unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Stagnating Pakistan-Iran Relations

S F Hasnat December 1, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 64-80   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#59 Posted by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 1:45:25 pm
Re: # 58: faisal, 60% of US GDP is domestic spending driven not export driven. You need a balance. India`s growth 8% y/y and soon to hit 9+% going by last quarters 9.2% growth is being fueled by domestic investment not through exports. This will happen for a long time to come. so rest assured..there is not as much risk to foreign demand. What woudl happen if US hits a recurrive solw down driving demand for chinese goods down?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#58 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 1:39:47 pm

just to put things in perspective, thailand with a population of 70mn will export as much as india will:

http://etna.mcot.net/query.php?nid=26345

Export growth in 2006 projected at nearly 20 per cent

BANGKOK, Dec 2 (TNA) - Thailand`s exports this year are projected to grow and meet the target of 17.5 per cent with total value of US$130.37 billion, according to Commerce Minister Krirkkrai Jirapaet.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#65 Posted by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 2:10:10 pm
Re: # 64: abay cab driver, no one is calling for downturn of cheen. India`s trade with cheen is only expanding. In a decades time when you are having iftar having cooked your keema samosas in Ganeshpati Ghee from Banaras and served savaein from Fat Buddha Noodle Co in Beijing think about what I said about developing institutions among sectors that drive growth. Getting paid $5 miilion a pop to send citizens to gitmo is not developing a export driven industry. although, the rate ofpopulation growth in pakistan will only drive the price down.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#67 Posted by chaltahai on December 2, 2006 2:13:55 pm
Re: # 64: The last time any one actually used the Nation as a source for economic happenings in Pakistan, they were tarred and feathered.

http://www2.goldmansachs.com/insight/case_studies/innovate_case_studies/brics.html

this is the world to come. Get used ot it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#64 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 2:02:44 pm

haha...check out chaprasi macaca predicting downfall of cheen even though cheen`s annual surplus is equal to india`s total foreign reserves and india`s budget deficit is around 7% vs less than 1% for cheen.

as far as pak`s farm production goes, here is a recent development:

http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=33458

Pakistan may drive up global wheat prices

With stocks towering above 0.45m tonnes, Pak exports will be affecting international commodity exchanges

KARACHI: The world sees Pakistan instrumental in driving up international wheat prices, as it stands among only three wheat-producing countries across the globe having surplus stocks of more than half a million tonnes from last year crop.

A latest assessment made by the US Department of Agriculture suggests Pakistan along with Argentina and Ukraine would be the major player in the international commodity market to determine 2006-07 prices.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#68 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 2:21:28 pm

more laughter....who else but a chaprasi would hold india as some sort of a model when indian exports are only marginally higher than that of thailand - country of 70 mn people.?

http://www.indianexpress.com/story/17554.html

``Trade deficit balloons to $6.2 billion in Oct

Export growth rate slows to 11% against a full year target of 26%

NEW DELHI, NOV 28: India’s trade deficit witnessed more than a two-fold increase to touch $6.2 billion in October 2006 from $2.9 billion in October 2005. In September 2006 the trade deficit stood at $5.3 billion.

Releasing its provisional data on Tuesday, the government said the trade deficit for April-October, 2006 was $ 30.2 billion, 20.3% higher than the deficit of $ 25.1 billion (provisionally revised figure) during April-October, 2005....``

next chaprasi will be offering tips on how good india is in producing world class fast bowlers.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#69 Posted by mohar11 on December 2, 2006 2:22:23 pm
Of all the delusions pakis have expressed over the years - the ``mega firms`` story takes the cake... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#70 Posted by arjun2 on December 2, 2006 2:28:36 pm
#52 by taikonaut on December 2, 2006 1:17pm PT


Failure? or trying to diversify our services to the West.


diversify...!! HAHA...72 million $ is what bangalore alone probably exports in like 3-4 days...

bottom line: you tried your damndest to get on the IT bandwagon and while India is now doing chip design and other value added stuff, you`re stuck at 72 million/yr..mostly in call centers..

what`s diverse are paki delusions..


However Hindia can`t beat China`s $300 billion manufacturing sector. You know why?


Umm...Are you chinese?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#71 Posted by arjun2 on December 2, 2006 2:33:32 pm
takeout paki...

forget IT..in the post-quota world, you can`t even hack it in the textile exports game....

Textile exports may miss Q2 target
KARACHI, Oct 21: Time is apparently running out for Pakistan’s textile exporters, who after having failed to achieve a proportionate export target of $3.83 billion in the first quarter of this fiscal year, are finding it extremely difficult to earn $4 billion plus in the next quarter -– Oct-Dec 2006.


In case of the US, a number of countries have free trade agreement (FTA) and, therefore, they get zero rating treatment on entry of their products into the American market, whereas for Pakistan the rate of duty ranges from 11 per cent to 18 per cent.“We did raise these points with a team of American negotiators at US consul general’s office in Karachi this month,” he recalled and revealed very soon Malaysia would end up with an FTA with the US. “We are clubbed with China and India in the US market,” he explained to assert his point that in China and India, the textile business enjoyed unlimited support in form of subsidies, tax concessions and reduced cost financing plus a relatively less energy cost and cheap labour.

