Aparna Pande November 21, 2006
#380 Posted by okhla99 on November 29, 2006 1:44:51 am
Re: # 376
Very very VRV,
<<< You can NEVER find me using abusive posts on my own EXCEPT as counters given for some madcaps from Pakistan. >>>
DO you realise that this flawed logic is exactly the same as
``You can NEVER find the mad Jehadis indulging in suicide attacks EXCEPT as counters to real or percieved grievances.``
Grow up, man..
Very very VRV,
<<< You can NEVER find me using abusive posts on my own EXCEPT as counters given for some madcaps from Pakistan. >>>
DO you realise that this flawed logic is exactly the same as
``You can NEVER find the mad Jehadis indulging in suicide attacks EXCEPT as counters to real or percieved grievances.``
Grow up, man..
#379 Posted by majumdar on November 28, 2006 11:27:00 pm
Harish bhai,
You misunderstand me. I am not giving any credit to either you or Manto mian (my two fave chowkies if it means anything to you) for influencing chowk policy, only for the number of interacts that appear on any article.
Regards
You misunderstand me. I am not giving any credit to either you or Manto mian (my two fave chowkies if it means anything to you) for influencing chowk policy, only for the number of interacts that appear on any article.
Regards
#378 Posted by harish_hyd on November 28, 2006 11:08:05 pm
#377 by majumdar
Second, whether Harish bhai or Manto mian chose to make their apperance or not.
Majumdar Bhai, you`re giving me way too much credit for influencing Chowk`s policy, however indirectly, on the kind of articles that appear here. My sole aim is to set the record straight, and I`d like to think I`ve done so, sometimes even at the peril of staying up late in the nights :-)
Second, whether Harish bhai or Manto mian chose to make their apperance or not.
Majumdar Bhai, you`re giving me way too much credit for influencing Chowk`s policy, however indirectly, on the kind of articles that appear here. My sole aim is to set the record straight, and I`d like to think I`ve done so, sometimes even at the peril of staying up late in the nights :-)
#377 Posted by majumdar on November 28, 2006 10:51:19 pm
VRV,
(When Lebanon was bombed this site gave like a dozen articles. Now we have genocide resumed in Darfur. Lakhs of people are being raped and brutally murdered. Not a single article by bleeding hearts or impromptu msg/article by Chowk. Why?????)
The number of articles/interacts have nothing to with the seriousness or relevance of the issue- they are purely a function of two things: First, how much potential it offers for Indo-Pak, Hindu-Muslim, MAJ-MKG, America-West/Islam bashing. Second, whether Harish bhai or Manto mian chose to make their apperance or not.
I remember the period you are alluding to very well. Same time as two articles on Lebanon went into 500+ interacts, an article by Feroze Khan on the future of democracy and civil society in Pakistan (very well-written and I dare say much more relevant for S Asia) barely went into double digits ( and barring one or two interacts, the rest were by FRK and me).
(Behram starts/writes unprintable abuses here but when Indians counter him then Okhla appears on the horizon advising restarint. People like tahmed32 again gets worked up only for Ajun`s posts but to those of Behram`s! Why this selective righteousness? )
Abusive language needs to be condemned irrespective of who it comes from and the fact is that both the Macacas and Pakis have been indulging in it pretty much unprovoked. Macacas chose to condemn Paki bad behaviour and ignore fellow macacas, while Pakis do the reverse.
The sensible reaction for those who do wish to interact, would be to ignore all those who are here just to abuse and insult (neither interact with them or condemn their behaviour) and just confine ur interacts to those who chose to debate civilly and rationally.
(When Lebanon was bombed this site gave like a dozen articles. Now we have genocide resumed in Darfur. Lakhs of people are being raped and brutally murdered. Not a single article by bleeding hearts or impromptu msg/article by Chowk. Why?????)
The number of articles/interacts have nothing to with the seriousness or relevance of the issue- they are purely a function of two things: First, how much potential it offers for Indo-Pak, Hindu-Muslim, MAJ-MKG, America-West/Islam bashing. Second, whether Harish bhai or Manto mian chose to make their apperance or not.
