the Games involve all Britain`s ethnic communities.
Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the London-based Islamic Human Rights Commission, said: ``They would not have organised this at Christmas. It is equally stupid to organise it at Ramadan.
``It shows a complete lack of awareness and sensitivity.
``This is going to disadvantage the athletes and alienate the Asian communities by saying they don`t matter.
``It`s not only going to affect the participants it`s going to affect all the people who want to watch the Games.
``They won`t want to travel during Ramadan and they won`t want to watch sport. It`s a spiritual time.``
Shaykh Ibrahim Mogra, an imam on the Muslim Council of Great Britain, said: ``I`m sure the athletes will seek advice from their scholars.
``They are obviously going to be at a disadvantage because other competitors will be drinking and keeping up their energy levels.
``But they are athletes and I am sure they will train their bodies to cope with this.
``A Muslim might feel it would have been nice to avoid this month but life doesn`t stop for Muslims during Ramadan even though they are fasting.
``The best thing for a Muslim is to continue his or her life as normal. This is the real test.``
The British Olympic Association is now planning a meeting with the organisers of London 2012 to discuss how the timing will affect UK Muslim athletes.
And Muslim countries such as Turkey are calling for the date to be changed.
Togay Bayalti, president of the National Olympic Committee of Turkey, said: ``This will be difficult for Muslim athletes.
``They don`t have to observe Ramadan if they are doing sport and travelling but they will have to decide whether it is important to them.
``It would be nice for the friendship of the Games if they had chosen a different date.``
The International Olympics Committee insisted the Games take place some time between July 15 to August 31, giving more than a week either side of Ramadan.
IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies said: ``We give a window to the five bid cities. The host city selects the dates within that window.
``The Games bring together virtually every religion and creed. How to deal with religious clashes is up to the athletes.``
Joanna Manning Cooper, spokeswoman for London 2012, said: ``We did know about it when we submitted our bid and we have always believed we could find ways to accommodate it.
``We had lots of things to consider when we submitted our dates, including the fact that transport will be less crowded in the summer holiday.
``We also need 70,000 volunteers and this is the best time to find them.
``We are working with the Muslim Council of Great Britain to find ways to accommodate Ramadan during the London Games.``
#243 Posted by Humsab on October 16, 2006 2:26:13 am
Urstruly ji
Ji haaN aap larhaakaiN haiN.
All this happen everywhere in third world countries and perhaps part of transitional stage of shifting gears to move forward. But why has Dr. Mahmood brought religion into it. as if it is only this particular religion which talks about `Sabr`, `maufi` and `khush akhlaaqi` etc. Now this may be the main reason why muslims are so intolerant.
Regards
Ji haaN aap larhaakaiN haiN.
All this happen everywhere in third world countries and perhaps part of transitional stage of shifting gears to move forward. But why has Dr. Mahmood brought religion into it. as if it is only this particular religion which talks about `Sabr`, `maufi` and `khush akhlaaqi` etc. Now this may be the main reason why muslims are so intolerant.
Regards
#242 Posted by bjkumar on October 15, 2006 5:19:41 pm
#238 Trully
Now will you care to translate it - into English?
So people will understand that you are actually willing to WORK to make whatever point you may be mating and are not just a plain lazy bum - too lazy to work!
Like your compatriots in khaki!
#241 Posted by harimau on October 15, 2006 4:52:18 pm
Ref arjun2 #232
[Muslim stabs wife when daughter becomes Christian in Australia ``If children fail, the mother is at fault and will bear the brunt of the blam``]
You really should post this on the ``Aussie Values`` board. Saeed Khan is already in hiding refusing to respond to interacts and this should put him in a tizzy.
[Muslim stabs wife when daughter becomes Christian in Australia ``If children fail, the mother is at fault and will bear the brunt of the blam``]
You really should post this on the ``Aussie Values`` board. Saeed Khan is already in hiding refusing to respond to interacts and this should put him in a tizzy.
#240 Posted by higgsfinder on October 15, 2006 2:46:19 pm
While it may not be your intention, your article seems disrespectful to certain sects within Islam. I would recommend better use of language.
There are many WRONG statements here. Let me just talk about one that is not even controversial. The Bahais are depicted as a sect of Islam, whereas they do not claim to be such. The Bahai faith is a different religion.
There are many WRONG statements here. Let me just talk about one that is not even controversial. The Bahais are depicted as a sect of Islam, whereas they do not claim to be such. The Bahai faith is a different religion.
#239 Posted by friend on October 15, 2006 1:20:48 pm
ZahraJ #229
What is your point here? Is that nanny, who happened to be an Indian, somehow putting Islam in danger? Did you read about Lousie Woodward, an English nanny, who killed son of a Boston base NRI doctor in late 90s, and than got away?
What is your point here? Is that nanny, who happened to be an Indian, somehow putting Islam in danger? Did you read about Lousie Woodward, an English nanny, who killed son of a Boston base NRI doctor in late 90s, and than got away?