The analysts say that Pakistani exporters are finding it difficult to respond to the challenges of international market after January 2005 following the phasing out of textile export quota regime. For more than five decades Pakistan business thrived on a captive market and a greenhouse environment. It is facing competition for the first time.

“Very soon Pakistan business landscape will be littered with dead and dying business houses,” a senior business leader predicts. He also points out that those companies that will withstand this tough period are bound to go a long way and grow.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#88 Posted by subhashjoshi on December 2, 2006 9:00:40 pm
Re: # 72 Arjun

(....The sources said Pakistan is in a disadvantaged position as compared to Bangladesh, which though being in the category of Least Developed Countries, its products are cheaper than that of Pakistan. ...)

Are you serious? Pakistan is disadvantaged in comparison with Bangladesh...there goes our burgers&fries-from-Pakistan dream.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#72 Posted by arjun2 on December 2, 2006 2:35:11 pm
Somebody call the waaahmbulance for the pakis...


Pak contacts WB against Indian textile gimmicks

Mehtab Haider
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan has claimed that India is using “unfair trade methods” for marginalizing its textile exports and raised the issue with the World Bank to pressure New Delhi to refrain from doing such practices.
“Yes, we have asked the World Bank to stop India from using unfair trade methods for boosting its textile exports,” official sources told TheNation on Saturday. The government is quite worried due to declining trend in the country’s exports, which have 60 per cent contribution from the textile sector.
However, the government is further analyzing the situation for determining factors behind the decline in exports.
The sources said Pakistan is in a disadvantaged position as compared to Bangladesh, which though being in the category of Least Developed Countries, its products are cheaper than that of Pakistan. The Pakistani exports are charged 13 per cent duty in USA while Bangladesh exports are taken at zero-rated duty.
The textile industry, according to the sources, also blamed India for using ‘unfair trade methods’ for boosting its exports.
Chinese exports are banned in US and EU markets during 2005-2008 and there is no truth that Pakistan’s exports shares are getting affected due to this ban.
For the July-October 2006 period, Pakistan’s export receipts have registered 1.3 per cent increase in USD terms.
The softness in export earnings being led by the textile & clothing sector, the underlying trend is not confined to T & C exports. These exports have registered a cumulative decline of 9 per cent for July-October 2006 period, while exports receipts from non-T&C manufactures have fallen by 34 per cent over the same period.
Discussing another reason, the sources said, it is coinciding with the fall in US$ receipts from exports, remittances from expatriate Pakistanis have picked up by over 20 per cent in the same period - from already elevated levels.
The combination of falling export receipts and an unexplained jump in remittances has fuelled suspicion that exporters have been concertedly diverting export receipts into non-bank channels in order to pressure the government into granting further “relief” in the form of subsidies and exemptions.
“The fact that US customs data for the July-September 2006 period indicates a 16 per cent increase in the USD value of textile and clothing exports from Pakistan has reinforced the suspicion of an element of “manoeuvring” from the textile lobby,” said ABN Amro Bank in its latest analysis.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#85 Posted by taikonaut on December 2, 2006 6:01:47 pm
Re: #73 by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 2:38pm PT



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6046718.stm

The report said India contributed to about 5.6 million child deaths per year, more than half the world`s total

Sheesh! Hindi Bhindis and Bhihari Bhikaris are the new emperors of the world. So let them live in a fantasy land for a little.

Emperor has no dhoti! hahahah.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#73 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 2:38:58 pm

next macacas will be offering tips on how to look after children:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6046718.stm

The report said India contributed to about 5.6 million child deaths per year, more than half the world`s total
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#74 Posted by arjun2 on December 2, 2006 3:06:10 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#75 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 3:16:11 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#76 Posted by faisaluno on December 2, 2006 3:30:28 pm

