Re-Imagining Pakistan

Here's a tale of two Pakistani self-haters and defeatists who enjoy every moment of hating themselves and their country: Dr. Pervaiz Hoodbhoy and Asma Jahangir.
Whenever there is a writing project in any newspaper anywhere in the world where they want to bash Pakistan using a Pakistani name, they call one man in Islamabad: Dr. Hoodbhoy. He spews more venom against Pakistan than Hamid Karzai and Bal Thackery - an Indian Hindu terrorist - combined.
Asma Jahangir, another defeatist who went to India to shake the hands of Narendar Modi, the killer of 2500 Indian Muslims, has just volunteered to Hindustan Times to confirm that Mumbai terror was a Pakistani conspiracy [see below].
Here's a letter sent by a Pakistani young man to Dr. Pervaiz Hoodbhoy, a Pakistani self-hater, and received no reply. And then watch Asma Jahangir's video.
Recommendation: We need to start a witch-hunt in Pakistan to cleanse our academia and public life of such self-haters and defeatists who poison the minds of young Pakistanis about their homeland. Such academics and human rights activists should not be allowed to hide behind the freedom of expression.
TO: Dr. Pervaiz A. Hoodbhoy
Professor and Chairman
Physic Department
Quaid-e-Azam University,
Islamabad.
E-mail: hoodb...@lns.mit.edu

NATION WILL NEVER FORGIVE YOU

Dear Dr Pervaiz Hoodbhoy Sahib,

I have been reading your articles and research reports and watching your interviews on different TV channels on different issues. I have tried to go through your articles again and again to satisfy myself that whatsoever you are speaking in the name of freedom of speech is just an ordinary criticism and could be a difference of opinion.
But I regret to say that I am unable to do so. In dozens of your articles and interviews you have never ever said a single positive thing about Pakistan and have always tried to portray a false picture of Pakistan, according to which Pakistan is a failed state. Whether it's the issue of extremism, or Pakistan's nuclear assets, or Pak-India relations, or if there is an issue of western and Indian allegations, you have always come up with your nasty ideas to prove to the world community that whatever the enemies of Pakistan are saying, you are more than happy to say it from them, using a Pakistani identity, which is an act for which you feel no shame.

I am not sure if Pakistanis have seen your massive one-man campaign against Pakistan where you have alleged that we are not capable of retaining our nuclear assets. Or, now, after the Mumbai attacks, when even the cheapest of Pakistani politicians have shown some kind of patriotism and unity for the sake of Pakistan, at this crucial time again you are trying to prove what the enemies of Pakistan are trying to do. I fail to understand what motivates you except gaining popularity in West or even in India.

India is a so-called democracy where low caste Hindus, Christians and Muslims are burned alive [a ritual unique to India, doesn't happen anywhere else], where Hindu extremists are in the government, where groups like Bajrang Dal are trained in Indian Army schools. But India seems like Switzerland after reading one of your articles on India, especially the one you wrote recently after a visit to India. India's terrorist and rogue intelligence agency, RAW, which is funding and supporting separatist movements in our tribal belt and in Balochistan, continues to be an untouchable issue for you. What really is important for you is to put all your efforts toward portraying a negative Pakistan.

I give you an example from the history which you will find self explanatory in reference to our current scenario.

I am not sure if our enemies will impose a war on Pakistan or not but at this crucial stage all your efforts to distort Pakistan's image is not going to remain unnoticed and the nation will never forgive you for what you have done.

Wassalam.

Waqas Ahmed
Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

Re: # 493 majumdar

Fajar = dawn of a new day

Meanwhile, you have plenty of jokes to keep you busy at ``An Untouchable Apology`` board.

Sleep tight

;-)~~

NT syed sahib,


(Nothing suits the Muslims more than to have our non-Muslim brethren stay busy with silly jokes. We`ll awaken them at Fajar. )

Why don`t you give us kaffirs some more silly jokes to while away while u awaken us at Fajar.

What is Fajar btw?

Regards

Re: # 491 maujmdar

Ha ha ha....good one.

Nothing suits the Muslims more than to have our non-Muslim brethren stay busy with silly jokes. We`ll awaken them at Fajar.

:-)~~

NT syed,

(Like I advised bjkumar, Stay Tuned...the show is about to begin )

Will remain tuned. Reminds me of an old joke.

Indira Gandhi and Zia went to God for knowing when their countries will achieve salvation. God told IG ``Not in ur lifetime``, He told Zia ``Not in my lifetime``.

Regards

Re: # 487 majumdar

Like I advised bjkumar, Stay Tuned...the show is about to begin

:-)~~

Re: # 486 bjkumar

``Sir what is this fascination with ``Muslim Rule``? Are there ANY places in th world which are ``Muslim Rule``? How many of them are happy?``

It`s not a fascination, Bhai. It`s the only hope for tomorrow, for the entire world. Why else do you think non-Muslims are reverting to Islam in unprecedentedlylarge numbers? The reason is right there in your statement: no people are happy today, because there is no country with Muslim Rule. Just like having a Muslim as the President of India doesn`t mean Muslims rule India, having Muslim rulers in predominantly Muslim countries does not mean Islam is the law there. Insha Allah, that will be changed for good very soon.

Stay tuned ;-)~~

Re: # 485 ranjit

Indeed, that seems to be case. However, I do disagree with your presumptions that Hindus would have been chaprasis under the Muslim rule. That could only be true in this current system of governance gifted to the Indians by the fleeing Brits. If the Muslim clergy had prevailed, certainly neither this would not have been the system nor the continuation of subjugation by anyone.

Notwithstanding the credits to Hindu civilization prior to Turk conquest of the region, the sub-continent saw its zenith under the Muslim rule when it was 25% of global economy. It could not have been possible by oppressing the majority. Why do you think the Portugese and the Brits worked so long and hard to overpower the region? Some may disagree, but during the Muslim rule, Hindus had their religious autonomy throughout the subcontinent, and governing autonomy in their states.

In 1947, it was reduced to 1% when the Brits were through plundering it. Without a doubt the 1% was achieved with unprecedented oppressive rule that the land had ever seen. It was during the British Raj that the indigenous - Hindus and Muslims alike - were reduced to chaprasis and foot soldiers. Unfortunately, with the inadequate system of governance - leftover by the Brit, today by and large Indian Muslims are the worst off lot, according to the Indian reports - not Pakistani or Western propaganda.

So your assumption that Muslims would have continued the British way of things can only be classified as paranoia. Perhaps it stems from the guilty conscience of periodic unwarranted ethnic cleansing and continuous systematic economic oppression.

But fear not, like I said your better days have yet to come, and Insha-Allah it will be delivered to you when the Khilafah brightens the globe again .... very soon!

;-)~~

NT Syed sahib,

(if Jinnah hadn`t come along; and probably by now you`d be under Muslim rule again....perhaps for another millennia. But fret not, dear boy, you just may live to see that day again. )

Amen to that. But how about beginning with imposing Muslim rule in Muslim populated parts of the world, Iraq, Palestine and Pakistan for eg.

Regards

#484 NTSyed

Sir what is this fascination with ``Muslim Rule``? Are there ANY places in th world which are ``Muslim Rule``? How many of them are happy?

Re:ntsyed#484

[..to confess that you couldn`t have gotten it if Jinnah hadn`t come along; and probably by now you`d be under Muslim rule again....]

Syed, for once I agree completely with you. We hindus would have got royally screwed if partition had not occured. Muslims would have demanded a very steep price to stay united, like say 40 - 50% of all public office, army, police, bureacracy etc. This would have been on top of large scale autonomy for the muslim majority regions as per the Cabinet Mission Plan. The old fool Gandhi might have even given in to such demands, if Jinnah had actually asked for them.

Think of the situation after that. Hindus at that time were totally fragmented based on caste, language, ethnicities etc. The muslims would have to make an alliance with just 5-10% of hindus perhaps the backward castes to take over power at the center. They could play off one section of hindus against another, to consolidate their position forever. On top of that, in the muslim majority areas, they could whip up the jihadi machinery via madrassas and so forth to exert pressure on hindus to accept their status, not that it takes too much to rule hindus!! Some muslim general could also just carry out an army coup and take over power, this time over entire India. You couple that with the complete support from the Islamic world to the muslim ``minority``, such as Saudi petro-dollars and regimes in Afghanistan/Iran, you would have a Iraq like situation with the minority muslims ruling effortlessly over majority hindus.

This was the situation for 800 years before the Brits showed up and it was naturally headed in that same direction where people like me would be chaprasis to people like you. The Congress fools were all gung-ho on a united India, except for Sardar Patel and Lala Lajpat Rai, who had the wisdom to foresee what would happen. Then thankfully Shri Jinnah showed up. That was a blessing from God!! Shri Jinnah demanded adamantly that muslims needed separation since hindus would dominate them. What a joke!! Hindus could not even dominate a mouse, let alone vast millions of muslims!! Shri Jinnah then made it an ego issue and his life`s purpose and even created an ideology around separation. Of course, the cunning Sardar Patel seized the opportunity and made sure that the Congress would ``give in``.

The results are there in front of us. Muslims basically withdrew to a moth-eaten state primarily consisting of the barren NWFP and Baluchistan, with half of Punjab, Sindh and half of Bengal. There was massive ethnic cleansing to reduce muslim population in India to the 10% mark, a level that was manageable. If it were not for Nehru`s greed for Kashmir, all muslims would have been pushed out, but for the sake of international image, we had to stop. Patel managed to cunningly get Hyderabad, Junagadh and even Kashmir into India. Suddenly hindus were a massive majority in the lion share of the subcontinent, controlling all the resources, major cities, major industries, all the water resources. We even had a buffer state between us and the Islamic world. It was but a dream come true, all due to Shri Jinnah. Then India added the second last nail in the muslim coffin by splitting off Bangladesh in 1971 to further reduce muslim influence in India to sheer irrelevance. The final nail in the coffin was by acquiring nukes, making muslim conquest impossible.

So my friend, all in all Shri Jinnnah was the greatest hindu liberator of all times. It was inadvertent but nevertheless, very effective. In fact, Shri Jinnah`s entire philosophy of separation was unislamic which is why the muslim clergy opposed it tooth and nail. If you read the history of Islamic conquest in India and elsewhere, muslim minorities had struggled and overwhelmed big civilizations based on sheer will power and religious zeal. The minority argument was ridiculous from a historical context. But now it is too late. India has nukes and it will fire them to protect itself. So now muslims can simply look at India from Pakiland and get jealous of its economic progress. There is nothing else you can do anymore. While we hindus amass wealth and status, you can struggle for cabdriver jobs in New York and elsewhere.

Re: # 482 by ranjit

``Sirjee, Cheers!! Lets drink to ``Mecaca Day`` i.e. Jinnah`s birthday. Thanks to Shri Jinnah, we mecacas got the India that we have today, a lion share of the subcontinent with no muslim competiton to rule it. May God bless Shri Jinnah`s soul.``

Pretty masculine, in spite of your below average manhood, to confess that you couldn`t have gotten it if Jinnah hadn`t come along; and probably by now you`d be under Muslim rule again....perhaps for another millennia. But fret not, dear boy, you just may live to see that day again.

:-)~~

Re: # 479 by mohar11

``GWB zindabad
Ntsyed murdabad :)``

Now where have I seen that before?

Oh yeah....the ostracized 31% of the American constituency, aka the trailer park trash.

Congrats on your acquiring this undesired offical status.

Before I forget, thanks for the compliment. Nothing pleases me more than to have my adversary wish for my death. It demonstrates quite a desperation on his part. Don`t you think?

LOL :-)~~

Re:sanatani#481

[..Ranjit Please drink whisky and have pork sausage to celebrate Mr J`s birthday...]

Sirjee, Cheers!! Lets drink to ``Mecaca Day`` i.e. Jinnah`s birthday. Thanks to Shri Jinnah, we mecacas got the India that we have today, a lion share of the subcontinent with no muslim competiton to rule it. May God bless Shri Jinnah`s soul.

Shri Jinnahe,

Shri Hindutwawadi, Shri Divyadrishtiman, Shri Bharatmata Bhaktam

Janamdivasye Shubham Kamna.

Jai Shri Krishna
Jai Shri Jinnahe

Ranjit Please drink whisky and have pork sausage to celebrate Mr J`s birthday