#237 Posted by okhla99 on October 15, 2006 6:04:33 am
Arjun, Zeemax, echoboom, Harimau are all who continuously and frequently ``cross the line``. All of them need to be disciplined-- i.e. either all or none. Chowk staff should not discriminate against specific individuals.
Zeemax-- perhaps the problem they find with you is your (what we find) ingenuity in discovering new ``names`` for the Indians. But somehow, you overdo it, repeating the names and variations, ad nauseum.
However, I do agree that chowk approach towards banning should be uniform.
Zeemax-- perhaps the problem they find with you is your (what we find) ingenuity in discovering new ``names`` for the Indians. But somehow, you overdo it, repeating the names and variations, ad nauseum.
However, I do agree that chowk approach towards banning should be uniform.
#236 Posted by harimau on October 15, 2006 4:12:33 am
Ref zeemax #233
[Indeed, what constitutes name calling / hate speech and what doesn`t is a mystery as well .. e.g. :
.......
4) Zeemax = continued hate-speech; harimau = continued cupid personified.
.......
Hmmm ... All I can deduce from above is that when there`re too many soiled lungis left behind on the field, the referee jumps in to restore the balance. Fair enough ....]
Actually, you selectively abuse Indians and that too only Hindus. Harimau is well-known as an equal opportunity abuser. He abuses with relish Islamofascists, Pakistanis, those Indians who dare cross him, and in particular Masanamuthus of Tamil Nadu. He toys with that dear boy Yasser Latif Hamdani.
Therein lies the difference.
[Indeed, what constitutes name calling / hate speech and what doesn`t is a mystery as well .. e.g. :
.......
4) Zeemax = continued hate-speech; harimau = continued cupid personified.
.......
Hmmm ... All I can deduce from above is that when there`re too many soiled lungis left behind on the field, the referee jumps in to restore the balance. Fair enough ....]
Actually, you selectively abuse Indians and that too only Hindus. Harimau is well-known as an equal opportunity abuser. He abuses with relish Islamofascists, Pakistanis, those Indians who dare cross him, and in particular Masanamuthus of Tamil Nadu. He toys with that dear boy Yasser Latif Hamdani.
Therein lies the difference.
#235 Posted by zeemax on October 15, 2006 2:19:45 am
#142 by tahmed32 re #zeemax 138
Ok. Sorry for the interruption. These chowk bouncers are themselves rampaging drunks.
On ``These emotions are not reciprocated``: you write :
It is emotions that are not reciprocated that I was ... questioning ... how many times have arabs done the same on kashmir? not once.
True. It was also India that officially supported Palestine cause more than Pak did except of a brief period in the 70s. Also, it was Brigadier Zia of Pak, later the President General Zia, who had massacred 15,000 Palestinians in Jordan in 1965. Would they still support you over India?
you add: ``I dont like to generalize about any people - you find fine people and lowlife among all groups, arabs or israelis, pakistanis or indians, africans or europeans.``
But you constantly rant against `Arabs`, `Arbis` etc. . How`s that given the above?
On 2) ``....what happened at around the same time 60 years ago in pakistan-india..``:
you write re: ``It was an exchange of populations, and certainly not `expulsions```:
The palestinians did not have to go through any of the brutalities that muslims in India and Hindus and Sikhs in what became Pakistan had to go through. The did not have train-passengers slaughtered, women killing themselves to save themselves from dishonor, brother watching brother being surrounded by sikhs and going down fighting even as he was being slashed by swords (as was also the case for one of our relatives). So, please dont tell me that palestinians suffered more than Pakistanis or Indians in 1947.
This is an extremely pernicious remark. Do you really believe that? How? In fact they suffered much much more than your kin (and mine) as you have graphically detailed; and continue to do while we don`t; so much so that they`ve taken to blowing themselves up just so that they can take at-least a single one of their tormentors with them.
you write: This brings me to the answer the palestinans I mentioned had: they said that in the subcontinent, we had our own country to go to while they have no country. To this extent this palestinian lady was right, of course. I did not pursue this point further with the palestinians...but ask you to think about the answer they gave and ponder the implications.
Now this really makes me think about your answer, not the Palestinians. On one hand you vehemently oppose the two-nation theory which resulted in the carnage upon your kin as better not having taken place, on the other hand you fault the Palestinians for not supporting your Kashmir cause against India which is precisely based on the two-nation theory.
What gives? Do you support the TNT for Kashmir but not for Pakistan?
Ok. Sorry for the interruption. These chowk bouncers are themselves rampaging drunks.
On ``These emotions are not reciprocated``: you write :
It is emotions that are not reciprocated that I was ... questioning ... how many times have arabs done the same on kashmir? not once.
True. It was also India that officially supported Palestine cause more than Pak did except of a brief period in the 70s. Also, it was Brigadier Zia of Pak, later the President General Zia, who had massacred 15,000 Palestinians in Jordan in 1965. Would they still support you over India?
you add: ``I dont like to generalize about any people - you find fine people and lowlife among all groups, arabs or israelis, pakistanis or indians, africans or europeans.``
But you constantly rant against `Arabs`, `Arbis` etc. . How`s that given the above?
