S F Hasnat December 1, 2006
#49 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:02:48 pm
this is how impotent iranian leadership is. it cant even pay back baghul may churee macaca leadership. in contrast, pakistan - recepient of millions of dollars in annual u.s. aid -actually voted in favour of iran in this resolution. and this is precisely why i favour pakistan maintaining an ambiguous stance on iran. iranian leadership must be made to realise that there will be a price to pay if acts in ways that might be to the detriment of pak. any leadership that cant distinguish between its friends and enemies deserves to be dicked around.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/archive/archive?ArchiveId=15434
India`s IAEA vote upsets Iran
Iran`s ambassador in New Delhi has met a top Indian foreign affairs official to convey his government`s deep disappointment at India`s decision to vote against Tehran on a UN atomic agency resolution.
The meeting between Indian Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran and Iranian Ambassador Siyavash Zargar Yaghoubi took place on Tuesday, as Iran threatened to review trade deals with countries that voted against it at the International Atomic Energy Agency.
#50 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:06:29 pm
meanwhile real situation india with regards to farm production and hunger. i can see a ``we are the world`` type concert fairly soon:
http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=3&id=163237&usrsess=1
seven million children in India die of hunger every year. It was earlier reported that 63 per cent of children go to bed hungry, and 53 per cent of them suffer from chronic malnutrition. In 2002, a large number of people died of starvation and malnutrition in the poverty-stricken regions of Orissa, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and Himachal Pradesh despite surplus food in the FCI godowns
...Our food output in 2004-05 has declined to 204.6 million tonnes from 212 million tonnes in 2003-04. The scenario in 2005-06 has not been encouraging as the output has not exceeded 209 million tonnes. Given the burgeoning population, the present food production will not be enough to feed our growing population of over 1100 million, if the entire half-fed people are fully fed.
It is reported that India will face a food shortage of about 28 million tonnes by 2025 when the country will need a minimum of at least 338 million tonnes of food for feeding a population of 1690 million.
#51 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:14:01 pm
as i said before, this article is very idiotic - only fit to be published on a website like chowk. reality is that relationship between iran and pak is normal.
hot off the wires:
http://www.geo.tv/geonews/details.asp?id=152189&newscategory=pakistan
Musharraf, Ahmadinejad discuss gas price on phone
ISLAMABAD: President General Pervez Musharraf on Saturday talked to Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad on telephone and discussed measures to expedite the US $ 7 billion Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project.
The two leaders agreed to remove impediments in the 2600 km gas pipeline project that aims at supplying natural gas from Iran to Pakistan and then onwards to India.
#52 Posted by taikonaut on December 2, 2006 1:17:16 pm
#48 by arjun2 on December 2, 2006 1:01pm PT
: if the billions of $$ india earns through, among other things, designing chips is munshigiri, why have you been massive failures at even that?
Failure? or trying to diversify our services to the West. Yeah sure we can`t compete with Hindia`s $15 billion IT bijnus. However Hindia can`t beat China`s $300 billion manufacturing sector. You know why?
Hindians can`t compete with China. Manufacturing is not their core competency. So what do Hindians do to compete with China? Make monkey faces to Pakistan. hahahha.
#53 Posted by taikonaut on December 2, 2006 1:19:12 pm
Re: # 50 Faisal sez
regions of Orissa, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and Himachal Pradesh despite surplus food in the FCI godowns
...Our food output in 2004-05 has declined to 204.6 million tonnes from 212 million tonnes in 2003-04. The scenario in 2005-06 has not been encouraging as the output has not exceeded 209 million tonnes. Given the burgeoning population, the present food production will not be enough to feed our growing population of over 1100 million, if the entire half-fed people are fully fed.
See the commie policies of Hindia won`t work.
regions of Orissa, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and Himachal Pradesh despite surplus food in the FCI godowns
...Our food output in 2004-05 has declined to 204.6 million tonnes from 212 million tonnes in 2003-04. The scenario in 2005-06 has not been encouraging as the output has not exceeded 209 million tonnes. Given the burgeoning population, the present food production will not be enough to feed our growing population of over 1100 million, if the entire half-fed people are fully fed.
See the commie policies of Hindia won`t work.
#54 Posted by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 1:19:32 pm
Re: # 52; give it time man...production is transient. Innovation is not.
#55 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:27:46 pm
taikonaut,
your numbers are incorrect. india`s total export (merchandise +services) will amount to $140-150bn this year. china`s export in comparison are expected to reach $960bn. to catch up with china, india`s export growth rate will have to exceed china`s export growth rate by 10% for the next 20 years. reality however is that india is running a current account deficit unlike china which is accumalating record surpluses.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8LA6QVG1.htm
China exports expected to reach $960B
NOV. 10 7:15 A.M. ET The Commerce Ministry said Friday that China`s exports are expected to reach $960 billion this year, boosting its politically sensitive trade surplus to about $150 billion, a state news agency reported.
