Mohammad Gill December 5, 2006
#546 Posted by raziab9 on December 13, 2006 8:43:52 pm
Aha! We started off when i simply added on the stuff remember? ``I replied to you not in defence but to add on to what the religion adds in Pakistani law``
However, you and I are officially off the line :)
RB
However, you and I are officially off the line :)
RB
#545 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 8:20:22 pm
Re #543:
Discussion here is about killing apostates ... in this world ... by living Muslims. What Allah decides to do with apostates is irrelevent here.
Your issue is with Urstruly and not with me. He is hell bent upon executing apostates, but cannot explain why. So show your references to him ...
#544 Posted by raziab9 on December 13, 2006 8:17:14 pm
Oh PS: i certainly go against the ratass-mullas and how they`ve killed apostates --it seemed more of a personal pleasure for them and maybe a means of opening the nominal heavens gates. However, the argument seemed to have adopted the pro-mullah thing in your mind for me. that`s not the case as i do take them into account.
#543 Posted by raziab9 on December 13, 2006 8:10:44 pm
Re: # 542
I didn`t say that they must be punished by humans. notice earlier that i claimed free of that.
You call it bias -arite. i did not refuse from backing up: ``I`ll have to pull it out and present it to you later time. ``
Ahem, calm down.
I didn`t say that they must be punished by humans. notice earlier that i claimed free of that.
You call it bias -arite. i did not refuse from backing up: ``I`ll have to pull it out and present it to you later time. ``
Ahem, calm down.
#542 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 7:30:32 pm
raziab (#541),
You are making wild claims here … but these claims are meaningless unless you back them up with reasonable references.
Quran refers to shariah being completed. Appearance of future prophets to guide people back to Islam is a different issue. You are confusing one with the other. Nothing in Quran suggests that propehthood has ended.
I’ll take your claim about punishment for apostasy seriously when you back it up.
You are now showing your true colors. You started out trying to sound neutral and carefree. You are now showing your anti-Ahamdi bias … without backing up your claims. And all along you have ignored mullahs here who have condemned apostates, blasphemers etc. to death, even as such views are negated by Quran. Read #540 for details.
Islam is being disfigured by these mullahs, while pseudo-intellectuals like yourself debate punishment for apostasy. It is no surprise that the ummah continues to degenerate intellectually and socially ...
#541 Posted by raziab9 on December 13, 2006 6:43:22 pm
Re: # 537
See that`s the difference. Ahmadies have changed the contents of the holy book.
Prophet Mohammed claimed that he had literally completed the religion`s text and the religion itself. In Quran it does tell that Prophet M is the last one. I`ll have to pull it out and present it to you later time.
And yes, the punishment is also stated for apostates. Islam is lenient but there are some major major things that can not be altered.
See that`s the difference. Ahmadies have changed the contents of the holy book.
Prophet Mohammed claimed that he had literally completed the religion`s text and the religion itself. In Quran it does tell that Prophet M is the last one. I`ll have to pull it out and present it to you later time.
And yes, the punishment is also stated for apostates. Islam is lenient but there are some major major things that can not be altered.
#540 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 5:16:51 pm
Urstruly,
Here are some relevant Quranic references that you insist on violating. This also negates your earlier claims that Quran is silent on such matters.
You seem to suggest that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself violated these commandments, so it is alright for you to do the same.
This is a low view for a Muslim to adopt ... and suggests a hidden agenda (could this be the case with you ....? hmmmm ...).
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Apostasy
Forgiven through repentance: 3:86-91
Harmless to cause of Islam 3:144, 5:54
Punishment for apostasy from Allah alone 2:217, 3:87-89, 4:137, 16:106
Blasphemy
4:140 Believers commanded to sever ties with blasphemers
6:68 Believers commanded to turn away from those who blaspheme
13:43 Prophet (pbuh) commanded to refer the matter to Allah if someone calls him a liar
Adultery
24:2 Punishment of 100 lashes for perpetrator
4:25 Half of full punishment for slave women (half of 100 lashes is 50 lashes, but half of “death” is not possible)
+++++++++++
What you call ``Quadiyani fitna`` is teachings of Quran that you continue to run away from ...
#539 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 3:25:13 pm
Re #538:
You are now ducking the issue now. Simply stated, here it is:
Quran tells believers how to deal with apostasy, blasphemy, adultery, etc. If you advocate killing the perpetrators, you are in violation of Quraic injunctions. The burden of proof rests on your shoulder, not mine.
Your position suggests that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself violated clear Quranic injunctions. This is an odd position for a Muslim to adopt.
Your view strikes at the base of prophethood of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), his truthfulness, and the message he brought. Your views cast Islam as a fake religion at the hands of a fake prophet. Sadly, such is the inevitable outcome of your position.
+++
Namaz , as initiated by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is consistent with message of Quran … which asks Muslims to remember Allah standing up, prostrating etc. Furthermore, you cannot point to a single verse that contradicts this method of prayer. Still furthermore, you can pray any way you like and call it namaz … it is between you and Allah.
You now have nothing left to argue … so you put on an act and make excuses.
#538 Posted by Urstruly on December 13, 2006 2:58:38 pm
sattar
Unless you tell me where in Quran the Method of Namaz is elaborated explicitly our conversation is not going anywhere because this is the heart of your argument. The burden of proof should be on yourself not me.
Unless you tell me where in Quran the Method of Namaz is elaborated explicitly our conversation is not going anywhere because this is the heart of your argument. The burden of proof should be on yourself not me.
#537 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 2:42:26 pm
raziab9 (#535):
Two brief comments for now:
1) You seem to be suggesting that Islamic punishment exists for one who claims to be a Muslim (huh???). Where are you getting this? Please elaborate.
2) Nothing in Quran or ahdith suggests that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is the last prophet. This is a myth perpetuated by present day ullema. Rather, Quran suggests that door to prophethood remains open and ahadith are in agreement with this view. I can elaborate more as needed … but this should suffice for now …
#536 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 2:35:38 pm
Urstruly (re #534)
No, rather your ignoring arguments I raised in #520 is a face-save. It addresses issues you raised ... and raises issues on which you remain silent ...
+++++
Prayer initiated by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), which involves remembering Allah standing up, prostrating etc. ... is consistent with Quranic verses that suggest similar ways of remembering Allah. There is nothing magical here.
However, one is not limited to remembering Allah in these physical postures only. A Muslim should remain mindful of existence of Allah Almighty at all times. He may (should?) constantly engage in remembrance of Allah in his heart, in a quiet manner. Honest and genuine remembrance of Allah strengthens relationship between a believer and his Creator ... and leads to a peaceful, harmonious existence.
Furthermore, if a person wants to remember Allah hanging upside down from a tree, it is his business. He may resemble a monkey at times ... but who am I to argue one way or another. If you want to call this namaz, I have no right to tell you otherwise. This is between you and Allah Almighty, and is none of my business.
My response is really a simple one … so don’t try to twist it in any way.
+++++
It is now your turn to explain (something you have been avoiding all along ...)
Quran explicitly tells believers to merely sever ties with blasphemers, to ignore apostates, and to punish adulterers by lashes. However, you want to kill the perpetrator in each case.
What is the basis of your position? Are you telling me that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself violated clear Quranic commandments? ... that all recorded ahadith are true and completely accurate? Is this your position?
#535 Posted by raziab9 on December 13, 2006 2:25:21 pm
Re: # 532 by Sattar2
[And where in Islam did you come up with the notion of punishing a person who claims to be a Muslim?]
I did not come with that notion --it already exists.
[do note that Ahmadi-Muslims fully believe in Quran, articles of faith in Islam, and truthfulness and prophethood of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). How can you justifiably consider them non-Muslims? I don’t necessarily need an answer from you … this is supposed to make you think and question your own views.]
As I said, being a Muslim is not a mediocre thing. Believing in the last Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) is a crutial part of being a Muslim. Oh and you bet Ahmadis practise their stream well --Very organized too. I have no comments on if it was good or bad to kick out Ahmadis.
Again, I`m not a religion fan who`s going to decide who is Muslim as, yes, God does ask you to stop wandering about who the hell is the real Momin and who`s not --resulting in hell/heaven decision: they are his to make.
I``m not claiming to be a shia/sunni/ahmadi either :)
[And where in Islam did you come up with the notion of punishing a person who claims to be a Muslim?]
I did not come with that notion --it already exists.
[do note that Ahmadi-Muslims fully believe in Quran, articles of faith in Islam, and truthfulness and prophethood of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). How can you justifiably consider them non-Muslims? I don’t necessarily need an answer from you … this is supposed to make you think and question your own views.]
As I said, being a Muslim is not a mediocre thing. Believing in the last Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) is a crutial part of being a Muslim. Oh and you bet Ahmadis practise their stream well --Very organized too. I have no comments on if it was good or bad to kick out Ahmadis.
Again, I`m not a religion fan who`s going to decide who is Muslim as, yes, God does ask you to stop wandering about who the hell is the real Momin and who`s not --resulting in hell/heaven decision: they are his to make.
I``m not claiming to be a shia/sunni/ahmadi either :)
#534 Posted by Urstruly on December 13, 2006 1:41:13 pm
Re: # 533
The #520, is not an argument, it is a face-save. What I asked you in my post before 520 was to show me the explicit edicts in Quran that stipulate the method of offering prayers and not the timings of Namaz.
So what you are essentially saying is that if, as per Quadiani religion, I hang up side down from a tree five times a day and call it a Namaz I would be consistent with the teachings of Quran - right?
The #520, is not an argument, it is a face-save. What I asked you in my post before 520 was to show me the explicit edicts in Quran that stipulate the method of offering prayers and not the timings of Namaz.
So what you are essentially saying is that if, as per Quadiani religion, I hang up side down from a tree five times a day and call it a Namaz I would be consistent with the teachings of Quran - right?
#533 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 1:25:11 pm
Urstruly (#530),
I posted a long series of arguments in #520 on which you remain silent. It is you who is intellectually lost.
You earlier cited unanimous support among ullema to validate your views. In #524 I underscored collective intellectual decline of your ullema. Fools are usually united in their foolishness … so your point remains invalid.
For example, Jewish scholars in the days of Jesus were also in agreement that Jesus should be crucified. There are good reasons why Quran and Bible give such accounts. What does this tell you about unanimity among corrupt ullema?
As another example, one may also argue that White House, CIA, Pentagon too were collectively united on war on Iraq. Recall the ``coalition of the willing``. What does it all mean anyway?
+++++
And before you go too far, check with Naqshbandi ... who now thinks it unfair to kill people for apostasy. And he has his own list of Muslim scholars to support his view. Your blanket statements have way too many holes ... so give me a break ...
I’ll point to my post #520 for now and let you think things over. Try to come back to Quran ... if you still remember what Quran is ...
#532 Posted by sattar2 on December 13, 2006 12:50:31 pm
Raziab (#526),
Read your post #522 again. You seem to be suggesting that Ahamdis claim to be Muslims while in reality they are not, and that this explains why they are punished according to Islamic law.
While we are discussing Islam, do note that Ahmadi-Muslims fully believe in Quran, articles of faith in Islam, and truthfulness and prophethood of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). How can you justifiably consider them non-Muslims? I don’t necessarily need an answer from you … this is supposed to make you think and question your own views.
Furthermore, declaring someone non-Muslim goes against the message of Quran. In Quran Allah Himself uses the term Muslim for believers, without granting anyone any right to declare a person otherwise.
And where in Islam did you come up with the notion of punishing a person who claims to be a Muslim?
Your ideas are not offensive … they are senseless. Like I wrote earlier, when a person is persecuted for declaring his faith in Allah, it is because people against him are lowly rascals. Lives of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and early Muslims are grim reminders of such travesty. Same travesty is unfolding against Ahmadi-Muslims in this day and age.
+++++
And if you don’t know who wants to kill apostates, you need to pay more attention. Urstruly, ntsyed are but a few examples, right here on chowk. Your issue is with the ummah and not with Ahmadi-Muslims.
Fanaticism and violent tendencies displayed by ummah and their leaders are very much responsible for secterian and religious violence we see every day. And that`s the point I am making here ...
#531 Posted by Ranjit on December 13, 2006 11:49:16 am
Check out the latest medal list at the Asian Games -
http://www.dohaasiangames.org/gis/menuroot/medals/InfoMedal.aspx
India has 9 Gold, 18 silver and 24 bronze for a total of 51 medals for an overall rank of 6th.
Pakistan has 1 silver, 2 bronze for a grand total of 3 medals and an ovrerall rank of 29th.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- quin: Re: # 2 MatloobZaman, Thank... Honor Killings in Babakot
- quin: Re: # 2 MatloobZaman, Thank... Honor Killings in Babakot
- quin: Honour killings and women... There is no ‘honour’
- tahmed32: #47 hamidm: sigh..re-read #27.... Why Zardari Should Be
- hamidm2: tahmed, .... are these judges... Why Zardari Should Be
- hamidm2: Re: # 45 faruk mian, ....... Why Zardari Should Be
- hamidm2: Re: # 48 allah mian, ...... US Commando Strike in
- wiseguyin: Re: # 30 [[[ ...if... US Commando Strike in








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content