Mohammad Gill December 21, 2006
#6 Posted by ntsyed on December 22, 2006 8:05:05 am
Re: # 2 by zarrar2
[I do believe we need more freethinkers to capture and take custody (no joint custody) of good and spread the word.]
If it is indeed an `us-vs-them` thing, then why ``take custody`` of this commodity? Why not create / invent your own ``good``, so that none other than you can claim its custody?
[Science will prevail inevitably.]
The key operative in this assertion is ``inevitably``.
Considering the meaning of the word above, there would be a small chance, and that too only if the visible universe is to live forever.
Unfortunately, today`s scientists unanimously concur otherwise.
Re: #3 by majumdar
[In Hindu mythology we come across rishis - great and exalted humans but humans nonetheless-]
Please note the boldened word `mythology`; meaning the concept without ``scientific`` basis; pertaining to unseen and/or unknown.
[fashioning humans out of animals or sometimes just out of thoughts/sacrifical fire etc- for eg Draupadi, Drishtyadyumna etc.. Usually the humans so fashioned had exceptional characteristics]
This is far away from ``cloning``. The process above needs scientific verification and validation, just as the existance of God, to be justified as science-friendly or in sync with it. The closest words to describe this process are miracle or magic, which are again something scientifically unacceptable due to its inexplicability on tangible basis.
Nice try, though...
The two mustn`t be pitted against each other, lest both fail the humanity.
Life starts and ends with religion, because what happens before and after life is unknown and cannot be determined by science, at least not yet. Religion, on the other hand, fill in these blanks whether it matters to one or not. This is where atheism fails a free thinking mind.
The tangibles of the interim period is the knowledge, specifically for this period, and is called science. The unseen forces that influence the life in this period can only be explained via religion. Hence, science is only a subset of, or a means to reaffirm / reject, religion.
:-)~~
[I do believe we need more freethinkers to capture and take custody (no joint custody) of good and spread the word.]
If it is indeed an `us-vs-them` thing, then why ``take custody`` of this commodity? Why not create / invent your own ``good``, so that none other than you can claim its custody?
[Science will prevail inevitably.]
The key operative in this assertion is ``inevitably``.
Considering the meaning of the word above, there would be a small chance, and that too only if the visible universe is to live forever.
Unfortunately, today`s scientists unanimously concur otherwise.
Re: #3 by majumdar
[In Hindu mythology we come across rishis - great and exalted humans but humans nonetheless-]
Please note the boldened word `mythology`; meaning the concept without ``scientific`` basis; pertaining to unseen and/or unknown.
[fashioning humans out of animals or sometimes just out of thoughts/sacrifical fire etc- for eg Draupadi, Drishtyadyumna etc.. Usually the humans so fashioned had exceptional characteristics]
This is far away from ``cloning``. The process above needs scientific verification and validation, just as the existance of God, to be justified as science-friendly or in sync with it. The closest words to describe this process are miracle or magic, which are again something scientifically unacceptable due to its inexplicability on tangible basis.
Nice try, though...
The two mustn`t be pitted against each other, lest both fail the humanity.
Life starts and ends with religion, because what happens before and after life is unknown and cannot be determined by science, at least not yet. Religion, on the other hand, fill in these blanks whether it matters to one or not. This is where atheism fails a free thinking mind.
The tangibles of the interim period is the knowledge, specifically for this period, and is called science. The unseen forces that influence the life in this period can only be explained via religion. Hence, science is only a subset of, or a means to reaffirm / reject, religion.
:-)~~
Interact Index
Also by Mohammad Gill
Similar Articles
- Freud and Jung and Their Secret Affairs Khalid Sohail
- Judah Folkman Syed Shah
- Ultimate Fate of the Universe mubasher jamil
- Rote Learning Vis-à-vis Physical Comprehension Mohammad Gill
- Science and the Islamic world --- The quest for rapprochement Pervez Hoodbhoy
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- _arjun30: heh... ‘Pakistan loses $1.5bn due... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- _arjun30: #64 Posted by... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- laddu: The more Islamist thinking... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- _arjun30: #48 Posted by... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- _arjun30: #51 Posted by... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- Urstruly: It came as a... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- chaltahai: BJ, it wasn't fear... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: badi sharafat se baat-cheet... ‘Dustbin of history’ or








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content