#56 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:27:47 pm
taikonaut,
your numbers are incorrect. india`s total export (merchandise +services) will amount to $140-150bn this year. china`s export in comparison are expected to reach $960bn. to catch up with china, india`s export growth rate will have to exceed china`s export growth rate by 10% for the next 20 years. reality however is that india is running a current account deficit unlike china which is accumalating record surpluses.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8LA6QVG1.htm
China exports expected to reach $960B
NOV. 10 7:15 A.M. ET The Commerce Ministry said Friday that China`s exports are expected to reach $960 billion this year, boosting its politically sensitive trade surplus to about $150 billion, a state news agency reported.
#57 Posted by mohar11 on December 2, 2006 1:28:13 pm
Re: # 41
I am sure paki mega firms are a mega success [for some reason, it`s also a mega secret] ... so how much money do you make per year by shipping out your farm products... I am no researcher in high-flying world of paki mega firms - so you tell us... :)
I am sure paki mega firms are a mega success [for some reason, it`s also a mega secret] ... so how much money do you make per year by shipping out your farm products... I am no researcher in high-flying world of paki mega firms - so you tell us... :)
#58 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:39:47 pm
just to put things in perspective, thailand with a population of 70mn will export as much as india will:
http://etna.mcot.net/query.php?nid=26345
Export growth in 2006 projected at nearly 20 per cent
BANGKOK, Dec 2 (TNA) - Thailand`s exports this year are projected to grow and meet the target of 17.5 per cent with total value of US$130.37 billion, according to Commerce Minister Krirkkrai Jirapaet.
#59 Posted by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 1:45:25 pm
Re: # 58: faisal, 60% of US GDP is domestic spending driven not export driven. You need a balance. India`s growth 8% y/y and soon to hit 9+% going by last quarters 9.2% growth is being fueled by domestic investment not through exports. This will happen for a long time to come. so rest assured..there is not as much risk to foreign demand. What woudl happen if US hits a recurrive solw down driving demand for chinese goods down?
#60 Posted by taikonaut on December 2, 2006 1:50:16 pm
#56 by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:27pm PT
taikonaut,
your numbers are incorrect. india`s total export (merchandise +services) will amount to $140-150bn this year. ........
China exports expected to reach $960B
thanks for the correction dude! Yeah the numbers are different but the relative disparity between China and Hindia (same population) remains the same or even worse.
taikonaut,
your numbers are incorrect. india`s total export (merchandise +services) will amount to $140-150bn this year. ........
China exports expected to reach $960B
thanks for the correction dude! Yeah the numbers are different but the relative disparity between China and Hindia (same population) remains the same or even worse.
#61 Posted by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 1:51:21 pm
Re: # 59: what drives sustainable growth are institutional development of lead sectors that can drive economic growth over long stretches of time. Take China for example, it opened its economy in 1978, it was a blip on the international trade scene until the early nineties (roughly the smae amount of relevance and attention that India is getting now after 15 yrs post liberalization) Just as the special economic zones in the south Guangdong and outside of shanghai led to shifting of manufacturing form the develop[ and other asian economies, same is happening in India in the services and other industries, pharama and biotech for example.
pakistan needs to develop sustainable sectors that can drive economic growth. According to chucklehead here it is land. There is no comparative advantage in wealth allocated among landed gentry. It creates countries like Blivia and Argentina, not countries like Singapore and China or India.
pakistan needs to develop sustainable sectors that can drive economic growth. According to chucklehead here it is land. There is no comparative advantage in wealth allocated among landed gentry. It creates countries like Blivia and Argentina, not countries like Singapore and China or India.
#62 Posted by taikonaut on December 2, 2006 1:52:14 pm
#59 by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 1:45pm PT
What woudl happen if US hits a recurrive solw down driving demand for chinese goods down?
The day US suffers a big slow down, its going to be bring down everyone else including Hindia.
#63 Posted by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 1:53:43 pm
Re: # 62: on what basis? Look at export exposures of the countries you are talking about. Use your own argument to defend your stand. YOU CAN``T!!!!
#64 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 2:02:44 pm
haha...check out chaprasi macaca predicting downfall of cheen even though cheen`s annual surplus is equal to india`s total foreign reserves and india`s budget deficit is around 7% vs less than 1% for cheen.
as far as pak`s farm production goes, here is a recent development:
http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=33458
Pakistan may drive up global wheat prices
With stocks towering above 0.45m tonnes, Pak exports will be affecting international commodity exchanges
KARACHI: The world sees Pakistan instrumental in driving up international wheat prices, as it stands among only three wheat-producing countries across the globe having surplus stocks of more than half a million tonnes from last year crop.
A latest assessment made by the US Department of Agriculture suggests Pakistan along with Argentina and Ukraine would be the major player in the international commodity market to determine 2006-07 prices.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 14 There... US Commando Strike in
- ahmedmadani: Major Sahib You write... US Commando Strike in
- nkg: Mike.... There is no point... US Commando Strike in
- pavocavalry: US Commando Raid in... US Commando Strike in
- pavocavalry: zia did not have... 17 August 1988
- muradbaig: Re: # 113 Satya100 How do... Faith and Religion
- muradbaig: Re: # 119 I have... Faith and Religion
- tahmed32: quin #70: I agree... Save Me From Charismatic








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content