Pervez Musharraf Vs. George Orwell

So that racist casteist misogynist obscurantist religious-revivalist monster Gandhi has finally arrived on the Orwell-Musharraf board. Let it be known that Orwell added his powerful voice to those denouncing that Hindutva-fascist Hindu-fanatic hate-filled half-naked fakir and hypocritical fraud Gandhi. Here, then, is

Orwell contra Gandhi

#125 (add-on)

The author of this piece maybe therefore justified in her disappointments!

#125

Manto, that picture does not do you justice. It fails to show your vitals.

#125 by Mantolives

Works especially well for BJkumar, though major changes required for the Queen.

No problem. Just paste on a set of macaca boobs. Preferably South African macaca ... !!!

So the Don Quixote barb really hurt. My god, you really take yourself extremely seriously here

Okay boss, no more barbs from me(T)

#125 mantolives now that is really lame

#123 Zeemax, thank you for suggesting mantolives is my pet macaca

Mantolives, has turned himself into a veritable Don Quixote, always tilting at windmills.

zeemax,

I thought that description with minor changes was more aptly suited for any of our favorites from across the border

__ ( hereinafter the ``Macacca``) is our resident Don, Don Quixote , the man from La Mancha. Always ready to tilt at windmills (read evil evil Pakistani)

In his perpetutal state of half-madness and a confused state, he, Maccaca, believes himself to be a knight, re-names himself Maccaca-Le-

---

(name of Indian state/city), and has set out to fight injustice in the name of his beloved Gandhi, or as he knows him in his mind, Great Intellectual Leader and father of India.


Maccaca ready to defend Gandhi`s honor.



Works especially well for BJkumar, though major changes required for the Queen.

#122 :Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you ...another pathetic attempt to salvage the day for the dearly departed Gandhiji ... below

#122 by queen_cut&paste

Hello Queenie. Is that your pet macaca? How sweet ... Thanks :-)

Mantolives is our resident Don, Don Quixote , the man from La Mancha. Always ready to tilt at windmills, be they Mullahs (as witnessed by the great fight with Atif2), or Gandhi (as witnessed with his on going tilts with Sadna, Amansandhu and everyone really).

In his perpetutal state of half-madness and a confused state, he, Yaseer, believes himself to be a knight, re-names himself Mantolives de la Lahore, and has set out to fight injustice in the name of his beloved maiden Jinnah, or as he knows him in his mind, Great Intellectual Leader and father of India.





Mantolives all ready to fight gandhiji

#120 by Mantolives

Dear Yasser mian,

I am still taken aback by your description of the racism portion of Gandhi`s collected works as ``every little thing``.

Just as I am about your claim that I called Gandhi`s autobiography the ``gospel truth``.

Dear Harish mian,

I am still taken aback by your description of the racism portion of Gandhi`s collected works as ``every little thing``.

#117 by Mantolives

Could you show me - since you say Gandhi did not hide anything in his autobiography- on which page he mentions - regretfully or otherwise- his racism against black people in South Africa (which are corroborated by his collected works) and whether he had now changed his view.

Dear Yasser, I explained it in simple English, but apparently it was a bit too much for you. Please re-read #116.

If not, then it is clear that his autobiography is not the gospel truth you wish to make of it.

You seem to have a rather fertile imagination. Gospel truth? Please let me know where I make such a claim.

PS: Also would you say that the copious body of work that is found in the Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi regarding the status of black people and their inferiority can be honestly described as ``every little thing`` as you put it?

Dear Harish mian,

Please... I asked you a simple question for my information.

Could you show me - since you say Gandhi did not hide anything in his autobiography- on which page he mentions - regretfully or otherwise- his racism against black people in South Africa (which are corroborated by his collected works) and whether he had now changed his view.

If not, then it is clear that his autobiography is not the gospel truth you wish to make of it.