On 2) ``....what happened at around the same time 60 years ago in pakistan-india..``:
you write re: ``It was an exchange of populations, and certainly not `expulsions```:
The palestinians did not have to go through any of the brutalities that muslims in India and Hindus and Sikhs in what became Pakistan had to go through. The did not have train-passengers slaughtered, women killing themselves to save themselves from dishonor, brother watching brother being surrounded by sikhs and going down fighting even as he was being slashed by swords (as was also the case for one of our relatives). So, please dont tell me that palestinians suffered more than Pakistanis or Indians in 1947.
This is an extremely pernicious remark. Do you really believe that? How? In fact they suffered much much more than your kin (and mine) as you have graphically detailed; and continue to do while we don`t; so much so that they`ve taken to blowing themselves up just so that they can take at-least a single one of their tormentors with them.
you write: This brings me to the answer the palestinans I mentioned had: they said that in the subcontinent, we had our own country to go to while they have no country. To this extent this palestinian lady was right, of course. I did not pursue this point further with the palestinians...but ask you to think about the answer they gave and ponder the implications.
Now this really makes me think about your answer, not the Palestinians. On one hand you vehemently oppose the two-nation theory which resulted in the carnage upon your kin as better not having taken place, on the other hand you fault the Palestinians for not supporting your Kashmir cause against India which is precisely based on the two-nation theory.
What gives? Do you support the TNT for Kashmir but not for Pakistan?
#234 Posted by Aangaara on October 15, 2006 12:21:49 am
Re: # 233
i support zee bhiya in his jehad against the use of ``peemax``.... that is an injustice.... if a pakistani wants to pay homage to zee tv then, indians should not discourage him for doing so....
zee bhiya jindabad.
i support zee bhiya in his jehad against the use of ``peemax``.... that is an injustice.... if a pakistani wants to pay homage to zee tv then, indians should not discourage him for doing so....
zee bhiya jindabad.
#233 Posted by zeemax on October 14, 2006 10:41:22 pm
chowk-staff
Currently Zeemax is banned from posting because of his continuous disregard of Chowk guidelines. This is a warning to all -- Anyone who continues name calling and/or hate-speech will be banned from posting any further. (emphasis mine)
Oh well ... can`t make head or tail of what the chowk bouncers mean by above ... i.e. what they consider merely filterable and what outright bannable without warning.
Indeed, what constitutes name calling / hate speech and what doesn`t is a mystery as well .. e.g. :
1) Macaca (various prefixes) = no no; Rabid Paki (and various prefixes) = yes yes.
2) Hideous/ugly macaca = no no; Peemax = yes yes.
3) Excrement worshipping etc = no no; paedophile worshipping etc = yes yes.
4) Zeemax = continued hate-speech; harimau = continued cupid personified.
5) Multiple nicks = no no; arjun2/arjun_m = yes yes.
6) Zeemex = bannable; rest = filterable.
Hmmm ... All I can deduce from above is that when there`re too many soiled lungis left behind on the field, the referee jumps in to restore the balance. Fair enough ....
Currently Zeemax is banned from posting because of his continuous disregard of Chowk guidelines. This is a warning to all -- Anyone who continues name calling and/or hate-speech will be banned from posting any further. (emphasis mine)
Oh well ... can`t make head or tail of what the chowk bouncers mean by above ... i.e. what they consider merely filterable and what outright bannable without warning.
Indeed, what constitutes name calling / hate speech and what doesn`t is a mystery as well .. e.g. :
1) Macaca (various prefixes) = no no; Rabid Paki (and various prefixes) = yes yes.
2) Hideous/ugly macaca = no no; Peemax = yes yes.
3) Excrement worshipping etc = no no; paedophile worshipping etc = yes yes.
4) Zeemax = continued hate-speech; harimau = continued cupid personified.
5) Multiple nicks = no no; arjun2/arjun_m = yes yes.
6) Zeemex = bannable; rest = filterable.
Hmmm ... All I can deduce from above is that when there`re too many soiled lungis left behind on the field, the referee jumps in to restore the balance. Fair enough ....
#232 Posted by arjun2 on October 14, 2006 9:09:09 pm
Muslim stabs wife when daughter becomes Christian in Australia ``If children fail, the mother is at fault and will bear the brunt of the blam``
A devout Muslim woman was attacked and stabbed to death, allegedly by her husband, after their 17-year-old daughter announced she was embracing Christianity, according to police and news reports.
Officials say Dr. Muhammad Hussain, 48, remained in critical condition in the Gold Coast Hospital with knife wounds, under police guard, as authorities investigated the death from stabbing injuries of his wife, Yasmine, 41.
According to Assist News Service, neighbors of the Australian family reported ``blood curdling`` and ``terrifying`` screams, along with cries of ``Help me, help me, they`re trying to kill me,`` on Monday night. Shortly after, the report said, Kaihana Hussain fled from the family`s apartment, dressed in underwear because her clothes had been torn off, with blood splattered over her scratched and cut body.
Police found the mother inside the apartment, dead, and the father seriously hurt. It was not immediately clear how the father was also stabbed.
``From what we understand the daughter decided to tell her father of her radical plan to convert to Christianity which, in the eyes of most Muslims, is totally unacceptable and to be honest, sadly, many would react as he has done,`` a Muslim source told ``The Gold Coast Bulletin.``
``It is the Islamic way that if a son or daughter does or plans to do something that is unacceptable or wrong for a Muslim then it is the mother who is automatically at fault and will bear the brunt of the blame,`` the source said.
The mother and daughter apparently had arrived in the popular East Australia region only a few days earlier. The doctor apparently had been there for several weeks, establishing his medical practice.
Elizabeth Kendal, of the World Evangelical Alliance Religious Liberty Commission, told ASSIST that the tragedy highlights ``the great and urgent need for rigorous, open debate on what Western religious liberty means for Muslim immigrants, and what Islam`s rejection of apostasy means for Christians in terms of convert care.``
Reports said Hussain finished his medical training in Bangladesh in 1982 and in 2001 finished a masters in family medicine program in Australia. The family settled earlier in Adelaide, where the daughter attended a local nondenominational Christian school.
Police indicated the religious dispute was being reviewed, but they couldn`t confirm the details. Neighbors, however, supported that account.
Neighbor Caitlin Dalton told The Australian that many people heard the screams as the girl fled the luxury apartment.
She told the neighbors she had wanted to ``convert from the Islam religion … and obviously her father didn`t handle it very well,`` Dalton said.
A police detective-inspector said the investigation would determine if charges will be filed.
``This matter may end up in a criminal trial or may end up in a coroner`s court. Before we know the full facts, I`m not willing to speculate,`` he said.
Officials at Pembroke school in Adelaide, where the teen had attended, said the school is nondenominational and students are encouraged ``to seek their own spiritual journeys.``
Students are not required to participate in Christian services, officials said.
Pembroke principal Malcolm Lamb released a statement explaining the school`s practice.
``In the case of Islamic students the school is in principle and in practice very supportive of students observing religious customs, such as wearing the Hijab – this has happened in the past, observing fasting and the need for prayer rooms,`` Lamb said.
The Quran does instruct the faithful to kill those who leave the faith but Muslim leaders have said that is not to be taken literally.
A devout Muslim woman was attacked and stabbed to death, allegedly by her husband, after their 17-year-old daughter announced she was embracing Christianity, according to police and news reports.
Officials say Dr. Muhammad Hussain, 48, remained in critical condition in the Gold Coast Hospital with knife wounds, under police guard, as authorities investigated the death from stabbing injuries of his wife, Yasmine, 41.
According to Assist News Service, neighbors of the Australian family reported ``blood curdling`` and ``terrifying`` screams, along with cries of ``Help me, help me, they`re trying to kill me,`` on Monday night. Shortly after, the report said, Kaihana Hussain fled from the family`s apartment, dressed in underwear because her clothes had been torn off, with blood splattered over her scratched and cut body.
Police found the mother inside the apartment, dead, and the father seriously hurt. It was not immediately clear how the father was also stabbed.
``From what we understand the daughter decided to tell her father of her radical plan to convert to Christianity which, in the eyes of most Muslims, is totally unacceptable and to be honest, sadly, many would react as he has done,`` a Muslim source told ``The Gold Coast Bulletin.``
``It is the Islamic way that if a son or daughter does or plans to do something that is unacceptable or wrong for a Muslim then it is the mother who is automatically at fault and will bear the brunt of the blame,`` the source said.
The mother and daughter apparently had arrived in the popular East Australia region only a few days earlier. The doctor apparently had been there for several weeks, establishing his medical practice.
Elizabeth Kendal, of the World Evangelical Alliance Religious Liberty Commission, told ASSIST that the tragedy highlights ``the great and urgent need for rigorous, open debate on what Western religious liberty means for Muslim immigrants, and what Islam`s rejection of apostasy means for Christians in terms of convert care.``
Reports said Hussain finished his medical training in Bangladesh in 1982 and in 2001 finished a masters in family medicine program in Australia. The family settled earlier in Adelaide, where the daughter attended a local nondenominational Christian school.
Police indicated the religious dispute was being reviewed, but they couldn`t confirm the details. Neighbors, however, supported that account.
Neighbor Caitlin Dalton told The Australian that many people heard the screams as the girl fled the luxury apartment.
She told the neighbors she had wanted to ``convert from the Islam religion … and obviously her father didn`t handle it very well,`` Dalton said.
A police detective-inspector said the investigation would determine if charges will be filed.
``This matter may end up in a criminal trial or may end up in a coroner`s court. Before we know the full facts, I`m not willing to speculate,`` he said.
Officials at Pembroke school in Adelaide, where the teen had attended, said the school is nondenominational and students are encouraged ``to seek their own spiritual journeys.``
Students are not required to participate in Christian services, officials said.
Pembroke principal Malcolm Lamb released a statement explaining the school`s practice.
``In the case of Islamic students the school is in principle and in practice very supportive of students observing religious customs, such as wearing the Hijab – this has happened in the past, observing fasting and the need for prayer rooms,`` Lamb said.
The Quran does instruct the faithful to kill those who leave the faith but Muslim leaders have said that is not to be taken literally.
#231 Posted by echoboom on October 14, 2006 8:58:56 pm
Zahraj:229
thanks.
another one for his pleasure reading
it really belongs here:
October 14, 2006 8:25pm PT
4 brothers arrested for throwing mom on dad`s funeral pyre
Associated Press
NEW DELHI — Indian police have arrested four brothers for allegedly throwing their 95-year-old mother onto their father`s funeral pyre, in accordance with an old but illegal Hindu custom that persists in rural pockets of India, media reports said Friday.
The incident took place Wednesday evening in the village of Baniyani in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, the Press Trust of India news agency reported.
The brothers and villagers initially said the woman, Kuria Devi, climbed into the flames by herself, committing sati, as the ritual suicide is known. Sati has been banned for nearly two centuries.
However police investigating the death said she was too old and frail to have clambered up alone.
and this is the video for you arjun-m Saj rahee kaisee teri amma sunehri gotay meiN.
Those who have not watched it or heard it would never forget it. Not scary; its belly-aching FUNNY!
thanks.
another one for his pleasure reading
it really belongs here:
October 14, 2006 8:25pm PT
4 brothers arrested for throwing mom on dad`s funeral pyre
Associated Press
NEW DELHI — Indian police have arrested four brothers for allegedly throwing their 95-year-old mother onto their father`s funeral pyre, in accordance with an old but illegal Hindu custom that persists in rural pockets of India, media reports said Friday.
The incident took place Wednesday evening in the village of Baniyani in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, the Press Trust of India news agency reported.
The brothers and villagers initially said the woman, Kuria Devi, climbed into the flames by herself, committing sati, as the ritual suicide is known. Sati has been banned for nearly two centuries.
However police investigating the death said she was too old and frail to have clambered up alone.
and this is the video for you arjun-m Saj rahee kaisee teri amma sunehri gotay meiN.
Those who have not watched it or heard it would never forget it. Not scary; its belly-aching FUNNY!
#230 Posted by teshah on October 14, 2006 8:14:32 pm
Re: # 209
urstruly
YAAR truly you have done well to debunk QADIANI Mazhab. But I am sorry to say that you tried to do all this on mere technical grounds which raise many questions. For instance:
1. You say the last masjid did not literally mean the last one as many mosques were raised after that. My question is why the prophet got a mosque raised in his life destroyed by declaring to be harmful to the unity of the believers. Are not the Mullah mosques doing the same thing today?
2. What about the Hadees whereby the entire face of earth has been declared as a mosque by Allah for the Muslims? Does it not put an end to the `Dhanda` of hate-preaching at the Mullah mosque?
3. Why did you downgrade `Qibla - e -Awal` just to win a point against Qadiani?
4. Why to take cover behind technicalities and not say any thing about merit? As it is, will you accept Mirza as prophet simply if it is proved technically that the last prophet does not mean literally the last one but the greatest one, as they say in a QAWALI: ``Shahe Madina, Yasrab ke wali; Saare nabi tere dar ke sawaali``.
regards
urstruly
YAAR truly you have done well to debunk QADIANI Mazhab. But I am sorry to say that you tried to do all this on mere technical grounds which raise many questions. For instance:
1. You say the last masjid did not literally mean the last one as many mosques were raised after that. My question is why the prophet got a mosque raised in his life destroyed by declaring to be harmful to the unity of the believers. Are not the Mullah mosques doing the same thing today?
2. What about the Hadees whereby the entire face of earth has been declared as a mosque by Allah for the Muslims? Does it not put an end to the `Dhanda` of hate-preaching at the Mullah mosque?
3. Why did you downgrade `Qibla - e -Awal` just to win a point against Qadiani?
4. Why to take cover behind technicalities and not say any thing about merit? As it is, will you accept Mirza as prophet simply if it is proved technically that the last prophet does not mean literally the last one but the greatest one, as they say in a QAWALI: ``Shahe Madina, Yasrab ke wali; Saare nabi tere dar ke sawaali``.
regards
#229 Posted by ZahraJ on October 14, 2006 7:55:26 pm
Arjun - This is for your pleasure reading.
New charges possible in baby beating
Saturday, October 14, 2006
By KIBRET MARKOS
STAFF WRITER
An Upper Saddle River nanny caught brutalizing a 6-month-old girl on videotape could face more serious charges once authorities review all of the medical reports, a Bergen County prosecutor said Friday.
Identified only as P.S., the girl remained at Hackensack University Medical Center, where doctors Friday were trying to determine exactly how much damage was done when 51-year-old Manjula Patel of Rochelle Park slapped and shook her, then threw her on a hardwood floor and stomped and kicked her, said Assistant Bergen County Prosecutor Liliana Silebi.
Patel said very little when she was brought to Superior Court in Hackensack, where she was formally charged with aggravated assault and child endangerment, both second-degree counts that carry up to 10 years in prison each upon conviction. She remained held on $200,000 bail at the Bergen County Jail on Friday.
Silebi didn`t say what other charges could follow.
``The [medical] testing is still ongoing, and depending on what those results are in the next couple of days, there may be additional charges,`` she said.
Patel, an Indian national, has been in the United States since June. The Upper Saddle River family hired her through a newspaper ad six weeks ago after interviewing her, Silebi said. She declined to comment on whether they had done any background check.
Silebi said the family left a video camera running on a table in their living room Wednesday. After returning home and viewing the video, they called an ambulance.
The incident renewed debate over ``nanny cams,`` with distributors touting their use and nanny hiring agencies insisting they expose a greater need.
``I think it`s an absolute stupidity,`` said Bob Mark of America`s Nannies, a Paramus placement agency. ``People get cameras, and they think that will excuse their negligence and failure to properly screen their nannies.``
Mark said he wondered why the family would hire an immigrant ``who just got off the boat,`` instead of finding a nanny with experience and solid references.
``These are mistakes that people make over and over again,`` he said. ``They cheap out and hire a complete stranger to save a few bucks. Yes, such nannies are to blame for abusing children, but the family is also to blame for giving them the opportunity.``
Silebi, meanwhile, said the Upper Saddle River case should be a warning to other parents hiring nannies.
``This is an example of what can happen when you take a nanny into your house,`` she said. ``It`s very important to do a background check.``
Andrea Flagg, a career nanny and president of the Nanny Alliance of New York and New Jersey, agreed that proper screening -- rather than ``nanny camming`` -- is the best way to avoid abusive caretakers.
Flagg said she was once ``nanny-cammed`` by a family she worked for six years ago.
``I felt very self-conscious,`` she said. ``I felt like I was being stalked.``
Rhyder McClure, president of The New York Nanny Cam Co., disagreed.
``Are you going to tell me that it`s OK not to have a camera when you leave the most precious thing you have -- which is your child -- in the hands of a stranger?`` said McClure, whose company distributes cameras in the metropolitan area. ``Any parent in this day and age who doesn`t have a nanny cam is bordering on irresponsibility.``
Christy Ann Bozanian, owner of Be Our Nanny, a placement and referral agency in Leonia, incorporated both views.
``There is never too much protection you can give to your child,`` she said. ``We would want the parents to take every step possible under the law to protect their children.``
Nanny cams have become increasingly popular in recent years. Parks Associates, a market research firm focusing on digital home devices, estimated that nearly 40 percent of households with children in 2004 have shown interest in such products.
In 2006 alone, the firm estimates, close to 1.2 million homes nationwide will have installed wireless cameras, said Bill Ablondi, director of home systems at the Dallas-based firm.
Nanny cams have helped solve several child-abuse cases, said Bergen County Prosecutor John L. Molinelli. But that doesn`t mean parents should rely solely on them, he warned.
``Parents are usually right when they feel that something is wrong [with a nanny],`` Molinelli said.
Instead of shopping for a nanny cam, the prosecutor said, they should call police at that point.
``Don`t wait for the very harm to occur that you are seeking to avoid,`` he said.
New charges possible in baby beating
Saturday, October 14, 2006
By KIBRET MARKOS
STAFF WRITER
An Upper Saddle River nanny caught brutalizing a 6-month-old girl on videotape could face more serious charges once authorities review all of the medical reports, a Bergen County prosecutor said Friday.
Identified only as P.S., the girl remained at Hackensack University Medical Center, where doctors Friday were trying to determine exactly how much damage was done when 51-year-old Manjula Patel of Rochelle Park slapped and shook her, then threw her on a hardwood floor and stomped and kicked her, said Assistant Bergen County Prosecutor Liliana Silebi.
Patel said very little when she was brought to Superior Court in Hackensack, where she was formally charged with aggravated assault and child endangerment, both second-degree counts that carry up to 10 years in prison each upon conviction. She remained held on $200,000 bail at the Bergen County Jail on Friday.
Silebi didn`t say what other charges could follow.
``The [medical] testing is still ongoing, and depending on what those results are in the next couple of days, there may be additional charges,`` she said.
Patel, an Indian national, has been in the United States since June. The Upper Saddle River family hired her through a newspaper ad six weeks ago after interviewing her, Silebi said. She declined to comment on whether they had done any background check.
Silebi said the family left a video camera running on a table in their living room Wednesday. After returning home and viewing the video, they called an ambulance.
The incident renewed debate over ``nanny cams,`` with distributors touting their use and nanny hiring agencies insisting they expose a greater need.
``I think it`s an absolute stupidity,`` said Bob Mark of America`s Nannies, a Paramus placement agency. ``People get cameras, and they think that will excuse their negligence and failure to properly screen their nannies.``
Mark said he wondered why the family would hire an immigrant ``who just got off the boat,`` instead of finding a nanny with experience and solid references.
``These are mistakes that people make over and over again,`` he said. ``They cheap out and hire a complete stranger to save a few bucks. Yes, such nannies are to blame for abusing children, but the family is also to blame for giving them the opportunity.``
Silebi, meanwhile, said the Upper Saddle River case should be a warning to other parents hiring nannies.
``This is an example of what can happen when you take a nanny into your house,`` she said. ``It`s very important to do a background check.``
Andrea Flagg, a career nanny and president of the Nanny Alliance of New York and New Jersey, agreed that proper screening -- rather than ``nanny camming`` -- is the best way to avoid abusive caretakers.
Flagg said she was once ``nanny-cammed`` by a family she worked for six years ago.
``I felt very self-conscious,`` she said. ``I felt like I was being stalked.``
Rhyder McClure, president of The New York Nanny Cam Co., disagreed.
``Are you going to tell me that it`s OK not to have a camera when you leave the most precious thing you have -- which is your child -- in the hands of a stranger?`` said McClure, whose company distributes cameras in the metropolitan area. ``Any parent in this day and age who doesn`t have a nanny cam is bordering on irresponsibility.``
Christy Ann Bozanian, owner of Be Our Nanny, a placement and referral agency in Leonia, incorporated both views.
``There is never too much protection you can give to your child,`` she said. ``We would want the parents to take every step possible under the law to protect their children.``
Nanny cams have become increasingly popular in recent years. Parks Associates, a market research firm focusing on digital home devices, estimated that nearly 40 percent of households with children in 2004 have shown interest in such products.
In 2006 alone, the firm estimates, close to 1.2 million homes nationwide will have installed wireless cameras, said Bill Ablondi, director of home systems at the Dallas-based firm.
Nanny cams have helped solve several child-abuse cases, said Bergen County Prosecutor John L. Molinelli. But that doesn`t mean parents should rely solely on them, he warned.
``Parents are usually right when they feel that something is wrong [with a nanny],`` Molinelli said.
Instead of shopping for a nanny cam, the prosecutor said, they should call police at that point.
``Don`t wait for the very harm to occur that you are seeking to avoid,`` he said.
#228 Posted by arjun2 on October 14, 2006 7:35:01 pm
hijacked my ass....A minority of muslims are actual jihadis and the majority condone their actions by supporting them, being their apologists or standing by and doing squat(like the guys in canada who let the paki spout extremist views in the mosque because he quote - took out the trash for them unquote....
THE MISSISSAUGA NEWS
Muslim leader fears backlash over Liberal views
Radhika Panjwani
Oct 13, 2006
The new president of the Muslim Canadian Congress (MCC) says she is feeling the wrath of Islamic fundamentalists because of her stance on such issues as terrorism, homosexuality and religious law.
Now, Mississauga`s Farzana Hassan Shahid is calling on Queen`s Park to intervene. She wants Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant to incorporate the kind of threats made by various radical groups against her and other members of the MCC into the framework of existing hate crime laws.
``There is an underlying fear all the time...that uneasy feeling is part of my daily life,`` Hassan Shahid told The News. ``I have been declared an apostate (a person who forsakes their religion) twice, for opposing the Sharia (a form of Islamic law). We have asked Michael Bryant to include or acknowledge accusation of blasphemy and apostasy into the existing hate laws so the public and legal frame work is sensitized to this issue.``
Hassan Shahid said she and other members of her organization receive threatening e-mails and are subjected to other acts of hatred from radical Muslim groups. One strongly worded hate-mail accused her of being the, ``younger sister of Satan.``
More recently, Hassan Shahid has been in the eye of the storm for her organization`s stance on homosexuality. Her husband was questioned by some congregation members at a local mosque recently and ordered to, ``control his wife.``
``I got a lot of negative e-mails from the Muslim community, questioning my stand on gay and lesbian issues,`` she said. ``I had a hard time explaining to them that I am not supporting homosexuals, but supporting equal rights for them.``
MCC`s vocal opposition of violence, too, doesn`t sit well with the fundamentalist, she said. Hassan Shahid said many Muslims are angry and accuse the organization of not supporting the plight of Muslims in places such as Chechnya, Palestine and Serbia.
``We have denounced terrorism with a type of clarity that is really needed now,`` Hassan Shahid said. ``When we do that we are accused of not understanding the political conflicts abroad...we`re really caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.``
MCC`s former communications director, Tarek Fatah resigned from his post after receiving death threats.
Sohail Raza, the present communications director of MCC, said radical elements are changing mosques, that were once great cultural entities, and relegating them into places where rituals are enforced.
``I think where we lose out is the ability to discuss,`` Raza said. ``The stand is not a line in the sand, every body has a right to interpret their own religion, every body has the right to debate and discuss issues, unfortunately that is lacking and that is what we want to encourage in a democratic society like Canada.``
THE MISSISSAUGA NEWS
Muslim leader fears backlash over Liberal views
Radhika Panjwani
Oct 13, 2006
The new president of the Muslim Canadian Congress (MCC) says she is feeling the wrath of Islamic fundamentalists because of her stance on such issues as terrorism, homosexuality and religious law.
Now, Mississauga`s Farzana Hassan Shahid is calling on Queen`s Park to intervene. She wants Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant to incorporate the kind of threats made by various radical groups against her and other members of the MCC into the framework of existing hate crime laws.
``There is an underlying fear all the time...that uneasy feeling is part of my daily life,`` Hassan Shahid told The News. ``I have been declared an apostate (a person who forsakes their religion) twice, for opposing the Sharia (a form of Islamic law). We have asked Michael Bryant to include or acknowledge accusation of blasphemy and apostasy into the existing hate laws so the public and legal frame work is sensitized to this issue.``
Hassan Shahid said she and other members of her organization receive threatening e-mails and are subjected to other acts of hatred from radical Muslim groups. One strongly worded hate-mail accused her of being the, ``younger sister of Satan.``
More recently, Hassan Shahid has been in the eye of the storm for her organization`s stance on homosexuality. Her husband was questioned by some congregation members at a local mosque recently and ordered to, ``control his wife.``
``I got a lot of negative e-mails from the Muslim community, questioning my stand on gay and lesbian issues,`` she said. ``I had a hard time explaining to them that I am not supporting homosexuals, but supporting equal rights for them.``
MCC`s vocal opposition of violence, too, doesn`t sit well with the fundamentalist, she said. Hassan Shahid said many Muslims are angry and accuse the organization of not supporting the plight of Muslims in places such as Chechnya, Palestine and Serbia.
``We have denounced terrorism with a type of clarity that is really needed now,`` Hassan Shahid said. ``When we do that we are accused of not understanding the political conflicts abroad...we`re really caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.``
MCC`s former communications director, Tarek Fatah resigned from his post after receiving death threats.
Sohail Raza, the present communications director of MCC, said radical elements are changing mosques, that were once great cultural entities, and relegating them into places where rituals are enforced.
``I think where we lose out is the ability to discuss,`` Raza said. ``The stand is not a line in the sand, every body has a right to interpret their own religion, every body has the right to debate and discuss issues, unfortunately that is lacking and that is what we want to encourage in a democratic society like Canada.``
#227 Posted by arjun2 on October 14, 2006 7:31:33 pm
Oh those poor innocent jihadis..
Worker beheaded in south Thailand
BANGKOK, Thailand (AP) -- Suspected Muslim insurgents in southern Thailand beheaded a man in a gruesome attack carried out in the presence of the victim`s daughter, police said Friday.
The man was identified as a 45-year-old Burmese worker at a prawn farm in the Nong Chik district of Pattani province, one of three Muslim-majority provinces in Thailand that has been gripped by a deadly insurgency since 2004.
Four armed men entered the prawn farm Thursday evening, blindfolded the man`s 16-year-old daughter and shot the man at close range before beheading him, said police Col. Thawan Nakarawong, head of the Nong Chik precinct.
The gunmen then picked up the head and drove about 20 kilometers (12 miles) to a site where they tried to blast it with a bomb, but the device failed to detonate, Thawan said.
``The insurgents left a note demanding that police and soldiers pull out from the area, otherwise they will kill more people,`` Thawan said.
Worker beheaded in south Thailand
BANGKOK, Thailand (AP) -- Suspected Muslim insurgents in southern Thailand beheaded a man in a gruesome attack carried out in the presence of the victim`s daughter, police said Friday.
The man was identified as a 45-year-old Burmese worker at a prawn farm in the Nong Chik district of Pattani province, one of three Muslim-majority provinces in Thailand that has been gripped by a deadly insurgency since 2004.
Four armed men entered the prawn farm Thursday evening, blindfolded the man`s 16-year-old daughter and shot the man at close range before beheading him, said police Col. Thawan Nakarawong, head of the Nong Chik precinct.
The gunmen then picked up the head and drove about 20 kilometers (12 miles) to a site where they tried to blast it with a bomb, but the device failed to detonate, Thawan said.
``The insurgents left a note demanding that police and soldiers pull out from the area, otherwise they will kill more people,`` Thawan said.
#226 Posted by ZahraJ on October 14, 2006 7:12:50 pm
This is an interesting read on the the development among Muslims.
An Arab Therapist
Seeks to Lift the Veil
On a Touchy Subject
With Frank Talk About Sex,
Ms. Kotb Helps Couples
Confront the Unknown
By MARIAM FAM
October 11, 2006; Page A1
SAN`A, Yemen -- On a recent trip to Yemen, Heba Kotb drew an audience o
An Arab Therapist
Seeks to Lift the Veil
On a Touchy Subject
With Frank Talk About Sex,
Ms. Kotb Helps Couples
Confront the Unknown
By MARIAM FAM
October 11, 2006; Page A1
SAN`A, Yemen -- On a recent trip to Yemen, Heba Kotb drew an audience o








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content