I remember the period you are alluding to very well. Same time as two articles on Lebanon went into 500+ interacts, an article by Feroze Khan on the future of democracy and civil society in Pakistan (very well-written and I dare say much more relevant for S Asia) barely went into double digits ( and barring one or two interacts, the rest were by FRK and me).
(Behram starts/writes unprintable abuses here but when Indians counter him then Okhla appears on the horizon advising restarint. People like tahmed32 again gets worked up only for Ajun`s posts but to those of Behram`s! Why this selective righteousness? )
Abusive language needs to be condemned irrespective of who it comes from and the fact is that both the Macacas and Pakis have been indulging in it pretty much unprovoked. Macacas chose to condemn Paki bad behaviour and ignore fellow macacas, while Pakis do the reverse.
The sensible reaction for those who do wish to interact, would be to ignore all those who are here just to abuse and insult (neither interact with them or condemn their behaviour) and just confine ur interacts to those who chose to debate civilly and rationally.
#376 Posted by VRV on November 28, 2006 9:52:51 pm
Dear Okhla,
That was my response to Behram`s post 357. Do u find Behram`s 357 rational?
My original language can be found in post 53. The 359s are counters to some filthy posts. You can NEVER find me using abusive posts on my own EXCEPT as counters given for some madcaps from Pakistan.
I never saw u or tahmed32 objecting to HP`s language either. Standards only when ur boys are cornered??
That was my response to Behram`s post 357. Do u find Behram`s 357 rational?
My original language can be found in post 53. The 359s are counters to some filthy posts. You can NEVER find me using abusive posts on my own EXCEPT as counters given for some madcaps from Pakistan.
I never saw u or tahmed32 objecting to HP`s language either. Standards only when ur boys are cornered??
#375 Posted by okhla99 on November 28, 2006 9:45:45 pm
Re: # 373
Well.. WHY NOT ???
Read your #359 and point out even one rational argument in it.
Please exhibit some restraint.
Well.. WHY NOT ???
Read your #359 and point out even one rational argument in it.
Please exhibit some restraint.
#374 Posted by okhla99 on November 28, 2006 9:37:54 pm
Re: # 372
Very Very VRV,
Read #333 and you shall stand corrected. Invective and abuse is equally despicable, whether from Behram or from the rest of you.
Very Very VRV,
Read #333 and you shall stand corrected. Invective and abuse is equally despicable, whether from Behram or from the rest of you.
#373 Posted by VRV on November 28, 2006 9:34:53 pm
Re: # 371
Dear Okhla99,
Pl dont group my ID with those of Harimau and Behram1. That wud be a great favour to me. Thanks.
Dear Okhla99,
Pl dont group my ID with those of Harimau and Behram1. That wud be a great favour to me. Thanks.
#372 Posted by VRV on November 28, 2006 9:28:06 pm
Majumdar & Okhla,
Sometime back I gave a list of articles and made a louder observation abt this site. Even a Musharraf`s fart becomes an article on Chowk but a cataclysmic event in India doesnt find an article! Whose site is this. Naamke India-Pakistan site!!
When Lebanon was bombed this site gave like a dozen articles. Now we have genocide resumed in Darfur. Lakhs of people are being raped and brutally murdered. Not a single article by bleeding hearts or impromptu msg/article by Chowk. Why?????
Behram starts/writes unprintable abuses here but when Indians counter him then Okhla appears on the horizon advising restarint. People like tahmed32 again gets worked up only for Ajun`s posts but to those of Behram`s! Why this selective righteousness?
Sometime back I gave a list of articles and made a louder observation abt this site. Even a Musharraf`s fart becomes an article on Chowk but a cataclysmic event in India doesnt find an article! Whose site is this. Naamke India-Pakistan site!!
When Lebanon was bombed this site gave like a dozen articles. Now we have genocide resumed in Darfur. Lakhs of people are being raped and brutally murdered. Not a single article by bleeding hearts or impromptu msg/article by Chowk. Why?????