taikonaut,

you are right on the money on deficiencies in pak`s tax system. agriculture comprises 20% of pak`s economy and contributes about 0% to tax revenue. also there is a large hidden economy thats not being taxed. there are 42mn cell phones in pak. assuming 6 phones per family, there should be around 7mn families with cell phone connections and yet there are less than 2.5mn tax payers in pak. this data indicates that there are large number of families and businesses not in the tax net. one reason is that small businessmen in pak support mma which is why mma is against documentation of the economy. pak`s tax to gdp ratio is one of the lowest in the world.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 64-80   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #187 zeemax
    #184 okhla99
    #183 muqaddam
    #185 Behram1
    #186 muqaddam
    #181 jang
    #178 Behram1
    #177 Ranjit
    #175 taikonaut
    #179 Behram1
    #180 subhashjoshi
    #182 Behram1
    #173 Ranjit
    #172 Behram1
    #171 Ranjit
    #169 Ranjit
    #162 subhashjoshi
    #158 Ranjit
    #164 subhashjoshi
    #161 subhashjoshi
    #156 tahmed32
    #155 zeemax
    #154 tahmed32
    #153 zeemax
    #151 bbabu
    #150 tahmed32
    #149 zeemax
    #148 tahmed32
    #147 tahmed32
    #152 Behram1
    #145 zeemax
    #144 Faruk
    #143 tahmed32
    #142 tahmed32
    #141 taikonaut
    #146 Behram1
    #139 stuka
    #138 majumdar
    #137 bjkumar
    #133 Behram1
    #132 bjkumar
    #135 okhla99
    #131 tahmed32
    #136 taikonaut
    #130 bjkumar
    #128 tahmed32
    #127 stuka
    #134 Behram1
    #157 Sanatani
    #159 Behram1
    #165 subhashjoshi
    #167 Behram1
    #168 subhashjoshi
    #170 Behram1
    #176 subhashjoshi
    #174 subhashjoshi
    #166 subhashjoshi
    #160 iron_mask
    #163 Behram1
    #126 tahmed32
    #125 tahmed32
    #140 muqaddam
    #129 taikonaut
    #124 krishna_abcd
    #123 taikonaut
    #118 taikonaut
    #117 tahmed32
    #116 tahmed32
    #115 arjun2
    #114 krishna_abcd
    #122 Behram1
    #113 taikonaut
    #121 Behram1
    #112 mohar11
    #110 Behram1
    #106 arjun2
    #111 Behram1
    #109 taikonaut
    #104 Behram1
    #107 taikonaut
    #103 tahmed32
    #105 taikonaut
    #100 okhla99
    #101 taikonaut
    #102 okhla99
    #99 taikonaut
    #98 tahmed32
    #97 tahmed32
    #95 Naqshbandi
    #94 Naqshbandi
    #96 taikonaut
    #108 Behram1
    #119 taikonaut
    #120 Behram1
    #93 taikonaut
    #92 zeemax
    #91 zeemax
    #87 subhashjoshi
    #86 faisaluno
    #84 faisaluno
    #83 mohar11
    #82 faisaluno
    #81 arjun2
    #80 faisaluno
    #79 arjun2
    #78 faisaluno
    #77 arjun2
    #76 faisaluno
    #75 faisaluno
    #74 arjun2
    #73 faisaluno
    #85 taikonaut
    #72 arjun2
    #88 subhashjoshi
    #71 arjun2
    #70 arjun2
    #69 mohar11
    #68 faisaluno
    #64 faisaluno
    #67 chaltahai
    #65 chaltahai
    #58 faisaluno
    #59 chaltahai
    #62 taikonaut
    #63 chaltahai
    #61 chaltahai
    #66 taikonaut
    #56 faisaluno
    #60 taikonaut
    #55 faisaluno
    #52 taikonaut
    #54 chaltahai
    #51 faisaluno
    #50 faisaluno
    #53 taikonaut
    #49 faisaluno
    #48 arjun2
    #46 arjun2
    #45 arjun2
    #44 arjun2
    #42 muqaddam
    #40 stuka
    #39 bjkumar
    #47 taikonaut
    #35 bjkumar
    #34 mohar11
    #36 taikonaut
    #38 mohar11
    #41 taikonaut
    #57 mohar11
    #30 faisaluno
    #29 arjun2
    #31 taikonaut
    #43 chaltahai
    #28 bongdongs
    #32 taikonaut
    #26 nasah
    #33 mohar11
    #25 arjun2
    #24 tahmed32
    #23 faisaluno
    #22 arjun2
    #27 taikonaut
    #19 arjun2
    #21 taikonaut
    #17 arjun2
    #20 taikonaut
    #15 Jamesmaxwell
    #18 taikonaut
    #13 arjun2
    #16 taikonaut
    #89 subhashjoshi
    #90 subhashjoshi
    #12 arjun2
    #14 taikonaut
    #11 jang
    #10 taikonaut
    #8 tahmed32
    #7 zeemax
    #5 Zeena
    #6 taikonaut
    #4 Behram1
    #2 tahmed32
    #9 Kamath
    #37 muqaddam
    #3 taikonaut
    #1 taikonaut

Latest Interacts

  • nb: Yes, Fosa, the terrorists... An Indian Muslim
  • KaalChakra: GT bhai, left the... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • KaalChakra: qyousuf (and riaz bhai... An Indian Muslim
  • GT: To those who may... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • kcs: Re #659 Goldfinger, do you... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • tahmed32: to illustrate the last... An Indian Muslim
  • tahmed32: #211 this habit of... An Indian Muslim
  • qyousuf: I am surprised to... An Indian Muslim

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • An Indian Muslim
  • Sexless and Loveless Marriages
  • Terror in Mumbai.....and also in 'Bannu or somewhere'
  • A Big, Decadent Pakistani Wedding
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Awakening
  • Beyond Regional Thinking
  • A Candid Interview With Saeed Anwar
  • Statesmanship Needed
  • A Tree of Water

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited