Pakistan's Afghan Policy

#374 Zee

[HP why aren`t you replying to my numerous posts addressed to you? Naraaz ho kia?]

Start singing...

``Roothey roothey PEE-aaa
Manaaoon kaise!``

And if that fails....

``PEE-aaa tooo, aaab toe aaa jaaa``

#373 by HP

HP why aren`t you replying to my numerous posts addressed to you? Naraaz ho kia?

Can this happen in Baghdad in 2007?

No! becasue the helipad is not on the rooftop in Baghdad!

Line may still be there!

Saigon, saigon, saigon...





Baghdad, Baghdad, Baghdad....

(post picture here)

#371 by VRV

Haha .. well VRV ... for friday and saturday nightouts. :-) we`ll really do well. ! Hey did I owe you a pic? Or was it Harish_Hyd? Maybe later ... on UP because it`s certain to be naughty!

And yes .. I won`t call anyone any names again. That`s a promise. Manto too stepped over the line and you rataliated. This gobble up stuff is quite unlike manto who is usually one of the politest on these boards. Provocation .... what else .....

Re: # 372

Zee...

This VRV guy has been resorting to the worst kind of abuse for many months now because he could not handle disagreement and a clear defeat on facts...

Gobbling up defaecation (a much more polite way of saying ``you are eating shit``) is simply a metaphor. It means that Sadna weaves lies and VRV takes them wholeheartedly. The abuse that he throws at my family is not metaphor. It is indicative of Indian mentality that resorts to abuse whenever at loss of an argument. I happened to argue with him on my board ``Remembering a great Pakistani: Sir Zafrullah Khan``... and there are atleast 200 or so posts I exchanged with him and in almost every single one of them he resorted to abuse.

Re: # 372

Zee,

Yep, we can rock the nights!

Name calling will do on UP & on FP on case-to-case basis.

U dont owe me pic coz I have ur long-shot pic. That`ll do. Btw, all the 3 look the same. Does ur papa is a grrrreat shooter that he gave birth to triplets :-)))))

Best.

#367 by kaalchakra

The surprising thing is that this is something that has to be EXPLAINED to people!

So you know. Perhaps you can attempt to explain it to people. My explanations will never suffice as being an interested party.

#366 by mohar11

Amaa Mohar ... have I ever quoted an Indian editorial? Besides, do you know the background of `Daily Times`? I.e. who owns it and who is the Editor? It is Najam Sethi (of Friday Times fame which I admire except for the back page of Jugnu) who made treasonous remarks against Pak while in a conference in India (calling it a failed state and all that) back in 1998 and was picked up for that by NS, which episode Musharraf has cited in his book as a justification for the coup.

Now would you call that an unbiased source?

Zeemax

Just read that # 323. :)

The surprising thing is that this is something that has to be EXPLAINED to people!

[#289]

Are you familiar with the character of Napoleon the Pig in Animal Farm?

I read AF long back and I do not remember details. But you can still make your point and then make reference to chapter and verse in AF. I should be able to find a web site with an online version of AF. But I prefer that you make your point in a secular way. By ``secular`` I mean without appealing to my or your knowledge of a specific book. I am lowQ on literature.

#362 by mohar11

``The gang which nearly set off rockets near the Presidency turned out to be local boys led by a retired brigadier’s son. ..............

Exactly. But you missed it was also said that these were the masterminds. So were the attacks on Musharraf who were air-force personnel, and the attack on Shaukat Aziz who was a tailor from Attock. None had any Arab or even Afghan links. So why/how do you say ``cannon fodder for Al Qaeda``? On what evidence?

Like I said in a previous post, this is where the twain meets. That`s Islam.

Re: # 364
[....Like I said in a previous post, this is where the twain meets. That`s Islam....]

yes, that`s islam alright :)... On pakis being canon fodder for AQ - that`s not my word... the daily times editorial has described it as that...

#358/360 by kaalchakra

That`s true Kaal. Did you read #323? Biggest mistake people make is in believing in static nature of things. Nothing is static, and no empire lasts forever. It looks like the world will soon see an elephant lazily turning over on its side and in the process upsetting the entire apple cart. Above anyone else, India must see that. It is a great civilization and must make it`s place in whatever new order emerges.

#355 by VRV

VRV Bhai,

...I think Eid/Ramzan month had worked on Zee. He`s making some posts that are readbale....

Thanks. I am an Ahl-e-Eeman. Even if I didn`t fast, the spirit of Ramzan works. So no more gaalum-galuch for me :-)

BTW .. VRV .. that attack on Manto`s family was far below the belt. Now don`t come back with my episode with Hamidm because that`s between me and him. If he apologises for cheering bombing of Lebanese civilians, I`ll apologise ten times in return to him.

Re: # 361

Zee Bhaijan,

I observed something in u i.e softness. I thgt it might be due to ur fasting coz my mom`s weekly fasting does bring similar mulayam to her.

I never attatck anybody without provocation from the other side. Saying that I and Sadna gobble up defecation is something below belt. Isnt it? If that`s a normal chore in Pakistan or in whichever place Mr. Hamdani lived, then I can ignore that and apologise for the attack BUT nowhere in the world does people eat nightsoil.

Anyway I wish to see u argue ur points, how much ever extreme they are, without losing focus and name calling. However there are exceptions in an open board where people respond to the signals (explicit or implicit) in our writeups.

P.S: I wish I had a friend like u for friday and saturday nightouts. :-)

ah...that should be ``Taliban would not exist...``