Behram starts/writes unprintable abuses here but when Indians counter him then Okhla appears on the horizon advising restarint. People like tahmed32 again gets worked up only for Ajun`s posts but to those of Behram`s! Why this selective righteousness?
#371 Posted by okhla99 on November 28, 2006 9:17:25 pm
The days of blind and senseless mutual bashing by Pakistan & India are over.
It is time for civilised rational discussions.
Whether VRV, Krishna, Arjun, Harimau & Behram understand this or not....
The forces of moderation shall prevail in the subcontinent...
The decent Pakistanis & Indians shall not be chased away by the mad Jehadi mindsets.
They shall continue to remain & irritate & annoy the invective spouting, hate mongereing
mad jehadis of both countries. In the end, good sense will prevail, insha` allah.
#370 Posted by majumdar on November 28, 2006 9:17:12 pm
Tahmed sahib/VRV/Okhla,
There are some people who come here just to abuse and insult others. The key thing is to cut out the noise- confine our discussions only to those who are willing to indulge in rational, civilised discourse and ignore others, irrespetive of what abuses/taunts are hurled.
(i one day the chowk owners will probably pull the plug on this website, and we will all go our separate ways)
Who are the owners of the chowk? How does chowk.com make money? And what is the motivation of the chowk owners to run chowk- is it profit or do they actually shell out money from their pocket to run chowk. That may give a clue as to at what point of time they decide to shut down chowk.
(chowk has basically remained where it was several years ago - a place to waste time.)
Indeed, sir. It has been one of my favourite place to waste time.
Regards
There are some people who come here just to abuse and insult others. The key thing is to cut out the noise- confine our discussions only to those who are willing to indulge in rational, civilised discourse and ignore others, irrespetive of what abuses/taunts are hurled.
(i one day the chowk owners will probably pull the plug on this website, and we will all go our separate ways)
Who are the owners of the chowk? How does chowk.com make money? And what is the motivation of the chowk owners to run chowk- is it profit or do they actually shell out money from their pocket to run chowk. That may give a clue as to at what point of time they decide to shut down chowk.
(chowk has basically remained where it was several years ago - a place to waste time.)
Indeed, sir. It has been one of my favourite place to waste time.
Regards
#369 Posted by VRV on November 28, 2006 9:06:38 pm
Mr.Ahmed,
Pl show me where Arjun used some words that are comparable with those of Behram`s. Behram`s language is pure expletives.
If I read him correctly, Arjun`s contention is that all Pakistanis are jihadis/terrorists. I dont agree to that coclusion (if u ask for it or not).
Since u look away for Behram`s expletives, then do the same for Arjun`s linear posts, please.
Pl show me where Arjun used some words that are comparable with those of Behram`s. Behram`s language is pure expletives.
If I read him correctly, Arjun`s contention is that all Pakistanis are jihadis/terrorists. I dont agree to that coclusion (if u ask for it or not).
Since u look away for Behram`s expletives, then do the same for Arjun`s linear posts, please.
#368 Posted by tahmed32 on November 28, 2006 8:54:08 pm
VRV #367 i didnt ask you to disapprove of arjun. in fact, i said that the fault is that of chowk staff, who have failed to support their own guidelines. and thus prevented chowk from developing into something more than what it is.
#367 Posted by VRV on November 28, 2006 8:34:02 pm
Mr. Ahmed,
If u cant disapprove of Behram, we too cant disapprove of our Arjun. We need Arjun as much as u need Behram. So lets not be indignat abt the Gresham`s Law.
Rgds,
If u cant disapprove of Behram, we too cant disapprove of our Arjun. We need Arjun as much as u need Behram. So lets not be indignat abt the Gresham`s Law.
Rgds,
#366 Posted by tahmed32 on November 28, 2006 8:28:43 pm
VRV: being young is no excuse to be spiteful and deceiptful - even kindergarten kids are not excused on this accout. and arjun has been on chowk 7-8 years, so rest assured he is no infant.
as for the rest - most normal people would wish their neighbors well anyway. i consider chowk staff to have failed in their duty to kick out those who violate their guidelines. chowk is basically unmanned at this stage. i dont consider this to be a good thing - since, (to apply gresham`s law from economics), bad currency drives out the good.
as a result, chowk has basically remained where it was several years ago - a place to waste time. but not a place to build understandings of different cultures, points of view etc. as you and okla have seem to want to see it. and as i had hoped it would when i first came here. as a result, i one day the chowk owners will probably pull the plug on this website, and we will all go our separate ways. :-)
as for the rest - most normal people would wish their neighbors well anyway. i consider chowk staff to have failed in their duty to kick out those who violate their guidelines. chowk is basically unmanned at this stage. i dont consider this to be a good thing - since, (to apply gresham`s law from economics), bad currency drives out the good.
as a result, chowk has basically remained where it was several years ago - a place to waste time. but not a place to build understandings of different cultures, points of view etc. as you and okla have seem to want to see it. and as i had hoped it would when i first came here. as a result, i one day the chowk owners will probably pull the plug on this website, and we will all go our separate ways. :-)
#365 Posted by VRV on November 28, 2006 8:18:21 pm
Mr. Ahmed,
Arjun is too obsessed with one-point argument. Life shud have nava rasas (rainbow of nuances). He`s too young, I think. Not all Pakistanis are jihadis, not all Indians are into making one chip. Btw, we dont need the acknowledgements of Pakistanis abt India. We wud be better off without any contact with Pakistanis. They already showed us how poisonous their minds are and we are still facing the covert actions of that poisonous thinking.
So this site shud be a place for gup-shup or something of that type.
Ur list of India(n) baiters is bigger (compared to ur country`s size) who are fulltimers and professional India(n) baiters. Inspite the Net, they still think India is a Hindu country. Incorrigibles!
For the sake of record: I hate the people who dream abt Akhand Bharat. That wud the day India digs its grave as a free, democratic, secular & forward looking nation.
As a neighbour we wish u guys good luck and watch u guys growing or dying or may be tottering.
WHEN CHALLENGED WITH ANYBODY FROM THAT SIDE, WE WUD LIVE UPTO THE CHALLENGE(s)....WHICHEVER THAT IS I.E INTELLECTUAL OR OTHERWISE.
Arjun is too obsessed with one-point argument. Life shud have nava rasas (rainbow of nuances). He`s too young, I think. Not all Pakistanis are jihadis, not all Indians are into making one chip. Btw, we dont need the acknowledgements of Pakistanis abt India. We wud be better off without any contact with Pakistanis. They already showed us how poisonous their minds are and we are still facing the covert actions of that poisonous thinking.
So this site shud be a place for gup-shup or something of that type.
Ur list of India(n) baiters is bigger (compared to ur country`s size) who are fulltimers and professional India(n) baiters. Inspite the Net, they still think India is a Hindu country. Incorrigibles!
For the sake of record: I hate the people who dream abt Akhand Bharat. That wud the day India digs its grave as a free, democratic, secular & forward looking nation.
As a neighbour we wish u guys good luck and watch u guys growing or dying or may be tottering.
WHEN CHALLENGED WITH ANYBODY FROM THAT SIDE, WE WUD LIVE UPTO THE CHALLENGE(s)....WHICHEVER THAT IS I.E INTELLECTUAL OR OTHERWISE.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- MantoLives: Errata: Fazlurrahman's role in... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Tahmed, The insurgency of Fakir... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Stukay, You should ask... Living Gandhi and King
- MeiraJ08: too bad you're giving... Fathers and Daughters
- BJ2: [I'm a nice person.] I... Fathers and Daughters
- BJ2: My dear Meira, If you... Fathers and Daughters
- MeiraJ08: "Since the days of...since... Fathers and Daughters
- BJ2: Re: # 93 Meira, good... Fathers and Daughters








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content